0
0.0
Mar 25, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> is a media gotchas over justice kavanaugh's accuser his childhood friend who face the accusationf his own system with an exclusive interview with vaccination. a ridiculous way to land a dinner reservation by postcard that's next. ♪ (♪) some people just know that the best rate for you is a rate based on you, with allstate. not one based on paul. you don't want to ride with paul. or sarah, not today anyway. and you don't want a rate based on ben, he's got some important business to take care of. why would you pay a rate based on anyone else? with allstate, you're connected to a rate based on you. fox news is proud to bring you this she■s a hero moment. i knew i was interested in working with students who were easily excluded. part of my journey is responding to looks. we have to look out for each other. we have to take care of each other. dance is my safe space. i am autistic and i am a performer. and i'm really good at it. once we're in our own space and we get to create that space, it's really fun. i am here because i have seen women do it. if you can see her, you can be her. her
. >> is a media gotchas over justice kavanaugh's accuser his childhood friend who face the accusationf his own system with an exclusive interview with vaccination. a ridiculous way to land a dinner reservation by postcard that's next. ♪ (♪) some people just know that the best rate for you is a rate based on you, with allstate. not one based on paul. you don't want to ride with paul. or sarah, not today anyway. and you don't want a rate based on ben, he's got some important business to...
0
0.0
Mar 24, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> is a media gotchas over justice kavanaugh's accuser his childhood friend who face the accusationf his own system with an exclusive interview with vaccination. a ridiculous way to land a dinner reservation by postcard that's next. ♪ e racking... ...or crab cracking, you're cashbacking. cashback on flapjacks, baby backs, or tacos at the taco shack. nah, i'm working on my six pack. switch to a king suite- or book a silent retreat. silent retreat? hold up - yeeerp? i can't talk right now, i'm at a silent retreat. cashback on everything you buy with chase freedom unlimited with no annual fee. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours. >> welcome back to "the big weekend show", new details on the horrific terror attack at a concert in moscow putin calling the wording from the united states two weeks prior of a plan terror attack outright blac blackmail. lucas tomlinson is live at the white house with no reaction from the biden administration. >> marco rubio says a terrorist attack in moscow by the isis branch in afghanistan is one of the reasons why u.s. military should've
. >> is a media gotchas over justice kavanaugh's accuser his childhood friend who face the accusationf his own system with an exclusive interview with vaccination. a ridiculous way to land a dinner reservation by postcard that's next. ♪ e racking... ...or crab cracking, you're cashbacking. cashback on flapjacks, baby backs, or tacos at the taco shack. nah, i'm working on my six pack. switch to a king suite- or book a silent retreat. silent retreat? hold up - yeeerp? i can't talk right...
0
0.0
Mar 25, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kat: a former classmate of justice kavanaugh reels against in the immediate reaction next. ♪ ♪ ♪.ow" remember the moderna blowout on the alaska airlines flight, the fbi is telling those passengers they may be victims of a crime. christina coleman has update. >> an attorney representing 27 of the passengers who were on the alaska airlines flight he said even though they knew the d.o.j. bob sugarman on investigation into the incident they were stunned when they received a letter from the d.o.j. notified each of them that they could be a possible victim of a crime. >> when you receive a letter from the department of justice, it is a major development as an aviation lawyer the only time of two crashes of max a witherington 46 people died. i represented dozens of victim families on the two max eight disasters which was by the department of justice. the reason d.o.j. is investigating this incident even though nobody died is because we see a pattern of problems from boeing. >> alyssa boeing incident public scrutiny attire falling off a boeing plane as it departed from san francisco. desp
kat: a former classmate of justice kavanaugh reels against in the immediate reaction next. ♪ ♪ ♪.ow" remember the moderna blowout on the alaska airlines flight, the fbi is telling those passengers they may be victims of a crime. christina coleman has update. >> an attorney representing 27 of the passengers who were on the alaska airlines flight he said even though they knew the d.o.j. bob sugarman on investigation into the incident they were stunned when they received a letter...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
two other witnesses outside of justice kavanaugh p.j.judge also said this never happened. she couldn't remember where it happened. she couldn't remember how she got there. how she left. and no one can corroborate it. it's flimsy and false. >> judge jeanine: the left isn't just gunning for kavanaugh though. the atlantic published a piece this week calling on sonia sotomayor to retire this year arguing if she doesn't she will be making a bet that she will remain fit to serve until possibly age 78 or even 82. if she retires this year, president biden will 234078 nate a young and reliably liberal judge to replace her. the author even goes to point out that justice sotomayor is a diabetic and relatively poor health. carrie, does this surprise you because it shocks me. >> yeah. at this point i don't think we should be surprised but i agree. this is lower blow than i thought. especially for someone who is such a reliable liberal. they are doing things to suggest she ised in n. bad health. there is really no evidence. they are going out of their
two other witnesses outside of justice kavanaugh p.j.judge also said this never happened. she couldn't remember where it happened. she couldn't remember how she got there. how she left. and no one can corroborate it. it's flimsy and false. >> judge jeanine: the left isn't just gunning for kavanaugh though. the atlantic published a piece this week calling on sonia sotomayor to retire this year arguing if she doesn't she will be making a bet that she will remain fit to serve until possibly...
0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh: yeah. martinez: we -- i agree with at justice kavanaugh: ok. on the constitutional issue that justice gorsuch and justice kagan we rsing, you have lots of arguments here, and mr. clement does too, for overruling chevron without reaching the constitutional issue. so guess why -- why would we ach it? if -- if we agreed with you on overruling chevr oother grounds, i don't see the need to address the poetical that justice kagan raised about congress passing a chevron-type regime. rtez: i think three things on that. like iaiearlier, we would certainly welcome overruling chevron, especially under the apa and especially if informed cstitutional avoidance principles. but i think there e ree reasons why you should consider going beyond that to the constitutional holding. there are going to be some cases that, as a technical mte section 706 of the apa wouldn' -- doesn't apply. and so, if it's an apa holding, it may be that in those se there might be lingering uncertainty abouwhher deference should -- should apply to casethat aren't technically under sect
justice kavanaugh: yeah. martinez: we -- i agree with at justice kavanaugh: ok. on the constitutional issue that justice gorsuch and justice kagan we rsing, you have lots of arguments here, and mr. clement does too, for overruling chevron without reaching the constitutional issue. so guess why -- why would we ach it? if -- if we agreed with you on overruling chevr oother grounds, i don't see the need to address the poetical that justice kagan raised about congress passing a chevron-type regime....
