0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KPIX
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
just as can deonte brown jackson focused on the amendments specific justice ketanji brown jackson focus on the specific words, that trump could prevail, suggesting the provision just after the civil war clearly did not apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that was barred and president was not there. and so there is an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of a colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you are off the ballot, and others, for the republican candidate, you are off the ballot. and it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: people camped out overnight for up to two days to get a seat inside, but trump did not attend. >> i'm a believer in our country and i'm a believer in the supreme court. i listened today, and thought our arguments were very, very strong. >>
just as can deonte brown jackson focused on the amendments specific justice ketanji brown jackson focus on the specific words, that trump could prevail, suggesting the provision just after the civil war clearly did not apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that was barred and president was not there. and so there is an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of a colorado decision and how...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson.d not grant that the part donald trump participated in an insurrection, ease that it wasn't organized. justice jackson seemed to be amused. so it is okay if it is a chaotic attempt. he said, no it does not buy the argument that there is an effort to overthrow the government. he did disagree with both trump participating in it, the idea that it was organized, and that it was actually an attempt to overthrow the government. >> the republican majority caucus in the house is not organized. everybody has seen that. they are the majority. and is an insurrection regardless of what point in the continuum of organization it appears. you are right that he ended up saying at the end. my point is simply that if you look at the atmospherics of the oral argument and briefing, they don't place much on the idea that they are contesting either donald trump's due process rights in colorado, or the idea that there was an insurrection. they are really making an argument about the law that no state can dis
brown jackson.d not grant that the part donald trump participated in an insurrection, ease that it wasn't organized. justice jackson seemed to be amused. so it is okay if it is a chaotic attempt. he said, no it does not buy the argument that there is an effort to overthrow the government. he did disagree with both trump participating in it, the idea that it was organized, and that it was actually an attempt to overthrow the government. >> the republican majority caucus in the house is not...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
LINKTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
amy: i also want to ask about the line of questioning of justice contagion brown jackson -- ketanji brownckson and the whole issue of what it means to be an officer in the 14th amendment. also talk about the history of this case, why colorado going back to the civil war, what it means for an insurrectionist to run for office. >> this is a double-edged sword of justice jackson. she is fantastic, amazingly smart. and she is an originalist, a liberal version of those words. but she is the person who kind of goes toe to toe with neil gorsuch whenever they want to talk about the original public in of this or that. she is the one who goes right in to the oxford english dictionary to fight gorsuch about the definition of what "is" is. and that is great most of the time. but yesterday, those -- that intellectual consistency led her to what i think is a quite tortured place where she was parsing the word "office" versus "offices" to try to find some way to not include president trump. the problem is it is ridiculous. it is ridiculous as a matter of common sense to think the people who said that yo
amy: i also want to ask about the line of questioning of justice contagion brown jackson -- ketanji brownckson and the whole issue of what it means to be an officer in the 14th amendment. also talk about the history of this case, why colorado going back to the civil war, what it means for an insurrectionist to run for office. >> this is a double-edged sword of justice jackson. she is fantastic, amazingly smart. and she is an originalist, a liberal version of those words. but she is the...
