0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
BELARUSTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
horrible, the federal government had to take a new blow, again from the federal constitutional court. many citizens are wondering what happened to theirs. own country, there are crises everywhere, but all this is happening in a country where everything worked exemplary before, the government and its chancellor are resorting to tricks, the fact that the federal elections in berlin had to be declared almost rigged is especially bad for the exemplary german democracy, who always loves to teach others. who shook his finger at the german regime, accused of falsification and other sins, but in general, none of the very attentive human rights activists, when it comes to, for example, belarus or russia. the russian foreign ministry readily commented on the double standards about the absurdity that was happening at polling stations with queues and the discrepancy between the number of ballots and the number of voters . i won’t even begin, who needs the queues , they are russian, classics, columns are different, the diplomat wrote. zakharova recalled that only five observers were present at the
horrible, the federal government had to take a new blow, again from the federal constitutional court. many citizens are wondering what happened to theirs. own country, there are crises everywhere, but all this is happening in a country where everything worked exemplary before, the government and its chancellor are resorting to tricks, the fact that the federal elections in berlin had to be declared almost rigged is especially bad for the exemplary german democracy, who always loves to teach...
1
1.0
Feb 14, 2024
02/24
by
RUSSIA24
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
the ban by the federal constitutional court to redistribute budget money that was supposed to go to fightact. reuters also reports that the german government plans to sell up to 30% of unir shares next year. earlier, the authorities were forced to nationalize it due to the catastrophic losses associated with the abandonment of the russian one. we see completely different soldiers, in general it’s archive, we are working to study the history associated with prisoners, television broadcasts were dropped at the front, in enemy positions. the staliningrad city defense committee adopts resolutions stating that all forces are to be used to control military construction and prisoners of war. prisoners are not always our enemies; among the prisoners there may be those who sympathize with us. as you see your future destiny, get married, start a family, work calmly, so that i can be confident in the future. in germany, ukrainophobia and hatred of for visitors from ukraine has already reached unimaginable proportions, as they write in the local media. this week, in one of the cities near düsseldorf,
the ban by the federal constitutional court to redistribute budget money that was supposed to go to fightact. reuters also reports that the german government plans to sell up to 30% of unir shares next year. earlier, the authorities were forced to nationalize it due to the catastrophic losses associated with the abandonment of the russian one. we see completely different soldiers, in general it’s archive, we are working to study the history associated with prisoners, television broadcasts...
2
2.0
Feb 14, 2024
02/24
by
RUSSIA24
tv
eye 2
favorite 0
quote 0
the ban by the federal constitutional court to redistribute budget money influenced which were supposedgo to fight the pandemic. reuters also reports that the german government plans to sell up to 30% of unir shares next year. previously, the authorities were forced to nationalize it due to catastrophic losses associated with the refusal of russian gas. the state now owns 99% of the company, which is approximately 23 billion euros at the current market value. that's all for now, more news in the next hour. six juicy nuggets for only 69 rubles. at a delicious point. well, credit card debts carry interest. are they dripping? need a holwa. you take out credit cards. you transfer debts to kholva, divide them into 24 months, conveniently repay, make purchases or get rid of debts on a credit card, it’s easy with kholva, i help with liver problems, i am essential, tested and ready for action in 24 hours, available on the yandex market, what a blessing that avito has sales and discounts up to 70%, give it to yourself and your loved ones. brand new equipment, inspiring sales of electronics on av
the ban by the federal constitutional court to redistribute budget money influenced which were supposedgo to fight the pandemic. reuters also reports that the german government plans to sell up to 30% of unir shares next year. previously, the authorities were forced to nationalize it due to catastrophic losses associated with the refusal of russian gas. the state now owns 99% of the company, which is approximately 23 billion euros at the current market value. that's all for now, more news in...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
creating a federal constitutional question that this court decides and other courts, other states -- if this court affirms the decision below determining president trump is ineligible to be president other states would have to determine what effect it would have on their own state law and procedure. >> well, if we affirmed and said he was ineligible to be president, yes, maybe some states would say well we'll keep him on the ballot anyway but as justice kagan said it will have the effect of colorado deciding. i want to push back a little bit it's a national thing because this court will decide it. you say that we have to review colorado's factual record with clearer orr as the standard of review. so we would be stuck, the first mover state here, colorado, we're stuck with that record and, you know, i don't want to get into whether the record -- maybe the record is great but what if the record wasn't. what if it wasn't a full some or just made by the secretary of state without a process as all. how do we review those factual findings? why should clear error apply? we made with mr. mit
creating a federal constitutional question that this court decides and other courts, other states -- if this court affirms the decision below determining president trump is ineligible to be president other states would have to determine what effect it would have on their own state law and procedure. >> well, if we affirmed and said he was ineligible to be president, yes, maybe some states would say well we'll keep him on the ballot anyway but as justice kagan said it will have the effect...
