it had 4300 pound of its own costs and 13 thousand of the gphc's cost to pay so that's what come from a government fund and that is taxpayers money £56 pound just to get me. struck off, which they failed to do, which makes no sense when the gphc committee, fitness and practice committee have been well within the their rights to find a determination that they found, and they found me that a warning was ample enough, so questions need to be asked really, what made the psa take this back to the high court at expense of the taxpayers money? no, indeed, questions certainly do need to be asked, but i mean david, i mean, what do you make of of of nazim's case on? i mean, absolutely crazy doesn't he that we had to go through what four different uh processes, numerous different processes actually involving seven in fact separate organizations between the zionist, police, the courts and and the regulators, mean what what's that tell us about the nature of of the zionist lobby? well it tells you that they uh intend to intimidate, bully and harass any organization that gets in their way and they