0
0.0
Feb 19, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we have ketanji brown jackson. this is one of the ministrations that has have one of the most diverse administrations in my lifetime. we have our first black woman as vice president. we also have to get down to how does this make you feel? if i don't feel we are doing well then we have to address that. some of that is sharing what you have done but also share what you haven't done in a way that people say, this is going to be my choice because they are fighting for me. host: you mentioned black women in leadership roles. there is an article here in the 19th news, saying for the first time, black women are leading democrats in early primary states. the women serve as the public face of the democrat party in south carolina, nevada and michigan. i wonder what you think the idea -- do you think that the democrat party leadership and its apparatus are reflective of the prominent black women who are at the grassroots in the united states, organizing for democrats? guest: i think georgia has a black woman too. i think you
we have ketanji brown jackson. this is one of the ministrations that has have one of the most diverse administrations in my lifetime. we have our first black woman as vice president. we also have to get down to how does this make you feel? if i don't feel we are doing well then we have to address that. some of that is sharing what you have done but also share what you haven't done in a way that people say, this is going to be my choice because they are fighting for me. host: you mentioned black...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
yield like to refer to the fact we just heard about ketanji brown jackson. it's true she reiterated an argument the president made. andre i think this also speaks n justitute what the justices were thinking but the performance essentially ofhe the lawyer mr. murray who was representingaw t colorado voters. i would say we've all heard a lot of oral arguments. i don't know this was the most confident oral argument we've ever coheard, and it felt there wered times when all the justis including sanchez and kagen who he has clerked for were almost frustrated they weren't able to getle straight answers out of h, he at several points declined to answer the question that had been asked, wanting instead to answer something else. even in that exchange with jackson it was hard to tell whether or not that was something she truly believed or she felt this was not a great argument mades by the trump lawyers. if you listen to the argument with the trump lawyer, with mr. mitchell, it was clear amy coney barrett and others were saying this is a ridiculous argument, of course
yield like to refer to the fact we just heard about ketanji brown jackson. it's true she reiterated an argument the president made. andre i think this also speaks n justitute what the justices were thinking but the performance essentially ofhe the lawyer mr. murray who was representingaw t colorado voters. i would say we've all heard a lot of oral arguments. i don't know this was the most confident oral argument we've ever coheard, and it felt there wered times when all the justis including...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
particularly, justice ketanji brown jackson was very fixed on the history.ed it is something that you've been covering, and she had a very different take on one historical record of what she took away from that. she might have been wrong, but her view was very much that it would be ironic, and to be looking at this as someone who gives more rights when there was such a concern about the confederate insurrectionists burrowing into the states, that goes to the clip you played, it's and this essentially kavanaugh saying that there is a federal way out? which is that somebody could be charged as a federal insurrectionist after a congressional statute, doesn't that solve the question? unclear to me if they actually had done this extra charge that justice kavanaugh would be saying that. and it still doesn't, -- it doesn't totally answer the question because there is still an issue on whether that is constitutional. whether that really does come forward and is anti-democratic. so there is still that issue. many viewers might be asking why wasn't there that prosecut
particularly, justice ketanji brown jackson was very fixed on the history.ed it is something that you've been covering, and she had a very different take on one historical record of what she took away from that. she might have been wrong, but her view was very much that it would be ironic, and to be looking at this as someone who gives more rights when there was such a concern about the confederate insurrectionists burrowing into the states, that goes to the clip you played, it's and this...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson, justice ketanji brown jackson did get into this question of, why didn't the draftersnt include the president? i guess they did not have the lord imagination to understand any presidential candidates, you can be president can commit insurrection, so i did not specify. >> just a legal point, we are talking right now about the what, which is very important. most of the argument turned on the who, and one of the cases they talked about the most was the turmoil and a case, which is not a perfect case, by the way. >> can you say the name of the case, it's turmoil, not a case about turmoil. >> you're right. >> very frustrating. >> the supreme court has previously held that if you add something, even something that sounds reasonable like, we don't want people in congress forever, right? and we want to have a limit on the amount of, time they said that actually is adding and eligibility requirement, and you cannot do that. yes, the what is super important. indeed, i would argue that the split on the court is about the white, and we might see that by the way on the immunity cas
brown jackson, justice ketanji brown jackson did get into this question of, why didn't the draftersnt include the president? i guess they did not have the lord imagination to understand any presidential candidates, you can be president can commit insurrection, so i did not specify. >> just a legal point, we are talking right now about the what, which is very important. most of the argument turned on the who, and one of the cases they talked about the most was the turmoil and a case, which...