0
0.0
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court on the federal constitutional matters. but the tennessee supreme court is going to dismiss the appeal on a technicality that they didn't get it filed in time and the fine overturned the the conviction of scopes under the theory that the law the fine how much it should be $100 or $500 should have been set by the jury, not ralston, but they dismiss the case rather than send it back. saying nothing is to be gained by prolonging the life of this bizarre case. and they crush darrow's appeals. and the butler act will stay on the books in tennessee for the next 40 years. and as we've talked about in this class, we want to know why these trials are so famous cases that everyone knows that have no precedential value and the scopes trial doesn't have precedential value because the tennessee supreme court undoes the hopes of the aclu and darrow that this could become something on appeal. so instead it's remembered and it is widely remembered because of the cultural import, because how it represents all these divisive divisions of the
supreme court on the federal constitutional matters. but the tennessee supreme court is going to dismiss the appeal on a technicality that they didn't get it filed in time and the fine overturned the the conviction of scopes under the theory that the law the fine how much it should be $100 or $500 should have been set by the jury, not ralston, but they dismiss the case rather than send it back. saying nothing is to be gained by prolonging the life of this bizarre case. and they crush darrow's...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ultimately it is this court that is going to decide that question of federal constitutional eligibility. and settle the issue for the nation. and certainly it is not unusual that questions of national importance come up. >> i suppose this court would be saying something along the lines of that the state has the power to do it. but i guess i was asking you to go a little bit further and say why should that be the right rule? why should a single state have the ability to make this determination, not only for their own citizens, but for the rest of the nation? >> because article 2 gives them the power to appoint their own electors as they see fit. but if they're going to use a federal constitutional qualification as a ballot access determinant, it is creating a federal constitutional question that then this court decides and other courts, other states, if this court affirms the decision below, determining that president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's law and state procedure. >> if we affirmed
ultimately it is this court that is going to decide that question of federal constitutional eligibility. and settle the issue for the nation. and certainly it is not unusual that questions of national importance come up. >> i suppose this court would be saying something along the lines of that the state has the power to do it. but i guess i was asking you to go a little bit further and say why should that be the right rule? why should a single state have the ability to make this...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
oh though the case came up through a state court, many important cases of federal law, federal constitutionalrts, but once they're at the u.s. supreme court, is for this court to make the final decision that will govern for the whole country about the constitutional eligibility of the candidate. that was the case that we were trying to make today. >> i, jason, ari melber here. congratulations to you and all dealers today. it was a big case, a moment this one on one of the most difficult things to do, handle that hot bench with nine justices. congratulations to all of. you two questions, i don't know if you want to answer both of them, but given what you want to today. it's so hard, the whole thing is so fast and complex. is there anything where you get a do-over or a slender or marks or build on your answer. that could happen in any part of life. second, we discussed today on this panel, and it was clear in the courtroom, that it was bipartisan skepticism about wanting your team points, which is that the insurrection was a unique and rare event. i wonder if there is a way to your argument and
oh though the case came up through a state court, many important cases of federal law, federal constitutionalrts, but once they're at the u.s. supreme court, is for this court to make the final decision that will govern for the whole country about the constitutional eligibility of the candidate. that was the case that we were trying to make today. >> i, jason, ari melber here. congratulations to you and all dealers today. it was a big case, a moment this one on one of the most difficult...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is creating a federal constitutional question that then this court decides. >> why should one statedecide who is the president? for the plaintiffs, challenging whether donald trump can be on the ballot, that starts off as this incredibly damning question from justice elena kagan today. but the lawyer for colorado, and then after him the colorado solicitor general, and an answer for that concern, saying basically, hey, states decide who gets on the ballot all the time. that's the system. it's not at all uncommon for different states to have different candidates listed for the same election. some smaller party candidates get, on not others. some are kept off eligibility concerns the some states take more seriously than others. it happens. the supreme court can give guidance to make it more uniform, but the states can handle this. the colorado solicitor general, speaking on the same point just moments later said there is a huge amount of disparity and candidates end up on the ballot in different states and every election. just this election, she said, it a candidate to colorado exclude
