it is a name you may not know, but in the environmental ity, people know the name robert bullard. he has been at this for six decades. old now, still doing and he is on our panel tomorrow night. dan when jeff bezos gave $100 million to to support thework the committee is doing, righteous work. van jones on that panel. dr. ali the panel, peggy shepard, cochair of the wh environmental advisory council, on the stage tomorrow night. bensierra club,aps the foremost organization working on these issues. we all know si pen to have right now and african-american and he is on the stage tomorrow night. it is and i will assess same question tomorrow night to the experts policy-wise, what are we talking about? it will be an amazing, empowering, and uplifting conversation. host is an article here from last year, little more than a year ago, with this headline, advocates are saying that s are the answer for sea level threat in west oakland, california.where do you stand on the issue might be advocating for when it comes to climate justice? guest: night, the issue at repa will come up tomorrow n

ities do to address this? . give us so examples. >> first of all i want to you and say that public leaders and elected s are under so much pressure to address these very complicated issues. it by one agency or department alone. it cannot be addressed by one mayor alone. you need resources capacity, collaboration, innovation. you need resources from the federal level and advocates like us who are supporting the needs. access that could be any number of things. access has to do with cost. can peoplecoverage. access has to do with workforce. do people, clinics to see folks? access has to do with geography. can people get transportation? elehealth available? is broadband available? access is one. so many of you are doing great work in the rollout of ouw as that has built out we pushed further upstream so we are not only effectively addressing crisis at the final moment, but that we are moving to the point where we can prevent those crises as much as possible. having a hotline is great. having warm lines is terrific.

'ity to worship our god, the ability to share our faith.t, the constitution is so important. that is what is at stake. and that is why we have to go out and talk to our friends at church for the next 20■w weeks. get there early. sit down and start talking politics at church. some featht?re going to ruffle [applause] the case. we are in a really very lastned thankfully, at the ripe age of 50, i took a back to god. i realized, i can't do it alone. i took a really hardcore shift back to god. isn't god amazing? because his plans are always so much better than ours. [applause] you probably know my story how far 30 years i worked in the media. i was one ofhe fair anwakeup call and said, this isn't even journalism anymore. this is just full-on propaa we all know that's a fancy way of saying ■ga big old fat lie, right? when you don't want to admit your lies, you can say, i gave you ah. but it is really a lie. when i realized the half-truths were what we were putting out that was dividing our countr dividing my community, pushing fear into people's

who makes the best speeds uh to find that out the auditing and capital business itis just posted the weld pizza and, and panada tournament. while the freestyle acrobatic section of the competition provided the most action, but it depends completed in various categories from the longest adults strides to the best tasting products. more than a 170 ships from cold over the world to fox, some even blindfolded. but who won a shift from argentina? i can walk you through the notes. here is a quick reminder of our top story of this. all the un has condemned and he's been in the air strikes on a school run by the united nations can does a dozens of people have been killed and many more wounded? israel says it was targeting, how most fighters involved in the october, 7th, tentative tex, watching the news coming up next off of the break. as you all goes to the polls we ask, does the economy mount to the far right? that's on business beyond. in just a moment, i'm going to expand a g. a. and believe your back again, care in about 45 minutes. we'll see you then by the russians got any issues or th

courage of that kind of moment for this resolution and as senator graham said so well for unrussia as itys no substitute for providing arms or the united states galvanizing w korea, rus, iran. democracy is under assault. and this iser. this is a statement of moral intent. sen. graham: rounding out with just imagine for a moment if you voted against this resolution, if you had a chance to vote look what you would be endorsing. you would be sayin well, that is not enough. ng of a sovereign nation, the mass rape of women, the kidnapping of children, providing nuclear capability to north korea for god's sake. the dismemberment of countries in africa. on and on. i know representative mccall is very interested in this. but i wouldany member of the house and senatepass hern all that putin h done, and we have lost deterrence. if this is not enough, i mean as of yesterday. if■+ there wasc) is in terms oft state, he just entered into a defense agreement with north a and pledged to help their nuclear program. if you can forgive all then you will shine in history all the wrong ways. if in time and le

at itis, the german sent us an integrative by of us to research and the us the home health center for environmental reset. and so the current modem production is extremely efficient. we're producing a lot much more than we need in fact, um, but we are losing everything with it. we're losing the farmers, we're losing nature. we're losing soil and we're poisoning the consumers and the water. and that means that we really have to find solutions. proficient turns his mode of production without losing the capacity to produce enough food for a growing population. in 2022, the european commission adopted a proposal for new regulation with a wide targets to reduce by 50 percent the use of risk of chemical pesticides. by 2030, it was positive plans to reduce the environmental footprint of the food system and to help mitigate the economic losses. but the sustainable use regulation, as it was cold, was scrapped off to being bolted down with the service. blaming lobbying from pesticides produces the final proposal, pertain so weak that many political groups on the left and progressive they sold.

