justice sotomayor and justice kagan and justice jackson highlighted the wild inconsistency of the roberts court by quoting chief justice roberts himself who wrote this when he joined the majority opinion in overturning roe v. wade. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is not necessary to decide more. the three justices then said, that fundamental principle of judicial restraint is practically as old as our republic, yet the court continues on to resolve questions not before us. in a sensitive case crying out for judicial restraint, it abandons that course. today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how section 3 can bar an oath breaking insurrectionist from becoming president. although we agree that colorado cannot enforce section three, we protest the majority's efforts to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision because we would decide only the issue before us. we concur only in the judgment.

what is justice and justice in the words of the prophet, peace be upon him, well, it has been talkedut a lot during the past 14 centuries, as he said in the qur'an, according to the commentators in the life of muhammad and the family of muhammad , especially amir al-mu'minin, who is generally known between your friend and your enemy, everyone writes murder in the altar. the worship of justice is one of the manifestations of amir al-mu'minin that everyone pays attention to, not only shia or sunni or muslim or christian, everyone recognizes ali as justice and justice, of course this should not prevent other aspects of the personality amir al-mu'minin should also be recognized by humans, for example, you know that we now know imam hussain for his epic, martyrdom, sacrifice and courage . i am reading, everyone is surprised, i am saying that imam sajjad, when he buried the headless body of my father in that pit, he said, "my father's back is here, we esfanis call it pollen on my father's back, the traces of calluses that my father used to feed the poor ." it takes away the traces of callu

chief justice roberts: and justice jackson, i think you -- justice jackson: yes.out it because you are making . mitchell: mm-hmm.. justice jackson: and as i look at section iii, i see two parts of the first sentence of section iii. mr. mitchell: mm-hmm. jujackson: the first is a list of offices that a ualified person is barred specific circumstances that give rise to disqualifica so, first, am i about)6 seeing that there are two different happening in the first sentence? mr. mitchell: yes, for sure. justicn: okay. case or just one? are you arguing both that th fice of the presidency should barred offices -- one of the mr. mitchell: mm-hmm. justice jackson: -- and that the person -- a person who previtook the presidential oath is not subject to disqualification? mr. mitchell: we are arguing both, your honor. justice jackson: i don't see that in your brief. mr. mitchell: well -- justice jackson: i see a lot of focus on the second but not on the first. mr. mitchell: -- there is definitely more focus on the , and we acknowledge that we have a somewhat heavier l on the

there are many verses about justice and justice . one of the issues that is very prominent is the discussion of justice, in such a way that the christian jagdad writes a book about the voice of justice, the voice of human justice, and this shows that even a christian person is like this. imam (peace be upon him) takes it and says about the speech of his highness gibran, khalil gibran, what would happen, what a secret there is a sign that every century, no one like hazrat, peace be upon him, gave sustenance to the world . what is the meaning of justice in the words of hazrat, peace be upon him. and justice has been talked about a lot during the past 14 centuries, as he said in the quran, according to the commentators in the biography of muhammad and the family of muhammad, especially amir al-mu'minin, who is known to be between your friend and your enemy. of the manifestations of amir al-mu'minin that everyone pays attention to, not only shia or sunni or muslim or christian, everyone recognizes ali's world as justice. in other words,

what is the meaning of justice in the words of the prophet (peace be upon him), justice and justice, well, it has been talked about a lot during the past 14 centuries, as he said in the qur'an , following him, the commentators in the life of muhammad and the family of muhammad, especially amir al-mu'minin, who is generally known between your friend and your enemy, all write murder in the altar of worship, the severity of justice is done. adla is one of the manifestations of amir al-mu'minin that everyone paid attention to, not only shia, sunni, muslim, or christian, the whole world of ali. they know justice, of course, this should not prevent them from doing so other aspects of the character of amir al-mu'minin can be known by humans, for example, you know that we now know imam hussain for his epic, martyrdom, sacrifice, and courage . i am surprised by imam sajjad when he buried the headless body of baba in that pit. it was and it is true that this direction is in his character, but it is not that only amir al-mu'minin is justice, not that amir al-mu'minin is a perfect human being in

don't forget that sometimes there are those who are extreme in seeking justice and justice, and sometimes they are populist poets, and they give you a blank slate . some of these sects are doing strange extremes that i am afraid of. it is the end of some of these dry and petrified thoughts like the deviant groups of fargans and hypocrites and those who are fighting in the name of a harsh justice . remember me . he used to say, "o ali, we are fair ." he used to say to ali, "you did not treat yourself fairly." the prophet used to say, o messenger of god, you want justice , teach the prophet justice , he wants justice for the amir al-mu'minin. you want to be ahead of the imam, you want to be ahead of the imam of the islamic community , you want to question ali, yes, hajj sir, one of the arguments is that we have a book called nahj al-balagha, which is both in arabic literature and in content. it is unique and this is said even by others who are not sure, and some are now again one among those who raise this issue is jaghardad, a christian who says that he came, i met him for a few hours, he

