the meeting of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court elected judges olga stupakrhiy pogribny to the grand chamber for a term of three years. according to the estimates of the foundation's experts, there are appointed judges. unscrupulous, according to the conclusion of the public integrity council, the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income, and the judge allegedly deliberately understated the value of the purchased real estate in the declaration. olga stupak assured that she bought 10 acres of land in kyiv, allegedly for uah 149,000, and a new house with an area of ​​380 m2 and 13 acres of land near kyiv, svykrusa managed to buy it for almost three times less than the market value. from the conclusion of the public. integrity councils, in particular, unconfirmed sources of income for the acquisition by the candidate of a house with an area of ​​380 m2 and a plot of land of 0.13 hectares under it, which are located in the village of stoyanka, kyiv-svitoshyn district, kyiv region. according to data from real estate sites, the market value o

izovito vakim is the judge of the maidan., it passed a decision to ban peaceful gatherings in support of euromaidan in kharkiv. at first, the judge banned peaceful actions from november 26 to 29 , 2013, and the very next day she banned protest actions indefinitely. the previous composition of the high council of justice recognized that the judge had violated the rules of procedural law, but exempted her from punishment due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. judge olena izovitova vakim has a lot of property, the appearance of which it is difficult to explain with income, and not only her, but also her children, who at the minimum salary became owners of expensive cars. mother of judge lidia izovitova, head of the national association of lawyers of ukraine and associate of putin's godfather, viktor medvedchuk. the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office sent an indictment to the court against volodymyr serdynskyi, judge of the brovyr city district court of the kyiv region. it will be recalled that serdynsk

judge. requests this notification about interference in the activity of a judge regarding the administrationice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice, council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. the decision on closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the general the prosecutor and director of the dbr. regarding the verification of the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. the members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigations to the need to observe the guarantees of the independence of judges and to maintain them. justice during investigative actions. the council of justice will also contact the judicial security service to ensure the personal safety of judge yulia ivanina and her family members. we will remind, on january 11, the meeting of ju

so if he goes there with the judge, you are saying the judge is not going to tolerate nonsense.is the response then look like? what are the potential consequences? >> they may remove him from the fans. you don't have to allow this individual to testify and he's violated rules of the court. now, i think people say whoa, -- contempt or find him. i know you'd have to be really bad to find a witness for holding a contempt of court, but you just kick him off and say -- >> could kicking him off held an appeal? >> no because the defendant would have violated the rules of the court. now, if it were a criminal case and a defendant really said that this is necessary for me to be able to zealously advocate on my behalf and the judge didn't allow it, then of course, you have a much better chance of an appeal. but here in a civil case, where the guy doesn't have to be in the court in the first place, doesn't have to begin a right to testify, he's being given a favor by this judge. now the judge, it's not really going to -- the case. >> let's bring in our kristen holmes, we've been tracking t

judge? >> judge jeanine: you get that tall thing and you fry a turkey in it. i would never recommend anyone do that. >> greg: that's a good one. >> sandra: i thought of the cooking one. i tried to make pralines last week. has everyone made a homemade praline? difficult and i regret it. i spend so much time and they never harden. >> greg: why can't you just buy the praline? it is a nut, right? >> sandra: some things are better homemade. >> greg: you can make your own>g nut? >> jesse: how do you do it? >> greg: i don't make nuts. something you've donege that? yu would discourage others from doing? let's see... >> jesse: working in television? [laughs] >> greg: i'm going to go withit going on tiktok. tik there you go, kids. stay off of tiktok. what is the most frightening dream you remember?. judge? >> judge jeanine: don't we all have the same dream that if you actually die froom im it you are really dead? the dream i keep having is thata i'm fighting witth people that s had enough credits to g

judge? >> judge jeanine: i'm not looking. >> dana: why? >> judge jeanine: i'm pro bidet. >> jessica: you don't bidet out. you just go. >> judge jeanine: eat them in moderation like oreo cookies. >> tyrus: have you ever eaten oreos in moderation judge? just so you know i live next door to you. >> judge jeanine: never, ever. aoc said stop eating hamburgers, you stop eating hamburgers. >> what happens if you take food away from judge jeanine. >> dana perino eats her salad with her fingers. she does. she actually eats like crumbled feta cheese with her fingers. >> it's five years. five years with the forks there. >> what a great forking story. >> jesse: i've seen what it looks like, grab something dana, with your fingers, show us how you did it. >> dana: i just picked it up like that. i was in a hurry. >> jesse: we're doing a lot of wheels on the bus ♪ the wheels on the bus go round and round -- everybody -- round and round. and then you go the wipers on the bus go swish swish swish ♪ >> jesse: don't go chasing waterfalls. ♪ >> jesse: is it going to be forever or will it go d