it is creating a federal constitutional question that then this court decides. >> why should one statedecide who is the president? for the plaintiffs, challenging whether donald trump can be on the ballot, that starts off as this incredibly damning question from justice elena kagan today. but the lawyer for colorado, and then after him the colorado solicitor general, and an answer for that concern, saying basically, hey, states decide who gets on the ballot all the time. that's the...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a federal constitutional qstion this court decides. if this court affirms the decision below determining esident trump is ineligible to be president, other states would have to determine what effect that has on their own state's lien procedure. justice barrett: if wsaid he was ineligible to be president, maybe yes. bb states with say we will keep him on the ballot anyway. it is going to have the fe of colorado deciding. i want to push back on it is national thing because this court will did. you say weavto review colorado's factu rord with clear error as a standard of review. we would be stuck with that record. i don't want to get into whether the record -- maybe the record is great. what if the record wasn't? what if wn't a whole some record? the hearsayul. whatf this is just made by the secretary of much process at all? how do we review those factual findings why should -- apply and ds't that buckle back into this point that jti kagan was making, with mr. mitchell, tooth it doesn't se le a state called. mr. murray:hree points, your h
a federal constitutional qstion this court decides. if this court affirms the decision below determining esident trump is ineligible to be president, other states would have to determine what effect that has on their own state's lien procedure. justice barrett: if wsaid he was ineligible to be president, maybe yes. bb states with say we will keep him on the ballot anyway. it is going to have the fe of colorado deciding. i want to push back on it is national thing because this court will did....
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but if they are going to use a federal constitutional qualification as a ballot access determinant, then it is creating a federal constuonal question that then this court decides d her courts, other states -- if this court affirms the decision below, determining thatredent trump is ineligible to be president, hestates would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's law . host: the supreme court today hearing the case, trump v anderson, about whether or not the colorado primary ballot should have the former president 's name on it, and the case sundering about 14 amendment section iii, the insurrection because of the institution. we are getting your reactions this evening and we will re-air it in its entirety, coming up here on c-span. vicki from west virginia, whether you think? + i think it should be left on the ballot. if they are allowed to do that in texas, florida, republican states, they say, biden should able to run, that is a bigger insurrection than what we had in d.c.. in d.c. there was not one weapon. the only person who got shot was shot by a co
but if they are going to use a federal constitutional qualification as a ballot access determinant, then it is creating a federal constuonal question that then this court decides d her courts, other states -- if this court affirms the decision below, determining thatredent trump is ineligible to be president, hestates would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's law . host: the supreme court today hearing the case, trump v anderson, about whether or not the...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and although the case came up through a state court, many important cases of federal law, a federal constitutionalu.s. supreme court, it is for this court to make the final decision that will govern for the whole country about the constitutional eligibility of the candidate. that is a case we were trying to make today. >> hi jason, our email or hear congratulations to you and all of the lawyers today. it was a big case, and a momentous one on one of the most difficult things to do. handle the hot bench with nine justices. congratulations to all of you. two questions, i don't know if you want to answer both of them. but given what you went through today, and it is so hard, and the whole thing is fast and complex, is there any part where you would want a do-over or to extend your remarks, or build on an answer? that could happen in any part of life. i am curious if that happened at all today. second, we discuss on this panel, it was clear in the courtroom that there was bipartisan skepticism about one of your key points which is that the insurrection was this unique and rare event. i wonder, is ther
and although the case came up through a state court, many important cases of federal law, a federal constitutionalu.s. supreme court, it is for this court to make the final decision that will govern for the whole country about the constitutional eligibility of the candidate. that is a case we were trying to make today. >> hi jason, our email or hear congratulations to you and all of the lawyers today. it was a big case, and a momentous one on one of the most difficult things to do. handle...
