goinc this morning of the robert hur testimony yesterday in front of the house committee, judiciary committeeet's look at democrat adam ■ño> i could have written my report theoretically in a way that omitted references to the presence memory but that would have been an incomplete and improper report. >> that was not my question. you could have written your report with comments about his recollection as to documents or a set of documents, but you chose a general pejorative reference to president. you understood when you made decision, didn't you, that you would ignite a political firestorm with that language, didn't you? >> politics played no part whatsoevn you understood nevers -- you cannot tell me you are so naÏve as to think your words would not have created a political firestorm. you understood that, didn't you when you wrote those words and you decided to include those words and goreferences to documu understood they would be manipulated by my colleagues her