could not hold back my tears, despite the unrealism of the narrative, that is, samsonov, standing on katurnyecisely into the tragic plane, creating, well , a truly great major work, it is very different from the prose of the lieutenants xx century, emphasized by the conventionality of the events taking place, although there are also practical details and a lot of passion , it is clear that he studied the material, it is clear that, by the way, we need to talk about this today, because this is one of the important differences in modern prose, the fact is that the participants in the war... and bonderev and boris vasiliev and so on, they do not dwell in such detail on technical details. contemporaries, seryozha, ilya boeshov, and other authors, are often carried away by wikipedia. i understand that access to information has become enormous, when you start doing research, you, well, you get carried away by this or that fact, technically, and this affects, as a result, boeshov comes across phrases like a machine gun. it means that samsonova is aviation, pilots , aces, for boeshov it’s tank crews