0
0.0
Feb 26, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson, so many other people, so this was monumental for you to come in here and put delta ons pedestal. we know for as long as we can remember of voting rights, democracy, lots of social issues have been on the plate and frankly it is what helps catalyze the president into his role, and was the work of deltas, afrin american women who helped him solidify this presidency was a what would you cite is the value of black women specifically in foreign policy and national security and how can we continue to elevate black women in the space? amb. jenkins: thank you. the bio needs to be updated. jalina: we have to put that on the bio. amb. jenkins: yeah, briefly, it was great. i was accepted as an honorary member of delta along with an illustrious line of other women, and it really did, it is great to be part of this wonderful organization. but you know, being around all these other you know, black women, i have had an opportunity to do a number of activities with delta, really doesn't still just the power of black women working together. i know that the deltas were also a strong pro
brown jackson, so many other people, so this was monumental for you to come in here and put delta ons pedestal. we know for as long as we can remember of voting rights, democracy, lots of social issues have been on the plate and frankly it is what helps catalyze the president into his role, and was the work of deltas, afrin american women who helped him solidify this presidency was a what would you cite is the value of black women specifically in foreign policy and national security and how can...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but they all, besides ketanji brown jackson, sidestepped the question of did the former president, whilewas in office, effectively take up arms against his own country? that's the core question i think voters want to have an answer to. that's a question -- that's an issue that led jack smith to charge the former president and it is unfortunate that the supreme court looks like they're going to not weigh in on that at all, and instead sidestep it and likely do one of these off ramps here. >> i hadn't heard ketanji brown jackson, who is in a supreme court setting asking questions, i thought she was particularly pointed toward history. that's interesting, because who you are and your sensitivities in life kind of help you become who you are and how you ask questions in a moment like this. it was interesting to see how she was very carefully focusing on history. >> she has done this in other oral arguments. historically, it is a conservative side of the bench that has to be focused on what people thought historically, what the founding fathers thought, and really looking backwards. but she h
but they all, besides ketanji brown jackson, sidestepped the question of did the former president, whilewas in office, effectively take up arms against his own country? that's the core question i think voters want to have an answer to. that's a question -- that's an issue that led jack smith to charge the former president and it is unfortunate that the supreme court looks like they're going to not weigh in on that at all, and instead sidestep it and likely do one of these off ramps here....
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump could prevail, suggesting the provision passed after the civil war didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a goodly number of states will say whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: people camped out overnight for up to two days to get a seat inside, but trump did not attend. >> i'm a believer in our country, and i'm a believer in the supreme court. i listened today, and i thought our arguments were very strong. >> reporter: now normally with a case this momentou
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump could prevail, suggesting the provision passed after the civil war didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides....
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
take a listen to justice ketanji brown jackson on this point. >> i guess i need a reason why there's so much worse about a situation in which you push it forward rather than pull it back that we can reasonably say that that was a particular category that congress wanted to prohibit? and that's what i'm missing in your argument. it doesn't make sense to me that we're going to identify guns on that purpose and say those are the ones that are prohibited when others that achieve the same result are not. >> it's because the statute was written in 1934 and congress wasn't thinking about bump stocks. >> that's the issue. can this 1934 law cover this device that wasn't even conceived back then, chris, and we'll have to wait and see. >> ken dilanian, thank you. >>> joining me now is chris brown, president of brady united against gun violence. let me go back to where all of this began because that's the person who brought this case. you were in vegas after the attack. you have talked about the damage done in just ten minutes. put it in perspective what it meant that this ar-15 had a bump stock
take a listen to justice ketanji brown jackson on this point. >> i guess i need a reason why there's so much worse about a situation in which you push it forward rather than pull it back that we can reasonably say that that was a particular category that congress wanted to prohibit? and that's what i'm missing in your argument. it doesn't make sense to me that we're going to identify guns on that purpose and say those are the ones that are prohibited when others that achieve the same...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was asked by justice ketanji brown jackson to the presidents lawyer. what is likelihood after listening to more than two hours today, this oral argument, that the former president remains disqualified on the primary ballot in colorado? guest: the likelihood that he remains disqualified is quite low. i certainly agree, and most of my reporter colleagues and others who watched his or listen to it on the live stream agree that that's not where the court is going, and it may well be unanimous, it may well be lopsided, but that is not the direction the court is headed. they will, in some way or another, overturn this colorado supreme court decision. host: how soon could the court make a decision? guest: that's a good question. this case is been compared to bush versus gore, that was the 2000 presidential election. it was close and came down to florida. the court took a wild before it got involved, but then decided it needed to result -- resolve the theme pretty quickly. heard arguments one day. it did hear arguments in the separate site issue first. but whe
