0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonya soto mayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration in a concurring. saying that decision protects donald trump from "future controversy." cbs's robert costa has a former president's reaction. >> reporter: a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court ruling that former president trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot. due to the state court's view that he stoked the january 6th insurrection. >> you cannot take somebody out of a race. the voters can take a person out of the race very quickly, but a court should not be doing that. >> reporter: with this ruling, two other states also have their efforts to remove the former president stalled. three justices and a separate concurring opinion said allowing the colorado measure to go forward would we agreed create a chaotic state-by-state patchwork of made a tense political landscape. justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision. writing "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, n
justices sonya soto mayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration in a concurring. saying that decision protects donald trump from "future controversy." cbs's robert costa has a former president's reaction. >> reporter: a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court ruling that former president trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot. due to the state court's view that he stoked the january 6th insurrection. >>...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kagan, and our newest justice, ketanji brown jackson. now, justice barrett, one donald trump's appointees. the third one, in fact, split off a bit also, but not joining the liberals. >> interesting and aly, i'm just wondering read, it looks like page 13 of those it says for the reasons given responsibility for enforcing section three against federal office holders and candidates rests with congress and not the states, right? the judgment the colorado supreme court therefore cannot stand. so they're saying essentially that congress has to make this decision >> whether there >> are insurrectionist who need to be kept off of ballots. is that essentially what they're saying? essentially what they're saying is it's up to congress to tell us how this works. so if congress had, let's say 50 years ago, congress had passed a law saying, we're going to let the states do it, so long as they they abide by due process, then what colorado did would have been fine, but congress has done essentially nothing in the 150 years since the 14th amendment was
kagan, and our newest justice, ketanji brown jackson. now, justice barrett, one donald trump's appointees. the third one, in fact, split off a bit also, but not joining the liberals. >> interesting and aly, i'm just wondering read, it looks like page 13 of those it says for the reasons given responsibility for enforcing section three against federal office holders and candidates rests with congress and not the states, right? the judgment the colorado supreme court therefore cannot stand....
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration in a concurring, saying the decision protects donald trump from, quote, future controversy. cbs's robert costa has the former president's reaction. >> reporter: a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court ruling that former president donald trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot due to the state court's view that he stoked the january 6th >> you cannot take somebody out of a race. the voter can take a person out of the race very quickly, but i couldn't shouldn't be doing that. >> reporter: with this ruling, two other states also had their efforts to remove the former president stall. three justices in a separate concurring opinion said allowing the colorado measure to go forward would, we agree, create a chaotic state-by-state patchwork amid a tense political landscape. justice amy coney barrett also urged americans to see unity from the unanimous decision, writing, "in this circumstance, writings on the court should turn the national temperature down, not up
justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson expressed frustration in a concurring, saying the decision protects donald trump from, quote, future controversy. cbs's robert costa has the former president's reaction. >> reporter: a crucial decision today with sweeping political consequences. the high court ruling that former president donald trump cannot be removed from colorado's ballot due to the state court's view that he stoked the january 6th >> you cannot...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
ketanji brown jackson and elena kagan said, quote, section three provides that what an oath breaking insurrectionist is disqualified, congress may by a vote of two thirds of each house remove such a disability. it is hard to understand by the constitution would require a congressional super majority to remove a disqualification if a single majority could nullify section 3's operation by repealing or declining to pass implementing legislation. it is worse than they know. it would not take a simple majority to decline to pass implementing legislation, to vote against implementing legislation. it would only take 41 out of 100 senators to block implementing legislation which, according to the procedural rules of the united states senate, requires a 60 vote majority threshold to pass. so, if a group of 59 senators agreed on implementing legislation tomorrow for section three of the 14th amendment, it could not become law. it could be blocked by 41 senators who support an oath breaking insurrection and want to see insurrectionists and want to see an oath breaking insurrectionist become pre
ketanji brown jackson and elena kagan said, quote, section three provides that what an oath breaking insurrectionist is disqualified, congress may by a vote of two thirds of each house remove such a disability. it is hard to understand by the constitution would require a congressional super majority to remove a disqualification if a single majority could nullify section 3's operation by repealing or declining to pass implementing legislation. it is worse than they know. it would not take a...