0
0.0
Feb 20, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitutional rights and maintaining the structural limits on federal government.he supreme court however has failed to uphold the structure of the constitution with respect to perhaps the most essential protection for pluralism. the vesting of legislative power in congress. congress provides a mechanism for imparting our inevitable disputes resolved like that the lawmaking process of bicameralism improvement in us. representation of different interests promote deliberation and identification of policies that serve general welfare. the legislative process in congress is not perfect, but it is legitimate, representative and accountable in a way that lawmaking can never be. this brings me to the modern administrative state. my final points about the ways in which the administrative state threatens the peaceful pluralism protected by the constitution. to begin with the progressive ideology behind the expansive administrative state is at odds with pluralism. the original progressives with the modern administrative state -- woodrow wilson, frank and others, they began w
constitutional rights and maintaining the structural limits on federal government.he supreme court however has failed to uphold the structure of the constitution with respect to perhaps the most essential protection for pluralism. the vesting of legislative power in congress. congress provides a mechanism for imparting our inevitable disputes resolved like that the lawmaking process of bicameralism improvement in us. representation of different interests promote deliberation and identification...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a federal constitutional question this court decides. if this court afrmthe decision below determini president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would have to determine what effect that has on their own state's lien procedure. justice barrett: if we said he was ineligible to be presen maybe yes. debbie states with say wwi keep him on the ballot anyway. it is going toavthe effect of colorado deciding. i want to push bacont is a national thing because this cot ll decided. u y we have to review colorado'sactual record with clear error as a standard of review. we would be stuck with that record. i don't want to get into whether the record -- maybe the record great. what if the record wasn't? wh if it wasn't a whole some record? the hearsay rules. what if this is just made bth secretary of much process at all? how do we review those factual fiings? why shoul -- applynd doesn't that buckle back into this point at justice kagan was making, with mr. mitchell, too, that it doe't seem like a state called. mr. murray: three points,
a federal constitutional question this court decides. if this court afrmthe decision below determini president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would have to determine what effect that has on their own state's lien procedure. justice barrett: if we said he was ineligible to be presen maybe yes. debbie states with say wwi keep him on the ballot anyway. it is going toavthe effect of colorado deciding. i want to push bacont is a national thing because this cot ll decided. u y we...
