, the ecumenical patriarch, who repeatedly directly condemned the russian armed aggression in ukraine, could onufry himself decide whom to commemorate or not, or could he refuse? from the mention of cyril in divine services, well, i think that he could do it, as many hierarchs of the same ukrainian orthodox church, which at that time did not yet hide its connection with the moscow patriarchate, did in the end at the beginning of the war. i understand the essence of your question and the desire behind it so to speak, but i would still advise, i am always in such a position, you know, to look at the glass as half full, and not as half empty. what do i mean you know, the address of nufry himself, let them remain, or the way of commemoration remains his responsibility, as a church hierarch who , after all, heads a certain religious structure that has believers among ukrainians and in the ukrainian state, but i would say that the reaction of the department of external church connections of the same church in ukraine. so was quite sharp, if i wasn't saw, so to speak, the text and did not kn