of national unity, whether this government of national unity is needed, and in the context of what zelenskyhat he has five or six people in his team, perhaps it makes sense to ask our guests and guests what they think about the government of national unity, whether it is at all timely. do you need to do this? let's start with olga len. do you think ukraine needs a government of national unity? well, these recent speeches of zelensky showed that in principle there are such issues that are painful in principle, and it is difficult, probably, for him to be solely responsible for them, and therefore there should be some kind of more general consensus, that is, when it is not a decision one person, and you can... share the responsibility, but these conversations, you know, now about the government of national unity, to a certain extent we have, you know, such a spherical horse in a vacuum, because the first thing you can see is that the current president absolutely does not understand what he needs it for, he simply does not see it, he does not understand it, he does not perceive it, he does not

in fact, why did the topic of the national government of national unity arise?se, if professional patriotic parties such as european solidarity enter such a government, it is european solidarity that has a lot of experience cooperation in the coalition. and it seems to me that european solidarity will be the force that will insist on signing a clear agreement. coalition agreement, where the program of this coalition's activities will be formed for the period when it is impossible to hold elections and change, well, the composition of the parliament, then changes, then the program is signed, and in a certain way it is a substitute for these democratic elections, and we see what the coalition's program, program principles will be introduced by certain parties. then , in accordance with the program principles, they will be able to delegate people to the coalition government, but it seems to me that there is one problem in the current bankuyu, her surname is poroshenko, where the surname poroshenko is heard, it throws the government into some irrational model of beh

the national government of national unity arise, because if in such a government will come professionalarties like european solidarity, that is, in european solidarity... there is a lot of experience of cooperation in the coalition, and it seems to me that european solidarity will be the force that will insist on signing a clear coalition agreement, where the program of activities of this coalition will be formed on the period when it is impossible to hold elections and change the composition of the parliament, then it changes, then the program is signed and it... in a certain way is a substitute for these democratic elections, and we see what programs are included in the coalition program these or other parties will introduce principles, then, in accordance with the program principles, they will be able to delegate people to the coalition government, but it seems to me that there is one problem in the current bankuyu, its surname is poroshenko, wherever poroshenko's surname is heard, it throws the power away. into some irrational pattern of behavior, despite the fact that poroshenko sa

decade the war will end, decade, not what year, therefore, of course, the government of national unitys the only possibility for survival , it's not too late to create one, it's never too late to create one, the president has a beautiful one the opportunity to turn to the leaders of the political forces, which he himself considers patriotic and capable of joint leadership of the state, and eventually get out of the ... isolation in which he is, because in fact what we see when there is no such government, there is no such consultations, there is no meeting with the leaders of political factions, it is called very simply: political isolation, and a person in political isolation lives in a completely distorted reality, and can make wrong decisions, and this is very dangerous, because the president must be strong, must be effective, should be realistic, and should not be those texts that appeared this year about being completely alone. isolation of the president, why this isolation occurs, because the president communicates exclusively with representatives of his closest circle, who are a

of national unity, we invite you labor, you have no votes, to come into of this government, and labor we'll go in, but please, here's your party leader, neville chamberlain, who led to such a situation, let him sit on the bench of deputies, he cannot be the prime minister in the government of national unity, because he made mistakes, and... then they asked, what should we give this winston churchill, let's he will head the government , he means absolutely nothing special to us, nothing special to us, to you , just a compromising figure, and that's how chertel became the prime minister of great britain, not because he was a great national leader, but because that he was not taken seriously by both political parties parties of the country, as a leader, well, he became one , but at the time when he was elected, he was not one, but he... shared his political responsibility with the leader of the labor party , kliment metl, who became his deputy, and that was the essence, that he could not be afraid to make political decisions, firstly, because he did not think about the rating of the cons

political forces and maximum unity, already about israel and about this government of national unity, which was established on october 7, 23, after the attack of hamas on israel, has already been said and done as an example of how our entire system should work. it seems to me that in ukrainian politics, with the exception of perhaps a few groups there, there are no people who would be against or did not see the victory of ukraine over russia there, and this is the goal, this is the most important thing, because without this victory there will be no politics , if there is no victory, there will be no ukrainian politics, there will be nothing to divide, there will be no cabinets of ministers, there will be no verkhovna rada, there will be some revenge councils there if the russians win. why don't we make quick decisions about how i, how this big state machine should be managed, or whether it is advisable during martial law, the concentration of power exclusively in one hand, although this concentration began in the 19th year, actually after the parliamentary and presidential elections.

