0
0.0
Dec 23, 2023
12/23
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a lot there, jeff rosen. jeff: the answer is, yes, he almost took a perverse pleasure in upholding laws that he did not like. we talked about those free-speech cases where he was so contemptuous of the puny, foolish simpletons who misguided lee embrace communists, which he very much repudiated. or the loeffler case was also a perverse irony. he said the 14th amendment doesn't enacthe social status, but he himself is in enthusiastic social darwinist who has contempt for the minimum wage laws, which he thinks are meant to protect the interest of labor, but unlikely to be effective. in that sense, it's such a good question because it raises the question of pragmatists, as the question suggests. might suggest what he thought the right answer was in every case based on good policy. but for homes, pragmatism led him not to do that. basically to say that was a decision for other people unless the legislators are transgressing, clearly articulating constitutional rights that everyone would embrace and it would uphold
a lot there, jeff rosen. jeff: the answer is, yes, he almost took a perverse pleasure in upholding laws that he did not like. we talked about those free-speech cases where he was so contemptuous of the puny, foolish simpletons who misguided lee embrace communists, which he very much repudiated. or the loeffler case was also a perverse irony. he said the 14th amendment doesn't enacthe social status, but he himself is in enthusiastic social darwinist who has contempt for the minimum wage laws,...
0
0.0
Dec 25, 2023
12/23
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a lot there, jeff rosen.f: the answer is, yes, he almost took a perverse pleasure in upholding laws that he did not like. we talked about those free-speech cases where he was so contemptuous of the puny, foolish simpletons who misguided lee embrace communists, which he very much repudiated. or the loeffler case was also a perverse irony. he said the 14th amendment doesn't enact the s status, but he himself is in enthusiastic social darwinist who has contempt for the minimum wage laws, which he thinks are meant to protect the interest of labor, but unlikely to be effective. in that sense, it's such a good question because it raises the question of pragmatists, as the question suggests. might suggest what he thought the right answer was in every case based on good policy. but for homes, pragmatism led him not to do that. basically to say that was a decision for other people unless the legislators are transgressing, clearly articulating constitutional rights that everyone would embrace and it would uphold a whol
a lot there, jeff rosen.f: the answer is, yes, he almost took a perverse pleasure in upholding laws that he did not like. we talked about those free-speech cases where he was so contemptuous of the puny, foolish simpletons who misguided lee embrace communists, which he very much repudiated. or the loeffler case was also a perverse irony. he said the 14th amendment doesn't enact the s status, but he himself is in enthusiastic social darwinist who has contempt for the minimum wage laws, which he...
0
0.0
Dec 8, 2023
12/23
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jeff rosen? >> i don't know there will be. from the thieves, i'm sure.the end of the day, our police officers need to be able to do their jobs, and sometimes we have laws that get in the way. and i don't think there's any violation of civil liberties here to ask someone to prove that a bunch of catalytic converters they're carrying around were actually purchased. we also have to keep working on the resale market, really cracking down on those shops that are selling catalytic converters. they should know their supply chain. they should know where they're coming from and not be purchasing stolen goods. so we're going to be keep focusing there as well. >> i'm curious to see the data on the thefts in the next 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. thanks for your time. appreciate it. >> thanks for having me, raj. >>> it is a somber day in the united states. today marks 82 years since the attack on pearl harbor. if you're in the east bay, you might have spotted this beacon of light atop mount diablo. it's part of the remembrance ceremony honoring lives lost in th
jeff rosen? >> i don't know there will be. from the thieves, i'm sure.the end of the day, our police officers need to be able to do their jobs, and sometimes we have laws that get in the way. and i don't think there's any violation of civil liberties here to ask someone to prove that a bunch of catalytic converters they're carrying around were actually purchased. we also have to keep working on the resale market, really cracking down on those shops that are selling catalytic converters....
0
0.0
Dec 7, 2023
12/23
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he would not have around him the kinds of people like pat cipollone, for example, jeff rosen, rich donoghue, the people who actually stopped him from doing even more damage this last time around. >> but do you think having their licenses to practice law taken away, do you think these slaps on the wrist they've gotten is enough? do you think there need to be more serious charges? >> i think it's very important -- you know, we've looked at what the department of justice, how they began their investigations around january 6th. they began with, you know, in some ways the foot soldiers. they began with the people who invaded the capitol. and i think it's very important that they now have expanded that, that that's got to go all the way up to the top. accountability is really crucially important. without accountability for everybody including donald trump, including those lawyers around him, those others around him who helped him with his plot to overturn the election, without that accountability you can be confident this is going toe happen again and again. >> i think it's very likely that in a
he would not have around him the kinds of people like pat cipollone, for example, jeff rosen, rich donoghue, the people who actually stopped him from doing even more damage this last time around. >> but do you think having their licenses to practice law taken away, do you think these slaps on the wrist they've gotten is enough? do you think there need to be more serious charges? >> i think it's very important -- you know, we've looked at what the department of justice, how they...