at itis, the germans sent us an integrative by it of us to research. and the us said home health center for environmental research. so the current modem production is extremely efficient by producing a lot much more than we need in fact. but we are losing everything with it. we're losing the farmers, we're losing nature, we're losing soil and we're poisoning the consumers in the water. and that means that we really have to find solutions to vision, turns even more the production without losing the capacity to produce enough food for a growing population. in 2022, the european commission adopted a proposal for new regulation with a wide targets to reduce by 50 percent the use of risk of chemical pesticides. by 2030, it was positive plants to reduce the environmental footprint of the ease food system and to help mitigate the economic losses that the sustainable use regulation as it was cold with scrapped of to being able to down with a service. blaming lobbying from pesticide produces the final proposal became so weak that many political groups or on the

what we find is that trump's elected returns his popular ity is off the charts and exurbia and the mostsychotic members of congress lovable characters like. marjorie taylor greene, matt gaetz, jim jordan, some of your favorites. doug lauren boebert they all represent that are predominantly exurban.so the book begins, i'mo get to your questions take the long way around the scenic route through exurbia. the book begins as a work of political geography that rather than examining trump because we've all read a number of of trump they're all quite gruesome and unpleasant. rather than inspecting let's inspect the perhaps through inspecting those places we can learn about the people who vote for them and the movement that they represent. and what we discover is the movement is reactionary, but it's also reactive in the sense that it's an adverse reaction it's a backlash to the progress, the immense progress that is taking shape across the united states in my lifetime, your lifetime, just over the past few decades, the progress on issues of race, progress on issues of gender the progress on, is

what we find is that trump's elected returns his popular ity is off the charts and exurbia and the most psychotic members of congress lovable characters like. marjorie taylor greene, matt gaetz, jim jordan, some of your favorites. doug lauren boebert they all represent that are predominantly exurban. so the book begins, i'm going to get to your questions take the long way around the scenic route through exurbia. the book begins as a work of political geography that rather than examining trump because we've all read a number of of trump they're all quite gruesome and unpleasant. rather than inspecting let's inspect the places where they're most popular and perhaps through inspecting those places we can learn about the people who vote for them and the movement that they represent. and what we discover is the movement is reactionary, but it's also reactive in the sense that it's an adverse reaction it's a backlash to the progress the immense progress that is taking shape across the united states in my lifetime, your lifetime, just over the past few decades, the progress on issues of race,

what we find is that trump's elected returns his popular ity is off the charts and exurbia and the most psychotic members of congress lovable characters like. marjorie taylor greene, matt gaetz, jim jordan, some of your favorites. doug lauren boebert they all represent that are predominantly exurban. so the book begins, i'm going to get to your questions take the long way around the scenic route through exurbia. the book begins as a work of political geography that rather than examining trump because we've all read a number of of trump they're all quite gruesome and unpleasant. rather than inspecting let's inspect the places where they're most popular and perhaps through inspecting those places we can learn about the people who vote for them and the movement that they represent. and what we discover is the movement is reactionary, but it's also reactive in the sense that it's an adverse reaction it's a backlash to the progress, the immense progress that is taking shape across the united states in my lifetime, your lifetime, just over the past few decades, the progress on issues of race,

number of manufacturing facilities, one that is specifically now in kenya apparel industry there has the itydiversify away from china and from other east asia manufacturing hubs and to the opportunities provided in the american markets. i have a bipartisan bill to extend. we must do it soon to provide certainty for all who would seek to increase their investment in east africa. we must do more for our free partnership, advance the negotiations, which are a promising start in a promising start and move forward with the free trade agreement. that would be the foundation upon which we could build the next chapter of u.s.kenya partnerships, and i look forward to working with president ruto, president obama, vice president harris, and secretary rolando for delivering on that. thank you so much. >> introducing the honorable rebecca miano cabinet secretary of the ministry of investments trade, industry at the republic of kenya. ♪ >> my role today is to invite the president of the republic of kenya, but before i do that i will say one or two things. this state visit follows ae7 commitment of deepeni