course, he would not agree to the formation of a government of national unity there, but the societynot understand this. here in ukraine, this is the complete opposite, or the opposite side precisely because it is in israel. in israel, by the way, the same, let's be. speaking, in principle, there is pluralism in the media, in israel there is no linguistic single marathon, yes in israel, in israel there are pro-government opposition media, so they do not cross certain red lines, so they understand that now victory is above all else, but these frameworks are anti-democratic, well, you can call them differently, they do not exist, because both society and the ruling elites, they understand and... and have their own vision of victory and a vision of what a democratic society should look like society, even in wartime, and likewise we have to go through all these things, what should a democratic society be like in wartime, because if we have an authoritarian society, then what will we lead to, what will we achieve, anyway one way or another we have to build even now in the backend, at leas

and vote if you support the idea of... creation of the government of national unity in ukraine 0800- no 0800-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next , we have a special agent, an officer of the armed forces of ukraine, ihor lapin. mr. major, i welcome you and thank you for being with us today. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. first of all, mr. major, i would like to hear your impressions. about the results of the year from the supreme commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, whether he was convincing president at the annual press conference, and what aftertaste did you have after zelenskyi's public appearance in front of journalists? well, let's be honest, if we analyze it completely, of course, the format of the program should be delayed, but if we talk about the main... things that i expected to hear from the president, well, at least, i still expect for the second year that he at least once he will come out and say: sorry, yes, people, sorry, i still didn’t think tha

, in our country any government of national unity turns into a government of national unity shit, no, talking about the national government, i'm talking about the technocratic wartime government, and i ... i specifically started with this because i understand that a large part of the audience will probably think because of the analogies with and israel because of pumping the thesis, now very active, this one is popular. and they will think that we are now talking about a government of national unity, but in contrast to this, we would really like to see a more technocratic government, and it would not be so important now and president zelenskyy answered, when asked the question, he said, name which of the factions to appoint, the problem is not in factions, the problem is that it is necessary to appoint strong professionals, specialists who would have consensus support among the political elites, who could not be opposed by other representatives, in particular the opposition from within the government. those for whom zelensky is ashamed within the government, which he admitted, of cour

any unity on the creation of a government of national unity. the situation has unfortunately become worse again, now the situation is now the belief that victory will happen in the near future, in the next few months, is obviously going away due to the rational information that we are getting, so now i am sure, the best opportunity would really be for the president of the country, who is supposed to represent this unity, to really announce the creation of a government of national unity, then he would really show himself as a national leader, not a party leader, as a person who understands that he is leading the state in a very difficult situation and takes it upon himself responsibility for the fate of this country, unfortunately, this is not happening yet, unfortunately, on the contrary, the discussions that are started at least from the environment of the president, because for her to talk about mrs. maryana bezuglu, during her four years of work in the parliament, the only thing what exactly i can say about her that she was always a loyal so

on tv then if you support the government of national unity govt formation 0800 211 381 no 0800 2011 382calls to these numbers are free. today we have the best journalists of ukraine on the air, olen natalya ishchenko and maryna danylyuk yarmalayeva. we are talking about the results of the 23rd year and the results of the annual year zelenskyi's press conference, but also about what to expect in the 24th year, because it is clear that all results make their own and everyone has their own results, but the goal and expectations from the 24th are obviously also the same, we all strive for victory, we want ukraine to defeat russia, he asks... only in what way, how it will happen and what will happen, how events will unfold in ukraine and in the world as well. let's, ladies, very briefly try to describe what to expect, what are your personal expectations from the 24th year, what can we get and in what perspective? marina, let's start with you. it is to solve this whole story with mobilization, with the transfer of the country to more military lines, and not to engage in these sweet syrups fro

of national unity.s is not a division of portfolios, there is nothing to divide now, and being in power right now is really not honey, but it is a division of responsibility, it is taking responsibility for very difficult strategic decisions, but i see that the current government, it does not realize the scale of the problems , and i have never heard anything like that from them, they are satisfied with everything, moreover, the votes in the parliament, you know, about the closed for journalists, you would be surprised, i think, it has not been a year no law was voted, where there were 226 servants, there are not 226, the maximum that the servants give is about 200 votes, well, let it be 205 and the rest - these are either satellites from the police, if we are talking about some nonsense, well, if these are laws that directed to the protection of territorial integrity, sovereignty, support of the army, european integration laws, then they gain a constitutional majority when the entire parliament votes a

obvious that the creation of a government of national unity is a request of ukrainian society and, byt of our western friends who keep saying if you can't hold elections... the only guarantee of your legitimacy is the government of national unity, it's the alphabet of politics, whoever doesn't want to learn the alphabet of his politics, sooner or later starts learning the alphabet of other people's politics, president should be aware of the great credit of trust in the ukrainian society today that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine has, and i do not discuss the issue of effectiveness or ineffectiveness of a particular person, because i am not a military expert, i believe that the issue of effectiveness, inefficiency - the question of the ukrainian president, who appoints the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. how did volodymyr zelenskyy himself say about it? olek, if the president realizes that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine has a much... greater credit of trust in society than he himself, he should use this credit of trust of