martinez -- justice gorsuch: and then -- and then -- justice jackson: -- doesn't that -- justice gorsuch: -- and then if i might just -- just finish up, what -- what's the effective difference of that? it seems to me that in the first case, en- when a judge says here's the law, it's settle 're done, right? it can be appealed, but at the end of the day, if the supre court of the united states upholds that interetion, we're finished. whereas, under the chevr approach, are we finished? martinez: no. justice gorsuch: what happens? martinez: i think e ency can overrule what the court said. the agency can overrule what itself said. i think that's a very strange thing, that in every other area of statutory interpretation,e understand the law to have one fixed meaning and the goal is to try to figure out that fixed meanin b chevron by design creates this world in which the agency is -- is -- because there's this zone of discretion, the -- the agency and ambiguity, the agency can kind of flip-fl and then force courts to iplop with them. justice rsh: and i'm struck on that score by the brand x cas

justice , legal justice, and political justice. well, if we can know such people, then we will vote for them. if you don't know , use trusted insightful people. these are the conditions of the election candidates. i don't know them. i don't know. so it's better not to vote. no, definitely vote. but with wise people , trusted people, people who can be trusted. go to them, ask them, ask them. if you guide accept their guidance so that , god willing, they will enter the field with pure intentions and bowing to the almighty god, god willing, all the people of your time , dear and respected compatriots, will be happy and good . voting and handing over the ballot boxes to the members present and supervising the elections of this period is in each of the specialized branches of my colleagues in tehran and all over the country. some of them reached their own opinion. let's go along let's sit down with our colleague, mrs. hosseini, a reporter of sed and radio news agency in tehran, the capital . you said that we are now in one of the pollin

the university has long been considered a personnel hotbed for the justice and justice party.al institution was founded in 2018. the brother of a member of the european parliament became its rector; in the summer of next year he became a member until 2019, he was a deputy from pisa, already the supervisory board of the state company pkp karga, or, for example, slawomir batko, occupies a prominent position in the city of opole, for a year he was the president of one of the divisions of the state concern orlin, but not only managers became famous for their fake diplomas, leading officers the polish army also finished. graduate school. the press service of the country's ministry of defense reported that there are 37 military personnel on the list. trials of members of a large-scale cybercriminal group continue in belarus. attackers on online flea markets under the guise of buyers were offered to pay for goods online and the victims were sent a phishing page visually identical to the one on which the user sold their goods. to get money, you just had to enter the card details, but

martin - then -- gorsuch: and then -- and justice jackson: -- doesn't that -- justice gorsuch: -- and then if i might just -- just finish up, what -- what'the effective difference of that? it seems to me that in the first case, when -- en judge says here's the law, it's settled, we're done, right? it can be appealed, but at the end of the day, if the supreme court of the united states upholds that interpretation, w're finished. whereas, under the chevron approach, are we finished? martinez: no. justice gouc what happens? martinez: i think the agency can overrule what the court said. the agcyan overrule what itself said. i think that's a very strange thg,hat in every other area of statutory interpretation, we undeta the law to have one fixed meaning and the goal is to y to figure out that fixed meaning, but chevron by degn creates this world in which the agency is i-- because there's this zone of discretion, the -- the agey d ambiguity, the agency can kind of flip-flop and then force courts to flip-flop with them. justice gorsuch: and i'stck on that score by the brand x case, which inl

and healing and repair~ _ goal around justice and healing and repair~ i_ goal around justice and healingl the recommendations, and i hope this will inspire — recommendations, and i hope this will inspire other institutions and organisations who have been involved in a similar— organisations who have been involved in a similar history, like the church— in a similar history, like the church of— in a similar history, like the church of england, to recognise they have to _ church of england, to recognise they have to look at righting the wrongs. and when— have to look at righting the wrongs. and when i— have to look at righting the wrongs. and when i say that, i mean it in the biblical— and when i say that, i mean it in the biblical expression, but also an expression — the biblical expression, but also an expression of reparation, a resort tojustice — expression of reparation, a resort tojustice. this is a journey expression of reparation, a resort to justice. this is a journey for the church— to justice. this is a journey for the church of england but maybe it is also _ the church of englan