. >> a pre-judge panel from the d.c. circuit judge oral arguments in the u.s. trump, for his alleged role in trying toveurn the 2020 presidential election and the january 6 capitol attack. hour. >> united states of america versus donald j. trump. [indiscernible] >> good morning. before you get started can i just get a couple of things the record. our jurisdti was challenged ami. >> i do want to spea to you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. so even though yo believe there is jurisctn with respect to the collateral orderoctrine, how do you place that in line withhe asphalt case which ecically says in a criminal case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the constitution or the explicit as well in statutory law? >> we havehr responses. if y look at the language that justice scalia discussed, a siatn where the right is one, the legal and practical value would be destrod and these claims of absolute munity falls within tt discrimination- >> explicitly stating that and don't have communication with anything in the statute

the commission of judges made a decision on his transfer to the position of judge ochakiv city district of mykolaiv region. he did not agree with such a career turn and successfully appealed the decision of the bkks. thus, ivaneshchuk managed to work for another 2.5 years in a non-existent judge and receive a salary without administering justice. on august 20, 2019, the supreme council of justice dismissed him. during the time of the judiciary, andriy ivaneshchuk and his family were able to build and renovate. not only this luxurious estate. as of 2017, the former judge also owned a five-room apartment of 267 m2, also in the center kherson his mother had another house, an office, non-residential premises. anatoly ivaneshchuk, who managed to avoid prison, also had elite real estate. the current whereabouts of this large successful family is unknown. according to the sources of most, they probably left for crimea at the beginning of the occupation. southern ukraine. the security service of ukraine and the national anti-corruption bureau exposed a corruption scheme in the belgorod-dniester

you think of this judge, judge chutkan who received threats, prosecutors, the d.a.fulton county, fani willis and her staff have been threatened. jack smith and his staff have been threatened. it's a pattern you cannot ignore. trump puts out the word, somebody out there will act on it. and it's eminently predictable and it's a sad state that we're in. brynn mentioned the gag order. it's important to talk about, this judge issued a very, very narrow gag order. he actually, the only thing trump is not allowed to talk about is judge engoron's staff. this was a case where trump was talking about the law clerk. but this is the risk. this is what judges are trying to balance. you do have to respect someone's first amendment rights but not at the risk of the safety of the people involved. >> that's a balance that a judge should never have to consider, that measures should be made with the concern of family. these threats, this violence against the judiciary, especially in the past couple years, we all remember the judge whose child was murdered at her front door. we heard f

first and foremost is the judge. while the judge found them liable for fraud, he's considering other charges and there's the question of penalties. we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties. also on the line is trump's ability to do business in new york. it's not just about money. it's about identity. it's about his personal brand, which is why he's shown up here so many times. the political argument is more for the court of public opinion. the judge knows the facts. he knows the documents. he won't be swayed by that. chris kise talking to his client, the judge and the electorate. >> the very first thing in the closing art was to make the claim this was all political. >> absolutely. ellie and caroline, weigh in on this. i scribbled it down as paula was reporting, this entire case is a manufactured case to serve a political agenda, first words out of chris kise's mouth. >> two things can be true at once. yes, donald trump inflated the value of his assets, by a lot. that's been established. there

each chamber has two judges. in fact, the board. it is impossible, and they involve the criminal chamber, civil, civil, criminal, so-and-so, how long they will last, let's say, it is unknown, in this state and in this mode of operation. only 13 judges work in the kharkiv court of appeal out of 60 positions by state. in the largest kyiv court of appeals, out of 145 judges by staff, 70 are missing. the higher qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges. in the appellate courts next fall. the competition has already started for 550 vacant positions judges, more than 200 candidates apply. the largest number of applicants for a position in the general court of appeals is 912. the least in the commercial court of appeals is 183. the meeting of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court elected judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny to the grand chamber for a term of three years. for the eyes. we experts of the foundation appointed judges a

the judge, denied. deputy clerk, should i get the jury now? the judge, sure. judge lewis kaplan knows every move the trump lawyers have made and are going to make an rules on their stunts immediately with one word rulings like denied. later, trump co-counsel alina habba moved for a mistrial because e. jean carroll testified that she deleted some of the death threats that she received. attorney hala, your honor, at this moment i feel i have to ask for a mistrial. the witness has just admitted to deleting evidence herself, which are part of her claim of damages. and i haven't seen them. she has no evidence of them. she hasn't turned them over. the judge, denied. the jury had already seen plenty of death threats thid no. attorney habba insisted that e. jean carroll was not suffering because of donald trump's attacks on her and that in fact she enjoys the attention. question, at some level you enjoy this attention? answer, no. e. jean carroll's attorney objects to that question, and then the judge overruled the objection, and then e. jean carroll says this is not