any kind of unity, of the creation of a government of national unity. now the situation unfortunatelyworse again, now the situation in the belief that victory will happen in the near future in a few months is obviously going away due to the rational information that we are getting, so now probably, i'm sure, the best opportunity would really be for the president of the country, who is supposed to represent this unity, to really announce the creation of a government of national unity, then he would really show himself as a national leader, not a party leader, as a person who understands that he is leading the state in a very difficult situation and takes it upon himself responsibility for the fate of this country, unfortunately, this is not happening yet. instead, on the contrary, those discussions that are started at least from the president's entourage, so that you do not talk about mrs. mariana indiscriminately during the four years of her work in the parliament, the only thing i can definitely do about her to say that she was always a loyal soldier, to the office of the president,

or smartphone and vote if you support the idea of ​​creating a government of national unity in ukraine800-211-381), no, 0800-2 11382, all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we have a special agent, an officer of the armed forces of ukraine, ihor lapin. major, i salute you and thank you for being with us today. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. first of all, mr. major, i would like to hear from you your impression of the results of the year from the supreme commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, whether the president was polite at the annual press conference, and what was the aftertaste left by you after zelenskyi's public appearance in front of journalists ? well, let's be honest, if you analyze it completely, of course, the format of the program should be longer, but if you talk about the main things that i expected to hear from the president, well, at least i have been waiting for the second year that he will at least once come out and say: it's all right, people, i'm sorry,

the ukrainian government, the government of national unity, they name petro poroshenko, to what extent is possible, and in what way , we will talk about all this with our guests, we will also mention foreign policy issues, in particular, regarding trump and his path to the future election, because in the united states of america , courts have begun to prohibit him from running for office in certain states, what it means, what consequences it will have in the presidential campaign. donald trump, we talk about it all in literally 12 minutes. wait for our broadcast, friends, the big broadcast of winter, the big evening of winter continues, vasyl, you have a word. thank you sergey, we are waiting for you 20-0, meet serhii rudenko, but for now i have a plot for your attention, a decorated house, delicious meals and the whole family at the table. this is one of the best christmas traditions that can cost a holiday this year. my colleagues from the white church counted the table. christmas is one of the most important holidays for ukrainians. believers traditionally go to church, the whole fa

this is how the government of national unity was formed., such a model may or may not be applied in ukraine. only ukrainians can decide this. the world admires the president's leadership zelensky, he became the face of ukraine, but of course, we also realize that ukraine is a democracy, and even winston churchill , after a successful victory over the nazis, was removed from office almost immediately after the war. therefore, politics can be relentless. however, we cannot and do not want to interfere in ukrainian politics, it is none of our business. we want to see a democratic, sovereign, successful ukraine. whether in the united states and in general in the civilized world, in particular, i do not know, at the g7 level, recognize the process that in russia or in the kremlin they call it the presidential election. we understand that putin will appoint himself in a few months. but the key story is whether it will be recognized by the world and what consequences it may lead to, if it is about fixing the moment of usurpation or the seizure of

we have literally two minutes left, the issue of the government of national unity, a survey was recentlyducted, and it turned out that ukrainians, despite the fact that it is like a national telethon, where this topic is not heard very much, i doubt that anyone mentioned it even once at all, no less it turns out that ukrainians are aware of this debate. and even a greater part of those polled percentageally for such a government of national unity to appear. nevertheless , the critics of this idea, they point out, perhaps rightly, that a government consisting of active leaders of political forces could be ineffective, i.e. imagine a government where, relatively speaking, the prime minister - minister poroshenko, and deputy prime minister tymoshenko, in principle, we already went through this once, and also boyko, for example, then also give him place, do not give in this configuration, zelensky, will yarmak, for example, then be some kind of minister of supervision over this cabinet of ministers and so on, that is, in your opinion, nevertheless such a government, strong, independent, in p

this is how the government of national unity was formed.ever, such a model may or may not be applied in ukraine. only ukrainians can decide this. the world admires president zelensky's leadership. he became the face of ukraine. but of course, we also realize that ukraine is a democracy. and even winston churchill was removed from office after a successful victory over the nazis. almost immediately after the war, therefore, politics can be relentless, however, we cannot and do not want to interfere in ukrainian politics, it is not our business. we want to see a democratic, sovereign, successful ukraine. whether in the united states and in general in the civilized world, in particular, i do not know, at the g7 level, recognize the process that in russia or in the kremlin is called presidential elections. we understand that putin himself will... appoint himself in a few months, but the key story is whether it will be recognized by the world and what consequences it may lead to if it is a matter of fixation the moment of usurpation or seizure o