and destiny to lead the court and for the other justices to fall line behind him and the other justices didn't quite see it that way, and that really bothered frankfurter. he was very about it. and in fact, during the war years, during some of the war years, he kept a journal and a diary. and in it he recorded every grievance and perceived insult. and he was very, very unhappy it and he even took to calling the other justices black and douglas and murphy and rutledge the axis. now is at the height of world war two when we're fighting the axis enemies, you know. it's as if after 911 when justice started calling another group of justices al qaida. but it also was not a one way street. for example, there are from douglass to murphy this period where he refers to frankfurter as der fÜhrer and the little --. so there's all of personal enmity then among the justices and. what i find interesting with that, too, and then i'll focus to some of the cases in what's going on, both in terms of the war and in terms of domestic affairs. but it's so much it does play out in public there regularly to gr

justice kagan: and this wi b my last one, mr. martinez, and it's going bfairest one because it's going to be one you know about, which is chevron. as a stationary source in the clean air act, does it refer to whole plants or to each pollution-emitting device within the plant? martinez: we think that the decision ichron was -- reflected the best interpretation witmu respect to justice gorsuch's mother's epa. we think that that was the best interpretation. but -- but c iust go back and i think what you described earlier abt stening to the agency and taking into account althose things, our -- our rule would allow that. that's idmore. i think the only difference between our rule and -- d e skid- -- what -- the skidmore sortf proach and the chevron approach is that after listening to the agency's explanation of all the things that you said, the court isn't persuaded by the agency that the agency' interpretation is correct, chevron would say you still have to go with the agency. and that's just like a dramatic thg. justice soto buthy n

and justice sotomayor agree. now we're talking about two people still on the court. i'm looking specifically at page 723 in which the court goes on to say were the court to hold the interest in truthful discourse alone is sufficient to sustain a ban on speech absent any evidence that the speech would be used to gain a material advantage, it would give government a broad power unprecedented in this court's cases or in our constitutional tradition. so that's the beginning part of plurality saying the way to attack all speech or false political speech or core speech is with truth. which is precisely what was going on. we are talking about this time period without getting outside the indictment, you are talking about at the same time the allegations are being made, factual allegations in the indictment, you have others that are fighting that off. the government's position would be the state's position with truth. moving beyond alvarez, that part of it. you have justice kagan and justice breyer. here i think gets to t

katyal: and dfs and regulators do that all the same, justice sotomayor. so there are two buckets of illegal activity, serious illegal activity that ms. vullo isolated, and they're at issue in the consent orders by name. one is the provision of intentional act insurance, sometimes called murder insurance. that violates public policy in new york, as almost every state. second, the fact nra was doing all of these affinity products without a license. now, just without a license alone, dfs routinely imposes massive sanctions, including lifetime bans. for example, metlife, which we cite in our brief, in 2014, they were offering -- did the same thing, offering unlicensed insurance with a partner, lifetime ban. lifetime bans are not unusual. they happen all the time. in securities regulation, you can have a lifetime ban for a meeting. what normally happens, justice sotomayor, in these cases is, if the nra ever decided that they wanted to get a license and offer a lawful plan, they then come back and seek a modification of the consent order. but there's nothing un

and justice of the russian state, ensures a dignified future of society and the well-being of each ofits citizens. well, as we all know the constitution in russia exists only for a tick, because what kind of democracy and justice can we talk about when the country has been ruled by a usurper and a bloody murderer for more than 20 years, and for any display of war there they are immediately executed. i think that shortly after the presidential elections , the gulag machine of torture will resume its work at full strength. in november 2022 , the sbu reported suspicion of this traitor. according to the investigation materials, it is moroz who carries out the so-called state control over educational institutions in the skadovsky district, organizes and supervises their conduct of russian propaganda activities. nothing, soon moroz will organize events in our prison. knowledge of the ukrainian language and literature will be needed there. neither a dead brother, nor a suspicion from the sbu. what could not stop yuri kovalev from the russian mandate. this shallow official was able to sneak i