add ask judge chutkan this.were probing different ideas, none of which was in lockstep with what chutkan said. there are two reasons it matters. depending on how they decide, even if they were unanimous, and you could see concurrence from judge henderson, if they were unanimously could affect the prospects for a remand, and remand might entail a subsequent round of appeals under the remanded standard by trump and a little bit more delay. it also could affect whether the supreme court takes review. so that lower level, there was some drama. i think people were basically not confident about the way in which the panel, the panel will reject his claim. they will do it quickly. the exact rationale is a little bit uncertain, i'd say. >> i just be clear on the definition of a rebound, remained is when an appellate sends it back down one level and they say we are going to put -- we want you to reassess this issue, but with these sort of parameters. and you heard jack smith attorney say, no, no, no, that's a terrible ide

judges of ukraine.andidate for the european union, ukraine fulfilled four of the seven criteria required by the council of the eu to maintain its status. in particular. the reform has been fully implemented in terms of conducting competitions for judicial governance bodies, the supreme council of justice and the supreme qualification commission of judges have been updated with the participation of international experts, and while the judicial system is being rebooted to meet the high international standards of justice, ukrainian power structures operate according to the old schemes, by force. last week the staff the state bureau of investigation raided the dnipro district court of kyiv, without any reason. which court decision: urgent search in connection with an urgent case, namely related to saving property. no court decision authorizing such a search has been given to anyone. there was no, they came without a court order, er, the law requires a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the

>>> the judge in the second e.g. king -- e jean carroll trial is threatening to kick trump out of the courtroom. what trump said that triggered the warning and the response. >>> the biden administration designates the houthis as a terrorist group following numerous attacks in the red sea. this comes as iran launched new missile strikes. what we are learning from a top iran in official. >>> we will be joined by dr. to talk to us about the major inflection in this country when it comes to weight. what we are learning about shifting attitudes when it comes to bodies and health and the obsession with new weight- loss drugs. we are following these developing stories and more coming in right here. >> thank you for joining us. we are tracking federal court developments in new york city. that is where the former president, donald trump is right now. he may not be there much longer because the judge threatened to kick him out. trump attended the second e. jean carroll civil defamation trial, this is the first he has attended

i take note of the solemn declarations made by judge ad hoc was to indicate and judge as act the rock in order to clear them duly installed. as judges ad hoc, in the case concerning application of the convention and the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in the gaza strip south africa versus israel. i shall now recall the principal steps of the procedure and present case on 29 december 2023. the government of south africa filed in the registry of the court, an application instituting proceedings against the state of israel, alleging violations by the matter of its obligations. under the 1948 convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide, i shall refer to this convention as the genocide convention. to found the jurisdiction of the court, south africa invokes article $36.00 paragraph, one of the statute of court. and article 9 of the genocide convention, south africa states that its applications concerns acts threaten, adopted, condoned taken and being taken by the government and military of israel against the palestinian people. a distinct nationa

it happens to judges at the highest levels, as well., a man was arrested near supreme court justice brett kavanaugh's maryland home, carrying things like a gun, a knife, and zip ties. while in recent weeks, two officials overseeing cases against former president donald trump have been targeted by swatting incidents. >> one of the big fears in all these swatting cases is when you take a tactical s.w.a.t. team to a house and believe that somebody's being held, shot, whatever it might be, they're going to go there in a pretty aggressive way because they want to save lives. >> juju: those threats can range from menacing but distant, to present and deadly. >> i know that i'm going to strive every morning to be the best person that i can be. my son gave his life for his father and i. >> juju: this judge's son, daniel, was tragically killed when he was 20 years old. >> we struggled to have a baby. i had four miscarriages, three before him, one after him. from the moment that little boy came to this world, he was the center of our universe. >>

>> good evening, judge.sident biden's under water approval ratings and voter anxiety about his age have reportedly pushed the campaign to have the 81-year-old president stop competing with himself, where he is losing, and start competing with trump. or as one aide told cnn, quote: it's about when to go full hitler when the leading republican candidate's speeches and actions go so far that the biden team goes all the way to a direct comparison to the nazi leader rather than saying their attacks parroted him. hope that the memory of trump bring voters back into the fold show him sliding among constituencies that elected him to office including black, hispanic, and young voters that effort was supposed to start on saturday, the three year anniversary of january 6th. because ever a weekend know storm it will start tomorrow at the site where george washington led the continental army and the fight for american freedom. biden will decry trump as a threat to democracy it. seems like the president will we've that to

to add ask judge chutkan this. they were probing different ideas, none of which was in lockstep with what chuck and said. there are two reasons it matters. depending on how they decide, even if they were unanimous, and you could see it concurring with judge henderson, if they were unanimously could affect the prospects for a remand, and remand might entail a subsequent round of appeals under the remanded standard by trump and a little bit more delay. and also could, affect whether the supreme court takes review. so that lower level, there was some drama. i think people were basically not confident about the way in which the panel, the panel will reject his claim. mildew a quickly. the exact rationale is a little bit uncertain, i would say. >> just to be clear on the technical renowned meaning. it's when the appellate court sends it back down one level. they say we want to reassess this issue but with these parameters. you heard jack smith's attorney say no, that's a terrible idea, let's not open that can of worms.

