"the new york times" story reports people in the room, federal society members like don mcgahn, who alsoestified about various aspects of this. so, that's a lie. how people hear about this matters. do people, as we go from this inflection point of conviction on to a debate in a couple of weeks and trump sentencing and a lot of other stuff -- this is what the summer is going to be partly like. do people hear these legal facts and know trump's past efforts to abuse power, the recent documented history? or do they hear him just selling all this as the new response and, sort of, think, well, that's true or that's kind of true or they see headlines about payback in "the new york times" and think, here we go again, both sides? maga curious voters might want to hear it that way or minimize it. and not everyone who might ever vote red, republican, or trump, is signed on to all the conspiracy theories. a lot of people, believe it or not, are still moved by facts. that's precisely why donald trump hoped people would wrongly think there was a fact about certain opponents being investigated or convi