, and justice is everyone having a fair share in the society they... living, but capitalism is about capitalism is about enriching a small number of people, and the concept of zinanism falls into that, it's it's used to uh, bring a certain group of people down, unfortunately palestine, but also used outside, and it's interesting because you know, in the recent years we have got even more amplified because you got social media now, so there's people receiving their news or the information in their phones, but we see the same pattern repeating in terms of... of social media companies, big tech companies kind of closing down on people or or clamping down on censoring voices, would you agree? so this concept goes back to for example what nome chamsky, the professor from americas. said that they manufacture consent, so before social media in the last 15 years became really popular, they would use it through newspapers and then tv, cinema, radio, and now we have those, but then top of that we have social media, which is the one people more engaged with more, and we know from many um articl

to stand up for justice and human rights. so it's just a job, we heard the opinions of some of the muslim community there in terms of their responsibilities, but in terms of yourself, what do you think are our responsibilities in terms of clarifying, misconceptions and lies that are pushed out by the global hegemony? i think first and... foremost we have to understand that we have a responsibility in the first place, many maybe assume that a sheich or someone that's uh active on social media, they can take on this role, but in reality it comes down to god chose for you a position in which you are in a geographic, cultural, systematic area for a reason, because you can have influence in a way in which someone else cannot, they are not equal, and so to have and recognize that you have the influence in the first place is necessary, then to understand that you have the language and the... and the mechanism to do a form of in which other people cannot is necessary, and so in the media right now with the misconsumptions are happening. "this is no different in a time of say zainab in which she w

martinez -- ice rsuch: and then -- and then -- justice jackson: -- doesn't that -- justice gorsuch: -- and then if i might just -- just finish up, what -- what's the effective difference of that? it seems to me that in the first case, when -- when a judge says here's the law, it's settled, we're done, right? it can be appealed, but at the end of the day, if the supreme court of the united stes upholds that interpretation, we're finished. whereas, under the chevron approach, are we finhe martinez: no. justice gorsuch: what happens? martinez: i think the agency can overrule what e urt said. the agency can overrule what itself said. i think th's a very strange thing, that in every other area of statutory interpretation, we understand the law to have one fid meaning and the goal is to try to figure out that fixed meaning, but chevron by design eas this world in which the agency is -- is -- because there's is zone of discretion, the -- the agency and ambiguity, e agency can kind of flip-flop and then force courts to flip-flop with them. justice gorsuch: and i'm struck tt score by the brand

the university has long been considered a personnel hotbed for the justice and justice party.on was founded in 2018, the brother of the deputy became its rector member of the european parliament from the pis party. some employees were charged with participating in an organized crime group operating on university property. their goal was to commit crimes related to the sale of diplomas. hundreds of names were included in the lists of graduates. whom even the uncle of the polish dictator, antoni duda. until 2019, he was a deputy from pisa, and in the summer of next year he became a member of the supervisory board of the state-owned company pkp-cargo. or, for example, slawomir batkom, occupies a prominent position in in the city of opole, for a year he was president of one of the divisions of the arlen state concern. but not only managers became famous for their fake diplomas, leading officers of the polish army also for... soldiers and admitted that the us contingent could soon reach 100,000. the polish dictator started talking about overseas troops. on the eve of his visit to a

islam says is promote justice and justice is everyone having a fair share in the society they live in, but capitalism is about capitalism is about enriching a small number of people and the concept of zinanism falls into that, it's it's used to uh bring a certain group of people down, unfortunately palestine, but also use outside, and it's interesting because you know in the recent years we have got even more amplified because you got social media now so there's people receiving their news. or the information in their phones, but we see the same pattern repeating in terms of social media companies, big tech companies kind of closing down on people or clamping down on censoring. voices would you agree? so this concept goes back to for example what nome chamsky, the professor from america said that they manufacture consent, so before social media in the last 15 years became really popular, they would use it through newspapers and then tv, cinema, radio, and now we have those, but then top of that we have social media, which is the one people more engaged with more, and we know from many

to stand up for justice and human rights, so it's just a job we had the opinions of some of the muslimommunity there in terms of their responsibilities, but in terms of your... self: what do you think are our responsibilities in terms of clarifying, misconceptions and lies that are pushed out by the global hegemony? i think first and foremost we have to understand that we have a responsibility in the first place. many may be assume that a sheich or someone that's uh active on social media, they can take on this role, but in reality it comes down to god chose for you a position in which you are in a geographic, cultural, systematic area for a reason, because you can have influence. a way in which someone else cannot, they are not equal, and so to have and recognize that you have the influence in the first place is necessary, then to understand that you have the language and the ability and the mechanism to do a form. in which other people cannot uh is necessary and so in the media right now with the misconsumptions are happening, this is no different than the time of sayab in which she

speed up justice and improve the speed of court cases.d point to. one is that we have funded over 100,000 sitting days this financial year, and again next financial year. we have committee to keep the use of the 20 nightingale court rooms, which in the next financial year have made a difference and we are in the process of recruiting 1000 extra judges. all of recruiting 1000 extra judges. all of that is on track and is helping to ease the pressure is. i complete there are pressures and the backlog as a result of covert is higher than it was. but we are doing what we can to bring it down.— to bring it down. there is about 100 on planned — to bring it down. there is about 100 on planned courtroom _ to bring it down. there is about 100 on planned courtroom closures - to bring it down. there is about 100 | on planned courtroom closures every week because of poor maintenance in the crown courts. about 600 on average cells are unusable during the course of an average year because of maintenance backlogs in the prisons. is it not time we looked