judge henderson: how about -- mr. pearce: if you don't -- there lot of different ways this court could not decide t way. i think to pick up on my response to judge childs, we certainly behind our view in the that some substantial number of allegations fall outside of an outerimeter. that i think is enough to affirm. ihink either party are urging court at that point to send the case back to the district urt. i think that would create a series of challenging questions that i mentioned earlier. re the evidentiary theories under which that evidence potentially come in? it wouldr strong view, if the court followt route, which we urge the court not to, to make it clear immunity is an of off switch. this is the immunity appeal. if the court says affirm, we send it back, there is no munity, then other things become evidentiary questions or questions of jury instructions, which anyl is then an appeal from the final judgment if any final judgment. judge child: the immunity defense is never lost? mr. pearce: i don't think it's i

judge doljko acquitted him. minister of themis justified his decision by the fact that the laws of ukraine and the decrees of the president on mobilization and martial law, which are called so-called in the verdict, are allegedly author's works. the so-called laws of ukraine, which are legitimized under the guise of laws, are author's works, have no constitutional basis, are not laws in essence, are not binding for... the people are offers from an entity that provides public administration services. these normative acts have the status of being applied, and are not legally valid legislation. in addition, judge dolshko called the ministry of defense of ukraine a private company, referring to the fact that the department has an identification code of a legal entity. he also called the cabinet of ministers a private company. the judge claims that... the ukrainian government is owned by a private foreign company, citing foreign registries. also, the judge believes that territorial staffing centers do not have the ri

so that same provision applies to judges ad hoc, before inviting judge most advocate and judge for us to make their solemn declarations . i shall 1st, in accordance with custom, say a few words about their careers and qualifications. judge dick on ernest most n k of south african nationality has had a distinguished career as a judge. law practitioner, an academic actor, obtaining degrees in english, political science and law from the university of south africa practice. as an attorney and an advocate with the pretoria bar in 22001, he was appointed to judge on the high court in pretoria. and a year later, he became a judge on the constitutional court of south africa, where he was deputy chief justice for more than a decade and acting chief justice in 202-013-2014 judge. most seneca is also an honorary professor in the department of jurisprudence at the university of pretoria and to serve as a chancellor of the pretoria technicom and the university of vic. about this time in your hands for judgment syndicate has received numerous honorary doctorates and awards. i shall now say a few wo

was complaining to the judge about hearing him say these things and the judge says, mr.mp has the right to be present, that right can be forfeited and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive, which what has been reported to me consist of him if he disregards court order, donald trump, i don't have too! -- i hope i do not have to exclude you. donald trump threw his hands up in response and the judge says, i understand you're probably eager for me to do that and it is pretty amazing what donald trump replied. >> the reply from donald trump to the judge threatening him, to kick him out of the room, donald trump saying, i would love it. the judge saying, i know you would, you cannot control yourself in the circumstance. the parties left the courtroom for lunch. >> that spring back in misty marris. drama playing out in the courtroom. they are taking lunch, maybe cooler heads will prevail, maybe they won't what you think of this moment in court? >> i thought the judge had done the light tap on the wrist, fall short of an admonishment as we discussed, reacting and the over-the-

he was our no to charles worth. brent judge at half percent against judge said attend a judge at hawk brock by 15 votes to to the state of israel, shall submit a report to the court on all measures taken to give effect to this order within one month. as from the date of the order in favor, president donahue, vice president of oregon, judges tonka, are behind the noun uses to a bundari. robinson said usaa no to charlesworth, brant, judge ad hoc the syndicate against judge. so attend a judge at hawk rock. i shall now call upon the registrar to read the operative part of the order in french stuff, so much ease like goals and deep limits. you'll also about 12 see the backgrounds work on put the diesel as well informed them also because showing me uncle bone with the toyota corvell shown for the place on showing. definitely put sound became degeneracy, calling to a to team. as you also provide up with placing the other commission, i don't go include the police danielle duke as a the to tech don't hold on your phone. that because you don't do enough to clue to level show all busty created.

judge childs: let me ask you. how does it either -- judge henderson: how does it bind us? mr.earce: it formally has no application at all because very early on if the opinio the court says we are nling with any questions about immunity in the criminal context. i tend to agree with my friend on the other side in many respects it does reinforce the nature of the fitzgerald civil perimeter standard. it says you don't look at intent or you don't look at purpose, context plays a more important role thacontent of communications. i think the signt change is the acknowledgement looking at a president whether that president is acting in his or he as office seeker or office holder. again, to go back to my resp to judge childs' question, may change the nature of whethe certain things are or are not official acts indictment, paradigm to use.at's the wrong we think -- that would inconsistent with fitzgerald's reasoning. also just irreconcilable with nature how criminal law works. ay we are not going to take into account the motive or intent, there are plenty of acts every day. for example,