1
1.0
Feb 24, 2024
02/24
by
NTV
tv
eye 1
favorite 0
quote 0
of the russian federation should be canceled and the case sent to a new constitutional considerationav mikhailovich lebedev headed the supreme court of russia for more than 32 years. in moscow, at vdnkh, at the grandiose exhibition of russia, an unusual wedding ceremony took place. in a solemn atmosphere, two doctors who met in the special operation zone swore oaths of love and fidelity to each other. she, a nurse, he, a doctor, an anesthesiologist. a romantic film could be made about the story of their acquaintance, but for now the newlyweds are only thinking about one thing, so that victory comes sooner. anton talpa, the birth of a new family. deciding to save yourself from the long agony of choice wedding dress, they came to the ceremony in military uniform. however, today is the day when the most important thing is, perhaps, the uniform. and the content of this family story, which, like any other, began with a date. work, a month of work, yes, yes, this is work, they met in the special operation zone, in samara yulia bereza had a business, in moscow with the doctor evgeniy pronin
of the russian federation should be canceled and the case sent to a new constitutional considerationav mikhailovich lebedev headed the supreme court of russia for more than 32 years. in moscow, at vdnkh, at the grandiose exhibition of russia, an unusual wedding ceremony took place. in a solemn atmosphere, two doctors who met in the special operation zone swore oaths of love and fidelity to each other. she, a nurse, he, a doctor, an anesthesiologist. a romantic film could be made about the story...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
supreme court to decide this question for the nation, because this is a federal constitutional question. the u.s. supreme court is the last word on whether or not donald trump is qualified or not until our constitution to hold office. certainly it comes up to the court through colorado courts, and that's how big cases come up all the time is through the state courts. we tried to make the case that this is a time for the supreme court to rise up to a pivotal moment, and enforce the constitution, even when doing so is incredibly difficult and even when it's incredibly controversial. i'm hope that point landed. >> jason, i very much appreciate your time. thank you so much. >> thank you. >>> he was the one responding to all those questions in the supreme court today. everyone is with me now. you just heard jason talk about the key pushback he thought about, and also his response to the officer question, that it was took place obvious essentially to be included. of course, the presidency is included. what do you make of those -- his responses that he gave to the justices' questions. >> i tho
supreme court to decide this question for the nation, because this is a federal constitutional question. the u.s. supreme court is the last word on whether or not donald trump is qualified or not until our constitution to hold office. certainly it comes up to the court through colorado courts, and that's how big cases come up all the time is through the state courts. we tried to make the case that this is a time for the supreme court to rise up to a pivotal moment, and enforce the constitution,...
0
0.0
Feb 21, 2024
02/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you can imagine federal constitutional claims raised by people want to pursue ivf, but this is a veryive u.s. supreme court that's going to be unlikely to recognize reproductive rights under federal law like a right to procreate. while that is theoretically possible, the alabama supreme court is likely to be the last stop in this case. stephanie: mary, you're really an expert on what has happened since the overturning of roe v. wade. where would you put this decision in the spectrum of reactions we've seen since the overton decision? mary: it is aig indicator of what is coming. i think a lot of americans believe that when the supreme court overturned roe v. wade in the dobbs decision, that was the end, that the people who believed that a fetus aren't embryo was a person won, and they would move on to other issues. i think it is a reminder that the idea that a fetus or embryo is a rights holding person has been a motivating reason for many to join the antiabortion movement since its inception in the 1960's. i think we will see much more of this. i think this is a sign of what is to com
you can imagine federal constitutional claims raised by people want to pursue ivf, but this is a veryive u.s. supreme court that's going to be unlikely to recognize reproductive rights under federal law like a right to procreate. while that is theoretically possible, the alabama supreme court is likely to be the last stop in this case. stephanie: mary, you're really an expert on what has happened since the overturning of roe v. wade. where would you put this decision in the spectrum of...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for federal office. the colorado supreme court's decision is no different from a state residency law that requires members of congress to inhabit the state prior to election day when the constitution requires only that members of congress inhabit the state they represent when elected. in both situations, a state is accelerating the deadline to meet a constitutionally imposed qualification. and is there by violating the holding of term limits. in this situation, a ruling from this court that affirms the decision below would not only violate term limits, but take away the votes of potentially tens of millions of americans. i welcome the court's questions. >> mr. mitchell, would you -- you didn't spend much time on your argument with respect to whether or not section three is self-executing so would you address that? and in doing that, your argument is that it's not self-executing but then in that case, what would the role of the state be, or is it entirely up to congress to implement the disqualification i
for federal office. the colorado supreme court's decision is no different from a state residency law that requires members of congress to inhabit the state prior to election day when the constitution requires only that members of congress inhabit the state they represent when elected. in both situations, a state is accelerating the deadline to meet a constitutionally imposed qualification. and is there by violating the holding of term limits. in this situation, a ruling from this court that...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