0
0.0
Mar 10, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
elena kagan, sonia sotomayor, ketanji brown jackson agreed that states lack the authority, but that wasn't for the critics. >> the supreme court does it again, handing another major win to donald trump, allowing him to stay on the colorado ballot and is choosing to ugh e near the question at the heart of the cases which is whether trump is an insurrectionist under the 14th amendment. >> a lot of americans out there, their blood is boiling for what donald trump did on january 6th. they just think he's getting let off the hook scot free. >> the truth is, of course, these people don't trust the voter, and they don't much like the voters, at least not the 74 million who voted for trump. today we really saw their anger and their hatred consume them. howard: cassie, the anchors and commentators who said of course colorado and maine and illinois should be able to kick donald trump off the ballot under section three of the 14th amendment, how do they look now in the wake of this unanimous supreme court ruling? >> silly, unhinged, not cred credible. -- not credible. 9-0, when do you hear that in th
elena kagan, sonia sotomayor, ketanji brown jackson agreed that states lack the authority, but that wasn't for the critics. >> the supreme court does it again, handing another major win to donald trump, allowing him to stay on the colorado ballot and is choosing to ugh e near the question at the heart of the cases which is whether trump is an insurrectionist under the 14th amendment. >> a lot of americans out there, their blood is boiling for what donald trump did on january 6th....
0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices brett kavanaugh and elena kagan compared the interactions between the government and socialedia platforms to communications government officials share with news outlets, when, for example, a news story could have a dangerous impact. their questions suggest that efforts by officials to influence coverage can be valuable. but it was justice samuel alito appears sympathetic to the states their argument first amendment rights have been trampled. alito reminded the court about section 230 protects social media companies from liability and has been the subject of scrutiny. here is his take. >> only reason why this is taking places because the federal government has got section 230 and antitrust in its pocket and it's, to mix my metaphors, it has these big clubs available to it and so it's treating facebook and these other platforms like they're subordinates. >> reporter: justice alito suggested that "the new york times" or "the wall street journal" would not have been subjected to the same type of pressure campaign that the social media companies experienced, suggesting social med
justices brett kavanaugh and elena kagan compared the interactions between the government and socialedia platforms to communications government officials share with news outlets, when, for example, a news story could have a dangerous impact. their questions suggest that efforts by officials to influence coverage can be valuable. but it was justice samuel alito appears sympathetic to the states their argument first amendment rights have been trampled. alito reminded the court about section 230...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
in one of the concurrences from justice sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, they referred to trump as an oath breaking insurrectionist not once, not twice, but four times in six pages. and they question the propriety of the court's conservatives seeming to dictate how the 14th amendment should be enforced. quoting no less than the dobbs decision that overturned roe v. wade in their opening line. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, than it is necessary not to decide more. and then closing with nothing less than bush v. gore. the case that three of their colleagues worked on as bush side attorneys. writing, quote, what it does today, the court should have left undone. ouch. ouch. and in her own brief concurring opinion, conservative justice amy coney barrett may have giving us a glimpse affwhat to expect from the conservative majority in the coming supreme court hearings on presidential immunity. as she agreed that her fellow conservatives did too much but for a different reason. writing, the court has settled a politically charged issue in the
in one of the concurrences from justice sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, they referred to trump as an oath breaking insurrectionist not once, not twice, but four times in six pages. and they question the propriety of the court's conservatives seeming to dictate how the 14th amendment should be enforced. quoting no less than the dobbs decision that overturned roe v. wade in their opening line. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, than it is...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