. >> judge jeanine: a judge trusted his girlfriend's best friend to marriage proposal.raccoon came to see what the commotion was all about. by the the time the camera comes back. embracing. fortunately somebody else was recording. they were able to laugh it off. >> happens all the time in my shoots. just kidding. >> this is going to be a great show. michelle tafoya, trace, trace gallagher. i would like a trace gallagher. kat timpf and tyrus, that's tonight, 10:00 p.m. >> jessica: want to make sure dana gets. in announcement. i'll going to los angeles doing real time with bill maher on friday. out all of next week for all of you who despise me. >> jesse: good luck, that will be fun to watch. >> a little shih tzu. broke out of his yard one snowy night to the horror of his owner jenny. posted a message on facebook. don't worry we found him at the bar. down at the local bar and he was all set. his name is bear. and he is fine. >> judge jeanine: did he know how to go there because she took him there all the time? >> jesse: always find a bear at the bar, right, brett? >> bret

lyudmila soltan was appointed a judge in 2009, in 2007 the verkhovna rada voted to elect her as a judge for an indefinite period, and already in 2019 the higher qualification commission tried to dismiss her due to ineligibility for the position. then soltan simply failed the qualifying assessment. judge saltan of the kyiv district court of the city of odesa received less than 50% of the maximum possible score for the practical task. ah... so, she didn't pass the exam and didn't may be admitted to the second stage of qualification assessment for the position held. in january 2019, the high qualification commission of judges forwarded the request for dismissal to the high council of justice. the latter undertook to consider it only after one and a half years in august 21st. however, it still did not satisfy. so lyudmila saltan for... remained in her position, administered justice, until she finally fell for a bribe. this was the final digest of the judicial control program, see you in exactly one week. there are discounts on paracetamol. donation - 10% of plantain bam and eschadnik in pha

it's just the judge. remind us why that is. >> it's a pretty rare bench trial, and it's even stranger because many of the issues were already decided on summary judgment. so you don't normally have a trial where summary judgment's been decided as to many issues including liability, and then you're making your case to a judge. but you know, there are benefits and negatives to a bench only trial. you have cut through the wheat and the chaff. you don't have to deal with the procedural issues of bringing a jury in and out. the person who decides what's relevant or admissible or even inappropriate as evidence is the judge, so he can't unring that bell in his head. it's a very interesting thing to try a case before a judge, a bench trial, and so your closing argument has to be tailored to that. you've got to get right down to the bare bones. focus on your main bullet points. don't go in for the theatrics because you don't have a jury. so much of the closing argument is demonstrative, is the theatrics, expected

has. >> you know, judges, especially a judge like judge kaplan, are very aware of the antics of defendants, defense counsel, people who try and go to judge to lose his or her temper, to get them to have to declare a mistrial. these are the kinds of things that judge kaplan, he is so experienced. this is one where i have no doubt he is going to steer the ship to a resolution for and take care of the jury and make sure that the rules are followed. with alina habba, it's worth noting that joe tacopina, the former lawyer, just recently stepped off that case. so she has had to step in, presumably with a larger role than she anticipated. mr. tacopina's a trial lawyer. alina habba maybe a very skilled lawyer outside of a courtroom, i don't know one way or another, but inside a courtroom she obviously doesn't know the rules of evidence. so it's an odd choice. and part of the frustration you are reading, lawrence, is because basic evidentiary issues and rules, the kinds of things that faith gay knows inside and out, are just not something that's part of her toolkit. >> andrew weissmann, faith gay,

last year, the supreme council of justice dismissed 325 judges. 293 judges were dismissed in connectione submission of applications about resignation due to special circumstances, the supreme court dismissed a total of seven judges, six of them for committing a significant disciplinary offense and one judge for submission. with the recommendation of the higher qualification commission of judges of ukraine. last year, as a candidate for the european union, ukraine fulfilled four of the seven criteria required by the council of the eu to maintain its status. in particular, the judicial reform has been fully implemented in terms of holding competitions for judicial governance bodies. with the participation of international experts, the higher council of justice and the higher qualification council were updated commission of judges. but for now, the judicial system is over. is loaded to meet high international standards of justice, ukrainian power structures operate according to old schemes, force. last week, employees of the state bureau of investigation raided the dnipro district court of

