0
0.0
May 30, 2024
05/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is interesting that judge katie cherkasky and check the past but occult contributions the fact he did not recuse himself from the case when he got it. it does beg the question, the books were cooked on the same from the very beginning. it was an attempt to get a partisan judge to get a partisan conviction on the president to try to help joe biden. >> it's funny to say the books were cooked on that that is clear the odd part is the one element that really mattered here whether trump falsely entered something into a business record was never established there is no question this was a political it played out just as we had been anticipating unfortunately. it is surprising to me that not even one juror would have some hesitation or doubt about this. we have a scene of the art new yorkers i have the optimism as a trial lawyer myself the jury system will be fair in the ob that balance on the checks that we need. but obviously that did not work out. not being in the courtroom i have covered a lot of trials. i was always very concerned about the judge obviously this is based on a lot of
it is interesting that judge katie cherkasky and check the past but occult contributions the fact he did not recuse himself from the case when he got it. it does beg the question, the books were cooked on the same from the very beginning. it was an attempt to get a partisan judge to get a partisan conviction on the president to try to help joe biden. >> it's funny to say the books were cooked on that that is clear the odd part is the one element that really mattered here whether trump...
65
65
May 28, 2024
05/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 65
favorite 0
quote 1
katie cherkasky winnett avenue your initial as always. thank you. also with us will shop an attorney for the former president in his immunity case, he was in court today. he's also running for missouri attorney general as a republican. is great to have you on the show. i want to know because you were in court today you have a chance to look at the jury. >>> what was the reaction? did they find a defense's cloning arguments compiling? what was your takeaways? >> what the jury what does this morning i think was a systematic dismantling of the prosecution's case piapot blanche. blanche give them ten independent reasons why hearing upper on the evidence -- where they can vote to convict and what i saw from the jury was attentiveness that was a serious attention to detail. i think they seemed interested by todd's argument and as a defense lawyer that's really all you can ask for and hope for. regarding this morning went extremely well for president trump for our team and we will have to see how the afternoon wraps up. >> trace: it's interesting. when the
katie cherkasky winnett avenue your initial as always. thank you. also with us will shop an attorney for the former president in his immunity case, he was in court today. he's also running for missouri attorney general as a republican. is great to have you on the show. i want to know because you were in court today you have a chance to look at the jury. >>> what was the reaction? did they find a defense's cloning arguments compiling? what was your takeaways? >> what the jury what...
78
78
May 13, 2024
05/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 78
favorite 0
quote 0
elliot felig and katie cherkasky. could trump say that heof t had with stormy daniels r purposes of the trail and madeth her testimony unnecessary? was that an evi evidentiary opto spare the details? >> i think the judge would agree to limit the testimony because he said most of that was irrelevant for some reason heit let the testimony keep coming anyway and blamed the defense for not objecting, even though they preserved that issue in pretrial motions. so, i assumeme that might have been aann option but judge mercn it is hard to say. because as we discussed, this is nonstandard. this is not what we see fore those who practice in the criminal justice system day in and day out. >> trey: all right, elliot, what do you think?nied trump denied having sex withwith stormy daniels is that what made her testimony admissible more salacious areas that she has the right to cooperate or the government has a right to cooperate with details and only in the room would have known? is that the justification for it? >> i don't know th
elliot felig and katie cherkasky. could trump say that heof t had with stormy daniels r purposes of the trail and madeth her testimony unnecessary? was that an evi evidentiary opto spare the details? >> i think the judge would agree to limit the testimony because he said most of that was irrelevant for some reason heit let the testimony keep coming anyway and blamed the defense for not objecting, even though they preserved that issue in pretrial motions. so, i assumeme that might have...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
elizabeth: katie cherkasky, you're terrific. it's good to see you. >>> still ahead, senator marsha blackburn from senate judiciary. this new development, house lawmakers held a shocking hearing on anti-semitism now in elementary and public high schools. wait until you hear what they found. also a senator josh hawley says the doj should file tax law violations against those who are funding anti-israel protests on campus. as politico reported, a lot of those donors, those are funding biden's campaign. plus, senator markwayne mullin from senate armed services. after dodging criticism denying this, the biden white house finally admits to, yes, pausing a weapons shipment to israel. that's got republican senators outraged. all of this coming up on "the evening edit. ". ♪ ♪ moving forward with node-positive breast cancer. my fear of recurrence could've held me back. but i'm staying focused. and doing more to prevent recurrence. verzenio is specifically for hr-positive, her2-negative, node-positive early breast cancer with a high ch
elizabeth: katie cherkasky, you're terrific. it's good to see you. >>> still ahead, senator marsha blackburn from senate judiciary. this new development, house lawmakers held a shocking hearing on anti-semitism now in elementary and public high schools. wait until you hear what they found. also a senator josh hawley says the doj should file tax law violations against those who are funding anti-israel protests on campus. as politico reported, a lot of those donors, those are funding...
0
0.0
May 20, 2024
05/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this morning katie cherkasky was on "fox & friends" and said the prosecution is now going to have to come back, which they now are, and they will have to rehab michael cohen, their star witness. this is a mess from start to finish. my only caveat i have to adhere, this is a new york judge, a new york c courtroom, and your jury. ask myself every day when i started to watch the coverage of the brilliant ladies of "outnumbered" and of course "the faulkner focus," he could still be guilty because this is new york. can you get a fair trial if you are donald trump in new york? i don't know. but michael cohen is a mess. >> harris: let's lean into the politics of this. the president talked about being where he is in court instead of campaigning. he wasn't happy about that. that was just a few hours ago. let's watch. >> i'm here instead of campaigning. as you know, i was supposed to be in a very different state this morning, and they decided to call it early. and it looks like we are going to have a very big gap, and it's going to be determined in court. but we are here about an hour early to
this morning katie cherkasky was on "fox & friends" and said the prosecution is now going to have to come back, which they now are, and they will have to rehab michael cohen, their star witness. this is a mess from start to finish. my only caveat i have to adhere, this is a new york judge, a new york c courtroom, and your jury. ask myself every day when i started to watch the coverage of the brilliant ladies of "outnumbered" and of course "the faulkner focus,"...
0
0.0
May 29, 2024
05/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
andy mccarthy, katie cher cherkasky. spell out what we are looking at tomorrow morning. the jury is back in that courtroom. >> the jury will be back, and the judge is going to be able to answer the question after he discusses the appropriate response with the council, ultimately making the choice about being responsive to the question. in terms of the questions we're getting from the jury, they may very well be looking for some corroboration, michael cohen. they cannot rely upon anything michael cohen says. >> they cannot read it themselves. what is the rules on that? >> they generally bring them in and read it to them they eat -- so that is read to the jury. as we think about timing to bear in mind, this episode shows the jury is not in complete control of the pace of deliberations, because i think the reason this got hung up this afternoon and they got sent home early. it's not that they didn't want to work. it's that the lawyers couldn't agree on what testimony in the record was responsive to their note. no idea how many times that could happen in the next day or two.
andy mccarthy, katie cher cherkasky. spell out what we are looking at tomorrow morning. the jury is back in that courtroom. >> the jury will be back, and the judge is going to be able to answer the question after he discusses the appropriate response with the council, ultimately making the choice about being responsive to the question. in terms of the questions we're getting from the jury, they may very well be looking for some corroboration, michael cohen. they cannot rely upon anything...