justice sotomayor and justice kagan and justice jackson highlighted the wild inconsistency of the roberts court by quoting chief justice roberts himself who wrote this when he joined the majority opinion in overturning roe v. wade. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is not necessary to decide more. the three justices then said, that fundamental principle of judicial restraint is practically as old as our republic, yet the court continues on to resolve questions not before us. in a sensitive case crying out for judicial restraint, it abandons that course. today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how section 3 can bar an oath breaking insurrectionist from becoming president. although we agree that colorado cannot enforce section three, we protest the majority's efforts to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision because we would decide only the issue before us. we concur only in the judgment. today at the florida club where donald trump cannot afford to live without charging other people

justice sotomayor and justice kagan and justice jackson highlighted the wild inconsistency of the roberts court by quoting chief justice roberts himself who wrote this when he joined the majority opinion in overturning roe v. wade. quote, if it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is not necessary to decide more. the three justices then said, that fundamental principle of judicial restraint is practically as old as our republic, yet the court continues on to resolve questions not before us. in a sensitive case crying out for judicial restraint, it abandons that course. today, nsthe majority goes beyo the necessities of this case to limit how section 3 can bar an oath breaking insurrectionist from becoming president. although we agree that colorado cannot enforce section three, we protest the majority's efforts to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement heof that provision because we would decide only the issue before us. we concur only in the judgment. today at the florida club where donald trump cannot afford to live without charging other peopl

but this area strongly pro law and justice around here, the law and justice party gets about 70 percent in elections, but their supporters are hiding. good enough. we do find one in the town center taxi driver in murray on doesn't believe in the new governments or even in the election results. yeah, you don't accept it, although no, i have to because what else can i do? you know, the law and justice party had a lot of voters. it's christina formula. meanwhile, is happy the old government left office if you asked me, it doesn't deserve any credit. i don't like them. i never supported them. and i didn't like what they did when they were in power. increasingly it seems they were nothing more than season crooks. in fact, despite the birthday party spirit, she doesn't have a kind word to say about the old government. so how did poland get to this point? the populace lawn just as party came to power and in 2015, it represented nationalist and right wing conservative values or the parties policy positions had concrete effects on the lives of polish people. for example, there was discrimination

and justice party, the broadcaster is now in a state of upheaval, programs that spread law and justice party propaganda and celebrate leader jada slough. kazinsky have been cut, which hasn't gone down well with everyone. electrical. why did they shut down or channel they liquidated by force? when they have no arguments, they use violence. why can't i watch the channel? i want to watch it. i'm the one with the remote in my hand. it's my right. for the sect, journalist, it's clear that pro law and justice staff should now be fired in turn. it's the only way to achieve media balance to ask them to come down. there is no doubt in my mind that most of these people acting like they have a journalistic mission, have to go immediately. they have to be fired. so this volume is poland heading for improved social cohesion or entrenched division just absolutely. i really feel there's hope for a big social change for 2 minds that instead it'll be difficult to make for reaching changes now, measuring up we're at the beginning of this road. so just want to be one society. so we'd really benefit from

well, you know, the law and justice party had a lot of voters. it's christina formula. meanwhile, is happy the old government left office if you asked me, it doesn't deserve any credit. i don't like them. i never supported them. and i didn't like what they did when they were in power. increasingly it seems they were nothing more than season crooks. given the fact that despite the birthday party spirit, she doesn't have a kind word to say about the old government. so how did poland get to this point? the populace lawn just as party came to power and in 2015, it represented national interests and right wing conservative values or the parties policy positions had concrete effects on the lives of polish people. for example, there was discrimination against l g, b t q plus people. this was the central pillar of the party's platform. the it also oversaw a de facto band on abortions, including for medical reasons. several pregnant women died as a result and it exerted influence on previously independent media journalists, critical of the government lost

and justice party the broadcaster is now in a state of appeal programs that spread law and justice party propaganda and celebrate leader yacht us love kazinsky had been cut, which hasn't gone down well with everyone. electric with the let's see, why did they shut down our channel? se liquidated by force. when they have no arguments, they use violence. why can't i watch the channel? i want to watch it. i'm the one with the remote in my hand. it's my right. for the sacked journalist, it's clear that pro law and justice staff should now be fired in turn. it's the only way to achieve media balance. to ask them to go down. there is no doubt in my mind that most of these people acting like they have a journalistic mission have to go immediately. they have to be fired. of this volume is poland heading for improve social cohesion or entrenched division. just absolutely to i really feel there's hope for a big social change. fortunately, mine's been fed, it'll be difficult to make far reaching changes. now, moses were at the beginning of this road, so just want to be one society. so we'd really be