so the judge let him speak. he gave him about a five minutes, he had a hard stop at 1:00 for lunch, and that is the reason why judge cut him off. -- trump was speaking pretty rapidly wanting to make the point he wanted to make, and he did go beyond just the facts the case, attacking the new york attorney general letitia james in the process. at some point the judge, he's -- he's had a lot of back and forth -- the same was true when trump was there speaking before the judge. the judge saying to trump you have your own agenda, understand that, and then saying to chris kise, mr. kise try to control your client, trying to rein trump in. -- i did nothing wrong, they should pay me for what i've had to go through, would -- trump getting a little bit of his words there before the judge. he did testify in this case, and he's going to be making more public statements later before the cameras, which he has used every opportunity coming to court as an opportunity to speak to the public. the real work meaning double the -- t

the judge, tonight. deputy clerk, shall i get the jury now? the judge, sure. judge lewis kaplan knows every move the trump lawyers have made, and are going to make, and rules on their stunts immediately, with one word rulings like denied. later, trump co-counsel, alina, moved for a mistrial because e. jean carroll testified that she deleted some of the death threats that she received. attorney habba. your honor, at this moment, i feel like i have to ask for a mistrial. the witness has just admitted to deleting evidence herself which are part of her claims of damages, and i have not seen them. she has no evidence of them, and she hasn't turned them over. the judge, denied. the jury had already seen plenty of death threats that e. jean carroll did not delete. attorney hobbit and cyst it, e. jean carroll was not suffering because of donald trump's attacks on her and, in fact, she enjoys the attention. question, at some level, you enjoy this attention? answer, no. e. jean carroll's attorney objects to that question, and the judge overrules the objection, and then,

he was our no to charles forest branch. judge at hawk was sent against judge 17 day judge at hawk or rock by 15 boats to to the state of israel shall ensure with immediate effect that it's military did not commit any acts described in point one above me. favor, president donahue, vice president of oregon judges tonka abraham the noon uses sch way bundari robinson. so he was our no to charlesworth brand judge. i talked with cent. okay. against judge 17 day judge at hawk brock by 16 votes to one. the state of israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to members of the palestinian group in the gaza strip. in favor, president donahue, vice president of oregon, judges tonka. behind the noun uses ch way bundari robinson, so that he was our, not a charles, where his brand judges ad hoc rock syndicate against judge 17 or by 16 votes to one. the state of israel shell take immediate and effective measures to ensure the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address th

. >> judge judy: she doesn't live there. >> no. >> judge judy: just you. >> just me. >> judge judy: youge judy: you know the date? >> may 1st. >> i don't know the exact date. >> judge judy: may 1st of...? >> 2017, your honor. >> judge judy: where had you lived before that, mr. moyer? >> i lived in an apartment. >> judge judy: what happened to the apartment? >> i ended up ng

the other thing i want to just point out is that judge henderson is the senior judge of the three-judgeerogative to decide she is going to write the opinion. the senior judge can do that, and so she may be part of the reason that this is taking a while is that, you know, she is probably of the group the most conservative so it is possible that there are disputes and disagreements. they're probably trying to see if they can agree on something unanimously, but if they have to write separate opinions, that would take longer, but it really is anyone's guess. it also just could be a question that they are all in agreement but they want to make sure that what they come out with is bulletproof. the next steps are to look very carefully at how much time they give donald trump to take some sort of appeal. i find it almost inconceivable that donald trump will prevail in the d.c. circuit on his argument based on the substance of the claim and as the oral argument went, which was horrific for donald trump. so i think everyone should be focusing on when we get a decision on how much time do they giv

if it's the judge deciding, as here, the judge can filter it out. irrelevant. not considering it. when you have 12 civilians, 12 new yorkers sitting there, the judge will have to be more careful. there are consequences as a lawyer if you throw upper relevant arguments. >> that will be relevant when you move over to the criminal trials. much more to come. much more coming out of the courtroom. john is there with paula and more. we'll keep an eye on that door. we have reporters inside letting us know what's happening there. we'll bring you all those developments from inside court. >>. >>> also, hunter biden set to appear in a court in california this afternoon on tax-related charges just after first lady jill biden is really slamming republicans who have led the investigation into him, calling it horrible, cruel. more details on that ahead. >>> you're looking at live pictures outside a courtroom in new york where the closing arguments in the donald trump civil trial are under way as we speak. on the way going into the courtroom, he spoke. listen to some of what he said. >> it's a ve

judge jeanine: why is -- >> what for. judge jeanine: let's go. >> -- i'm just.udge jeanine: charlie. >> that is not fair, because it was it was sealed not up to the -- it is sealed by a judge. >> justice department. >> a -- >> the one that called parents domestic terrorists. >> how about the trump justice department. >> talk about that -- >> about the fact. >> the obama. >> this is embarrassing to the department of justice from all angles this was a massive scheme,. judge jeanine: okay. >> that is why they are now saying. >> it is embarrassing. judge jeanine: can they release the names in the black book. >> i don't think -- i honestly if they committed crimes and judge preska has to look at this, they should, we said there are people who knew epstein who were not involved. judge jeanine: she can't say anything. >> if you were his friend and colleague you go on a plane or to florida how do you not know. >> if you go to his island.. it is called pedophile island. >> anyone that went on that plane and to that islanded it is clear. >> when did they call it pedophile