the war we had a government of national unity, then there would be joint responsibility, then, by theere would be no need to worry about a single telethon, because when there is joint responsibility, then, accordingly, there will be no sharp political battles in principle , it cannot be, so it would be a correct story, but unfortunately, it did not happen, by the way, it is not too late to make such a government of national unity, because it will at least give the authorities the opportunity to accept, even if not popular, but solutions are needed, that's for sure it will be better for everyone, including the president. thank you serhiy taran, a political scientist, was in touch with us, they talked about yesterday's final annual press conference of president volodymyr zelenskyi. now we pass the floor to our news editor, who will share with us the most relevant news, in general. news for the moment, because now a lot is happening around us and it is very important that you, our viewers, know about all the most important events, including those that are happening around us now, as of 3

this is how the government of national unity was formed. model may or may not be applied in ukraine. only ukrainians can decide this. the world admires president zelensky's leadership. he became the face of ukraine, but of course, we also realize that ukraine is a democracy. and even winston churchill , after a successful victory over the nazis, was removed from office almost immediately after the war. therefore, politics can be relentless. however... we cannot and do not want to interfere in ukrainian politics, it's not our business. we want to see a democratic, sovereign, successful ukraine. i don't know whether the united states and the civilized world in general, in particular, at the g7 level, recognize the process that in russia or the kremlin is called presidential elections. we understand that putin will appoint himself in a few months. but the key story is whether it will be recognized. the world and what consequences this may lead to, if it is about fixing the moment of usurpation or the seizure of power. it is hard to imagine tha

, in principle, already work, if we talk about the format of the government of national unity, as itr example, was done in israel, there, and it is clear that in the current conditions it could be one of the options for exiting the political crisis, which is gradually, gradually now, well, as we can see, there is a certain cumulative effect, it is forming, but it is clear that the big question today is to what extent such a hypothetical government of national unity, it will be a subject, it will be authorized to adopt its policy. precisely technocratic, here i think that there may be certain nuances, so this issue will obviously be further proposed to the authorities, but in the near future months, i think that this issue will stand for now, if it is in the negotiation stage, but the further we go into the war, i think that such an option can be used by the current government in case it is not. presidential elections have been held and there will be no parliamentary elections, then a certain restoration of legitimacy among the people of the executive power will really be necessary ,

, and they went to form a government of national unity, despite the fact that you and i understand thatch a danger to the existence of israel as russia poses to the existence of ukraine. therefore, this would be the right way. unfortunately, zelskyi is taking a completely different path, the establishment of absolutely such personal power, well, two people, himself and andriy yermak, is dangerous, it is a problem, it is already being noticed in the world, it will be reflected very substantially in all sectors and support of ukraine, and our european integration, euro-atlantic integration, well, this is already a serious challenge. well. by the way, president zelenskyi says that the war with russia is now at a new stage, let’s listen to what zelenskyi said, we have a new phase of war, and this is a fact, war is difficult, winter in general is a new phase of war, or war , winter, it occurs not only on the front line and in the middle. bridges, due to the large number of enemy uses of drones, due to the large number of missile uses, including ballistics, etc., and therefore the winter war

zelensky should create a government of national unity, he should finally realize that this is a warringveryone should unite, and instead we see some kind of political, internal, i don't know, showdowns , which i just don't know, but in the end, the ratings of the government itself collapse and act on her, well, harm her actually, so i think the eyes should be a bit of a toughening factor now measuring new ratings, should see that it is a lie, it always collapses the ratings, well, and start building this joint. to form a government of national unity, i don't see any other way for us to win, it's just a matter of survival for today . regarding the unity of the holiday, i have also already seen several posts that if you post some happy pictures of yourself from the christmas holidays, from new year's holidays, smiling with glasses, with pampuhs, and socks, then i will unfriend you, i'm sorry, and that's how it increases this gulf between the military. and civilian people, as it is right for us , today, by the way, if i may, i would like to add two words that we spoke with the military tod

elections, the only guarantee of your legitimacy is the government of the national unity, this is thet of politics, the one who does not want to learn the alphabet of his own politics, sooner or later begins to learn the alphabet of someone else's politics, the president should be aware of the great credit of trust in ukrainian society today that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine has and... i am not discussing the issue effectiveness or ineffectiveness of a specific person, because i am not a military expert, i believe that the question of effectiveness or ineffectiveness is precisely the question of the ukrainian president, who appoints the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. as volodymyr zelensky himself said about this. olek, if the president realizes that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine currently has much more credit of trust in society than he does, he benefits from this credit of trust of the commander-in-chief . for the good of the state, and not to perceive this credit of trust as some kind of political, it is an elector