the populace law and justice party came to power in 2015. it represented nationalist and right wing conservative values or the parties policy positions had concrete effects on the lives of polish people. for example, there was discrimination against l g, b t q plus people. this was a central pillar of the parties platform. the it also oversaw a defacto band on abortions, including for medical reasons. several pregnant women died as a result and it exerted influence on previously independent media journalists, critical of the government lost their jobs. many poets people protested, but that didn't stop the ruling party. instead, it brought in popular but expensive policies. for child benefit allowance was raised while retirement age was lowered, meaning older citizens no longer had to work as long changes like these were well received, including by many here and share because it's after enjoying their cakes. the women are now taking part in an exercise class at the local sports center. this is the most important thing is to have a decent pens

the university has long been considered a personnel hotbed for the justice and justice party.he educational institution was founded in 2018. its rector was the brother of a member of the european parliament from the peace party. some employees were charged with participating in organized crime criminal group operating on the territory of the university. their goal was to commit crimes related to the military also recalled that several thousand american soldiers are constantly stationed in poland and admitted that the us contingent could soon reach 100,000, the polish dictator spoke about overseas troops. on the eve of his visit to america, duda said that the country wants to station more american troops on its territory and emphasized that 2% of gdp is not enough for defense spending of nato countries; they are needed increase to 3%. but according to bloomberg , joe biden is confident that there is currently no need for additional american troops on the polish border. unlike poland, sweden does not want to support foreign soldiers, although the country has just become a member

bush, and remember, three of the current sitting justices, chief justice roberts, justice kavanaugh, and justice coney barrett, worked on that case as lawyers for the bush side. and the late remaining justice on the court from that decision, justice clarence thomas, is married to a woman who vociferously argued for and interacted with trump's inner circle, including his chief of staff, mark meadows, to support the idea that the election was stolen, and that trump's effort to, quote/unquote, stop the steal, was an official act, and now trump's lawyers are going to come before the court and make ginni thomas' arguments in front of her husband. what the supreme court is doing is incentivizing trump to become like the strongmen he has long admired and remain president for life. the idea being he is untouchable as long as he is the president. perhaps trump will ask for some tips from hungary's authoritarian leader viktor orban when he privately visits with trump next week at mar-a-lago. we know trump's affinity for the other global dictators like vladimir putin and kim jong-un, and who is

and justice party the broadcaster is now in a state of upheaval, new programs that spread law and justice party propaganda and celebrate leader jada slough. kazinsky had been cut, which hasn't gone down well with everyone. electric with the let's see. why did they shut down our channel? se liquidated by force. when they have no arguments, they use violence. why can't i watch the channel? i want to watch it. i'm the one with the remote in my hand. it's my right. for the sacked journalist, it's clear that pro law and justice staff should now be fired in turn. it's the only way to achieve media balance to ask them to come down. there is no doubt in my mind that most of these people acting like they have a journalistic mission, have to go immediately. they have to be fired. so this volume is colon heading for improved social cohesion or entrenched division just absolutely. i really feel there's hope for a big social change for 2 minds that instead it'll be difficult to make for reaching changes. now, measuring up we're at the beginning of this road. so we just want to be one society . so we'd

but this area strongly pro law and justice around here, the law and justice party gets about 70 percent in elections, but their supporters are hiding. good enough. we do find one in the town center taxi driver in murray on doesn't believe in the new governments or even in the election results. yeah, yeah. i don't accept it. although no, i have to because what else can i do? well, you know, the law and justice party had a lot of voters. it's christina formula. meanwhile, is happy the old government left office if you asked me, it doesn't deserve any credit. i don't like them. i never supported them. and i didn't like what they did when they were in power. increasingly it seems they were nothing more than season crooks. that despite the birthday party spirit, she doesn't have a kind word to say about the old government. so how did poland get to this point? the populous law, injustice party came to power, and in 2015 it represented nationalist and right wing conservative values or the parties policy positions had concrete effects on the lives of polish people. for example, there was discri