constitutional qualification as a ballot access determinant, then it's creating a federal constitutionalt decides and other courts, other states, if this court affirms the decision below determining that president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's law and state procedure. >> well, i mean if we affirmed and we said he was ineligible to be president, yes, maybe some states would say, well, we're going to keep him on the ballot anyway, but really it's going to have -- as justice kagan said -- the effect of colorado decidings it's a national thing because this court will decide it. you say we have to review colorado's factual record with clear error as the standard of review. so we would be stuck, the first mover state here colorado, we're stuck with that record and, you know, i don't want to get into whether the record -- maybe the record is great, but what if the record wasn't. >> okay. so you have heard and you have seen, jeffrey, so many of these arguments over the years. you've read i wouldn't
constitutional qualification as a ballot access determinant, then it's creating a federal constitutionalt decides and other courts, other states, if this court affirms the decision below determining that president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's law and state procedure. >> well, i mean if we affirmed and we said he was ineligible to be president, yes, maybe some states would say, well, we're...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for federal office.the colorado supreme court's decision is no different from a state residency law that requires members of congress to inhabit the state prior to election day when the constitution requires only that members of congress inhabit the state that they represent when elected. in both situations, a state is accelerating the deadline to meet a constitutionally imposed qualification. and is thereby violating the holding of term limits. and in this situation, a ruling from this court that affirms the decision below would not only violate term limits but take away the votes of tens of millions of americans. i welcome the court's questions. >> mr. mitchell, would you -- you didn't spend much time on your argument with respect to whether or not section 3 is self-executing. so would you address that? and in doing that, your argument is that it's not self-executing but then in that case what would the role of the state be, or is it entirely up to congress to implement the disqualification in section
for federal office.the colorado supreme court's decision is no different from a state residency law that requires members of congress to inhabit the state prior to election day when the constitution requires only that members of congress inhabit the state that they represent when elected. in both situations, a state is accelerating the deadline to meet a constitutionally imposed qualification. and is thereby violating the holding of term limits. and in this situation, a ruling from this court...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice barrett: the road is that absent rare circumstances, state courts and federal courts sharauority. there e certain limits to tt , limits to which the constitution preempts the state's ability to resolve constitutional qstns. you said earer that once a president leed, you accept a stagg uld not do anything about that. colorado cannot enact its own provision and use it g the secretary of state out of office i assume that is because of this inple of structural preemption? mrmuay: yes, your honor. justice barrett: i want to clifwhat that means. that means your aches are in the basket of the electorate clause. you are saying that even though all of t qstions have suggested there is a problem with gina single state the authority to render a decision that would have any effect on a national election, you are saying those structural concerns which gh otherwi ld to the kind of results you would accept after someone is in office, overcome by the electric cross. mr. murray: absolutely. states run presidential elections. what states have selecd electors and they have voted, states have no mor
justice barrett: the road is that absent rare circumstances, state courts and federal courts sharauority. there e certain limits to tt , limits to which the constitution preempts the state's ability to resolve constitutional qstns. you said earer that once a president leed, you accept a stagg uld not do anything about that. colorado cannot enact its own provision and use it g the secretary of state out of office i assume that is because of this inple of structural preemption? mrmuay: yes, your...
0
0.0
Feb 25, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so it's now this indiana law in the constitution are sort of illegal at the federal level. now the courts in indiana in 1866 rule that indiana black laws are no longer enforceable. and in this way, through the operations of u.s. constitutional change and federal statutes, rather than through local politics, indiana's black were finally put to rest. so to wrap up, i think, understanding nation's first civil rights movement really our view of what kinds of issues were being discussed and debated in lincoln's world. it new light on the long struggle against racism and for racial in this country. and it also helps us better understand the of the monumental and constitutional changes that occurred during reconstruction. thank you. we've got a few minutes for questions please to the microphones so that the on c-span can hear you. i hi. good morning. thank you. kurt carlson. and i'm from wheaton, illinois. so this was interesting. i also wonder, john and mary jones, if you look at their photograph, they're obviously not black yet. they're black. did any of this statute in any of t
so it's now this indiana law in the constitution are sort of illegal at the federal level. now the courts in indiana in 1866 rule that indiana black laws are no longer enforceable. and in this way, through the operations of u.s. constitutional change and federal statutes, rather than through local politics, indiana's black were finally put to rest. so to wrap up, i think, understanding nation's first civil rights movement really our view of what kinds of issues were being discussed and debated...