it was asked by justice ketanji brown jackson to the presidents lawyer. what is likelihood after listening to more than two hours today, this oral argument, that the former president remains disqualified on the primary ballot in colorado? guest: the likelihood that he remains disqualified is quite low. i certainly agree, and most of my reporter colleagues and others who watched his or listen to it on the live stream agree that that's not where the court is going, and it may well be unanimous,...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KRON
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the court to come to a decision quickly. certainly before super tuesday, march 5th. >> the bottom line, the supreme court appeared likely to reject the argument that the 14th amendment bar startled trump from returning to the white house. the >> 14th amendment was written to restrict states power. it starts by saying no state shao the nie equal protection denied due process. so to have a provision in which would expand state power and keep people off the strikes us as a little counterintuitive and they just don't want to go near the politics of thi
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KRON
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the court to come to a decision quickly. certainly before super tuesday, march 5th. >> the bottom line, the supreme court appeared likely to reject the argument that the 14th amendment bar startled trump from returning to the white house. the >> 14th amendment was written to restrict states power. it starts by saying no state shall the nie. equal protection denied due process. so to have a provision in which would expand state power and keep people off the strikes us as a little counterintuitive and they just don't want to go near the politics of t
justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorneys that what happened january 6th did not meet the criteria for insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to friend insurrection. that needs to be organized, concerted effort. this was a riot. >> it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things but did not qualify insurrection as that term is used in section both sides urged the...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i like to refer to the point that we just heard about ketanji brown jackson.it's true that she really did reiterate this argument that trump's lawyer and made about whether the president counted under the 14th amendment. whether he was an officer who could be taken off of the ballot. and i think this also speaks not just with the justices were thinking about the performance, essentially of the lawyer, mr. mary who was representing the colorado voters. i would say that we all heard a lot of our arguments. i don't know if this is the most confident argument i've ever heard. and it feels like there were tons, all the justices including -- and kagan, who he has quick for. almost frustrated that they weren't able to get straight answers out of. in that he had several points the climb to answer the question that had been asked, wanting to answer something else and bring up a previous point, or a point that he wanted to get to more and even that exchange with jackson, it was hard to tell whether or not it was something you should truly believe, or she felt that this
i like to refer to the point that we just heard about ketanji brown jackson.it's true that she really did reiterate this argument that trump's lawyer and made about whether the president counted under the 14th amendment. whether he was an officer who could be taken off of the ballot. and i think this also speaks not just with the justices were thinking about the performance, essentially of the lawyer, mr. mary who was representing the colorado voters. i would say that we all heard a lot of our...
0
0.0
Feb 6, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
[cheers and applause] her name is ketanji brown jackson and she's smarter than the rest of these guysand by the way, we're appointing more women to the federal court -- black women to the federal courts appeals than any other president in the history of america combined. [applause] all told, with the help of the senator from the state of illinois, i've gotten 175 federal dejongs confirmed, 2/3 of them are women and 2/3 are people of color. i also said when i got elected, i made a promise. i was going to have an american administration that looked like america. i have more women in my cabinet than men. i have more african-americans, i have more people in the background that are similar and by the way, i make no apologies for being the most pro-union president in american history. [cheers and applause] i also said that -- i asked the treasury department to do a study with raising the wages of union members, i've fought like hell to have happen and it's happening. unions are more popular now than they've been in a generation. i said, what's the effect of that? it raises everybody's wages
[cheers and applause] her name is ketanji brown jackson and she's smarter than the rest of these guysand by the way, we're appointing more women to the federal court -- black women to the federal courts appeals than any other president in the history of america combined. [applause] all told, with the help of the senator from the state of illinois, i've gotten 175 federal dejongs confirmed, 2/3 of them are women and 2/3 are people of color. i also said when i got elected, i made a promise. i was...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
KPIX
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump couldng the provision, passed after the civil war, didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. and so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i would expect that a, you know, a goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot. and others, for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. and it will come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. that's a pretty daunting consequence. >> reporter: people camped out overnight for up to two days to get a seat inside, but trump did not attend. >> i'm a believer in our country, and i'm a believer in the supreme court. i listened today, and i thought our arguments were very, very strong. >> and jan crawford joins us now from
justice ketanji brown jackson focused on the amendment's specific words as another reason trump couldng the provision, passed after the civil war, didn't clearly apply to presidents. >> they were listing people that were barred, and president is not there. and so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it against democracy? >> reporter: the justices also were troubled by the potential impact of the colorado decision and how it could be weaponized by both sides. >> i...
