international the courts and tribunals that applied it, all held the opinion that it required physical'. indeed keisloat genocide should be aimed at physical destruction, but this kiislo was formed on the basis or on the basis of specific cases, these are the cases from rwanda and caseybryanitsa, in other contexts the courts can approach the assessment of the situation in a more nuanced way. for eugene finkel from johns hopkins university, in the ukrainian case , the main evidence of genocide is not the murders. on the contrary, it is the most distant from the murders an act defined by the un convention. the displacement of children is much stronger evidence of genocide than the killing of civilians. persons, there is no military explanation, there is no strategic goal in taking thousands of ukrainians from their families and forcing them to become russians against their will. this is done only with the intention of forcing them to stop being ukrainians and become russians. russia is deporting thousands of children from ukraine, from the territories it invaded and raising them as russians. some of the