first, justice elena kagan said, "we should be acting faster to move this along.ice samuel alito said, "i - totally -- agree -- with - you. then justice ketanji brown jackson said, "please the american people are counting on us can we speed this up?" then justice neil gorsuch said, "we -- are -- going -- as - fast - as - we - c-a-n. [ laughter and applause perfect. we got mixed messages there. >> steve: wow. well, congress has struck a deal to delay a government shutdown until march 8th, which means in one week we'll have another looming shutdown it just keeps happening. and it's hard not to be bored by this whole thing to be honest which explains why c-span released this new promo trying to make it seem more exciting. watch this >> what's up, america? on march 8th, the biggest rivalry in politics is back for another historic showdown. but this time, there are no holds barred the fight over debt is a fight to the death two parties in the steel cage of negotiation, where no one leaves until a fiscal budget is approved schumer has lowered his glasses, and he's ready
first, justice elena kagan said, "we should be acting faster to move this along.ice samuel alito said, "i - totally -- agree -- with - you. then justice ketanji brown jackson said, "please the american people are counting on us can we speed this up?" then justice neil gorsuch said, "we -- are -- going -- as - fast - as - we - c-a-n. [ laughter and applause perfect. we got mixed messages there. >> steve: wow. well, congress has struck a deal to delay a government...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and frankly, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, and sonia sotomayor, should be standing up and screamingabsolute disgusting abuse of power. and let me make this clear for the non lawyers out there. because i have -- the one lawyer who's here. i'm explaining this, i'm on campus right. it's like explaining this case to my students today. and they are literally saying well, why is this taking so long? this isn't that complicated. i literally had to show them a video from lethal weapon to about a diplomatic immunity to explain how silly presidential immunity is. this is not complicated. it is very clear, that we have an absolutely corrupted supreme court. that at least three of the judges have financial dealings that we can't explain. gorsuch, kavanaugh, and clarence thomas. and rather than the court demonstrating that the only audience that matters is the american people, they have shown that the only audience that matters is republicans. that is the problem with this. it's not complicated, it doesn't require a lot of legalese. they are stalling in order to allow donald trump to get into th
and frankly, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, and sonia sotomayor, should be standing up and screamingabsolute disgusting abuse of power. and let me make this clear for the non lawyers out there. because i have -- the one lawyer who's here. i'm explaining this, i'm on campus right. it's like explaining this case to my students today. and they are literally saying well, why is this taking so long? this isn't that complicated. i literally had to show them a video from lethal weapon to...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonia sotomayor ketanji brown, jackson, and elena kagan. and i'll just read briefly from their descent because the majority itself did not explain itself. it just had an order that said that texas can enforce this two justices on the right. did concur in that. i'll get to that in a second. but i just wanted to explain what the dissenters road they said today, the court invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and removal of noncitizens in explicitly instructs it its state courts to disregard ongoing federal immigration proceedings that law appends federal state balance of power that has existed for over a century. that's what justices sotomayor and jackson road and then justice kagan wrote separately, the subject of immigration generally and the entry and removal of noncitizens particularly are matters long thought. the special province of the federal government that's that's kinda the crux of the argument, even though this is playing out in such human terms at the bor
justices sonia sotomayor ketanji brown, jackson, and elena kagan. and i'll just read briefly from their descent because the majority itself did not explain itself. it just had an order that said that texas can enforce this two justices on the right. did concur in that. i'll get to that in a second. but i just wanted to explain what the dissenters road they said today, the court invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement. texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and...