what we find is that trump's elected returns his popular ity is off the charts and exurbia and the most psychotic members of congress lovable characters like. marjorie taylor greene, matt gaetz, jim jordan, some of your favorites. doug lauren boebert they all represent that are predominantly exurban. so the book begins, i'm going to get to your questions take the long way around the scenic route through exurbia. the book begins as a work of political geography that rather than examining trump because we've all read a number of of trump they're all quite gruesome and unpleasant. rather than inspecting let's inspect the places where they're most popular and perhaps through inspecting those places we can learn about the people who vote for them and the movement that they represent. and what we discover is the reactionary, but it's also reactive in the sense that it's an adverse reaction it's a backlash to the progress, the immense progress that is taking shape across the united states in my lifetime, your lifetime, just over the past f decades, the progress on issues of race, progress on i

what we find is that trump's elected returns his popular ity is off the charts and exurbia and the most psychotic members of congress lovable characters like. marjorie taylor greene, matt gaetz, jim jordan, some of your favorites. doug lauren boebert they all represent that are predominantly exurban. so the book begins, i'm going to get to your questions take the long way around the scenic route through begins as a work of political geography that rather than examining trump because we've all read a number of of trump they're all quite gruesome and unpleasant. rather than inspecting let's inspect the places where they're most popular and perhaps through inspecting those places we can learn about the people who vote for them and the movement that they represent. and what we discover is the movement is reactionary, but it's also reactive in the sense that it's an adverse reaction it's a backlash to the progress the immense progress that is taking shape across the united states in my lifetime, your lifetime, just over the past few decades, the progress on issues of racre, progress on issue

her most recent book is, queer career sexual ity and work in modern america from princeton university, just won a big award. the taft. it follows this the straight state sexual and citizenship in 20th century america. university press with robert self and nancy cott. she co-edited intimate states, gender, sexuality and government and modern u.s. history. and that's with the university of chicago. ryan patrick murphy is associate professor of history and women's gender and sexuality studies at earlham college. he's the author of deregulating desire, flight attendant activism, family politics and workplace justice from temple, which won the 2017 david montgomery award from the firm lature and from the h. he is currently at on the book teamsters metropolis with the university of michigan press forthcoming in 24. we'll look forward to that which explores the connection between suburbanization. hunter normativity and jimmy hoffa's mess organizing campaign. murphy was once a flight attendant for united airlines, an elected leader of the association of flight attendants, local 11 shea olmste

and related questions about race and gender and■p questions funding and questions about the neutral ityuniversity. and it's been about an eighth month, an eight month labor of i can't say love, but of intense focus. overall, what is your take on the first amendment and free speech? well, i like them both. the idea that free speech is central to education and to the university, including receptivity toward protests that. people love or despise, receptivity toward freedom of speech. is to our country's central, to liberty under law, central to self-government, and central to re for one another. in this book, the campusur campt guide, youinstitutions dtinctivn unique the educational mission will requi an assortment of restrict bans on speech. u can't run a collegor universityrestrictions. can you go a little deeper and explain that to us? can so the headline is free speech. exclamation point. free speech for all■3x the the story underneath the headline emphasizes that if you're teaching course, let's say on american history and someone wants to write a4 paper on climate change and how terr

on the values of democracy and ity and where tips for the policymakers here in the di youth of socialia. we need to be careful about not modeling if we want to solve k there's a lot of attention right now in social media a lot of attention on ai a lot ofn on technologies there's a lot of attention on a lot of different things it goes back to if wething would be okay. the answer just reallyway. i think we have to really take a holistic approach and people with addiction problem if somebody has an addiction problem it means if they are on social media is a social media ction issue that needs to be dealt with. whose responsibility is it. i think one of the issues we are ?problem we have whose responsibility is it. we have an ownership or responsibility issue stop it's on every single level. if something is not working whose responsibility is it. nobody is taking ownership of that actual problem as citizens is that our responsibility to visit our responsibility to fix se's responsibility? is our responsibility to decide how social media is going to work in the next decade in our country w

i think iti sorts of circumstances. i think it told us — sorts of circumstances.s of circumstances. i think it told us a lot-— told us a lot. what rules is that kevin craig _ told us a lot. what rules is that kevin craig break, _ told us a lot. what rules is that kevin craig break, what - told us a lot. what rules is that kevin craig break, what did - told us a lot. what rules is that kevin craig break, what did he| told us a lot. what rules is that l kevin craig break, what did he do wrong? kevin craig break, what did he do wron: ? . . kevin craig break, what did he do wron. ? , ., ., kevin craig break, what did he do wron? , ., ., ., ., ., , wrong? these are all allegations, but let's say _ wrong? these are all allegations, but let's say hypothetically - but let's say hypothetically somebody— but let's say hypothetically somebody bets _ but let's say hypothetically somebody bets against - but let's say hypothetically- somebody bets against themselves. that is— somebody bets against themselves. that is what — somebody bets against themselves. that is what he _ so

