. >> you say we end up in gridlo, ich we have now. >> what i am saying chevron is a big factor contbung. i would think the uniquely 21- century phenomena of cryptocurrency wod have been addressed by congress. i certainly would'vethght that would've been true in the wake of the ftx debae. it hasn't. why? beusthere is an agency head out there who thinks he already ha the authority to address this unue 21st-century problem with a couple of statues passed in the 1930s. he's going to waive his want and say the words instment contracts are ambiguous and that is want to suck al this into my regulatory orbit, even though when that sam person is a professor that this is probably a job for the cf was just going to say let's assume for the sake of argument that i agree that in 706 congress has spoken to the problem we are not applying a fictional presumption. congress has lds we want the court to decide questions of law. solicitor general in the last argument talks about how litigants will be lining up for state -- cases decided under step two to reopen challenges the agency's interpretation. what