0
0.0
Mar 29, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
department and the spring court then announced garland's daughter wouldn't serve in that position as elenar remained attorney general and this i contrast justice thomas has insisted on hiring his near daughter, the one on his christmas cards and, man, that sounds like a very nice thing for him to do for her and the new york times gives us some idea of what her future holds and at least eight teen of her former clerks have served as state, federal or military judges, nearly 3/4 of them pointed by mr. trump to federal courts where they have ruled on issues like voting rights and access to the abortion pill. many of thomases clerks have gone on to do the bidding of justice thomas and that seems like not that much of a coincidence. >> law clerks are law clerks. they are wonderful to have around in my view is it's one of the best parts of the job and they have energetic people who are like family and i select them and they are mine and they are my kids. they know how i think. >> i will talk about the significant contributions to nepotism in the american judiciary with marc joseph stern next. de
department and the spring court then announced garland's daughter wouldn't serve in that position as elenar remained attorney general and this i contrast justice thomas has insisted on hiring his near daughter, the one on his christmas cards and, man, that sounds like a very nice thing for him to do for her and the new york times gives us some idea of what her future holds and at least eight teen of her former clerks have served as state, federal or military judges, nearly 3/4 of them pointed...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and then the third liberal joining in was justice elena kagan, who said the subject of immigration generally, and the entry and removal of noncitizens that's particularly are matters long thought. the special province of the federal government. and that's the point here. briana you're looking at all the human drama at the border right now with those pictures and we've just seen so much turmoil as migrants have tried to make their way to america across the river there. but what this is about at this point is essentially state powers versus federal powers. and as it said, it's been for more than a century that the federal government has had control of immigration. and this is the first time any kind of law like this is being allowed to be enforced. but let me just stress that this is not the end of anything we're just very early in, actually the legal proceedings on the merits of this law. governor abbott signed it into law back in december. it was challenged by the biden administration and immigrate immigration rights groups and the lower-court, the fifth circuit, that's based in new orleans
and then the third liberal joining in was justice elena kagan, who said the subject of immigration generally, and the entry and removal of noncitizens that's particularly are matters long thought. the special province of the federal government. and that's the point here. briana you're looking at all the human drama at the border right now with those pictures and we've just seen so much turmoil as migrants have tried to make their way to america across the river there. but what this is about at...
0
0.0
Mar 3, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kagan during those arguments. have a listen >> i think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. and other words, this question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again, is just say it, it sounds awfully national to me. >> did you read that question? other questions you heard from the liberal justices, is this being likely perhaps a unanimous decision or close to unanimous >> oh, i think it's very likely to be a unanimous decision. i disagree with her analysis of that. i think that the court has been quite comfortable letting states disagree on different topics such as in the abortion notice that situation but certainly from the oral arguments seemed that they were very much leaning towards we're allowing not allowing that case the stand and keeping them on the ballot. >> okay. trump's federal election, suburban subversion trial by the original schedule was going to begin tomorrow. that'
kagan during those arguments. have a listen >> i think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the united states. and other words, this question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again, is just say it, it sounds awfully national to me. >> did you read that question? other questions you heard from the liberal justices, is this being likely perhaps a unanimous decision or...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and that comes from experience both he and elena kagan were in the white house counsel's office. they know how this works. there is a real need for the government to be able to educate to be able to correct different disinformation, and to be able to get its message out and that is a distinction between them. when the government does that, when they act to restrict speech. and so that's the line that they're trying to draw in this case. >> well, some would say, well, how do you know as misinformation, maybe it just information it's evolving. obviously media companies in the 24/7 news cycle, what is known to be fact on tuesday may evolve beyond that on wednesday, you're a saturday that's the robins, some of this, right? >> yeah. that's absolutely right. and so that's why i think it's important that the justices were sticking to this line of the government, being able to get its message out. but the government is not telling private parties what they can say. so for example, if they reach out to x about disinformation they will say we know that these 400 accounts are being run by t