0
0.0
Dec 1, 2023
12/23
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump considered firing the attorney general jeff rosen and replace him with clark in order tosehe departmentstice to steal the election. this was a perry, trump, clark, plot. peru is a focus of the january six investigation, when she must've subpoenaed 88 nord. last summer the fbi seized perry's phone, and jack smith has also sought information from perry since he took over the federal investigation. a new court filing that case has revealed a slew of damning text messages when congressman perry said to jeffrey clark and many others in the trump orbit in the wake of the 2020 election. in the midst of the effort to elevate clark to top of the doj where he could set up that letter saying the department of justice doesn't know if the ballots are legit, perry texted him, quote, you are the man, i have confirmed it. god does what he does for a reason. between the end of december in january 5th, 2021, congressman perry also texted former doj colleague and embraced a plan to hava vice president mike pence, quote, at admit testimony prior to the counting of electoravos on january six. pre-agreed to
trump considered firing the attorney general jeff rosen and replace him with clark in order tosehe departmentstice to steal the election. this was a perry, trump, clark, plot. peru is a focus of the january six investigation, when she must've subpoenaed 88 nord. last summer the fbi seized perry's phone, and jack smith has also sought information from perry since he took over the federal investigation. a new court filing that case has revealed a slew of damning text messages when congressman...
0
0.0
Dec 11, 2023
12/23
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> >> i'm jeff rosen, the district attorney of santa clara county.fice prosecutes sexual assault. >> i've sentenced people convicted of sexual assault. >> vote no recall of judge persky. >> judge persky's bias is a threat to the rule of law. >> the idea of racial bias. >> laws against sexual violence mean nothing of the judges who enforce them are biased like judge persky. >> there is an effort to say no, this wasn't a one-off, this is a pattern with him. >> so they cherry pick five cases out of the hundreds and hundreds of cases over ten years. >> in these cases we're all plea bargains. >> these are situations where the prosecution and the defense reached an agreement on the sentence. i think those are much different than the kind of case we have with brock turner. >> the judge, the role we play, we get presented the plea bargain. and if the plea bargain is not violent if of the law, we approve the plea bargains. now sometimes judges bust a plea, but it rarely happens, because it's a deal. >> the guardian, they do this big story it says, raul ramire
. >> >> i'm jeff rosen, the district attorney of santa clara county.fice prosecutes sexual assault. >> i've sentenced people convicted of sexual assault. >> vote no recall of judge persky. >> judge persky's bias is a threat to the rule of law. >> the idea of racial bias. >> laws against sexual violence mean nothing of the judges who enforce them are biased like judge persky. >> there is an effort to say no, this wasn't a one-off, this is a pattern...
0
0.0
Dec 23, 2023
12/23
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
thank you, jeff. democracy. well, good morning constitutional principles, ideas for 100. alex, what what is the constitution in mary building you start yeah i this is something i find i spend a lot of time with my talking about is the fact our constitution our notion of a constitution was kind of new genre right is a new idea that you could have a piece of paper and you could write down on that piece of paper. the frame of government and in the period that the framers were working with in 1787, that idea was in transition. so people had begun to write down on pieces of paper charters. they were in england, they were state constitutions what they wanted a frame of government be, what rights they wanted, but no one yet had really begun to think. that was the constitution and. so in this period we see people talking the instrument, the piece of paper and the constitution as the body of government and over time, particularly after ratification, after the new government set up after the supreme starts interpreting what the constitution means. those two concepts, the piece of p
thank you, jeff. democracy. well, good morning constitutional principles, ideas for 100. alex, what what is the constitution in mary building you start yeah i this is something i find i spend a lot of time with my talking about is the fact our constitution our notion of a constitution was kind of new genre right is a new idea that you could have a piece of paper and you could write down on that piece of paper. the frame of government and in the period that the framers were working with in 1787,...
0
0.0
Dec 19, 2023
12/23
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
, and jay rosen, professor of journalism at new york university thanks for joining us.final edition of this year is from front to back, all about the stakes of the second trump term. why did you do that? >> i don't want to participate in the normalization of extremism. i thought it would be important before the primary season starts to put in one place, one package a reminder to people of all of the different manifestations of trump ideology and trumpism as kind of a warning. what i did was, we asked a group of writers, many of whom had been covering trump since 2015 at least, i asked them to simply tell me what you think will happen the second time around. it is not totally predictive because trump says things out loud. he is telling us that he is an authoritarian. he is telling us that he will have a revenge threat. he is telling us these things and he says it so often that we tend to ignore it. it is a seeming contradiction, that he is saying to us so frequently that he is going to be a dictator now that it becomes background noise. i think there is a danger in that.
, and jay rosen, professor of journalism at new york university thanks for joining us.final edition of this year is from front to back, all about the stakes of the second trump term. why did you do that? >> i don't want to participate in the normalization of extremism. i thought it would be important before the primary season starts to put in one place, one package a reminder to people of all of the different manifestations of trump ideology and trumpism as kind of a warning. what i did...