karina aleksandrovna, how would you answer this question? you see, i would not take on such a thankless task as predicting such moments, because even if international mediators or the forces representing the parties agree on something, an excess of the performers is possible, the situation goes into a tailspin, therefore this risk remains from my point of view. that the threat remains a high degree of uncertainty, the whole point is that the human factor can intervene, well, and political contingency, we see that benjamin netanyahu wants to drag the united states of america into this conflict in every possible way, and very often he acts not only against the interests of the rest of the world, but also against the interests of the united states, it may well turn out that the states may be dragged into this conflict against their will. nikolai petrovich, can we say with certainty that the threat has passed? i think, unfortunately, we can say with certainty that the threat has not passed, that it remains, i will try to comment dialectically, t

karina aleksandrovna, how would you answer this question? you see, i would not take on such a thankless task as predicting such. changes, i will try to comment dialectically, the fact is that the alternative it would be a reasonable decision if it had passed, but unfortunately we see that the western elites, to which benjamin netanyahu certainly belongs, have very rarely pleased us with reasonable decisions in the last decades, so the threat remains. karina aleksandrovna, and what do you think, is this what produces this position taken by mr. netanyahu and israel as a whole? because israel cannot accept the fact that not everything is allowed and that it does not have the right to use certain actions, even such aggressive ones. you know, it seems to me, that netanyahu missed the beginning of the process when israel ceased to be a valuable, super-valuable asset for the united states as a whole, the western bloc, to some extent even. the fighting will cease, he faces prison. let me remind you that the situation in the middle east has worsened

karina aleksandrovna, how would you answer this question?and, i would not take on such a thankless task as predicting such.

karina aleksandrovna, how would you answer this question? you see, i would not take on such a thankless task as predicting such moments, it is not only against interests of the rest of the world, but also against the interests of the united states, it may well turn out that the states may be drawn into this conflict against their will. nikolai petrovich, can we say with certainty that the threat has passed? i think, unfortunately, we can say with certainty that the threat has not passed, that it remains, i will try to comment dialectically. the fact is that the alternative would be a reasonable solution if it had passed, but unfortunately we see that the western elites, to which benjamin netanyahu certainly applies, in the last 10 years we have rarely been pleased with reasonable decisions, so the threat remains. karina aleksandrovna, and what do you think, this is what produces this position taken by mr. netanyahu by israel as a whole, because israel cannot come to terms with the fact that not everything is allowed and that it does not have

karina aleksandrovna, i welcome you. hello. as per tradition, we begin our discussion with a blitz question. has the threat of a major war in the middle east passed in the near future? karina aleksandrovna, how would you answer this question? you see, i would not undertake such a thankless task as predicting such moments, because even if international mediators or representatives. i think that the threat remains, a large degree of uncertainty, the whole point is that the human factor can intervene, well , the political situation, we see that benjamin netanyahu wants to drag in every possible way. not only against the interests of the rest of the world, but also against the interests of the united states, it may well turn out that the states can be dragged into this against their will conflict. nikolay petrovich, can we say with certainty that the threat has passed? i think, unfortunately, we can say with certainty that the threat has not passed, that it remains, i will try to comment dialectically, the fact is that the alternat

karina aleksandrovna, do you agree with this position and do you associate iran's recent decision, because... tirana is considering changing tactics, abandoning its initial plans for a massive attack on israel, the politics publication writes, citing sources. according to the publication, the us believes that tehran has already made the appropriate decision and does not expect a blow to the european state in the near future, and there was a corresponding visit mr. shaigu, that is, international actors contributed to the fact that there was no response from iran. well, i will start with the fact that the speaker of the lower house of the american parliament, mr. johnson, said that if iran strikes, the united states will declare war on iran, which means that in these circumstances the elections may be postponed altogether, in this case it is quite curious that johnson is playing for haris, even, so to speak, here a. nevertheless, the iranian leaders did not agree with this, the blow must still be a blow of retaliation, the question is about its scale, and nevertheless, that is, none of the i

well , really, karina aleksandrovna, what is there to talk about. is expressed by the political eliteies, and if it escalates and the signs of this escalation we really see, otherwise it is also unclear with whom to negotiate, even with which of these groups, therefore until there is some, some certainty, it is too early to talk about this, and it seems to me that this is such a protracted. this settlement, this village and so on, well, probably our viewers, some think, what about the village already, let's go out on the line, i don't know, get to kiev or something else in this genre, but this collapse can happen for political, for military reasons, and of course for economic ones, in terms of energy, whatever, that is , this cumulative effect should occur, and apparently it... ivan will not laugh that a cumulative effect is possible, in fact , the same thing happened with hitler's germany, which crumbled quite quickly, rapidly, and i am sure that the same will happen here, of course, although behind ukraine there is not only the ukrainian military-industrial complex, which does not e