131
131
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 1
brown jackson. brought up a fact pattern why should a court not in a state but a secretary of state in one state make a decision for the nation? and it immediately hearkened your mind to maine where an unelected secretary of state, shenna bellows made a decision for the country president donald trump will not be on this ballot. >> harris: that's the other case side by side with colorado and maine. colorado went first and then you have 11 other states that hope to take the former president's name off the ballot. sandra smith, your take? >> first of all, thanks for having me here today. it's good to be on the couch. first of all, i think this is a fascinating moment for the country to be able to hear these oral arguments, to hear these justices one by one. their questioning to these lawyers. it was a little bit longer, i think, than initially anticipated. not sure what the take away is from that. but, to jonathan turley's point. just a moment ago before the president -- the former president was speaki
brown jackson. brought up a fact pattern why should a court not in a state but a secretary of state in one state make a decision for the nation? and it immediately hearkened your mind to maine where an unelected secretary of state, shenna bellows made a decision for the country president donald trump will not be on this ballot. >> harris: that's the other case side by side with colorado and maine. colorado went first and then you have 11 other states that hope to take the former...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
even though trump himself describes the day as beautiful, justice ketanji brown jackson got trump's owncknowledge the reality of what happened. >> but for an insurrection, there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. and this riot that occurred -- >> so the point is a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we didn't concede that it's an effort to overthrow the government either, justice jackson. none of these criteria were met. this was a riot. it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, all those things. but did not qualify as insurrection as that term is used in section three. >> reporter: a decision in this case is expected sooner rather than later. it's a case about the presidential ballot in colorado, and the presidential primary in that state is march 5th. so, we should see a decision in weeks, not months. david? >> david: terry moran live at the court tonight. terry, thank you. >>> we turn tonight to the five u.s. marines now confirmed dead, killed wh
even though trump himself describes the day as beautiful, justice ketanji brown jackson got trump's owncknowledge the reality of what happened. >> but for an insurrection, there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. and this riot that occurred -- >> so the point is a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we didn't concede that it's an effort to overthrow the government...
0
0.0
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson questions whether or not colorado's 165 some odd page opinion should be meaning it's misinterpreted in that clause with the constitution and the third section and trump engaged in the insurrection ballot and what the court decided and what looks like they're going to decide is that they simply had no basis for making that decision and it'll be overturned. >> we're going to get the colorado decision tossed out and will it be 9-0? there's a potential for that and might be 7-2. i just don't think there's any way colorado can win this case. >> elizabeth: got it, francey, hans von spakovsky and treasury secretary janet yellen undercuts bidenomics testifying "prices will not be coming down any time soon and senator john kennedy in a rebuttal said"defending bidenomics is like defending a ffungal infection". and more on the gallop poll of democrats losing ground with black and hispanic voters. we talk on ethics against da fani willis in the georgia 2020 case against trump. special council's scathing report on the president's "significant mental decline". we have the congresswoman lesko and
brown jackson questions whether or not colorado's 165 some odd page opinion should be meaning it's misinterpreted in that clause with the constitution and the third section and trump engaged in the insurrection ballot and what the court decided and what looks like they're going to decide is that they simply had no basis for making that decision and it'll be overturned. >> we're going to get the colorado decision tossed out and will it be 9-0? there's a potential for that and might be 7-2....
