they basically called erin holly, the lawyer for the religious doctors, they called her theory probablisic. they said if there are federal conscience protections that work so that these doctors don't have to perform something that they disagree with, then why in the world are you here? why are you able to come in and make a federal case out of this? i didn't hear an answer to that. as a result, you know, i counted every justice, except justice alito as being skeptical about the legal theory of standing. if they don't have legal standing, the case goes away and you don't even get to the question of whether or not the fda acted appropriately, and i think as many as eight justices respect the holly view of the legal standing. seemed like an easy case, and i was surprised the oral argument ended so early in a big abortion case like this, and you would expect it to go at least two hours if not more, and it seemed like the justices had their minds made up from the minute they walked into the courtroom today. >> talk to us about the issue of standing in the case, and also there was the issue brou