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
chief justice robert jtice kavanaugh? justice kavanaugh: several questions. first of all, on skidmore, there was reference to skidmore deference, and i guess i don' think that's the right term, that it's respect or pay attention to, but i think, if we throw the term "fence" into skidmore deference, we'reoing to walk into another problem -- martinez: some -- justice kavanaugh: -- like the one we he th chevron deference. martinez: some might say "deference" is ambiguous. think that -- [laughter] -- that it's imprecise. i think the better way -- i think oftentimes, when ppl say "deference," what they mean is that if you think the ansr is x, you should defer to someone else's swer, which is different. i don't think -- i think absolulyhat that would be inappropriate. so i would not use "skidmore defenc because i think it -- it runs the risk of -- of giving that ilition. i think that, really, we're lkg about very serious consideration of the pointth the agency makes, but, ultimately, you have to be persuaded. d if you're persuaded, then that means that you've concl
chief justice robert jtice kavanaugh? justice kavanaugh: several questions. first of all, on skidmore, there was reference to skidmore deference, and i guess i don' think that's the right term, that it's respect or pay attention to, but i think, if we throw the term "fence" into skidmore deference, we'reoing to walk into another problem -- martinez: some -- justice kavanaugh: -- like the one we he th chevron deference. martinez: some might say "deference" is ambiguous. think...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i have worked on justin kavanaugh's hearing., judge kavanaugh at the time hade been through three fbi car background checks and none of these things alleged. and as rightly pointed out here, her name, best friend and supposedly cooperator said shets had no knowledge of this.rk think two other witnesses outside of justin kavanaugh, also said this never happened.e. she couldn't remember where it c happened, she couldn't remember how she go it.t there, how she t and nobody can cooperate it. it is flimsy and false appearance newman it isic interesting, the left isn't just gunning for kavanaugh though, calling on sotomayer to retire and if she doesn't, she will not be fit to serve until possibly age 70 or 82. if she retires thisth e year, president biden will nominate a young and reliably able judge to replace her. the author even close to pointat out that justice soto meyer is in relatively poor health. gary, does it surprise you because it shocks me. >> at this point, i don't think we should be surprised but ily f agree, this is a
i have worked on justin kavanaugh's hearing., judge kavanaugh at the time hade been through three fbi car background checks and none of these things alleged. and as rightly pointed out here, her name, best friend and supposedly cooperator said shets had no knowledge of this.rk think two other witnesses outside of justin kavanaugh, also said this never happened.e. she couldn't remember where it c happened, she couldn't remember how she go it.t there, how she t and nobody can cooperate it. it is...
0
0.0
Mar 28, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh: mr. katyal, it's a bit jarring, i guess, for me that the solicitor general is on the other side from you in this case given that the solicitor general represents the united states and, as we know from the last case, has a very strong interest in not expanding bantam books. so how should we think about that? mr. katyal: i think, you know, i don't want to characterize their motivations or anything. i just think ultimately, when they get to, you know, what -- their test is not different than our test. i think we're all basically in agreement that, for example, that the second circuit got it right. the second circuit's test is government officials cannot use their regulatory powers to coerce individuals or entities into refraining from protected speech. justice kavanaugh: are you okay with that four-part test? mr. katyal: absolutely. fine with that. i think the difference is that we do have to insist on an objective reasonability when you're dealing with enforcement actions, that second prong
justice kavanaugh: mr. katyal, it's a bit jarring, i guess, for me that the solicitor general is on the other side from you in this case given that the solicitor general represents the united states and, as we know from the last case, has a very strong interest in not expanding bantam books. so how should we think about that? mr. katyal: i think, you know, i don't want to characterize their motivations or anything. i just think ultimately, when they get to, you know, what -- their test is not...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh has denied that he assaulted christine or anyone else ever. >> kayleigh: she is now back inew book and allow the media coverage appears to be one-sided, martha just spoke with justin cavanagh's former classmate and his first on-camera interview. >> several people say you jumped on the bed and broke things up and you prevented this you have the hero here and you say that you are home free. and as i told the fbi i would say that but that would be be a lie. to say that. >> because he didn't recollect it? >> because i didn't recollect it. >> you can see that these don't sound like a unequivocal denial. >> what do you do when you don't remember if i did i would've said so that's why i didn't say this never happened this kind of happened and i don't think it ever happen especially with cavanaugh but i just wanted to tell the truth which is that i do not recollect it. >> kayleigh: martha what is this? >> martha: bailey said there are three people in the room brett kavanaugh was in the room, mike judges in the room, he is laughing and watching while she was pushed up to the bed and
kavanaugh has denied that he assaulted christine or anyone else ever. >> kayleigh: she is now back inew book and allow the media coverage appears to be one-sided, martha just spoke with justin cavanagh's former classmate and his first on-camera interview. >> several people say you jumped on the bed and broke things up and you prevented this you have the hero here and you say that you are home free. and as i told the fbi i would say that but that would be be a lie. to say that....
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh: okay.hink it is your position, but some of the rhetoryour position seems to suggest, unless the states can do this, no one can prevent surrectionists from holding federal office. but, obviously, congas enacted statutes, including one still in effect. section iii 23of title prohibits insuon. statute. and if you are convicted of that, you are -- it says, "shall be disqualified" from holding any . so there is a federal statute on the books, but charged with that.s not been so what -- what are we to make of that? mr. murray: two things, your section iii 2383 was initially enacted about six years before n iii. it wasn't meant as implementing legislation relateection iii. the ti tdehadmphasize that by already received a criminal pardon. justice kavanaugh: i guess thea- justice kavanaugh: -- a little bit different, which is, if the concu have, which i understand, is that insurrectionists should able to hold federal office, there is a tool to ensure th does not happen, namely, federal prosecution o
justice kavanaugh: okay.hink it is your position, but some of the rhetoryour position seems to suggest, unless the states can do this, no one can prevent surrectionists from holding federal office. but, obviously, congas enacted statutes, including one still in effect. section iii 23of title prohibits insuon. statute. and if you are convicted of that, you are -- it says, "shall be disqualified" from holding any . so there is a federal statute on the books, but charged with that.s not...
