the kadima party was against the continued presence of the israelis in gaza, and they had occupied gaza from 1987 until 2005, and the kadima party , in fact, could have such an idea unilaterally, because in any case, withdrawing from any of those maximum goals that the zionists set at the beginning of the war is considered a kind of defeat . yes, anyone who declares this will show himself as the loser of the war in the public opinion. to play the palestinians, the next issue is that actually israelis should understand this meaning, if there is a way to defeat the resistance groups, for example, that solution is not basically a military solution. basically, the instinct does not have a military solution because of the special conditions it has, the solution is through it. he was talking about the future of gaza and that the future of gaza should have the conditions that netanyahu now says that it should actually become civilian and non-radical. in fact, the path to this goes through the two-state solution. if the israelis allow the palestinians to have rights, then there are, in fact, al

and it was the kadima party that can actually have such an idea unilaterally be it because, in any case, retreat from each. from the maximum goals set by the zionists at the beginning of the war, it is considered a kind of defeat . anyone who declares this will show himself as the loser of the war in the public opinion. the next issue is that the israelis must understand this meaning if there is to be a path , because, for example , there is no military solution for the resistance groups, basically, gaza does not have a military solution because of its special conditions. the solution that can be achieved through it would have an impact on the future of gaza and that the future of gaza should have the conditions that netanyahu now says that it should actually become non-military and non-radical .

party, and since 1986 they had occupied gaza until 2005 and it was kadima party that they can have such an idea unilaterally now because in any case retreating from any of the maximum goals that the zionists set at the beginning of the war is a kind of defeat. anyone who declares this is considered a loser in the war of thoughts the public shows that yes, it is true that this issue exists , but it is not public, which means that in the end the israelis are forced to play the problem with the palestinians. the next thing is that the israelis must understand this meaning, if there is a way to defeat the resistance groups, for example, that solution is basically not a military solution. basically, gaza does not have a military solution. through it, it had an impact on the future of gaza and that the future of gaza would have the conditions that netanyahu now says that it should actually become a civilian and not if the israelis allow the palestinians to have rights, then in fact, for example , the alternative of the resistance groups, which is the self-governing organization, can actually