, in principle, work already. if we talk about the format of the national government unity, as it wasael, for example, there, and it is clear that in the current conditions this could be one of the options for getting out of the political crisis, which gradually, gradually now, as we see, there is a certain cumulative effect, it is being formed, but it is clear that the big... question today is how much such a hypothetical government of national unity actually is, it will be subject, it will be empowered to adopt its policy, precisely technocratic, and here i think that there may be certain nuances , so these questions will obviously follow to offer to the authorities, but in the coming months, i think that this issue for now ... will stand, if in the negotiation stage, but the further we go into the war, i think that such an option can be used by the current authorities, in case if presidential elections are not held and there are no parliamentary elections, then a certain restoration of legitimacy among the people of the executive power will really be necessary, and such a format ca

at the moment, there is simply an urgent need to form a government of national unity, which will work on issues of mobilization and ensure it, create... a responsible government and remind the whole world that we have a parliamentary-presidential, not an office-presidential republic. this is the only possible, in my opinion, way out of the situation that developed because the silencing of this problem will be negative for all of us, all of us without exception, and look at how actively russia is acting in this situation, how the russians, briskly, i would say, ... with fire use those contradictions that at the moment exist, we must fight back, fight back, we must all work for the victory of ukraine, clearly, each in the field in which he is engaged, and the more will be correctly stitched and correctly. sent messages to the president, to members of his team, the better it will be for all of us. now it is not time for elections, now is not the time for ratings, now is the time to fight for ukraine. 22 months of large-scale invasion have shown that ukraine has withstood the russian blow

i heard calls for the creation of a government of national unity in ukraine, which would unite some ofosition. but that's not the position my government is taking, it's just an idea that exists. it is not for me to say which political agreements will bring the greatest benefit to ukraine. it is absolutely true that during the most difficult period of the second world war, winston churchill invited his political rivals to the war cabinet. however, such a model may or may not be applied in ukraine, it is up to ukrainians to decide. the world admires the leadership of president zelensky, he became ukraine, but of course, we also realize that ukraine is a democracy, and even winston churchill, after a successful victory over the nazis, was removed from office almost immediately after the war. therefore, politics can be relentless. however, we cannot and do not want to interfere in ukrainian politics, it is none of our business. we want to see a democratic, sovereign, successful ukraine. whether in the united states and in general in... in the civilized world, in particular, i don't know, a

you know, if at the beginning of the war the authorities assembled a government of national trust, concluded a pact with not all political forces about national unity, invited all political forces to take joint responsibility for the defense of the country, then we would see more political unity now, if instead of the national as the so-called single a marathon where political censorship is introduced, we will see... censorship that extends exclusively to military information, as in israel, where there is censorship during wartime, but this censorship extends exclusively for military sensitive information and has nothing to do with political censorship. so, if our government had followed this path, we would now have political unity, because there would be joint political responsibility of the forces that could directly discuss their problems with freedom of speech on the air, since... at the beginning of the war , it took some different intonation, then now we see that all these political contradictions, which, unfortunately, are not inevitable, they are not inevitable, are spilling over the

the large-scale invasion, this is the creation of a government of national unity, and this is also a way of communication, when, for example, there are twice a day briefings from the spokesman of the idf and with the admission of all journalists, and not like this we will allow it, we will not allow it and so on, and only the military comment on military events and there is no political censorship, it is basically absent, that is, all kinds of things are interesting, so when, when you say, bohdan, about the lack of a system, but there is also and the simultaneous destruction of those systems that existed , but we have already been without a leader for, how many, several months, for example , the ministry of culture, how to explain this , is it a coincidence, is it culture in principle is not important now in the war, is there no people, perhaps who could lead the ministry of culture, but the point is that there is, and i mean, we know that there were discussions and yulia fediv was directly invited to head the ministry of culture, but at some point, something, something went wrong, i

of national unity. so, 91% of those polled on tv said yes, 9% against. on youtube, 88% yes, 12% against. we put an end to this, i wish. have a good and peaceful weekend, take care of yourself and your loved ones, this was the verdict program of serhiy rudenko, goodbye, turn on well - it's when everything as you want, click, and you are in the world of cartoons, click and around the universe of cinema, then switch on the good. oh, what is needed. megogo, turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports. a special performance of the legendary group mertvyi piven with an orchestra at the lviv opera, with the program christmas and selections. early lyrical songs, new christmas compositions and favorite super hits. on january 8, the stage of the lviv opera. tickets on the website of the big show ua organizer. information partners are espresso tv channel and radio fm halychyna. live sound. try it flebodia 600. pink french pills for acute hemorrhoids. flebodia 600. treat hemorrhoids without any sid

