who directly publicly defend the management of derzhkino, they still try to somehow get out of the way the end, what is the point now , what are emphasized by the cinematographers who watched this announcement, the pitching of the competition, there is a new point that wasn't there before is documenting war crimes, what documentarians say, they say that... this point should be removed, it's wrong, because documenting war crimes shouldn't be done by documentarians, it's again will be wrong, ineffective, and all these results will go up in smoke, because documenting war crimes is the business of archivists, the security service of ukraine or the ministry of defense, any services, but not cinematographers, because cinematographers make movies, even if it is documentary, anyway this is the author's point of view, and the documentation of war crimes is... it is not done with the aim of later shooting a movie, but with the aim of bringing this documentation to court, for example, it must be some kind of evidence, but the work of cinematographers is far from always possible to serve as eviden

and to everyone. managers bodies, ah, and we are asking to settle the situation that has arisen at derzhkino, and, unfortunately, we have not received any answers or reactions to any of these letters so far. listen, come on, i just want to understand, we see from time to time that in hollywood, for example, screenwriters go on strike there because the salary is too low, and that paralyzes, and some famous actors support, for example, and so on, but i have never seen anywhere in a democratic country that someone... against gathering and 700 leading cinematographers of the country write a letter to change the head of the conditional state cinema, i don't know, i don't know what state cinema actually is, for example, in france or in britain, it definitely exists, well, we don't know, it doesn't get into any of the newspapers, why do we have such a problem with this kuderchuk , from where it started on your heads, and on ours, absolutely, well, in fact, the problem has been many years after the change. government , changes have obviously begun in cultural policy, especially in the field of cinem

that's why we are protesting, because if, let's say, there was a transparent competition for the head of derzhkinohis council was re-elected, and really trustworthy people got there... the film community, maybe the conversation would have been different, although in fact, if you ask me, yes, i am in favor of giving money, all possible free money to the army , because the film community has already learned over the years. to survive and adapt it in this way is blasphemy, in my opinion, but on the other hand, i understand that there are projects that need to be supported very much, there are projects that can speak for ukraine in the world, and if we have this minority ukrainian part, for with the help of which we can receive financing abroad, it will probably be a good and correct step on the part of the authorities, but we need to see who distributes the money and for which projects, that's how we have very little time left, i don't know about your movie bubble a scandal, not a scandal, a discussion of the interview, parts of the interview of masha efrasinnaya and khrystyna solovya, where khrystyn