the judge asked, ms. habba, alina habba, he asked her whether or not she had any other witnesses and she said simply, yes, mr. trump, to which the judge says before he takes the stand, i have a few things to say. msnbc's yasmin vossoughian is outside the courthouse in new york. also with me, former prosecutor, kristy greenberg, and msnbc legal analyst, paul butler. so the judge had a few things to say, what were they? >> reporter: he did. and again, chris, excuse me for doing this, as you're looking down at my phone, so am i because we're getting this straight from adam reese inside the courtroom. i want to read kind of what we're hearing from the judge to make sure we're getting this thing right. and this is exactly, by the way, before i get into it, this is exactly what we expected to happen before the former president was allowed to testify, whether or not he would be allowed to testify is kind of laying the ground rules, and the judge has said this repeatedly, over and over, that this was already liti

in her declaration of integrity, the judge hid this fact.theless, i indicated that i did not make a decision, but, well, it would be strange not to admit that this decision falls within the scope. during the interview, members of the highest quality commission of judges drew attention to many more violations and errors on the part of judge myroshnychenko. in particular, it often violates. deadlines for entering decisions into the register, some were not entered for more than three months, some for more than six months. it is also known that the judge did not prosecute at least 21 drivers for driving under the influence of alcohol, closing the cases due to the expiration of the time limits. quite long delays, there are 174 days, there somewhere you had 101, 156, 223, how does that explain? i don't know if there are people present in this hall at all. sinless, one of us who has not sinned mistakes, and it is not enough to make a mistake, you need to have, ah, maybe courage, maybe wisdom to admit it and draw conclusions for the future. despite

south africa has chosen judge dikang, ernest, moseneike, and israel, judge ahron baraq. article 20 of the statute provides that every member of the court shall, before taking up his duties, make solemn declaration in open court that he will exercise his power. practitioner and academic, after obtaining degrees in english, political science and law from university of south africa, he practice as an attorney and an advocate with the pretoria bar. in 20, 2001, he was appointed a judge on the high court in pretoria, and year later he became a judge on the constitutional court of south africa, where he was deputy chief justice for more than decade, and acting chief justice in 2013. and 2014. judsenike is also an honorary professor in the department of jurisprudence at the university of pretoria and has served as a chancellor of the pretoria technicon and the university of vitwaterstran in johannesburg. judsenike has received numerous honorary doctorates and awards. i shall now say few words about the career and qualifications of judge baraq. judge ahron baraq of israeli natio

why not surge there and make the judge second-guess they judge whatever you do on damages you can't do this. but, donald trump once again his own worst enemy. >> are you surprised there were negotiations between the defense and the judge because donald trump didn't want to take part in the closing arguments? the judge wanted there to be preconditions. donald trump's lawyers could not agree to them because he would not agree to them. go past the deadline so it looks like he is not going to be a part of the closing arguments. that he shows up and he ends up being part of the closing arguments anyway. are you surprised it went down like that? >> this is about political pageantry for donald trump speaking to voters. from the judges perspective this is a bench trial. there is no jury to worry about. certainly we had jurors that are not schooled in law there could be some concern that they are inflammatory arguments irregular political speeches made at this jury may be unfairly tainted. the judge knows what evidence is relevant. what he should and should not be considered. i think at the end

last year, the supreme council of justice dismissed 325 judges. 293 judges were dismissed in connectionon of applications for resignation. due to special...circumstances, the supreme administrative court dismissed a total of seven judges, six of them for committing a significant disciplinary offense and one judge based on a recommendation of the higher qualification commission of judges of ukraine. last year, as a candidate for the european union, ukraine fulfilled four of the seven criteria required by the council of the eu to maintain its status. in particular, the judicial reform has been fully implemented in the part of competitions for judicial governance bodies. with the participation of international experts, the supreme council of justice and the supreme qualification commission of judges were updated , and while the judicial system is rebooted to meet the high international standards of justice, ukrainian power structures operate according to old schemes, by force last week, employees of the state bureau of investigation raided the dnipro district court of kyiv, without any cou

judge doljko acquitted him.s decision by the fact that the laws of ukraine and the decrees of the president on mobilization and martial law, which are called so-called in the verdict, are allegedly author's t... the so-called laws of ukraine, which are legitimized under the guise of laws, are author's works, have no constitutional basis, are not laws in substance, are not mandatory for the people to implement, are offers from an entity that provides services with state administration. these normative acts have the status of being applied, and are not legally valid legislation. in addition, judge doljko named the ministry of defense. by a private company, referring to the fact that the department has an identification code of a legal entity. so the cabinet of ministers called itself a private company. the judge claims that the ukrainian government owns the private foreign company dandbreet, citing foreign registries. also, the judge believes that the territorial staffing centers do not have the right to staff the