creating a government of national unity was raised, it was on condition, the idea of ​​such a governmentnt, which was created in israel, and it seems to me, judging by the president's answers, that he didn't even understand what was being discussed, he started talking about some rotations in the cabinet of ministers, but well, it's not about rotations, not about individual ministers are being replaced, but what about... unification of absolutely all pro-ukrainian politicians in order to win this war, and not to think about elections. as for the excerpt from the press conference that you showed so briefly, but very revealingly , i think it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that in this passage it is about five or six people, and also about the impossibility of dissolving the parliament, because it is not possible to hold elections to spend there and so on, in fact the president, to his great regret , showed, first of all, neglect. the constitution of ukraine and laws of ukraine, neglect of democratic values, public demand for changes, including the fight against corruption , the c

of national unity, and about finding others of possible solutions, now it's about... only the search order to still think more about the preservation of statehood, you are absolutely right, this is exactly what is at stake, and, unfortunately, i think we cannot say clearly. .. that we have already solved this problem forever, the threats are extremely serious, you have heard putin, his statements, you understand that the elections in russia will take place against the background of military escalation in ukraine, we understand that russia has human resources , well, much larger than in ukraine, and that russia has established the necessary production military elements, and even half-breeds. they have always had the production of missiles, which we do not have ballistic missiles, armored vehicles, we can talk about this for a long time here, comparing our capabilities and russian capabilities, but again, for us, this means making unpopular decisions and taking political responsibility for them. well, by the way, you mentioned russia, today the minister of defense, or rather, the minis

of technocrats or the government of national unity, these negotiators should be people who have relevante, we should not look at their political preferences or some kind of party... their affiliation, these should be people who have relevant connections in one or another country, who can represent ukraine very well there, so we are only at the beginning of the long journey, we will to hope that this path will not be , you know, overshadowed to a certain extent by some of our internal disputes, and also by the adoption of important european integration decisions, which, unfortunately, were often traditionally adopted in our country, for example, not in such a format as this it was necessary, and then it came well, we had to re-vote, we can't afford that today, why? because the price of a mistake will be very high and attention to reality is very serious. thank you, mr. viktor, does this mean that the european union's decision to start negotiations with ukraine means that, in principle, the european union made it clear to putin that ukraine is a part of the european space, and not a part o

of national unity, all this is a theory for political analysts, we have no other chance, if such a teamated, a window of opportunity for ukraine, we will not take advantage of it, next year there will be elections, the situation can change, everywhere 70 elections in the world. including european parliament elections, european commission elections, elections in many member states, and the mood may be different, that is why it was so important that we pass the status, that we pass the beginning of the negotiations and even in march before the start of the election campaign, we received directives and began negotiations process, and in this case i want to emphasize that we went through several. of such stages, it was also an association agreement, i am proud that it was in june 2014 that my signature was under it, it was also a deepened free trade zone, it was a visa-free regime with 148 theses, what should be done now every government official, every politician, every activist should know what the copenhagen criteria are, what they mean in terms of democracy and freedom, what they mean i

creating a government of national unity was raised, it was based on a condition, the idea of ​​suchovernment that was created in israel was meant, and it seems to me, judging by the president's answers, that he did not even understand what he was talking about it was about, he was talking about some he started talking about rotations in the cabinet of ministers, but hey, it's not about rotations, not about replacing individual ministers. the idea is yes, but about uniting absolutely all pro-ukrainian politicians in order to win this war, and not think about elections. as for the excerpt from the press conference that you showed , so short, but very telling , i think it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that in this passage it is about five or six people, and also about the impossibility of dissolving the parliament, because it is impossible hold elections there and so on, in fact the president, unfortunately,... i said , first of all, the neglect of the constitution of ukraine and the laws of ukraine, neglect of democratic values, public demand for changes, including the fig

the authorities united in order to create a government of national unity, they have a lot of disputes, of course, that benigans is just waiting for the war to end and he will give an account to netanyahu, and netanyahu understands this, but for the sake of the state, they united, and this and this and this are cool, because both those and first of all, on the same poroshenko, if we take him, that is, the deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada there allows or does not allow to go, for example , poroshenko to meet there with the invitation of the european people's party or for example meeting with the speaker of the congress, let's just think, poroshenko represents on average. each deputy represents at least 40,000 voters, well, it's just electoral mathematics, so you 're not stopping some pleasant or unpleasant man or woman, you're actually stopping a representative of 40,000 voters, in the case of poroshenko, it's even wider, wider scale, because we also have it, some electoral data of the 2019 presidential elections , however, let 's be formal, you just said that in israel has united,

that oppressing the opposition during the war and ignoring the need to create a government of national unity, to form, if you will, an apparent unity, is bad, then it's bad if we think that thank god that as long as, say, territorial centers of assembly centers, as long as people are taken away by force, and people are not shot on the streets, well then there is another option, it all depends on what are the criteria of perception, forgive me, i do not like the recent trends that i observe in ukraine, i do not like them intensely enough, and this, well , i think that i am not alone in this. well, really, as i look at it, i, for example , do not see anything unusual, i understand that there must be mistakes, and people are all different, as when there are 30 million such people, then obviously it is impossible without mistakes, and without violating knowingly or unknowingly, some laws are also impossible, and when someone criticizes even so, i always think, well, how they wanted, they wanted there not to be, theft during the war, and theft. during war it is alpha and omega, everyone ste