ity, but the lesson is that if you keep singing in america, if you keep )ñclimbing.america towards the end that tomorrow i'll be at the table when company comes. nobody'll de say to me eat in the kitchen. that means no murders. andsee how bziful i am and be ashamed. i, too, sing america. so now that we've unveiled this statue of■g daisy so that ameria and thet to. to see howeautiful america is when they seeaisy, lee, gaston bates say her name. ■hdaisy bates. and we all will be singing the same america. thank you, mr. speaker. thank you, mr. jeffries. thank you, america. ladies and choir of the universy of arkansas, pine bluff, philander smith university arranged by stephen hayes performing guide feet. got my■t easy. while i disarray. this feet,rhonda,, y'all hold my feet. lead here. run all. don't on this race race in vain. oh oh, my. hey, who i love run this race. oh, my. livesoh, my head. who run, massa■4 race for i do't ■;x.run this race in vain. z,oh,who i'll i'll run this rac, lord, i am your. warren run this race. oh, your child love, the one i run this race fo

here you have got ity that is giving $20,000 in mentoring four times a y a drop in the bucketst the .13%oes to black women, against the fact that profes bradley, in the evidence of the record, they get rejected three times as much as anybody else. cord that the white applicants lse. it's true of all of these charities that are directed to make a small change. of course their focus -- if you spend one dollar, you cannot spend it somewhere else. that is the reality of itable giving. >> the thing about that that i don't either fully understand is that it seems at Ñu as there are other sources of funding that are r we can. just a drop in the bucket, everyone else is saving us from our own unlawful c. i don't quite understand >> i would look at it as the reverse, your honor. in the context of charitable giving, the first amendment protecr right to donate it in that cxtgiving you cannot sat solving everyone's problem. the answ'z't possiblye give to everr no one. >> can i ask a related question? >> of course, judge rosenbaum. >> if the donations themselves, without doing the if the donations th

she says yiu have to pay attention to que it air ity inx number. >> most people i start to worry around one 50, but people who are sensitive so lung conditions were children or pregnant i worry a kind of 100 or higher, but i would say even when it gets in the 5200 range, some people can feel so where they feel like it's more difficult to breathe, a mace or getting caught for through the rotation eye irritation. so i think those are there so it's it's a little bit of a sliding scale. but in particular, when 50 or above regular people >> when the air is bad, doctor christensen recommends staying inside with the windows closed and using an air filter that is right for the size room. it's it. talking about the weather such a facr in all this. yeah, laurence, most notably area so far, so good right now. but well, i can't let your guard down. i mean, this is a dangerous fire conditions outside. right now, the winds have not ramped up like the models are forecasting. that is great news so far. >> but we're still not win or things are extremely dry out there. the atmosphere we're talking about

else he's ever said about, the declaration of independence,■l he's specifically talking about equal itythat all endowed by their creator with the right to be alive, the right to be free and the right■e to pursue happiness and slavery has no parties. ■;kone 1854. there's another one of these fragments. these little incomplete documents. he says, okay. want to juy slavery, huh? what do you think will make it all right for ]u to enslave a fellow human being all because their skin is darker than yours? well, my skin started using and enslaved me. because you think they're not as intelligent as. all right, well,s of people are smarter than others. does thatea enslave those peopl. and finally, he gets to is deeply important to lincoln throughout hi which this idea that might doesn' oh, because you'ree powerful. that's why you goio son. well, you be careful because ■fsomeone more powerful may come along and enslave you. ÷■qafter serving in the state legislature for four straight terms in 1834 through 1842, lincoln eventually decided to get involved nationalhe found y good in to be elected to t

brought to bear on these particul c campus speech and related quespktis about race and gender neutral itysnding and of the university. and it's bebout an eighth month, an eight month labor of i can't say love, but of intense focus. overall, what is your take the first amendment and free speech? well, i like them both. the idea that free speech is central education and to the university, includiward protests that. peoplereceptivity toward freedof speech. central, to liberty under law,■w■ ernment, o respect for one another. in this book, the campus guide to our campus free a pocket guide, you write educational institutions distinctive, even unique the educational mission will require an assortment of restrict bans on speech. you can't run a college or university without imposing such %lrestrictions. can you go a little deecan so te speech. exclamation point. free speech for all the theth te emphasizes that if you're american history and someone wants to write age and how terre it is, the teacher can american history. or if a professor and to teach about, let's say black holes and physics uni

