bilov, in my opinion, they, in three, one of the books, horbulin, lytvynenko bilov created, so we canay that lytvynenko, first of all, not a new person, he was even turcha's deputy. for some time, it has been there for a long time, but during this time from academician gurbulin to the current state of the nsdc lost several specialized security institutes that were engaged in problems, for example, external, external security, well, that is, these institutions were shortened, in the end, all this security work was reduced to only a residual principle. what remained was the national institute of strategic studies, which was also headed by lytvynenko, which for some time, and in fact , he always prepares annual notes and messages for the president, well, that is, we can say that in terms of such an analytical bureaucracy , litvinenko will really make the nsdc quiet , an advisory body er... on the model, er, well, really, maybe, maybe an academician horbulin, only litvyanenko is not the same format , that is, he, he himself is not, not a visionary like horbulin, and secondly, it seems to