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i celebrate supreme court justice ketanji brown jackson, appointed by president biden, the first black woman to serve as the supreme court justice. i had the distinct honor of testifying as a witness at her confirmation hearing in 2022. supreme court ketanji justice jackson is black history, american history. and finally, for this hour, i celebrate amanda gordon, the youngest poet at a presidential inauguration. her story inspires youth worldwide to choose democracy's brilliance over the hopelessness of you a tock are asy -- autocracy and oppression. amanda gordon is american history. and let us not have her books banned by this congress or anyone else, to be read by all of our schoolchildren. these historic roles, madam speaker, celebrate our nation's progress and compel us to leverage talent across race and gender for national prosperity. celebrating black history as american history. allows us to celebrate our nation's shared brilliance, strength, wisdom and power. madam speaker, i close by saying, for this reason, i ask my colleagues to support house bill h.r. 703, black history is
i celebrate supreme court justice ketanji brown jackson, appointed by president biden, the first black woman to serve as the supreme court justice. i had the distinct honor of testifying as a witness at her confirmation hearing in 2022. supreme court ketanji justice jackson is black history, american history. and finally, for this hour, i celebrate amanda gordon, the youngest poet at a presidential inauguration. her story inspires youth worldwide to choose democracy's brilliance over the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KRON
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorney jonathan mitchell. what happened on january 6th did not meet the criteria for an insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to for an insurrection that needs to organized, concerted effort. >> to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. both sides urged the justices to come to a decision quickly. >> reporting in washington, i'm basil, john. >> all right. thank you, basil. and joining us now is worry. little constitutional law professor at california college of the law, san francisco. we're thanks for your time this afternoon. is this in your opinion, the most kind of intertwined the supreme court will get into politics since maybe the bush gore election fiasco. >> yeah, grant. this is a very big case for the supreme court never ruled on this part of the 14th amendment before. obviously it has political implications for the nation and i think the court is going to try very hard to stay away the most divisive political sides of the case. th
and justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorney jonathan mitchell. what happened on january 6th did not meet the criteria for an insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to for an insurrection that needs to organized, concerted effort. >> to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. both sides urged the justices to come to a decision quickly. >> reporting in washington, i'm basil, john....
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we will start with justice ketanji brown jackson, and jonathan mitchell who is the lawyer who argued for former president trump. >> the colorado supreme court concluded that the violent attempts of the petitioners supporters in this case to hold the count on january six, qualified as an insurrection as defined by section three, and i read your opening brief to accept that those events counted as an insurrection. but then you are apply seems to suggest they are not. what is your position to that? >> we never accepted this was an insurrection. what we said in our opening brief is that president trump did not engage in any act that can plausibly be characterized as an insurrection. >> what is your argument that it is not? your brief says that it wasn't because, i think that you say that it didn't involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government. >> that is one of many reasons. but for an insurrection and needs to be organized, and an effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. and this -- >> and the point is that a chaotic effort to overthrow the go
we will start with justice ketanji brown jackson, and jonathan mitchell who is the lawyer who argued for former president trump. >> the colorado supreme court concluded that the violent attempts of the petitioners supporters in this case to hold the count on january six, qualified as an insurrection as defined by section three, and i read your opening brief to accept that those events counted as an insurrection. but then you are apply seems to suggest they are not. what is your position...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for instance, justice ketanji brown jackson suggested, i think stated that the 14th amendment post civilelections, that really to constrain the states. so she thought that the colorado voters position was flipped, they were off, that they were wrong. that the intent behind the amendment, again, was to constrain the states, and that was a position that -- seem to embrace, the chief justice roberts seemed to embrace. there are a lot of path for trump to win here and for the colorado voters to lose. i was a little surprised by the apparent unanimity. it strikes me that it is going to be a lopsided decision, not as close as some people might have imagined it to be. lots of reasons for that. i found it very interesting. i would be very surprised, jonathan as i sit here, if mr. trump did not prevail. >> gentlemen, the new york times headline says, supreme court appears set to rule that states can't disqualify trump, and the headline on the wall street journal, trump ballot spot appears safe. do you agree from what you heard yesterday? >> yeah winter percent, i think china completely right. it