oh, i get iti do. rology. >> okay.kay. >> g no lesseyear is impossibl . >> yeah, even if you try so hard to do, i can only imagine his donors are like, thank you so much for usinsg our monel towards areas well spent. the the big thing that camest to mind was when i read this article and i saw how much more he spent than other elected officials the area00 and saw that lori lightfoot only spent $2,000 the year prior. >> yes, i was like, you should a have spent wayr you more, you k, so what what cat like what kind of makeup you using? >> is it like, maybe it's for his whole body? yeah, he's got something on skin care. >> i yeah. i've never heard of man spending this kind of money on skin care. wan, dude.t italia okay, i'm just going to half my husband's italian. >> i'm like, you have more your cabinet than i do. >> it's true. >> douso they lear you think? you know? do you think he's just bang in the makeup ladt bainy? >> what?ear ph have you seen her? did you see her photos? otyeah, hopefully.- well >> well, maybe he is a

understanding of especially black maternal mortality an understanding it is not just black women but a maternal itisyou are seeing maternal mortality deserts across the country. congress has seenjç a big workforce opportunity. republicans and democrats continue support as a way to support women and people who have just given birth and need that support. the united states of care hs been lookingunderstanding that o irth and getting pregnant also need that care and. sed a few different blueprints and a task report about specifically maternenalth gap that the united states ofpo. but you might not as much legislation passing in congress this are a lot of different appropriations opportunities for making sure we are the maternal health needs across the u.s. but see next year as well. natalie:■: about telehealth and what to expect. conor: i'll be super brief on this one, i promise. with respect to medicare telehealth, the core we continuously extend, there's no chance we do notyear. i know that the house out two y. i would likehave better than one year. i think it depend on budgeting at the endthat i love

judging everything else he's ever said about, the declaration of independence, he's specifical equal ity among human beings, that all human beings are equally endowed by their creator with the right to be alive, the right to be free and the right to pursue happiness and slavery has no parties. one 1854 's another one of these fragments. these little incomplete documents. he says, okay. want to justify slavery, it all right for you to enslave a fellow human being all because their skin is darker than yours? well, my skin started using and enslaved me. because you think they're nintelligent as. all right, well, lots of people are smarter than others. does that mean they have a right to enslave thosee. and finally, he gets to something that i thinkimportant to lincoln throughout his life which this idea that might doesn't make right. he says, oh, because you're more powerful. that's why you going to enslave this well you be careful because come along and enslave you. after serving in the state legislature for four straight terms in 1834 through 1842, lincoln eventually decided to get involv

that he can actually go in and take control of the legislative ity which is the fiscal.nore the sovereignrd laws and not be held accountable. that is where the grace cross-section of the republican party is here today. we cannot hold him than who can? if you look in the last couple of years like the last few the great invasion of the southern border of criminals hat countries from islamic fundamentalist countries that the great nation. it for far too long and this is a good attempts at bin us back into balance. and i think if we do not do thi. look at most of the time and coy we spent in congress is tryingaf bureaucracies and a presidential executive orders the parameters. helping get this accomplished because it sets based on something we have always had which is the constitution pay but in this administration it has not been held accountable with i yield to congressmen. >> thank you very much. thank you for allowing us to be he. i'm the mom of a babynd henry possibly the fourth of the best looking child born in the last 60 as a pouring and 30 for the most powerful memb

speech and related questions about race and gender and questions funding and questions about the neutral ity of the university. and it's been about an eighth month, an eight month labor of i can't say love, but of intense focus. overall, what is your take on the first amendment and free speech? well, i like them both. the idea that free speech is central to education and to the university, including receptivity toward protests that. people love or despise, receptivity toward freedom of speech. is to our country's central, to liberty under law, central to self-government, and central to respect for one another. in this book, the campus guide to our campus free a pocket guide, you write educaonal institutions distinctive, even unique theducational mission will require an assortment of restrict bans on speech. you can't run a college or university without imposing such restrictions. can you go a little deeper and explain that to us? can so the headline is free speech. exclamation point. free speech for all the the story underneath the headline emphasizes that if you're teaching course, let's sa

theodore roosevelt, i guess i could say i chose roosevelt, but really, hchose and i wanted to write iti'se in the these two years as and a cowboy where he recovered in nature from the depressiohe suffered the loss of of his wife and mother. and i knew, of course, of bambi and, connieedith. but they'd never been the central character of any book. they're always just in the supporting.or surrounding and so as i started to do my i found dous letters. i mean, everywhere i turned, bambi was giving political connie serving as the emotional outlet for this impulsive personality or mitty who's been history is absolutely in his life, is actually source of this resilience in anality. so i just i thought i was 20 years in media and when know you've got a story, you've got story i said this■2 told and i don't think that i've ever heard it off i. so it foundve to say, i stand te shoulders of some extraordinary before me. dr. dalton, who wrote for my money best single volume biography of theodore roosevelt a strenuous spent 40 years doing research on tr. her ph.d. was she opened up her home to me. shar