131
131
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 1
then it's creating a federal constitutional question that then this court decides and other courts -- other states -- if this court affirms the decision below, determining that president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's laws. >> harris: what's your read of the question and the answer? >> ha, well, i think that the advocates for disqualification probably expected a cold reception. but this was perfectly glacial. the problem for jason murray is that his toughest questions came from the left of the court. many people have been saying how the conservatives are going to sandbag this entire appeal and how they have to look deeply within themselves. many of the toughest questions were coming from justice jackson and justice kagan. and justice jackson notably kept on raising this first question, which is perhaps the presidency is just not covered by this provision. and she has always taken a particular interest in the 14th amendment. and had said, you know, it's plausible that he was not. some of
then it's creating a federal constitutional question that then this court decides and other courts -- other states -- if this court affirms the decision below, determining that president trump is ineligible to be president, other states would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's laws. >> harris: what's your read of the question and the answer? >> ha, well, i think that the advocates for disqualification probably expected a cold reception. but this...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
law and constitutional cases in federal court, i don't think we're lowering the standard.is one among the highest standards we've had. a guy who is serving in a cabinet he position with arrogance, he is repeated lying to the american people in open hearings under the penalty of perjury, stateing the border is secure, they're doing everything they can to try to keep the border secure when they knowingly alow these people to come in. dangs russ people are coming into our -- dangerous people are coming into our country. in upstate new york we've had a rape charge, sexual assault caring, murder, from illegal immigrants. this is a dangerous situation that is a powder keg. i would not like to see these three who voted against impeachment, they're to see something terrible is going to happen and their picture will be next to it and the american people, republican or democrat or independent are going to see this. it's going to be harmful they didn't stick with us. maria: i spoke to one of my sources the other day at the border. he said one significant event we just arrested a cart
law and constitutional cases in federal court, i don't think we're lowering the standard.is one among the highest standards we've had. a guy who is serving in a cabinet he position with arrogance, he is repeated lying to the american people in open hearings under the penalty of perjury, stateing the border is secure, they're doing everything they can to try to keep the border secure when they knowingly alow these people to come in. dangs russ people are coming into our -- dangerous people are...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and although the case came up through a state court, many important cases of federal law, federal constitutionalonce they are at the u.s. supreme court, it is for this court to make the final decision that will govern for the whole country about the constitutional eligibility of the candidate. that was the case we were trying to make today. >> i jason, ari melber here. congratulations to you one of the lawyers today. when the most difficult things to do is to be in that bench with nine justices. so congratulations to all of you. two questions. i don't know if you want to answer both of them. but given what he went through today, the whole thing is so fast and complex, is there any part where you would want to do it over or exchange remarks or build on an answer, because that can happen in any part of life. i'm curious if that happened at all, and would you share that with us. and second, we discussed today on this panel, and it was clear in the courtroom, that there was bipartisan skepticism about one of your key points, which is that the insurrection was this unique and rare event, and i wonder
and although the case came up through a state court, many important cases of federal law, federal constitutionalonce they are at the u.s. supreme court, it is for this court to make the final decision that will govern for the whole country about the constitutional eligibility of the candidate. that was the case we were trying to make today. >> i jason, ari melber here. congratulations to you one of the lawyers today. when the most difficult things to do is to be in that bench with nine...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
when you have a federal national election, congress, the u.s. supreme court, the u.s.nsure equality across the states. i was really struck by various justices talking about what would happen if there were different factual determinations different states 80 to different determinations on this question of what is an insurrection and what is aid and abet. court touchdown that a little bit but really went back, to when there is ambiguity, when it's not straightforward, whether a candidate is eligible or not. stephen that provides that uniformity across the state. >> we talk about a thursday amongst ourselves just a bit how the argument was made for the plaintiffs. with the colorado voters, the attorney for the colorado voters, jason murray. you're an attorney yourself, you are a law professor, dean of a law school. what do you make up the criticism about how jason marie argue this case? and he was not as forceful, but there are lots of things on the table to support his argument and he did not give a forceful defense of the decision of the colorado supreme court. you are
