starr and minor pointed out to me yesterday, it wasn't the only the new york times which what with that systematic rates or reuse, also the british guardians. and right now the british car has to have low. they don't want to be reminded of what they did when the time spots do that story. and then turn the upper middle of packing paper and i read it. i'm always there. as i said, i'm a forensic scholar. i'm curious about governance and it was a very strange thing. first i called to say, because it's all what it was. she says, i'm not an investigator. this is not an investigative body, but there she says, i'm analyzing the evidence. i'm verifying the evidence. i'm reaching not just you know, um uh, if you know, human rights supports human rights supports are supposed to be preliminary tool, full fledged investigation. and so the why would you always use is reasonable grounds to wait. that's the maximum. typically a human rights report will go we have reasonable grounds to believe this that and that, but they never make state anything more because they haven't carried out a full fledged leg