0
0.0
Mar 30, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh: mr. katyal, it's a bit jarring, i guess, for me that the solicitor general's on the other side from you in this case, given that the solicitor general represents the united states and the last case as a very strong interest in not expanding bantam books. so, how should we think about that? mr. katyal: yeah, i don't want to characterize their motivations or anything. i just think ultimately when they get to -- their test is not different than our test. i think we are all basically in agreement that, for example, the second circuit got it right. the second circuit's test is government officials cannot use regulatory powers to coercing entities from refining from protected speech -- justice kavanaugh: are you ok with that four-part test? mr. katyal: absolutely we do have to insist on objective reasonability when you are dealing with enforcement actions. that second prong that i started with. because otherwise you are opening the door to anyone -- anyone would be highly incentivized if they a
justice kavanaugh: mr. katyal, it's a bit jarring, i guess, for me that the solicitor general's on the other side from you in this case, given that the solicitor general represents the united states and the last case as a very strong interest in not expanding bantam books. so, how should we think about that? mr. katyal: yeah, i don't want to characterize their motivations or anything. i just think ultimately when they get to -- their test is not different than our test. i think we are all...
0
0.0
Mar 29, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
kavanaugh?ice roberts: justice justice kavanaugh: quickly, your view on th-part test? mr: i think it is fine. juice kavanaugh: about all i [laughter] mr. cole: i think justice kavanaugh: you can explain. mr. cole: timate inquiry is has the government engaged coercion, has it invoked its coercive authori isome way, shape, or form? jukavanaugh: what if new york went to insurance companies and said we don't want you to continue ensuring gun manufacturers or sellers? for the same reasons, how does that constitutional analysis work? mr. cole: that wouldn't be a first amenproblem -- justice kavanaugh: would it be anything? mr. cole: it might be a amendment problem, i don't know. if government's coercion is sed on conduct rather than speech, then it is not a amendment -- justice kavanaugh: my last question, on bantam books, this is a little bit unusual, obviously, because it is not -- the government is not going to a communications company, boe, social-media company, to say take on that speech, but it is going to an insurance company. but i take your point that bantam books,
kavanaugh?ice roberts: justice justice kavanaugh: quickly, your view on th-part test? mr: i think it is fine. juice kavanaugh: about all i [laughter] mr. cole: i think justice kavanaugh: you can explain. mr. cole: timate inquiry is has the government engaged coercion, has it invoked its coercive authori isome way, shape, or form? jukavanaugh: what if new york went to insurance companies and said we don't want you to continue ensuring gun manufacturers or sellers? for the same reasons, how does...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jim kavanaugh, as well. we are going to hand off this hour.ue, jonathan caper. he will pick up this breaking coverage on msnbc at the top of the hour. i will see you tomorrow at 1:00 p.m. eastern for more news. re news. marlo thomas: my father founded saint jude children's research hospital because he believed no child should die in the dawn of life. in 1984, a patient named stacy arrived, and it began her family's touching story that is still going on today. vicki: childhood cancer, it's just hard. stacey passed on christmas day of 1986. there is no pain like losing a child, but saint jude gave us more years to love on her each day. marlo thomas: you can join the battle to save lives. for just $19 a month, you'll help us continue the lifesaving research and treatment these kids need now and in the future. jessica: i remember as a child, walking the halls of saint jude, and watching my sister fight for her life. we never imagined that we would come back. and then my son charlie was diagnosed with ewing's sarcoma. vicki: i'm thinking, we alread
jim kavanaugh, as well. we are going to hand off this hour.ue, jonathan caper. he will pick up this breaking coverage on msnbc at the top of the hour. i will see you tomorrow at 1:00 p.m. eastern for more news. re news. marlo thomas: my father founded saint jude children's research hospital because he believed no child should die in the dawn of life. in 1984, a patient named stacy arrived, and it began her family's touching story that is still going on today. vicki: childhood cancer, it's just...
0
0.0
Mar 28, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
chief justice roberts: justice kavanaugh? justice kavanaugh: quickly, your view on the four-part test that some of the circuits ve developed? mr. cole: you know, i think 's a -- i think it's fine. i think justice kavanaugh: that's about all i need. [laughter] mr. cole: yeah, and i would just sa along as --as long as the ultimate inquiry is has the government engaged in coercion, has it invoked its coercive authority in some way, sha, form? justice kavanaug a what if new york went to insurance coanies and said, we don't want you to continue insin gun manufacturers or sellers for the same reasons? mr. cole: well, that woul't be a first amendment problem because i don't thinkhe is a first, but it might. mht be a second amendment problem. if the government's coercion is focused on conduct rather than speech, then it's not a rs amendment problem. justice kavanaugh: and that's then my last question. on bantam books, this a little bit unusual, obviously, becset's not going to --the government's not going to aomnications company, a b
chief justice roberts: justice kavanaugh? justice kavanaugh: quickly, your view on the four-part test that some of the circuits ve developed? mr. cole: you know, i think 's a -- i think it's fine. i think justice kavanaugh: that's about all i need. [laughter] mr. cole: yeah, and i would just sa along as --as long as the ultimate inquiry is has the government engaged in coercion, has it invoked its coercive authority in some way, sha, form? justice kavanaug a what if new york went to insurance...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh: thank you. this is a question about the interplay between bantam books and state action generally.■5 justice thomas, he was talking about the distinction between encouragement and coercion. what if facebook said, you know what, we are partners. we are on the same team. this is a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic. we think it would be most helpful for the public good for us to turn over our content moderation to you. thit is voluntary on facebook's part, but would it be state action then? mr. fletcher: that starts to veer into the joint action or doing something together where the government is doing things making decisions. it is not just advising the platforms. e rubric may well be state action, but the rubric may be more found in the joint action cases then offer significant encouragement. justice barrett: how do we consider the relationship between those things? because i agree with you, bantam books is about drawing the line there, but there are some times when things veer into the joint action sp
justice kavanaugh: thank you. this is a question about the interplay between bantam books and state action generally.■5 justice thomas, he was talking about the distinction between encouragement and coercion. what if facebook said, you know what, we are partners. we are on the same team. this is a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic. we think it would be most helpful for the public good for us to turn over our content moderation to you. thit is voluntary on facebook's part, but would it be state...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