when you have a federal national election, congress, the u.s. supreme court, the u.s.nsure equality across the states. i was really struck by various justices talking about what would happen if there were different factual determinations different states 80 to different determinations on this question of what is an insurrection and what is aid and abet. court touchdown that a little bit but really went back, to when there is ambiguity, when it's not straightforward, whether a candidate is...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
law and federal courts.nk you so much for joining us. this morning all the legal analysis is pointing toward trump winning this one and colorado losing this one. in fact, some of the experts we were talking to during our special coverage yesterday said maybe it will be a 7-2 opinion. maybe it will be a unanimous decision. is that along the lines of your thinking? >> the supreme court clearly is looking for an exit to get out of this. they don't want to have to touch the issue of the real factual issues in this case ultimately, are was january 6th an insurrection, and did donald trump engage in that insurrection. i don't think the court's going to touch either of those. they're taking this, oh, a state can't make that determination line. it might even be 9-0. they don't want to touch the dynamite that's at the middle of this case. they're going to leave it alone and try to get out. >> you do expect they will come down on the side of trump in this case. >> yes. >> let me play a little bit of skepticism we hear
law and federal courts.nk you so much for joining us. this morning all the legal analysis is pointing toward trump winning this one and colorado losing this one. in fact, some of the experts we were talking to during our special coverage yesterday said maybe it will be a 7-2 opinion. maybe it will be a unanimous decision. is that along the lines of your thinking? >> the supreme court clearly is looking for an exit to get out of this. they don't want to have to touch the issue of the real...
0
0.0
Feb 3, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
law. >> this court deterne what constitutes an acquittal. bluford is an example of a case in which the juryailed to reach a verdict. >> no matter what lel the state puts o it, the state can have all kds of procedures and they can s, well,e will say that this particular result i not ancqttal. we held a functional analysis and that as a matter of federal law we look athat happened and determine what count >> exactly, justice jackson. this supreme crt had characterized the granting as not an acquial. similarly in evans, michigan had held that the ruling by the cot in a case in which the judg mtakenly lost it was not in acquittal the definition of acquittal just last termn the smith case, this court defined what in acquittal is and that is a determination, a resolution of criminal culpability. >> i'm sorry. to pick up on that, mr. simpson, it is my understanding that there are jurisdictions in which eule is that if a jury returns an inconsistent verdict or some subcategory of inconsistent verdict, the proper procedure for the trial judge is to i
law. >> this court deterne what constitutes an acquittal. bluford is an example of a case in which the juryailed to reach a verdict. >> no matter what lel the state puts o it, the state can have all kds of procedures and they can s, well,e will say that this particular result i not ancqttal. we held a functional analysis and that as a matter of federal law we look athat happened and determine what count >> exactly, justice jackson. this supreme crt had characterized the...
0
0.0
Feb 1, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to live in a post constitutional world, but this court is pushing our hand. the court needs to know that. p. the court needs to know that s? you ready? surprise! i don't think you can clear this. i got this. it's yours now. ♪ parodontax ♪ blood when brushing could be the start of a domino effect of gum disease. all of these signs could lead to worse. parodontax is clinically proven to reverse the signs of early gum disease. parodontax, the gum experts. hi. my name is kim and i am 41 years old. i've been given the opportunity to work from home, so that means lots of video calls. i see myself more and i definitely see those deeper lines. i'm still kim and i got botox® cosmetic. i wanted to keep the expressions that i would normally have, you know, you're on camera and the only person they can look at is you. i was really happy with the results. i look like me just with fewer lines. botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection
to live in a post constitutional world, but this court is pushing our hand. the court needs to know that. p. the court needs to know that s? you ready? surprise! i don't think you can clear this. i got this. it's yours now. ♪ parodontax ♪ blood when brushing could be the start of a domino effect of gum disease. all of these signs could lead to worse. parodontax is clinically proven to reverse the signs of early gum disease. parodontax, the gum experts. hi. my name is kim and i am 41 years...