it is a congres cleaning on the roads and it is congress back and take ity. one other reform idea is for congress to cut their funding untime court agrees to submit to ethics rules getting funding from harlan crow that's another solution take. altogether there are lots of things the political the political branches won't do those things until they think dope votersdon't voters care enoupreme court to vote them oute of office based on the supreme court reform that is not what is happening on if you will come at but republicans on their side of they aisleave enjoyed for years for pretty much my entirey gain of voters motivedhe supreme court they decide. donald trump down the escalator mascara. and here's my supreme court list it is completely standard and normalt i am paint normal and nowonald trump.e brought to heel on the supreme courtbe because republican voters demandednd it. democrat our candidates are strong on the supreme court and that in short form as are the republicans have won the supreme court and why they are now in control for there is of democr

speech and related questions about race and gender and questions funding and questions about the neutral ity of the university. and it's been about an eighth month, an eight month labor of i can't say love, but of intense focus. overall, what is your take on the first amendment and free speech? well, i like them both. the idea that free speech is central to education and to the university, including receptivity toward protests that. people love or despise, receptivity toward freedom of speech. is to our country's central, to liberty under law, central to self-government, and central to respect for one another. in this book, the campus guide to our campus free a pocket guide, you write educational institutions dtinctive, even unique the educational mission will requi an assortment of restrict bans on speech. u can't run a collegor university without imposing such restrictions. can you go a little deeper and explain that to us? can so the headline is free speech. exclamation point. free speech for all the the story underneath the headline emphasizes that if you're teaching course, let's say on

everything else he's ever said about, the declaration of independence, he's specifically talking about equal ity among human beings, that all human beings are equally endowed by their creator with the right to be alive, the right to be free and the right to pursue happiness and slavery has no parties. one 1854. there's another one of these fragments. these little incomplete documents. he says, okay. want to justify slavery, huh? what do you think will make it all right for you to enslave a fellow human being all because their skin is darker than yours? well, my skin started using and enslaved me. because you think they're not as intelligent as. all right, well, lots of people are smarter than others. does that mean they have a right to enslave those people. and finally, he gets to something that i think is deeply important to lincoln throughout his life, which this idea that might doesn't make right. he says, oh, because you're more powerful. that's why you going to enslave this person. well, you be careful because someone more powerful may come along and enslave you. after serving in the state

i am monitoring ity closely.■u nothing would be more■o devastating.2 type action on the border. the border is a mess.■-■y >> is it exaggerating things to say be seeing something? >> we are, we -- threat. the nes you referenced. one minute until >> oven gets their patent i've >> tom from 24 the intelli■■nttee dou have conr about representative scott in general not having gentlemen but i think it is telling you got the chair and ranking on being concerned concerned. and i want to give of credit that they bring it back?o make the comparison we look so much better with thegain is good for the country but bad for intramural competitions. correction we work on the stuff investigation. there is no committee/v have to take more serious than the work you did. and it concerns me. do not knowt concerns me with a number of seni■ç■n republicans who sit ohy shsecurity. the things we committee the sources and methods and beyond play fast and loose with that would be devastating. we look at the committee we range the ideological spect■ th. trust. i realize how import

in a few days ti we will nato's, celebrity streth, ity and growth and also critically, forward to make sure nato is fit for purpose for the challenges ofmorrow. makinge alliance continues to do what it has done effectively for the last 75 years, protect our people. i think it's an opportunity as well to remind all of our citizens about the power of collective defense. the power of collective defense is the best way to prevent r aggression and war. at the heart of mate -- nato is a commitment from each ally to come to the dense of an ally that may be the victim of aggression and that■á means an aggressor consideringq[ action knows that if they pick a fight with one, they pick a fight with all. that's the most effective, powerful way to do what we all want to do, which is prevent war from occurring in the first place. these investments we are making in our defensive alliance are the best possible investments we can make in preventing conflict, avoiding conflict, deterring aggression. secretary general and i were together in prague with all of ago, working through key decisions ahead ofhe