of national unity, team of national unity, office of national unity, can office of national unity wellit's dangerous, because there will be encroachment on the president's office, you know, it's the back office of national unity, that 's possible, but, well, i mean, it should be then, and it's not necessary to include deputies from current opposition factions. we have, excuse me, several members of the former governments , well, not all of them are pensioners so much, well, for example, well, those surnames that may be heard in our country. you, for example, viktor penzenyk, that he refused to go to work for the government, well, we have, for example, roman bezsmertny, well, roman bessmertny, how humanitarian, let's say, the vice-premier, ihor mityukov, as the minister of finance, he actively worked with state finances, ivan plachkov, for example, plachkov as the minister of energy, well , for example, that is, we can, we can, remembering those , who was in the government, we can, we can in this way... that is , those who do not currently have any opposition affiliation, there is no su

of national unity could be ... one of those decisions that would unite a society that supports quiteurally, different political forces, and this could add impulses for the work of the parliament, and in particular, again in the adoption of unpopular decisions, what i saw today the president obviously does not want to take on herself these unpopular decisions, says that decisions about mobilization are requests of the military, first of all, unfortunately, she did not hear answers to questions, for example, about... strategic plan a and plan b, for example, for the country, considering to the geopolitical challenges facing the country today, the next elections in america next year, and in the european union, and in many countries of the european european union, all of this really needs such, such good communication with society, when people would understand how we we have to hold on why should we be based and how should it all move, well, we heard about maryana and valera, of course it would be better if we didn't hear about it, because after all, such hints about disdain for the mili

of national unity, which included, in particular, the biggest opponent: netanyahu, benigans, generalituation there, uh, let's say this, what is, on the front, you can say that, well, yes, what we see externally, yes, all, all systems are working, if , there is a military cabinet, where decisions are made, there are military personnel, everyone shows, one united front, but we... let's say so, from various sources and media, and those people who are in, let's say so, in this cabinet and there on levels of decision-making, there is, well, there is a constant conflict, because it is necessary to understand that what happened in israel on october 7 from the beginning of the country's existence, such there was no failure, no big failure. are now showing, for example, how many people have died in various terrorist attacks throughout our time, yes, the existence of the country, and what happened on october 7 cannot be compared to anything, so now it is ruled by this government, this government , they also deal with survival, yes, political survival, and when there is a policy that contribute

of national unity was formed and everyone went to the defense as one, we have this year too a lost opportunityone kravchuk said at one time, we never launched the war economy, and the moscow occupier launched it in three shifts, if we need very high-quality and technological things, we have partners, we could do it would produce on the territory of poland right under the border, on the territory of nato, and calmly relicating a very important production there, already as of the 23rd year to have at least... a sufficient share of these weapons, when we do not have to depend on whether the trumpists will defeat the rest of the republicans, or won't they defeat the other side ocean, so this 23rd year is very difficult from the point of view of lost opportunities, on the horizon of this 24th year it is not yet visible that these are all illusions, that it is possible to fight with someone else's weapons, that it is possible. to completely rely on someone, no matter how close your allies are, you should think about whether you are autonomous at least in some of your greatest needs, no one is autono

, and they went to form a government of national unity, despite the fact that you and i understand that a danger to the existence of israel as russia poses to the existence of ukraine, so this was would be the right way, unfortunately, zelskyi is taking a completely different path, the establishment of absolutely such mutual power, well, or two persons, himself and andriy yermak, it is dangerous, it is a problem, it is already noticed in the world, it will be reflected very fundamentally on in all aspects of support for ukraine, and our european integration, euro-atlantic integration , well, this is already a serious challenge, by the way, president zelenskyi says that the war with russia is now at a new stage, let’s listen to what zelenskyi said, in our . the phase of the war is a fact, the war is complicated , winter in general is a new phase of the war, or war, winter, it takes place not only on the front line and in the middle of the cities, due to the large number of use of drones by the enemy, due to the large number of missiles, including ballistics, etc., and therefore winter wa

government of national unity, perhaps even it will be a government not from representatives of the politicales of the parliament, perhaps even from those leaders who are leaders of civil society and technocrats who can provide, well a new breath, there after march 24, in political life and in the management of the government itself, the executive power of the country, who knows, we will see, but for now it is definitely in... it is impossible to hold elections, we need to be united, we need to unite and win this war, after the victory it is obvious that later we will be able to ensure the constitutional rights of the entire ukrainian people and all the players of the political process for the elections of ukraine, both presidential and parliamentary. mr. maksym, we can ask you, as an internationalist, whether you were actually in examples of world history when elections were held during war? "well, listen, it's a very good question, i think there were, to be honest, i can't remember right away, but i'll have to refresh my memory, well, including, if we're talking in the context of the fact t