where does this leave justice kavanaugh? actually read the articles as you say, kavanaugh was concerned about prosecuting sitting presidents, not former presidents like president trump. it's really a goofy move on the trump legal team's part. he's always been concerned about presidential power, but here, we're talking about the power of a former president. so it remains to be seen how much kavanaugh cares about that. there's no reason to think that he does care about it in the way that trump does from the very articles that trump himself cites in his own brief. >> so jordan, you have jack smith. he has a responding brief due on april 8th. do you think then he uses it to quote kavanaugh more expansively, to give it some of the context you gave it? >> i think if he touches those quotes, he's going to go more expansively and point out what kavanaugh actually thought, which is that presidents can be prosecuted after they leave office. it's possible on the other hand smith just doesn't even touch it at all, which almost comments
where does this leave justice kavanaugh? actually read the articles as you say, kavanaugh was concerned about prosecuting sitting presidents, not former presidents like president trump. it's really a goofy move on the trump legal team's part. he's always been concerned about presidential power, but here, we're talking about the power of a former president. so it remains to be seen how much kavanaugh cares about that. there's no reason to think that he does care about it in the way that trump...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brett kavanaugh.conclusion holds that criminal investigation is waiting in the wings until he leaves office. but that's not entirely what brett kavanaugh has said. he said a president who is concerned about an ongoing criminal investigation is almost inevitably going to do a worse job as president. one might raise two important critiques of these ideas, he goes on to say, the first one is that no one is above the law in our system of government. i strongly agree with that principle. but it is not ultimately a persuasive criticism of these suggestions. here's the full screen of the further point. the point is not to put the president above the law or to eliminate checks on the president but simply to defer litigation and investigations until the president is out of office. so they're not quoting him entirely accurately. what might that mean for their argument in front of brett kavanaugh on april 25th? >> well, courts do not like it when attorneys file papers that contain inaccurate information, and thi
brett kavanaugh.conclusion holds that criminal investigation is waiting in the wings until he leaves office. but that's not entirely what brett kavanaugh has said. he said a president who is concerned about an ongoing criminal investigation is almost inevitably going to do a worse job as president. one might raise two important critiques of these ideas, he goes on to say, the first one is that no one is above the law in our system of government. i strongly agree with that principle. but it is...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so, like justice kavanaugh, i have some experience encouraging.hter] you just wrote a bad editorial. here are the five reasons you should not write another one. you just wrote a story that filled with factual errors. here are the 10 reasons you should not do it again. this happens thousands of times a day. mr modeling case you're describing to make a vein of the government going after the speaker themselves and trying to get them to change their spirit was soaked and is just here is you do not see the facts in this record unless we get discovery. when the deputy assistant to the president sends an emails of facebook or twitter and complained that they are not doing enough to censor with a view as vaccine hesitancy speech, the third party, peops and jim halfhoff whose of speech the white house is starting, they never know that is happening behind the scenes, and i think it makes a difference, justice kagan, that you have an intermediate who has no incentive to defend jim half's speech or jail hines' speech. >> what about abe? mr. aguiÑaga: -- op-ed
so, like justice kavanaugh, i have some experience encouraging.hter] you just wrote a bad editorial. here are the five reasons you should not write another one. you just wrote a story that filled with factual errors. here are the 10 reasons you should not do it again. this happens thousands of times a day. mr modeling case you're describing to make a vein of the government going after the speaker themselves and trying to get them to change their spirit was soaked and is just here is you do not...
0
0.0
Mar 24, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you are talking about an article that justice kavanaugh wrote long before he was justice kavanaugh ind if you read only one sentence of his article, mr. trump's lawyers have the better argument. if you read the entire argument, they are dead wrong. and so, as a strategic matter, not a great way to cite justice kavanaugh's work. as a practical matter, i think it's a disaster, but whether or not it will matter, that's another issue, alicia. look, justice kavanaugh, now on the supreme court, may have a different view than he did when he wrote the article a quarter of a century ago. what matters right now are the law and the facts. legal scholars write stuff just to write stuff, and their views change and they shouldn't be held to them. he is a judge now. he has a different job it sometimes where you stand depends on where you sit. >> let's go from the sublime to the ridiculous. you have trump's lawyers arguing, as business insider is reporting, if he doesn't have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution, future presidents could be blackmailed. seriously? >> i think that's nonsense. in
you are talking about an article that justice kavanaugh wrote long before he was justice kavanaugh ind if you read only one sentence of his article, mr. trump's lawyers have the better argument. if you read the entire argument, they are dead wrong. and so, as a strategic matter, not a great way to cite justice kavanaugh's work. as a practical matter, i think it's a disaster, but whether or not it will matter, that's another issue, alicia. look, justice kavanaugh, now on the supreme court, may...
0
0.0
Mar 17, 2024
03/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let's go over some of the things that the supporters of justice kavanaugh have said.it, that there was that party. >> there were so many parties in high school. this was a pretty unremarkable one. his friends not being able to recall that evening, i guess just doesn't surprise me because everyone sort of got together almost every night to hang out together. >> reporter: do you think that that lends weight to his side of the story, that no one can remember it? >> it seems like they think that for sure and that that was how they were portrayed that night. >> reporter: but to you? do you think that bolsters his side of the story of that no one can remember it? >> no, to me it doesn't bolster his story. for survivors out there, you know it happened to you. even if no one of believed you or no one thought it happened or no one saw it. there are people that are assaulted all the time where no one else was even there, and that doesn't mean it didn't happen. >> reporter: and her testimony drew strong reactions from both sides. were you naive about how the process worked? >> i
let's go over some of the things that the supporters of justice kavanaugh have said.it, that there was that party. >> there were so many parties in high school. this was a pretty unremarkable one. his friends not being able to recall that evening, i guess just doesn't surprise me because everyone sort of got together almost every night to hang out together. >> reporter: do you think that that lends weight to his side of the story, that no one can remember it? >> it seems like...