the populace law and justice party came to power in 2015. it represented nationalist and right wing conservative values or the parties policy positions had concrete effects on the lives of polish people. for example, there was discrimination against l g, b t q plus people. this was the central pillar of the party's platform. it also oversaw a de facto band on a portions, including for medical reasons. several pregnant women died as a result and it exerted influence on previously independent media journalists, critical of the government lost their jobs. many college people protested, but that didn't stop the ruling party. instead, it brought in popular but expensive policies. the child benefit allowance was raised while retirement age was lowered, meaning older citizens no longer had to work as long changes like these were well received, including by many here and share because it's after enjoying their cakes. the women are now taking part in an exercise class at the local sports center. this is the most important thing is to have a decent pe

and justice party, the broadcaster is now in a state of appeal. programs that spread law and justice party propaganda and celebrate leader jada slough. kazinsky have been cut, which hasn't gone down well with everyone. why did they shut down our channel? se liquidated by force? when they have no arguments, they use violence. why can't i watch the channel? i want to watch it. i'm the one with the remote in my hand. it's my right. for the stacked journalist, it's clear that pro law and justice staff should now be fired in turn. it's the only way to achieve media balance to ask them to come out. there is no doubt in my mind that most of these people acting like they have a journalistic mission, have to go immediately. they have to be fired. so this volume is colon heading for improve social cohesion or entrenched division. just absolutely to i really feel there's hope for a big social change. fortunately, mine's been said it'll be difficult to make far reaching changes now. measuring up we're at the beginning of this road. so just want to be one society. we'd really benefit from that. t

katyal: and dfs and regulators do that all the same, justice sotomayor. so there are twoucts of illegal activity, serious illegal activity that ms. vullo isoledand they're at issue in the consent orders by name. e is the provision of intentional act insurance, sometimes called murder insurance. that violates public poly in new york, as almost every state. second, the fact nra was doing all of these ainity products without a license. now, just wiout a license alone, dfs routinely imposes massive sanctions, including feme bans. for example, metlife, which we ci in our brief, in 2014, they were offering -- did the same thing, offering unlicensed insuran wh a partner, lifetime ban. lifetime bs e not unusual. they hpeall the time. in securities regulation, you can have a lifetime ban for a meing. what normally happens, justice sotomayor, in these cases is, if the nra ever decided that they wanted to get a license and offer a lawful plan, they then come back and seek a modification of the consent order. but there's nothing unusual whatsoever about pishment like

katyal: so, justice thomas, our position and ms. vullo's position is it is not one illegal insurance product, it is all legal. the attachments of the complaints attach the consent orders which make that clear. the nra never got a license for all of the affinity products. it is their burden to prove -- in other words, unlawful insurance product is in the complaint, they never identified in the complaint. we spent a huge amount of time on this and call them out. to this day they have not explained one lawful product that was ever issued by these three insurers. and that is why we think if you are asking yourself is there an obvious likely explanation for what is going on, that is what it is. that is why the consent orders -- justice sotomayor: sorry, these affinity programs could have been altered, and these consent decrees and what she was seeking was a ban even of potentially lawful affinity programs. i mean, if they had taken out the intentionality provision or the criminal activity provision and just insured for accidents with gun

but this area is strongly pro law and justice. around here, the law and justice party gets about 70 percent in elections, but their supporters are hiding. good enough. we do find one in the town center. taxi driver in murray on doesn't believe in the new governments or even in the election results. yeah, yeah. i don't accept it. although no, i have to because what else can i do? well, you know, the law and justice party had a lot of voters. it's christina formula, meanwhile is happy the old government left office if you asked me, it doesn't deserve any credit. i don't like them. i never supported them and didn't like what they did when they were in power. increasingly it seems they were nothing more than seeds and crooks given the fact that despite the birthday party spirit, she doesn't have a kind word to say about the old government. so how did poland get to this point? the populace law and justice party came to power and in 2015 it represented nationalist and right wing conservative values. the parties policy positions had conc

and justice party the broadcaster is now in a state of a people know, programs that spread law and justice party propaganda and celebrate leader jada slough. kazinsky had been cut, which hasn't gone down well with everyone. electric with the legend. why did they shut down our channel? se liquidated by force? when they have no arguments, they use violence. why can't i watch the channel? i want to watch it. i'm the one with the remote in my hand. it's my right. for the sect, journalist, it's clear that pro law and justice staff should now be fired in turn. it's the only way to achieve media balance to ask them to come down. there is no doubt in my mind that most of these people acting like they have a journalistic mission, have to go immediately. they have to be fired. so this volume is colon heading for improve social cohesion or entrenched division. just absolutely to i really feel there's hope for a big social change for us. no. one second said it'll be difficult to make far reaching changes now. measuring up we were at the beginning of this road. so just want to be one society. so we'd r

