over the last decade credit card giants have been hiking late evn lockstep. as technology has brought many of their cts have raised interest rates, squeezing american families out of an extra $25 billion in interest chaes last year alone. that's why we are working across government to get you a better deal to make it easier to switch from your height rate credit cards, bait and switch tactics on some credit card rewards and going after the online that drive consumers to bigger credit card issuers will wsen service and terms for this work is critical some of the biggest players in so many industries are looking to get even bigger and gain more power to corner the market. thank you president biden for your leadership of putting a stop to thatg and other unfair practices that keep costs high for so many families but it is my please to turn it over to the president of the united states. [applause] >> it is good to see you all. it is nice to see you all in one spot. look director, thank you for that introduction freight thank you all for the work of counsel. reduc

that -- that's what i understood evn to mean at least coming in here today. another would be to st carefully to both sides and pride special weight under skidmore to a coequal branch of goveme's views about the law, which one would think we would do anyway, and that they would have -- have -- be considered great weight in arriving at the best answer and that that's what a court wouldof -- if there were no interpretive principles advanced by the executive branch, if there hadn't been so sort of rule or adjudication. is that -- is that corre? martinez: i -- i think that's correct. and i think the ffence between the skidmore approach that you just laid out andhe chevron approach is just, at the end of the d, ce you've considered all the expertise and all the inrmion the agency has to bear -- justice gorsuch: who decides? martinez: who decides? who -- is the jue rsuaded or not persuaded? justice gorsuch: is the judge persuaded at the end of the day, with proper deference given to a coequal branch of gornnt, or does the judge abdicate that responsibitynd say autom

i looked straight and his eyes and kept myác voice calm and evn amanda told him you and i are doing theng. you are looking for food to eat and i am going to my field to grow crops for my children. let us not disturb each other. we have nothing to fear, you and i. the leopard went away so despite her fear, her grandmother you will hear that that is exactly what she does. she had driven or sometimes even walked into unprotected deep forests ruled by men with guns and grudges. she had negotiated for cease-fires, freed hostages and saved lives standing up to commanders and some of the worlds violent militias. her children encouraged her to do it, so let's take a look and then we will begin our conversation with the winter.t, about fire you just have to stop it. so you were working and it was this approach. as a humanitarian it was to help people in these camps if people get their they are sitting under these temps and there is no water. there is no food. so there was this program, and i was the person responsible for this program. i was the one who had to bring the water. you wouldn't have

it's not as though, if this court overruled evn, that's going to get rid of statutory gapsbiguities. justice gorsuch: no, it takes -- general prelog: ey will persist -- justice gorsuch: -- us back to skidmore, which justice jackson, the most ardent of new dle, wrote and that persisted in this court for 40 yrsmore or less, after the apa. and the world seemed to continue on its axis just fine. general prelogar: but it's not going to create grte predictability or stability or consistency across judges. justice gorsuch: that's -- at's -- general prelogar: if anything, i think that -- justice gorsuch: -- an interesting thing to suggest, at chevron predicts stability, when the whole point -- i didn't see you mention brand x much in your brief. but i -- 'm sorry to go back there, but -- my good friend, but brand x aecipe for instability, isn't it, because each new administration n me in and undo the work of a prior one. they're all reasonable. i mean, my goodness, the american pplelect them. of course, they're reasonable people. (laughter.) justicgouch: and -- and -- justice sotomayor: that

at least that'hoi thought congress could operate in a world where evn does not exist. martinez: i -- i think that's exactly right, justice kavanaugh. d think that, like i said earlier, in -- in those situations, the court's job is basically figuring out what the best interpretation of that word is. and in many cases, maybe most cases, those types of cacious words are basically -- the best understanding tse words is that congress is, in fact, conf the discretion on the agency. that's very different from chevron, where, instead of having any sort of language like that or express language conferring a delegation, you're -- you're basically applying this fictional implied delegation that -- that is triggered by ambiguity, which is like -- yo, frankly, it's -- it's -- it's not -- it's ctnal, it's made up. and so i think a world in which congress, when it wants to deleo agencies, needs to be express and use language like that or other language, i think is a better wod om the perspective of -- of article i and from article iii. justice kavanaugh: thank you. chief justice bes:

so i -- i -- i think it would be radical to say that congress couldn't implement evn. in fact, there is legislation to overrule chevron, requirinde novo review, that hasn't passed. there are statutes that basically don't -- say apply de novo review, correct? general prelogar: yes. justice sotomayor:ndhere are statutes that require differential revieexicitly to legal questions, correct? general prelogar: yes. justice sotomayor: besides chevron? general prelogar justice sotomayor: all right. so now we have -- we're now at 706. and my - adversary, your opposing counsel, said that he didn't see that much disruption fr orruling chevron, that nobody would really bring up those old do you have a view on that? general prog: i think that my friend, it -- it might be easy for him to sath because he is not going to be involved in the endless litigation that i think would resultf is court were to overrule chevron. i understand his point to that all of the holdings in ose cases will be secure because stare decisis will apply in tseontexts. but the important thing to realize is thai

joe bidet another evn just a fes away, the president of the united states, on esa saturday.n no one elsehas anything to do. these were the biden voters clamoring to see his campaign evenset. inside the room, there were more reporters than supportersen . he had bigger crowds during. covid, and it looked likeke the 12 people who came to see him speak half2 of them were [ she to boo during the joe tens of thousands about the this is the tale of twompaign campaigns. one's electric, the other stageds. an. >> one man cares, the other pretends to and should probabl l write georgia off afterge the lake and riley murder donaldorgia trump met with her family backstage before his speech consoled them f and laid her death at the feetnt of the president. >> biden has implemented a formal policy that illegal aliens who intrude into the united states are granted immunity rude from deportation. that's when this monster showed up at our border. he was set free immediatelt y id under the program that crooked joe created it. he i call it free to kill. >> it's free to kill now. he wass free illegal. >> and

administration has spoken from minutes about people scrounging for food, having to eat animal feed, and evney significant as well, in terms of the shift in tone. and the third part why it was so significant was because she actually refuted several statements from the israelis earlier today and yesterday that said they were doing everything they could to get assistance in, that they were not doing anything to hamper assistance going in, and that they weren't responsible for anything that happened around the so-called flour massacre, which is what it's being called right now. so she directly refuted that making sure these rallies knew the administration expects them to do more, to stop obstructing aid unnecessarily, and to do more to allow humanitarian assistance in. so those are three significant components. of course, the reason it fell short is something that you mentioned, which is and now what? so now that you've said all of this, what are you actually want to do about it to make sure that it happens? >> so let me ask you more broadly speaking about the decision to airdrop supplies to gaz

they're in every corporation evn and the corporations are too scared of getting sued to do anything. but it's but is g going to start o they're going to be the head office of the nba lookine ang at the numbers going here. of blac[ k guys . seems disproportionately one race. let's make sure four laotians are on everyproporately 1 nba . >> yeah, no, actually, i wouldir watch every game. yeah. leo so 4 to 8, 7:00 laotians. yeah, i think laotians it's, it's what a great term are. >> laotian. you know, they might shock you that i don't know a lotoc about basketball see this as an encouraging development. cat well, i think just, you know, taking any of the specifics out of it whethe specr this law did this or universities that it has been a quite an impressive racketma for some time. >> i guess diversity still for f but that's a fact. that's not even my opinion. study after study shows that thery diversity trainings that all of us in thats have jobs are alwayshave to do.e they don't actually do any good. worknhey make the work they ca m in many cases have made things worse, which there's n

they just give him a ticket and let him■ go, and he's is not evn registered, you know.is crazy. host: michael with his top story. this is jesse in california on the republican line. go ahead. f+ y thing is, president biden, that guy, you vote for biden, he will be voting for harris. he will not take a cognitive test. when he doesss conference, he always has a cute card. so it's not really biden running the show. when you see him without the cue or a set of writings, he can't even finish his sentence, that is number two, it is under th's policy that keeps these borders open. using to yoursel why is he letting the people in? because the democrats want to use the power of the vote. that only reason they are letting these people in. you could say, look how it is today and how it was when trump was running -- gas prices were not high. the economy was not as bad. interest rates were not high. the democrats will do anything to keep that power. who has to charge billions of dollars for biden messing with that lady? people get raped every day -- excuse my french -- but they put