143
143
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 143
favorite 0
quote 0
the same thing happened to brett kavanaugh. 0 prove democrats will attack you if you are a conservative men. men, heed the warning in biden's america you aren't safe here. this is clear by what we're seeing going on with the case. >> sandra: they were fawning over her. not an exaggeration. >> there is no proof. no witnesses, no location, no dates. no one backed her up. friends and family didn't even do that. >> sandra: those are just a few she listed in the response. a long list she published of why people are skeptical. meanwhile big backlash and calls for a boycott now after planet fitness revoked this woman's membership. >> a little girl sitting on the corner could have been 12 years old, i don't know how old she was. in a towel kind of freaked out there is a man shaving in her locker room. i was offended. i took a picture of him and asked him why are you there. he justified by saying i'm queer, lgb. this morning i got canceled. planet fitness is defending the man in the woman's locker room. >> sandra: the gym said it has a
the same thing happened to brett kavanaugh. 0 prove democrats will attack you if you are a conservative men. men, heed the warning in biden's america you aren't safe here. this is clear by what we're seeing going on with the case. >> sandra: they were fawning over her. not an exaggeration. >> there is no proof. no witnesses, no location, no dates. no one backed her up. friends and family didn't even do that. >> sandra: those are just a few she listed in the response. a long...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
well, that person is justice brett kavanaugh. and in this 67 page filing of filed by trump's team today, the former president's legal team digging deep into brett kavanaugh was passed to make their case as to why trump should not be charged with trying to overturn the 2020 election. and as they go through this, they point to several statements made by kavanaugh, including this one and they quote, a president who was concerned about an ongoing criminal investigation is almost inevitably going to do a worse job as president trump's team also going way back in time, going to a georgia law article that kavanaugh wrote in which he says and quoting again, prosecution or non-prosecution of a president is in short, inevitably, an unavoidably a political act will a political act that of course echoes what trump has been saying since the start of the investigation is that all of this these court cases are political and election interference and their own right. >> and >> trump's filing today is his last let's ditch attempt to do two things
well, that person is justice brett kavanaugh. and in this 67 page filing of filed by trump's team today, the former president's legal team digging deep into brett kavanaugh was passed to make their case as to why trump should not be charged with trying to overturn the 2020 election. and as they go through this, they point to several statements made by kavanaugh, including this one and they quote, a president who was concerned about an ongoing criminal investigation is almost inevitably going to...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> in the brief, danny, trump's lawyers reference brett kavanaugh, justice kavanaugh a couple of timesing citing kavanaugh's writing back in 1998 so before he was a justice where he wrote, quote, prosecution or non-prosecution of a president is, in short, inevitably and unavoidably a political act. trump of course appointed kavanaugh to the supreme court, at least nominated him. do you think there's a strategy here in bringing him up? >> here's a little secret about appellate practice, i'm sure kristy knows it too, when you're preparing a brief to a court, it's always a good idea to cite the judges you are submitting that brief to. how can a judge look at your brief and say, well, i said it, how can i go against what i said. in this case you're speaking to the likely majority, the conservative majority of the court. so it's a good strategy to take gorsuch, to take kavanaugh, to take their words and put it in this brief. trump's argument, we've been hearing it for months. we know what it is. it's pretty straightforward. it's basically presidents are immune for all official acts after th
. >> in the brief, danny, trump's lawyers reference brett kavanaugh, justice kavanaugh a couple of timesing citing kavanaugh's writing back in 1998 so before he was a justice where he wrote, quote, prosecution or non-prosecution of a president is, in short, inevitably and unavoidably a political act. trump of course appointed kavanaugh to the supreme court, at least nominated him. do you think there's a strategy here in bringing him up? >> here's a little secret about appellate...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i want to senator kavanaugh now, he didn't specify which kavanaugh because both michela kavanaugh and her brother, john, my cabinet at traveled, i >> actually served in the legislature, senator halloran later apologize on the senate floor for inserting his democratic colleague his name, but defended his decision to read the passage >> it was a blow by blow lesson on how to rape a woman that's where the outrage should be not in my pointing it out that it's in a book >> now an investigation has been launched into whether halloran violated workplace harassment policy. and tonight, a resolution was filed, taking to censure the senator now we've reached out center halloran for comment and have not heard back. but joining me now, are in nebraska is democratic senators makayla cabinet and her brothers, senator john cabinet. thank you both so much for being here. i mean, just hearing about what has happened i mean, stranger than fiction, very disturbing. i can't imagine what it was like to hear that name be sad and right into this passage. so senator michela kasin, begin with you here. we are
i want to senator kavanaugh now, he didn't specify which kavanaugh because both michela kavanaugh and her brother, john, my cabinet at traveled, i >> actually served in the legislature, senator halloran later apologize on the senate floor for inserting his democratic colleague his name, but defended his decision to read the passage >> it was a blow by blow lesson on how to rape a woman that's where the outrage should be not in my pointing it out that it's in a book >> now an...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they are going to justice kavanaugh and they are pointing out to justice kavanaugh, you remember back2009, you wrote an article in which you said, it's probably a bad idea to prosecute a currently sitting president because it might impede his ability to do a good job as president? the trump lawyers was saying, that was good thinking then. it should apply to former presidents as well. same old arguments with a little flattery. >> i want to look at that. maybe you can, too. i just heard last night, andrew weissmann saying they had misinterpreted justice kavanaugh's opinion when he was on the court of appeals. so they were citing an opinion with the wrong conclusion. maybe we better take another look. i don't know. not being a lawyer. interesting tactic. >> it could very well be. it's an interesting tactic. we will see whether that appeal to justice kavanaugh, which is an attempt to remind him former president trump put him on the court, we will see whether that works. >> exactly. phil, yamiche, paul, thank you all so much. >>> coming next, more politics. prime minister netanyahu at odds
they are going to justice kavanaugh and they are pointing out to justice kavanaugh, you remember back2009, you wrote an article in which you said, it's probably a bad idea to prosecute a currently sitting president because it might impede his ability to do a good job as president? the trump lawyers was saying, that was good thinking then. it should apply to former presidents as well. same old arguments with a little flattery. >> i want to look at that. maybe you can, too. i just heard...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
thank you, george solis and jim kavanaugh. let's go back to politics.nce to nikki haley, the former south carolina governor beat trump in vermont, district of columbia, and captured as much as 40% of the vote elsewhere. do you believe these voters are up for grabs in the fall? and what does president biden need to do to get them to pull the lever for him in november? >> absolutely. a number that really sticks out to me, is if you look at what happened in the early primary states, haley did get to, as you alluded to, around 30%. if you look at the percentage of republicans who don't believe the election was stolen and don't want to go along with donald trump's election lies, it is about 30%. i would say probably about half of those haley supporters are already going to vote for biden. nationally, some of those haley supporters are going to come home to the republican party, but within that segment of haley supporters, i think they are very reachable, and it is less about what joe biden can do, and more about what donald trump is going to do. because we h
thank you, george solis and jim kavanaugh. let's go back to politics.nce to nikki haley, the former south carolina governor beat trump in vermont, district of columbia, and captured as much as 40% of the vote elsewhere. do you believe these voters are up for grabs in the fall? and what does president biden need to do to get them to pull the lever for him in november? >> absolutely. a number that really sticks out to me, is if you look at what happened in the early primary states, haley...
