i'm in line with with the comments of commissioner eppler and everybody else. uh, i think i am also sympathetic to the appellants last point with respect to the, uh, actual use. uh, but uh, but to then, uh, turn on to the permit holder and ask them to verify the actual use, uh, in order to qualify for the appeal, feels like a bridge too far and out of step with, uh, with the normal process that we go through with, with these types of decisions. uh, so with that, i would move to deny the appeal on the basis that the permit was properly issued. so that's the motion on the table. yes okay. thank you. so on that motion, commissioner trasvina, i, vice president lemberg, i commissioner eppler i commissioner swig i so that motion carries 5 to 0 and the appeal is denied. thank you. so we are now moving on to item number seven. this is a special item, um, discussion and possible action. the board shall consider adopting a resolution which allows for remote public participation at board hearings. the resolution further encourages parties and their representatives to atte

xhilgzer eppler, nay. commissioner swig, nay. abstain. can he do that? >> i think you are required to vote. unless there is a conflict. >> i'll go aye on thes because of the cood factor. >> okay. that motion fails 3-2. requesting denied. do we have another motion on the table? okay. so, that concludes the hearing, rehearing requests are denied. [gavel] [meeting adjourned] >> my biggest take away is that you can always find a way. most people who go into public policies really want to make a difference and have a positive impact on the world, and that's what i love most about my job. i feel like every day at the sfpuc all of the policies that we're involved in have major impacts on people's lives both here in the city and across the state and the nation. in 2017, california senate bill 649 was released. it would have capped the fees that cities such as ourselves would be able to charge telecom companies for the right to use or poll for their cell equipments, and it also would have taken away city's abilities to negotiate what the equipment looks like, whe

xhilgzer eppler, nay. commissioner swig, nay. abstain. can he do that? >> i think you are required to vote. unless there is a conflict. >> i'll go aye on thes because of the cood factor. >> okay. that motion fails 3-2. requesting denied. do we have another motion on the table? okay. so, that concludes the hearing, rehearing requests are denied. [gavel] [meeting adjourned] [music] >> san francisco is known as yerba buena, good herb after a mint that used to grow here. at this time there were 3 settlements one was mission delores. one the presidio and one was yerba buena which was urban center. there were 800 people in 1848 it was small. a lot of historic buildings were here including pony express headquarters. wells fargo. hudson bay trading company and famous early settlers one of whom william leaderdorph who lived blocks from here a successful business person. african-american decent and the first million airin california. >> wilwoman was the founders of san francisco. here during the gold rush came in the early 1840s. he spent time stake himself as a m

xhilgzer eppler, nay. commissioner swig, nay. abstain. can he do that? >> i think you are required to vote. unless there is a conflict. >> i'll go aye on thes because of the cood factor. >> okay. that motion fails 3-2. requesting denied. do we have another motion on the table? okay. so, that concludes the hearing, rehearing requests are denied. [gavel] [meeting adjourned] >> (music). >> (multiple voices.) >> landing at leidesdorff is as the new public school in downtown san francisco for people to come together for 0 lunch and weekends a new place to enjoy the architect and our culture. >> landing at leidesdorff one of several initiatives to the road map for the initiatives all about using your public space and network for now environments to 0 invite people adopted not just to the office but any time of the day. >> it shows there is excitement and energy and people wore looking forward to enjoying the space that people may want to end up in downtown. >> we've been operating in the financial district since 2016 with the treasury and coming up we had a sm

will be the presiding officer and joined by commissioner lum berg, commissioner swig, commissioner eppler

i share commissioner eppler's. view on the unfortunate miss, for the school community.t's, you know, undoubtedly an unfortunate situation for the students and the teachers and the and the parents and the whole community. but i'm not sure that there's anything we can do about it necessarily, other than the several different types of processes that the city representatives from planning and dbe tonight have laid, laid out. that will happen. anyway, i overall agree with the with with the outcome here. i don't see a basis on which to grant these appeals tonight, and for that reason, i will be voting to, to deny both of the appeals. however, i want to take this opportunity to soapbox a little bit, in a way that i think might be a little bit valuable as one of the very few, stylish, queer san francisco historians with a formal position in city government, i if this was going up next to my house, i would protest this, too. and it's necessarily necessarily speaking . there is no accounting for taste in permitting processes. however, there is accounting for taste. if you want yo

will be the presiding officer and joined by commissioner lum berg, commissioner swig, commissioner epplerand . i'm julie rosenberg the board executive director and joined from the city departments prti

will be the presiding officer and joined by commissioner lum berg, commissioner swig, commissioner eppler and . i'm julie rosenberg the board executive director and joined from the city departments presenting before the board.

will be the presiding officer and joined by commissioner lum berg, commissioner swig, commissioner eppler

my name is jr eppler and i'm president of the potrero boosters neighborhood association.ave endorsed this project and we strongly ask you to pass the safer 17th today and implement it as soon as possible. i heard earlier two years in the making. that's from the sfmta side. i heard three years in terms of outreach, and that's from the neighborhood side. but really this has been a four year project because before we even brought this out to anyone else, we looked at it, can we make this work? can we make this work with the uses that we see? why? because we're the people that live there. we have a lot of knowledge about our neighborhood. we love those businesses that are in our neighborhood. we want to make things work. and we thought that we could. and we took it to the sfmta and they looked at it and they tested it, and they made a few tweaks. and they think that it works. and the reason that it works, despite the controversies that you've heard today, is because there's a lot of low hanging fruit in the neighborhood. you've heard about this vast was it, 1600 spaces and ho