as of 2017, a former judge.e-room apartment of 267 m2, also in the center of kherson. his mother had another house, an office for living quarters. elite real estate was also owned by the father, who managed to escape anatoly ivaneshchuk's prison. the current whereabouts of this large successful family is unknown. according to the sources of most , they probably left for crimea at the beginning of the occupation of southern ukraine. the security service of ukraine and the national anti-corruption bureau exposed a corruption scheme in the belgorod-dniester city and district court odesa region, with the help of which men could leave the territory of ukraine after paying a bribe. for $3,500 , decisions were made in court that fictitiously determined the place of residence of minor children by husband. this gave conscripts the right to go abroad after being conscripted. according to the investigation, the scheme has been operating since mid- april 2022. over 1,000 similar decisions were issued during this time. a law

he was our no to charles forrest friend. judge ad hoc was sent against judge 17 day judge at hawk or rock by 15 boats due to the state of israel shall ensure with the immediate effect that its military does not commit any acts described in point one above in favors. president donahue, vice president of oregon judges tonka abraham noon uses to a bundari robinson. so he was so no to charlesworth brand catch at talk. listen ok against judge said, attend a judge at hawk brock by 16 votes to one. the state of israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to members of the palestinian group in the gaza strip. in favor, president donahue, vice president of order judges tonka. behind the noun uses tre, bundari robinson, so that he was our not to transfer his brand judge's ad hoc. the rock was syndicate against judge 17 by 16 votes to one. the state of israel shall take immediate and effective measures to ensure the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address the adve

kilmeade, there are so many states that don't have judges, that don't have laws protecting judges andonally identifiable information. but this is an example of maybe looking at hardening courthouses and protocols to protect judges and out of the courtroom. >> brian: 72-year-old man came to your house to kill you, kills your son, shoots your husband three times. how did you get through that? >> you know, i got through that entire ordeal and continue to deal with it. the holidays just passed and we don't have our daniel on earth. it's faith. in god and faith we will do the right things. we have seen that in the passage of federal legislation last year. and the passage of states the passage of laws in the states. i just want to remind your audience that this attack, this attack on judge is the first attack in 2024. we saw maryland judge killed in october of last year at his home. and before that, we tired judge roamner wisconsin. >> this is a sign to all of us. that we need to do more to protect judicial officers. and i'm so -- so i thank you for, you know, doing this -- covering this st

is going to compel or order the judge. the judge will order former president trump to pay a specific amount of money. all you have to do is listen to the arguments he was making when he was trying to convince the judge that $2 billion wasn't a material misrepresentation. the judge had a hard time, as would any finder of fact, that that isn't a material misstatement. $2 billion delta, that's a hard fact for the trump team to overcome, and i think that's going to be one of the material facts that this judge is going to point to when he imposes a significant fine. >> paul charlton, car line polisi, and david enrich, thank you so much. >>> i want to bring in mike memoli, he's outside the courthouse. there you see the suv, hunter biden is inside. the president's son. pulling up to a los angeles federal courthouse where he's scheduled to be arraigned 40 minutes from now. tell us what you expect. >> chris, the president's son, hunter biden arriving through an underground entrance. we didn't see him come through the main entrance

the judge, overruled. and, again faith gay, we say this judge acting instantaneously, as so many trial judges do in scituate like this. but it's so clear when he makes these rulings so quickly and definitively. we know pretty clearly what's going to happen when he does give those instructions. >> lawrence, this judge is super experienced. and one thing he knows is that this jury is not determining guilt or innocence. it's kind of an odd time to think about, but that's what is going on. it's only damages. there is one question here. which, is how much was misses carroll damaged by this defamation. and this jury is entitled to know what the prior jury found and that graphic description is exactly what was at issue there. and what trump is trying to do here, is the things that andrew and i have known about since we were paid prosecutors. witness testifies and gets out of order, canton ring a bell. they say it, that judge can strike it all he wants to, but the jury has heard it. and that's exactly what's going

the judge has made a decision. this is going to come down to the number, the fines that are going to be issued against the former president and his organization. by the way, will he be banned for life from serving as director and/or head of this corporation? in these closing arguments, chris kise talks about the former president's personal wealth. he says, he has one of the strongest personal balance sheets you have ever seen. extensive real estate, a billion in equity, net worth of 4.2 adjusted to 2.4. that is what is material to them, not the annual financial statements. when you read that, i think it means two different things. one, that they are talking about the former president's personal wealth, but two, as you are analyzing it, imagining how hard -- you know this very well from following the former president for so long. how hard something like this is going to hit the former president and how he defines himself as a real estate magnate in the new york city area and the wealth that he has compiled over the