>> thank you you have said the taxes are too high and unfollow admits question i think it will put ityt that and among friends here, did you reallynk that it would be a great. [inaudible]. >> thatat you can see what conservatives a a new test on the table which is unfunded and there's one lesson from list trough of what happens to the economy is that you make unfunded tax cuts, minute damages t p price. and i was in weeks ago during this campaign and think it should have it that was a paramedic and aife works in jewelry store and they both are house five years ago and they at f a fixed rate mortgage nafta gets. five years and hundreds of rather they can get us what that is hundreds of pounds more cannot afford it there■7 point out about this price to pay from funded u tax cuts and e see not supposed to will one thing that he was supposed to provide stability in areas and working people pay the price. [applause] [applause] >> to the last election i did not think that we would win election i do not think that we were in for the work that we have now done and rejected about the country an

iti will not be simplistic calculation more for them requires more for us.he second area of focus for our administration isreventing the spread of nuclear weapons and other strategic capabilities by strengthening the global nonproliferation regime extended deterrence about one of the great contributions to the nonproliferation regime. for decades u. security allies they do not need to develop nuclear weapons of their own to deter against the grace of threats they face. continued success of extended deterrence is not however a foregone conclusion. space ever increasing nuclear dimensional threats from russia, prc and north korea may worry about the credibility of our guarantees. under the president's leadership we are fully invested in strengthening our alliance system to ensure extended deterrence continue. the ductless united states and south korea is an example of her efforts to jointly approach nuclear sinners with her allies as equal partners. nay has taken steps to improve its capabilities, posture exercises and planning. this is work were advancing ahe

this does isuse of a second-guessing, the opportunite -- somehow your industry is penalized or yoo ityones, but pa for grabs. that means they can be challenged in front of the cour ask these justices do you agree this was the right regulation? this is the rht reading of the statute? that means that the certainty that we livend operate the health system or all those rules and decisions they make pursuant to them are no be relitigated over andbt over. michelle: these are areas where there been significant deference for decades leading on to a crywe have had these agencies. the idea being that these are in deeply vested, learned individuals that are hired into tse it's true that sometimes there is some political pt coming from industry who then become appointedies. that said, the bulk of those any are career, lifetimer types duals who work within these agencies, learned, educ p the i's, cross the t's, and then review the rerds th a from these various organizations, thg then about the second-guessing, i the time that we are in. it's not as if we have oh, this is just been a part of how ind

response to a emancipation not unlike the poles and italians and others, was to reclaim national sovereign ity without awaiting divine intervention. main impulse for its founding, the zionismo expected that by removing the -- from where they wand normalizing their political status, they would end antisemitism. in this alone, zionism was greatly mistaken. although the recovery of israel gave the --d self-defense once they mastered it. organizing politics against the -- in their homeland proved to be even moreal effective than it had been against them in dispersion. the arab league was founded in 1945 as an anti zionist league with all the familiar functing finger console of dating, the arab muslim unity against a common target, and of course from the daunting- of modernization, that all these regimes and their leaders faced. conquest is to islam, as coexistence is to judaism creating the familiar for political complementarity between the desi<re hegemony expansion. on the one side, and the need . muslims knew -- as subject and they expected them to stay that way. in the 1950s common opposition

until 2008, in a case called heller that wasstice scalia, ity militias tt rights. not the second amendment to protect the individual right t@ube the court said you can have pistols in your home for self-defense, but it's really expanded dramatically b i agree, there's a misunderstanding somehow and a mythology that the second amendment has this umbrella right that supersedes other interests and rights in the consti■rtution■y. it's just not true historically, and it's not true under the case law of the supreme court. host: henry in georgia on our line for republicans. good question? hi there, we'll try to get henry back next up, we'll hear from huntersville, north carolina, on our line for democrat caller: yes, good morning, than. my question is, if every current legal issue that the judges are handling is subject to aion tesy rulinging that was ruled on longí ago, and if it's never been ruled on befor w issues get added to the history and tradion lis for ruling? when does history that's my question. thank you. host: thanks for your call. guest: it's an excellent qu

sometimes in a small town there is one large factory that is a primary employer and that is a ity.health industry, i think any industry has opportunity to do these partnerships because it is an opportunity tomessagero part of that community. on the health side, we all learned a lot with covidne of the most exciting ones we did with university of washington cdc, covid tests and the validation work t able to quickly give to public make the right policy decisions and figure out how to incorporate that into ■tsin the early days of the pandemic, seattle was one of■b e early hotspots of covid. ócone of the early cases was ina nursing home there. we quickly started to run out of ppe health system or provider to half to put on a down to do every covid test was not sustainable at a national level and we had many one calls with cdc and other federal agencies, the white house, a we do as a company very quickly because of our reach and s ■y■ scale where we can act fast in partnership and stae samples.validation workwere cols we took data within 10 days and start to get there early sector to ma