and that comes from experience both he and elena kagan were in the white house counsel's office. they know how this works. there is a real need for the government to be able to educate to be able to correct different disinformation, and to be able to get its message out and that is a distinction between them. when the government does that, when they act to restrict speech. and so that's the line that they're trying to draw in this case. >> well, some would say, well, how do you know as...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and that even gets to what a justice such as elena kagan, that was the central question she asked if she pressed lawyers during oral arguments, what's your answer to that question >> well states all the time determine whether or not candidates are on or off the ballot, including a national races. even in this presidential primary, there are candidates who have been determined disqualified and some states. and so they're not on the ballot, but they're on the ballot in other states. so that's exactly how it already works in the united states and it's worked for over 100 years at the least with election administration. and earlier, you mentioned the question of, well, what is an insurrection i believe that the united states supreme court can clearly define what an insurrection is in this case, there was a five-day trial going after that exact question. evidence was presented. witnesses were called from both sides, and then the colorado supreme court looked at that question again. so all these terms are able to be defined if the court chooses to go down the road under i guess, allowing s
and that even gets to what a justice such as elena kagan, that was the central question she asked if she pressed lawyers during oral arguments, what's your answer to that question >> well states all the time determine whether or not candidates are on or off the ballot, including a national races. even in this presidential primary, there are candidates who have been determined disqualified and some states. and so they're not on the ballot, but they're on the ballot in other states. so...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for example, elena kagan confronting the plaintiffs essentially saying, your problem here is you're arguing that one state can decide for the nation who can be president, and no justice was willing to go along with that. >> and lisa, you are looking through -- we have our lisa rubin here with us. as you look through this decision, that would just -- just put on the website there of the supreme court. >> yep. >> what stands out most to you, besides the fact that this was a 9-0 decision? >> it was a 9-0 decision, ana, and the decision was decided on the grounds that congress, not the states, has the power to enforce section 3 of the 14th amendment. still you have four justices concurring in the judgment meaning they agree with the result, but also concurring separately and saying that the way that they disagree with the majority or the prokurm opinion is they don't feel they have the need to decide this enforcement mechanism. justice barrett who is just for herself, and sotomayor. kagan and jackson saying this is not a right the that belongs to the state, but all four of them casting doubt on
for example, elena kagan confronting the plaintiffs essentially saying, your problem here is you're arguing that one state can decide for the nation who can be president, and no justice was willing to go along with that. >> and lisa, you are looking through -- we have our lisa rubin here with us. as you look through this decision, that would just -- just put on the website there of the supreme court. >> yep. >> what stands out most to you, besides the fact that this was a 9-0...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
nope, this time the so-called liberal justices, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson in a concurring opinion basically told her cat there are colleagues quit while you're ahead, you have them at patchwork. >> see you? i did there. you're waiting for c. rozanna day where you were all trying to you we're leaning into your tv is going how is lara coates going to bring j. maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there was going to be some chaos if every state gets to decide whether trump can be on the ballot they got to have consistency. that's going to come from congress. they said, not the states. otherwise, you've got this will not a hilou, but patchwork that was as far as they wanted the court to go. but i mean, tell a baby not to cry the rest of them all. but amy coney barrett, that is said, i see your patchwork and i raised you instructions for congress on what they ought to do next. now, we call that legislation, but forgive me for being a little bit cynical here. show me the money figures speaking. you see what happens in
nope, this time the so-called liberal justices, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson in a concurring opinion basically told her cat there are colleagues quit while you're ahead, you have them at patchwork. >> see you? i did there. you're waiting for c. rozanna day where you were all trying to you we're leaning into your tv is going how is lara coates going to bring j. maguire back the supreme court >> you're welcome. america. >> well, they agree that there...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson take issue with the rulings broadness, which they suggest is to quote insulate this court and petitioner from future controversy. the petitioner, of course, being donald trump, has for him, he praised the ruling, then pivoted to the courts. next big decision on presidential immunity when you make a decision, you don't want to have your opposing party or opponent, or even somebody that just thinks you're wrong, >> bring a criminal suit against you or any kind of a suit when you leave well, since i have that right now, at a level that nobody's ever seen before, i have rogue prosecutors and i have rogue judges have judges that are out of control and it's a very unfair thing for me >> keeping them honest. there is, of course, no evidence of rogue prosecutors or judges, no matter how many times he says that there are colorado secretary of state, jenna griswold also weighing in a bit earlier here on cnn first and foremost, i'm glad that they issued a decision colorado voters and american voters all across the country deserve to
justices sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson take issue with the rulings broadness, which they suggest is to quote insulate this court and petitioner from future controversy. the petitioner, of course, being donald trump, has for him, he praised the ruling, then pivoted to the courts. next big decision on presidential immunity when you make a decision, you don't want to have your opposing party or opponent, or even somebody that just thinks you're wrong, >> bring a...