0
0.0
Mar 22, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh, you asd about contemporaneous usage. there's a lot of contemporary usage of people using the term pu othe trigger to be synonymous with function of the trigger. that makes sense if we're taing about what the shooter does. it's by pulling on them. but i think myrid conceded that usage is all inconsistent with his reading, anasou pointed out, there is no evidence that anyonet e time or ever since until the development of deves like these ever thought that function of the triereant mechanical movement independent of any ti by the shooter. it's also worth emphasizing that even iyolooked at what the trigger does by itself, what the trigger does is acceptso input by the shooter. justice kagan, you aed a voice-activated trigger. you could also have one by a swipe re. they don't have any moving parts. onurnderstanding, we say is there an act of the shooter that initiated the firing sequence? on my friend's understanding, i have no idea how he would deal with a firearmhahad a trigger that did not have moving parts. we've also tal
justice kavanaugh, you asd about contemporaneous usage. there's a lot of contemporary usage of people using the term pu othe trigger to be synonymous with function of the trigger. that makes sense if we're taing about what the shooter does. it's by pulling on them. but i think myrid conceded that usage is all inconsistent with his reading, anasou pointed out, there is no evidence that anyonet e time or ever since until the development of deves like these ever thought that function of the...
0
0.0
Mar 18, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
chief justice roberts: justice kavanaugh?tice kavanaugh: your key legal argument is that coercn st -- encouragement and that it would be a mistake to so conclude because traditional everyday communications might be deemed problematic. mr. fletcher: exactly right. what the lower courts have done is go beyond the coercion test and openly say we are going to open up this state action enag risks turning the platforms into state actors restrict -- restricting their editorial choices. adverse government action. on the killing people hypothetical or not hypothetical but statement, that raises national security i don't know what your experiences are if you are plugged into this but it is probably not uncommon for government officials to protest an upcoming story on surveillance or detention policy and say, if you run that, it is going to harm the war effort and put americans at risk. mr. fletcher: i cannot profess to have hadi know it has happen. i think that is an example of a valuable interchange as long as it is on the persuasion
chief justice roberts: justice kavanaugh?tice kavanaugh: your key legal argument is that coercn st -- encouragement and that it would be a mistake to so conclude because traditional everyday communications might be deemed problematic. mr. fletcher: exactly right. what the lower courts have done is go beyond the coercion test and openly say we are going to open up this state action enag risks turning the platforms into state actors restrict -- restricting their editorial choices. adverse...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
let's go to jim kavanaugh, a former atf special agent in charge, and an nbc news terrorism analyst.us about what police are likely doing right now. i do you talk to someone who has allegedly killed three people, and knows they are going to have to face the consequences for that? >> you know, you can negotiate with anyone, jonathan. we are all human beings. even killers are human beings, even terrorist or human beings. as a negotiator, you have to reject people who say, you can't negotiate with this guy, or you can't negotiate with that guy. sometimes, it doesn't work. there are some examples of even terrorist negotiating cases. killers do it all the time. even though this guy was on a killing spree today and killed members of his family, the negotiators possibly can get to him. he is very alone in the world. so, if you are a negotiator or a commander on this and you are looking at getting him on the phone, this guy has nobody left. he has killed his people closest to him, his stepmom, his daughter, his wife, beaten up his mother in law, i think. so, who does he have? he has no one.
let's go to jim kavanaugh, a former atf special agent in charge, and an nbc news terrorism analyst.us about what police are likely doing right now. i do you talk to someone who has allegedly killed three people, and knows they are going to have to face the consequences for that? >> you know, you can negotiate with anyone, jonathan. we are all human beings. even killers are human beings, even terrorist or human beings. as a negotiator, you have to reject people who say, you can't negotiate...
0
0.0
Mar 21, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they yeah, they're probably trying to get in kavanaugh's head.ause he's got a loobably tt of trump court cae on the docket. tomi lahres on then, who knew ye so funny? >> thanks, tomi. >> i appreciate it. thank you. get it together on sale now. forget about christine blasey ford's book. and our series continues start your day with nature me, the number pharmacist i sta recommended vitamin and supplement brand. >> i strugglrtvyvgart.e with ges myasthenia gravis, but the myasthenia gravis, but the picture started changing i started on this card. i started on this card. >> this card is for adults with generalized myasthenia gravis or a.c.h or vyvgar antiby positive in a clinical trial, na vanguard significantly improved most participants ability to do daily activities when added to their current gmg treatment. most participate in takingmmon group guard also had less muscle weakness, and yo sio have off guard treatment schedule is designed just fonsr you. >> in a clinical study. included and respiratory tt infections and headache. this guard may incre
they yeah, they're probably trying to get in kavanaugh's head.ause he's got a loobably tt of trump court cae on the docket. tomi lahres on then, who knew ye so funny? >> thanks, tomi. >> i appreciate it. thank you. get it together on sale now. forget about christine blasey ford's book. and our series continues start your day with nature me, the number pharmacist i sta recommended vitamin and supplement brand. >> i strugglrtvyvgart.e with ges myasthenia gravis, but the...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
KGO
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
remember in 2018 when she accused then supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh of sexual assault in high school? now, she shares her story about her life after the hearings in her new memoir called one way back, her testimony set off controversy, and she says her she and her entire family received serious threats after the hearings, enough to send her into hiding for months. in her first ever live interview today, she shared how she found the courage to speak out for herself and set the stage for other survivors. >> after my day on television, it was really difficult for a couple of years and now that i'm doing much better, i felt it was time to write about the full experience, the before and the after so that people will know what it's like and hopefully it will help someone. i knew it was going to be difficult, but i also realized it was going to be more difficult to not say anything that i would just feel terrible if i didn't say anything, and that i wanted to share the information that i had about him. i had a high schooler. >> she says she originally hoped to share that information
remember in 2018 when she accused then supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh of sexual assault in high school? now, she shares her story about her life after the hearings in her new memoir called one way back, her testimony set off controversy, and she says her she and her entire family received serious threats after the hearings, enough to send her into hiding for months. in her first ever live interview today, she shared how she found the courage to speak out for herself and set the stage for...