i believe that our alliance is stronger than iti alliance is stronger than it was before.th war and security in europe but as well as economic and technological cooperation is growing. there are many things we can do together in the field and the effort to do that. trade talks have stalled and there has not been any activity towards an agreement for many years now. trade and technology council achieved results. first of all on technology, we got an agreement and a memorandum for understanding with semiconductors. we even have an institutional cooperation with the ai office in europe and the ai safety office here. so many things are happening. issues like technology, it is a competitive field but on the other hand it has many challenges, for personal data, for how we will approach and how ourjobs will be changed in those challenges are beyond the borders. one country cannot deal with those issues alone so cooperation is important and we are moving in the right direction.— are moving in the right direction. ~ ., ~' are moving in the right direction. ~ ., ~ ., direction. woul

this morning the staff gathered to discuss how to ity programs . our objective is to make it easier to work for americans erwho have a disability and want to work again. when i talk to those with disabilities they constantly say they want to contribute to their community and work in the private e laws that are on the books today when it comes to work and social security are a bureaucratic , suffocating, mindless straitjacket that makes it almost eligibility for benefits so i'm esal able to say that here on the panel today this has been a bipartisan talk and i'd like to recognize senators brown, casey and cassidy in particular . those three are a very str, cuts through all this byzantine redtape . they want to on a bipartisan basis help americans security . principle here and that is social security is to provide americans security and dignitita stern benefit, something they contribute to out of each paycheck but for too many cially those with a disability, dignity has fallen by the wayside because of these barriers when they are attempting to work.

assistance or nato assistance, but suddenly government that would be full knowing that -- if i may put itis supporting ukraine both in terms of amount of equipment in terms of being at the forefront of this debate as president macron did a few >> emma, your thoughts on domestic politics on the issue. >> i was sorely not venture to predict the french election, but question of support foraine is as camille says is not necessarily drivingelectrodynamics today. but a think we should probably take a step back and consider whether the decision made over the last couple of years have helped to bring the story are today. i think the economic space is perhaps the most notable here. much of the economic doldrums anti-vax that we are seeing in western europe, some of it is some of it is to do with decoupling from russian oil and gas and some totally unrelated to cope global factors. but the war in ukraine has played a role in worsening the economic situation in western europe. vultures react to at home here as well we know that. departments that doesn'trovide any answer going for because that cake is

and she pounds on the lunch table and goes, we did ití# befe and we can do it again.for me. so that was the spirit of bletchley park. here you the group of women working. there were some men working there too. but the majority were women. and in the lower right corner, what were they working on? the enigma machine. i fool around with an enigma machine before you ever y lift one up. make certain eaten your wheaties it's like gold. it may look small. excuse me. small. porbleypewriter or. it's heavy is led. the germans témhought, ey were unbreakable. but as you would see in the movie, the imitation game[ came out in 2014. again, a superior british movie. i hate to think what it would look like if hollywood did it and see. of course, their focus is on alan turing. but there were a huge amount of women working there day and night doing this. now we will come to mr. churchill's special operations executive for war heroes of suite. and that book came out a numr of years ago. so you may have to go to ebay to pick it up. the first lady here on your left is violet, and i'm goin

so let me say time in which things can be so dark, ity ówhen we can see the light of the moon and theith those beautiful words, joining me in thanking erin, elizabeth, and michele. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2024] >> tonight, a look at nato's future and the potential for further european expansion. watc the entire event for the council on foreign relations at 9:00 p. eastern oniq-span. also available on the free c-span now videopp c-span.org. ♪ >> on thursday, tune in to the s the two presumptive former president donald trump and president biden face off to earn your vote in november. our coverage begins 8:00 p.m. easternwhat's to come. then at 9:00 p.m. eastern, our simulct ■÷ the

ity. came in one day and said, you need a jukebox. and put■ the records on and the whole bit. peter: this is the. ali: no, i'e original, it's close. mr. demczuk:remaining jukebox ot and one of the few in washington, d.c. when you street and the door opens and soul music is bing street, and you lh that window and you see the chili dogs a hcharring, and thea whiff of that smellou smell it,n you hear the music, you want to come in. you want to come in. this is a place to be. peter: jackson, george w. bush, hillary west, french president nicholas are cozy, dick gregory, and in january of 2009, had a special guest come in here o was that? msali: former president obama. his very first outing in washington after he was elected president. and just a short time before his auration. he came to in washington right here. you see the seal, and that is the picture. he came with theyor at that time and it was a delightful surprise. peter: you did not know in advance? ms. ali: no. were you working that day? ms. ali: yes, i waso it, the secret service