0
0.0
Mar 8, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they are the chief justice of the united states, john roberts, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, who are the three democratic appointees on the bench. and then, in addition to them, neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh, who were two of donald trump's three justices appointed to the supreme court. it is obviously typical for the supreme court to come. not every justice is there. amy coney barrett, clarence thomas and samuel alito are not there. clarence thomas has not been there, has not attended the state of the union since 2006. casey, remind our viewers who see the sea of white of congressional women. yes. democrats in the house and senate, why? they are all wearing white. >> it's about reproductive rights. and that, of course, has become a the central issue. frankly, the democrats want to promote for all of the discussions that we're having around this table about the president's challenges on immigration and the economy, democrats are going to plan to answer those challenges with abortion. i mean, that is going to be something that we are going to be hearing over a
they are the chief justice of the united states, john roberts, sonia sotomayor, elena kagan, and ketanji brown jackson, who are the three democratic appointees on the bench. and then, in addition to them, neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh, who were two of donald trump's three justices appointed to the supreme court. it is obviously typical for the supreme court to come. not every justice is there. amy coney barrett, clarence thomas and samuel alito are not there. clarence thomas has not been...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
elena kagan said the question you have to confront is why a single state should get to decide who gets president of the united states. this was at one point to a lawyer arguing against trump's position. she went on to say, in other words, you know, this question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again just say it, she said. it sounds awfully national to me. strong suspicion that she would go this way along with the other liberal justice. >> that's right, david. it was interesting at oral argument you did not see the ordinary divides on display. everyone on the court seemed quite concerned about what it would mean for a nationwide election in which we choosing a national leader for everyone, for individual states to have so much control over something as important as whether a presidential candidate appears on the ballot. that's an argument about consequences. that's not grappling with the history of this amendment. it's really about consequences. you saw that in oral argument and i think you see it on display in this opinion. >> bottom line,
elena kagan said the question you have to confront is why a single state should get to decide who gets president of the united states. this was at one point to a lawyer arguing against trump's position. she went on to say, in other words, you know, this question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection to be president again just say it, she said. it sounds awfully national to me. strong suspicion that she would go this way along with the other liberal justice. >>...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 2
elena kagan said who's the person, where's the harm? let's put this aside.ppointed justices a number of them that were the ones that got us into this mess in first place by overturning roe v. wade. they wanted to give it back to states, it's coming right back to this court, now you have a situation where challenges are being made to the fda's authority which if they went that way would not only mean about mifepristone but would also apply to things like birth control, if you can just have a group of random doctors come in and say, hey, this is not in consistent with our beliefs to that or ivf as you point out, then you have chaos, you don't have expert decisions being made to protect the safety of people. you're not allowing these decisions to be made between a woman and her doctor. this is the natural outcome of these trump-appointed justices and clearly the public is not with these extremists, 70%, 80% depending on the polls, states like ohio, wisconsin, ballot measures or elections relevant to this they've sided with the woman's right to make her own deci
elena kagan said who's the person, where's the harm? let's put this aside.ppointed justices a number of them that were the ones that got us into this mess in first place by overturning roe v. wade. they wanted to give it back to states, it's coming right back to this court, now you have a situation where challenges are being made to the fda's authority which if they went that way would not only mean about mifepristone but would also apply to things like birth control, if you can just have a...