0
0.0
Mar 15, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
assassination attempt against justice kavanaugh and their two teenage daughters, the biden just department allow this to continue to happen. we have people from the justice department, we have the white house press secretary jen psaki saying from the white house podium that these protesters were protected by the first amendment. they absolutely were not. do not have a firs right to obstruct justice by intimidating federal judges outside their homes while cases are pending. host: got you there. let's hear from george in washington state. democrats line. caller: i wanted to say we will unelected trump again in november and then we will hold him accountable. this guy rambling about this and that. host: on the several fronts the president has seen delays to his trial, do you think that will impact his efforts for reelection? the president seen some delays and when these trials will take place? do you think that benefits his reelection effort? of course. the democrats campaign strategy seems to be convicting president trump and for these democrat judges and democratic prosecutors in democratic
assassination attempt against justice kavanaugh and their two teenage daughters, the biden just department allow this to continue to happen. we have people from the justice department, we have the white house press secretary jen psaki saying from the white house podium that these protesters were protected by the first amendment. they absolutely were not. do not have a firs right to obstruct justice by intimidating federal judges outside their homes while cases are pending. host: got you there....
0
0.0
Mar 8, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
wade and against the nomination of then-judge kavanaugh. >> confirming judge kavanaugh to the supremeake fundamental personal decisions, including deciding whether to have an abortion. make no mistake about it, a vote for judge kavanaugh is a vote against roe. >> and we're joined by andrew weissman, lead prosecutor from the mueller probe. you see him there, younger but not wiser. melissa and andrew have teamed up to write the new book i mentioned you may have heard about. you see it on your screen. you can google, amazon, or local bookstore, type into your internet browser, "the trump indictments: the historic charging documents with commentary." that is their legal commentary. i wanted to shoutout a worth while project. >> thank you so much. >> absolutely. why are you doing this, andrew? >> as you know, we're about to head into the new york criminal trial, and there are three other trials. and there is a disconnect between what is going to happen in court and what people understand about the legal system. so, not everyone's lawyers, not everyone's a criminal lawyer. so, between our t
wade and against the nomination of then-judge kavanaugh. >> confirming judge kavanaugh to the supremeake fundamental personal decisions, including deciding whether to have an abortion. make no mistake about it, a vote for judge kavanaugh is a vote against roe. >> and we're joined by andrew weissman, lead prosecutor from the mueller probe. you see him there, younger but not wiser. melissa and andrew have teamed up to write the new book i mentioned you may have heard about. you see it...
0
0.0
Mar 4, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh: because people will sit down and read as they do in the evening for fun. crack it open with the fire d the dog. mr. fletcher: i take tt point. the fact this rulemakg happened has not gone unnoticedo are interested in firearms. many people havevailed themselves of the right to chlenge our interpretation. the supreme court is hearing it. i agree, not everyone is going to find out but we uldo everything government could ssly do. >> let me ask you about the nction of the trigger. you liken it to a stroke of the key, throw up the dice, a swing of the bat. those are all d a function of the trigger. do people function triggers? maybe somewhere in fifth gra grammar i tt was an intransitive verb. people don't function things. th may pull, throw things, but they don't function things. it is a very old statu and designed f an obvious problem in the 1930's. al capone. people wof the trigger, thais thehing was . that is what they wrote. maybe they should have wrien e might hope they might write something better in the future, but that is the language that we are stucwi
justice kavanaugh: because people will sit down and read as they do in the evening for fun. crack it open with the fire d the dog. mr. fletcher: i take tt point. the fact this rulemakg happened has not gone unnoticedo are interested in firearms. many people havevailed themselves of the right to chlenge our interpretation. the supreme court is hearing it. i agree, not everyone is going to find out but we uldo everything government could ssly do. >> let me ask you about the nction of the...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this this argument also anderson is designed also to remind brett kavanaugh of some of his own writings they pointed out that in the past he has pointed, pointed out that a president who was concerned with being criminally prosecuted is inevitably going to do a worse job, is designed again, to appeal to that core conservative group on the supreme court. >> is it clear when special counsel jack smith may respond to this >> yeah. the supreme court has already set those deadlines. april 8 is when the government is due to respond. of course, there's gonna be another set of filings after that. and then the oral arguments are set for for april 25th, and we're anticipating that jack smith and his team are going to go back to the thing that you just opened with, which is that no precedent, no one under our system is supposed to be above the law, which is what president trump and his for president trump and his legal team arguing here. >> evan perez. appreciate it. thank you. joining us as former republican congressman adam kinzinger, who served on the house january 6 committee, also seen and le
this this argument also anderson is designed also to remind brett kavanaugh of some of his own writings they pointed out that in the past he has pointed, pointed out that a president who was concerned with being criminally prosecuted is inevitably going to do a worse job, is designed again, to appeal to that core conservative group on the supreme court. >> is it clear when special counsel jack smith may respond to this >> yeah. the supreme court has already set those deadlines....
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i want to senator kavanaugh how are in apologized for what he said. he said he was trying to get the attention of both the female lawmaker and her brother with the same last name. but now many of his colleagues are calling for his resignation including one of the senators that how tolerant mentioned in the speech, michela kavanaugh, she sent this statement to cnn halloran verbally spat in the face of sexual assault victims across this state and the country by inserting my name in-between phrases obscenity, it's beneath him it's beneath his title. so let me say this. senator steve halloran should be held accountable. calvino's colleagues backed her up. here's what another state senator had to say about what halloran did >> if you were at your job any other job any other job in the world and you got up and told your co-worker in front of the entire rest of the workplace give me you got up and you said that and then you interjected their name into a graphic description of a rape >> what do you >> think your company would do to you? do you think you would
i want to senator kavanaugh how are in apologized for what he said. he said he was trying to get the attention of both the female lawmaker and her brother with the same last name. but now many of his colleagues are calling for his resignation including one of the senators that how tolerant mentioned in the speech, michela kavanaugh, she sent this statement to cnn halloran verbally spat in the face of sexual assault victims across this state and the country by inserting my name in-between...