justice and social justice , the rule of law is nothing but the practical commitment of the people to implement the basic principles and laws, and there are no leadership qualities, people have no place to expect that we want more rule of law. it should be more visible in the sense that the people there are actually 100 on the same side and on the same side as the open system and in all arenas, scenes and presence, so to speak, is to make more use of the advantages and advantages of the rule of law and this i am not saying that there is no use of local forces, i am saying that in this space, if we are more to be able to use the potential and capacity of the elite society based on the parameters and specifics determined by the capacity of the region. it will be used with some help from you and in fact it can make us focus more on our main goals and negatives which is the rule of law. we have less than two minutes . there is a point that you would like to explain in less than these two minutes , this time is at your disposal . well, i would like to say that according to that the people

chief justice and justices barrett and kavanaugh, that will find ways to make cases.s this a functional body? >> some may say too functional. they are achieving the things that conservatively the movement wants to achieve. they've won the table on a lot of cases on abortion, guns and affirmative action. so it's functional in that sense. do they get along in the shadow of that kind of division, that's open to question. >> adam liptak, really good to have you. thank you very much. >>> coming up who voters don't want donald trump to pick for vp, and what it says for trouble ahead for voters. by voters, mar-a-lago. >>> and what is stirring up questions and the question of the royal family and the institution of it in the uk. i got the power of 3. i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some weight. in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. i'm under 7. ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack, or death in adults also with known heart disease. i'm lowering my risk. adults lost up to 14 pounds. i los

but this area strongly pro law and justice around here, the law and justice party gets about 70 percent in elections, but their supporters are hiding. good enough. we do find one in the town center taxi driver in murray on doesn't believe in the new governments or even in the election results. yeah, you don't accept it, although no, i have to because what else can i do? well, you know, the law and justice party had a lot of voters. it's christina formula. meanwhile, is happy the old government left office if you asked me, it doesn't deserve any credit. i don't like them. i never supported them and didn't like what they did when they were in power. increasingly it seems they were nothing more than season crooks. given the fact that despite the birthday party spirit, she doesn't have a kind word to say about the old government. so how did poland get to this point? the populace law and justice party came to power and in 2015 it represented nationalist and right wing conservative values or the parties policy positions had concrete effects on the lives of polish people. for example, there wa

>> i have three answers to that, and that is justice kagan, justice sotomayor, and justice ketanji brown jackson. in other words, this is a unanimous decision, and it's a point of law. i think, you know, this is really about, should the states have the ability to disqualify somebody versus it being decided by some federal mechanism? and that's where there's a disagreement among the justices, whether congress is the exclusive means or not. it seems like actually all the justices agree that it may not be the exclusive means, but it's certainly a primary means to congressional action. notably justice coney barrett says that the reason she didn't want to go so far to say that it's only congress is that she thinks it's very important in a political season to have the sort of rhetoric of a political season. the temperature taken down, not up, and so i think she's trying to say in her short concurrence is she's saying, this is not a political decision. this is just about who should be able to decide this issue saying it should be left to the feds, not to the states, and to reiterate something i

katyal: and dfs and regulators do that all the same, justice sotomayor. so there are twoucts of illegal activity, serious illegal activity that ms. vullo isoledand they're at issue in the consent orders by name. e is the provision of intentional act insurance, sometimes called murder insurance. that violates publicoly in new york, as almost every state. second, the fact nra was doing all of the ainity products without a license. now, juswiout a license alone, dfs routinely imposes massive sanctions, including feme bans. for example, metlife, which we ci in our brief, in 2014, they were offering -- did the same thing, offering unlicensed insurance wh a partner, lifetime ban. lifetime bans e not unusual. they happeall the time. in securities regulation, you can have a lifetime ban for a meing. what normally happens, justice sotomayor, in these cases is, if the nra ever decided that they wanted to get a license and offer a lawful plan, they then come back and seek a modification of the consent order. but there's nothing unusual whatsoever about a pishment li

so again i am grateful that today, this person was brought into custody he will face justice and justice must be served. >> are right we are just learning a little bit more information on how this suspect was arrested was detained apparently he had left to the house and then he was taken into custody. but the fact law enforcement were able to get him so quickly, stop him from committing any harm what you have to say about that? >> from what i understand was a five hour stand off. it's very unnerving for law enforcement these are trained professionals and they do this all the time. hostage negotiators are highly trained. they know how to handle it. you are really trying to get inside the mind of the criminal. and think what happened and what can we do to de-escalate the situation? to bring him out safely that is exactly what they did. we have to continue i'll use this as an opportunity. we must back of the blue he must back our law enforcement they're putting themselves in harm's way every day they are protecting american citizens every single day. i appreciate and respect but they did to