of technocrats or about the government of national unity, these negotiators should be people who have, we should not look at their political preferences or their party affiliation, they should be people who have relevant connections. in to some or other countries that can represent ukraine very well there, that's why we are only at the beginning of the long road, let 's hope that this road will not, you know, be overshadowed to some extent by some of our internal disputes, and the adoption of important european integration decisions, which , unfortunately, were often accepted by tradition , for example, not in such a format as it was required, and then it was necessary to re-vote, we cannot afford this today, why, because the price of a mistake will be. .. very high and attention to in fact, the chain is very serious. thank you, mr. viktor, does this mean that the european union's decision to start negotiations with ukraine means that , in principle, the european union made it clear to putin that ukraine is a part of the european space, and not a part of the post-soviet space, which p

of national unity could be one of those decisions that would unite a society that supports completelyurally different political forces, and it could add impetus to the work of the parliament, and in particular, again, in the adoption of unpopular decisions, what i saw today, the president obviously does not want to take on these unpopular decisions, says that the decision on mobilization is the request of the military , first of all, to our great regret, did not hear answers to questions , for example, about strategic plan a and plan b, for example, for the country, given the geopolitical challenges facing the country today, the next elections in america next year and in ... the european union and in many countries of the european union, all this really needs such good communication with society, when people would understand how we should hold on, what we should be based on and how it should all move, well, we heard about marijana and valera, it would be better if we of course, they didn't hear about it, because after all, any such hints about the contemptuous attitude towards... thos

at the moment, there is simply an urgent need to form a government of national unity, which will alsoilization issues. and to ensure it, to create a responsible government and to remind the whole world that we have a parliamentary-presidential, not an office-presidential republic, this is the only possible way out of the current situation, in my opinion, because keeping silent about this problem will be negative for all of us , all without exception, and see how it actively works russia in this situation. as the russians are actively, i would say, using the contradictions that currently exist, we must fight back, fight back, we must all work for the victory of ukraine, clearly, each in the field in which he is engaged, and with what the more there will be... correctly stitched and correctly presented messages from the mouth of the president, from members of his team, the better it will be for all of us, now is not the time for elections, now is not the time for ratings. now is the time to fight for ukraine. 22 months of large-scale invasion showed that ukraine has withstood the russia

of national unity could be one of those decisions that would unite a society that naturally supportsnt political forces, and it could add impetus to the work of the parliament, and in particular, again, in the adoption of unpopular decisions, what i saw today, the president obviously does not want to take on these unpopular decisions, says that the decision on mobilization is the request of the military , first of all. ah, unfortunately, we did not hear answers to the questions , for example, about strategic plan a and plan b, for example, for the country, taking into account the geopolitical challenges facing the country today, the next elections in america next year, and in the european union, and in many countries of the european european union, all this really needs such good communication with society, when people would understand how we should hold on to... we should be based and how it should all move, well , we heard about maryana and valera, it would be better if we of course, they did not hear about it, because after all , such hints about disdain for the military, for the

this unification, the importance of creating a government of national unity, which at one time, which at one time israel, for example, created absolutely, despite the fact that they have opposition politicians there, there are pro-government politicians, they united because they feel this threat, why does zelenskyy not consider it necessary to use in a good sense opposition politicians who are pro-ukrainian in order for them to deal with international affairs... if petro poroshenko, if the european solidarity team has a suitable practical experience, there are contacts, and there are , well, they are valued in fact, by various international leaders, i mean the countries of the european union, and the united states, and canada, and other countries, well , due to the fact that they have already worked in they have this experience, why not send them abroad, why not unite and convey the importance of support. of ukraine, because it is obvious that we need the f-16 planes that you mentioned, and we have needed them for a long time, we need powerful weapons, and we don't have such a thing,

of national unity, the team of national unity, the office nationally. the office of national unity isdangerous , because there will be an encroachment on the president's office , you know, it's the back office of national unity, so you can, but well, i mean, it should be then, and it doesn't have to be included there deputies from the current opposition factions, we have several members of the former governments, well, not all of them are pensioners so, well, for example, those surnames. which you and i may hear, for example, viktor penzenyk, that he refused to go to work for the government, well, we have, for example, roman bezsmertny, well, roman bezsmertny, as a humanitarian, let's say, vice prime minister igor mityukov, as the minister of finance, he actively worked with state finances, ivan plachkov, for example, plachkov as the minister of energy, well, for example, that is, we can, we can, remembering those who were in the government. we can, we can in this way, that is, those who do not currently have any opposition affiliation, there is no such thing, there is no need in soci