0
0.0
Mar 5, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice brett kavanaugh, because more than any other member of the court, he served at with a president of the united states as his chief of staff, george w bush, every day hey he worked with bush and he has very strong feelings about the importance of a strong executive and the way other branches can hobble it by threatening the president of the united states. i remember he was his chief-of-staff after 911, right. and that was a time when the president was exerting very, very broad, controversial, and strong, powers and since then, when he became a judge and then the justice justice kavanaugh has been a very forceful advocate of executive power. >> but kevin, i mean, obviously would not be enough to rule in trump's favor in that case. when you read the tea leaves, which is frankly kind of all we have, you have incredible sources as well. but the decision to take that case, plus what they did today, what does that all add up to in your mind? i mean, some people have suggested maybe they they took both cases so that they if they have split ruling, it shows an even handedness when it come
justice brett kavanaugh, because more than any other member of the court, he served at with a president of the united states as his chief of staff, george w bush, every day hey he worked with bush and he has very strong feelings about the importance of a strong executive and the way other branches can hobble it by threatening the president of the united states. i remember he was his chief-of-staff after 911, right. and that was a time when the president was exerting very, very broad,...
0
0.0
Mar 10, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
now you have sort of a madwoman, i called her, because she was so angry and such hatred with justice kavanaughlike it. she was the angriest of the group they were all angry. >> he was referring to harris and her line of questioning during the confirmation hearings of justice brett kavanaugh in 2018. he was trying to get confirmed to the supreme court. this was after he was accused of sexual assault. madwoman, it's a tired unoriginal, it's a stereotype is rooted in misogyny and sexism and all things lazy. it does suggest a society is just supposed to dismiss her passions and this is important when you discuss a marginalized group that has gone unappreciated in america. when you weapon eyes it in that way there are consequences but is important to understand that there is power any woman's passion and her steadfastness. historically, a historic change to movements like women's suffrage or like we saw the killings of leona taylor and george loyd. if donald trump was smart he would drop the madwoman trope because it hasn't worked in his favor in the past or at least try to find some mad women who
now you have sort of a madwoman, i called her, because she was so angry and such hatred with justice kavanaughlike it. she was the angriest of the group they were all angry. >> he was referring to harris and her line of questioning during the confirmation hearings of justice brett kavanaugh in 2018. he was trying to get confirmed to the supreme court. this was after he was accused of sexual assault. madwoman, it's a tired unoriginal, it's a stereotype is rooted in misogyny and sexism and...
0
0.0
Mar 23, 2024
03/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> he said brett kavanaugh assaulted her and you were in the room. some of your statements don't sound like an unequivocal denial. paul: welcome to the journal editorial report. president biden launched a new push to court hispanic voters with campaign stops in the swing state of nevada and arizona as the campaign struggles to reverse gains donald trump appears to be making with that crucial voting group. four years ago biden won latino voters 2 to to one over trump but recent polls indicate democrats's longtime advantages diminishing with the fastest-growing segment of the us population. speaking at phoenix on tuesday, president biden told those voters that he needs them. >> president biden: i need you. i need you badly. i desperately need your help, because look, there's only six or seven states that will determine the outcome of this election, tossup states and this is one of the. you are the reason why a large part i beat donald trump. let's beat him again. paul: let's bring in wall street journal columnist and fox news contributor karl rove. the
>> he said brett kavanaugh assaulted her and you were in the room. some of your statements don't sound like an unequivocal denial. paul: welcome to the journal editorial report. president biden launched a new push to court hispanic voters with campaign stops in the swing state of nevada and arizona as the campaign struggles to reverse gains donald trump appears to be making with that crucial voting group. four years ago biden won latino voters 2 to to one over trump but recent polls...
0
0.0
Mar 20, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brett kavanaugh is somebody who came under a lot of scrutiny and a lot of attack during his confirmation process. and i don't think that that's a coincidence that they're using this, but look, they are looking toward oral argument and they are looking toward how the justices are going to respond to it. and it is not especially turning to them that has ever noted, they are taking contradictory positions and one filing they say, well, he wasn't impeached and then another they say, well, the criminal justice during impeachment, they said the criminal justice system is where this should be dealt with. i just don't think we can underscore enough how consequential mitch mcconnell's speech was that day not because he was so hard get on trump, but because of what he chose not to do, which was not to vote to convict and not to whip other republicans to do the same >> in jennifer, every trump's lawyers, i want to read what he said. let's put it on the screen. he said if their lawyers said if immunity is not recognized, every future president will be forced to grapple with the prospect of possibly
brett kavanaugh is somebody who came under a lot of scrutiny and a lot of attack during his confirmation process. and i don't think that that's a coincidence that they're using this, but look, they are looking toward oral argument and they are looking toward how the justices are going to respond to it. and it is not especially turning to them that has ever noted, they are taking contradictory positions and one filing they say, well, he wasn't impeached and then another they say, well, the...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice kavanaugh: is therep anody that could do that? us start with the states that intervened. will you say that in that litigation fine, you can challengitnd let us get the meri othis issue and what the lawfulness of the fda did? ms. prelogar: the states lacked standing, they a aerting indirect injuries and could result in the states alway suing the united states government. justice kavanaugh: how about a doctor who opposes abortion,e is on duty when won who comes in with complications from taken mifepristone, anth doctor is the only one on duty who can attend to the woman's problem and as a result in order to save her life she has to abort the viable fet. with that doctor then have standing to seek injunctive relief? or would you say this is too speculative. this is like being struck by lightning and it is not sufficiently likely that ts will happen to this doctor again? ms. prelogar: atould represent past harm and we are not dispinthat conscious violation would be cognizable. we think that situation has neveco to pass and respondents
justice kavanaugh: is therep anody that could do that? us start with the states that intervened. will you say that in that litigation fine, you can challengitnd let us get the meri othis issue and what the lawfulness of the fda did? ms. prelogar: the states lacked standing, they a aerting indirect injuries and could result in the states alway suing the united states government. justice kavanaugh: how about a doctor who opposes abortion,e is on duty when won who comes in with complications from...