she married a isil fighter soon after arriving. she went on to have three children.none of whom survived. she was still in the caliphate, when it collapsed in january, was still in the caliphate, when it collapsed injanuary, 2019, and was taken to a camp in north—east syria. section 40, subsection two, of the british nationality act 1981, gives the secretary of state, in practice, the secretary of state, in practice, the home secretary, power to deprive a person of british citizenship, if satisfied that there probation is conducive to the public good. on february the 19th, 2019, without prior notice to ms begum, the then secretary of state made an order depriving her of british citizenship on the ground that it would be conducive to the public good to do so, because her return to the united kingdom would present a risk to national security. there is a right of appeal to the special immigration appeals commission against orders or deprivation of citizenship made on national security grounds. on the 3rd of may 2019, ms begum applied for leave to enter the uk, so that s

when isil announced that a safe zone had been established, the representatives came out. a representative did not go out of his age to say, "wel-balgh-ma-bulgh". we live or we kill or we are killed. this is a point . when the islamic republic of iran majlis has these forms, now minus those political ijtihads that may be created in the behavior, point. when the islamic revolutionary guard corps put the enemy on the list of terrorists, dear mr. ofgami, from the religious minorities, religious minorities, and the minority of the reformist and principled sunni brothers, radical and non- radical, wearing the uniform of the islamic revolutionary guard corps, this is very valuable, yes. one of the places that the twelfth parliament should really look at with an instructive view is that there is no conflict of interest in legislation at all because of if a representative of two representatives has a conflict of interest , or a regional one, or for any other reason, he is silent or at most wants to use monitoring tools. the highest one is the criticism of one minister, another min

the syria and align with isil.y risk was, in our judgement , a security risk was, in our judgement, a question of evaluation and judgement entrusted by parliament to the secretary of . state. ground secretary of. state. ground three. de facto statelessness . three. de facto statelessness. the third ground was that the secretary of state failed to consider that section 40 of the british national act, 1981 prohibits the making of a deprivation order if the consequence would be to make the person concerned stateless . it person concerned stateless. it is accepted that this means the uk stateless, that is to say stateless. as a matter of international law and that the deprivation order did not make miss begum so stateless because she still retained her bangladesh citizenship as. she still retained her bangladesh citizenship as . at bangladesh citizenship as. at february 2019, what was argued under ground three was that the secretary of state nevertheless failed to consider that the deprivation order would make miss beg

isill require that those who create technology,ot only from disciplines such as computer and data sciencebut from social and natural sciend humanities. if we are to ensure aifial intelligence makes decisions based on theesthat humanity has to offer, its development must result from a multidisciplinary process. as we think about theute of higher education we will need to make sure every computer and data scientist is exposed to the liberal arts. just as everyone who majors in liberal arts will need a dose of computer and data science. sebastian: this quote makes me really happy. i have been fighting to bring together humanities tools and computer science tools because of the core we are dealing with societal things. and it is our conscience that can make us drift apart, unable to talk to each other. this is the time that all of us have to talk. and humanities and social science are extremely important because at their core they care about people. they care about the impact on technology and people. use of technology, the book, the broadcast. now film are at the core. driven by technology.

isill be a one case only rt of ruling. >> justice, thatsot our position. our position that once the jury returns the verdict, the dble jeopardy protection is triggered i wanted to make the point that there is a distinction. that is not what happened here. once the jury has returned the verdict and there is an acquitta tt is the end of it the judgeay not send it back. that does not he to be decided in this case. >> you argue that t state cannot take what is really i acquittal and put some other label on it. lowering from federal court saying that a state cannot have th procedure for misuri. >> i'motware of the case on that issue. >> that is my other point of ncern about this case. you seem to agree that at least you don't contest the proposition that if the jury rern inconsistent verdicts of a repugnant verdict on the same count, t double jeopardy clause does not prohibit the judge from saying, no, you cannot do that, go back and deliberate tomorrow. is that correct it's not a violatn of double jeopardy? >> in your hypothetical inconsistent verdicts. one ca

after running away with her mates to syria in 2015 at just 15 to join isil and marry an isis fighter,uicide vests and actually said that she wasn't bothered or fazed by watching beheadings. shamima bagan wants to come back to the uk, which is no longer her home by the way, because of her citizenship, which has been revoked. although we are still paying revoked. although we are still paying for her legal appeals, she's apparently received nearly £250,000 of legal aid since 2021. she gave birth to three kids, all of whom died in cunous kids, all of whom died in curious circumstances . now the curious circumstances. now the war is lost and she is in a camp in syria. she's realised she's better off in the uk . i could better off in the uk. i could have told her that before she left the other day, shamima lost her court appeal to challenge against removal of her british citizenship . citizenship. >> for these reasons , as we >> for these reasons, as we unanimously dismiss the appeal, it could be argued that the decision in miss begum's case was harsh. >> it could also be argued that miss b