for instance, justice ketanji brown jackson suggested, i think stated that the 14th amendment post civilelections, that really to constrain the states. so she thought that the colorado voters position was flipped, they were off, that they were wrong. that the intent behind the amendment, again, was to constrain the states, and that was a position that -- seem to embrace, the chief justice roberts seemed to embrace. there are a lot of path for trump to win here and for the colorado voters to...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
everyone assumes they meant that book a ton g brown jackson picked that up today -- but ketanji brownked that up today. >> why did they not put the word president in the list? the thing that is troubling to me is i totally understand your argument but they were listing people that were barred and president is not there. >> this came up in the debates in congress over section three where they said why didn't you include president and vice president in a language and center more response, we have. look at the office any office says. >> doesn't that at least suggest ambiguity? this ties into justice kavanaugh's point. we had a person at the time saying what i am saying. the language here does not seem to include president. why is that? so if there is ambiguity, why would we construe it to come as justice kavanaugh pointed out, against democracy? amna: it is fascinating, the language at play here. did they ever address that central point, that january 6 was an insurrection that donald trump was responsible for? william: you would have thought that would be a central line of questioning bu
everyone assumes they meant that book a ton g brown jackson picked that up today -- but ketanji brownked that up today. >> why did they not put the word president in the list? the thing that is troubling to me is i totally understand your argument but they were listing people that were barred and president is not there. >> this came up in the debates in congress over section three where they said why didn't you include president and vice president in a language and center more...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KRON
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorney jonathan mitchell. what happened on january 6th did not meet the criteria for an insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to for an insurrection that needs to be organized, decision quickly reporting live in washington. i'm basil, john, thank you. basil. san francisco state senator scott wiener's introduced new legislation that would ensure the safe development of large-scale artificial intelligence systems in california. >> senator wiener says sb 10 47 would establish clear, predictable and commonsense safety standards for developers of the largest and most powerful ai systems. the bill would also provide funding for future large scale ai projects. this announcement comes on the same day. the country's ai safety institute consortium is launched, which is a first of its kind federal oversight program dedicated to developing ai measurements and evaluations. basically trying to get a handle artificial intelligence says it is some of us as the clouds are among u
and justice ketanji brown jackson question. the argument from trump's attorney jonathan mitchell. what happened on january 6th did not meet the criteria for an insurrection. you it did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow the government to for an insurrection that needs to be organized, decision quickly reporting live in washington. i'm basil, john, thank you. basil. san francisco state senator scott wiener's introduced new legislation that would ensure the safe development of...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ketanji brown jackson doesn't think colorado -- trump can be kicked off the ballot and colorado becauseons can be prohibited from exit the ballot in florida. right? so there is intellectual -- i disagree with the outcome in this case, but there is intellectual consistency from the liberals. what is gorsuch is excuse? what is kavanaugh's excuse? what is it clarence thomas excuse for, first of all, just being the following this case with his presence in the first place? and certainly what is his excuse for going against his alleged states rights people? that's his real people. instead of applying the 14th amendment is written to donald trump? >> i would love to see what would happen if ginni thomas ran for president. could she be kicked off at the appellate? she is for sure and insurrectionist, but i guess we'll never know. elie mystal sticking around to play who won the week? that's next. eek? that's next. xfinity rewards presents: '1st and 10gs.' xfinity is giving away ten grand to a new lucky winner for every first and ten during the big game. enter daily through february 9th for a cha
ketanji brown jackson doesn't think colorado -- trump can be kicked off the ballot and colorado becauseons can be prohibited from exit the ballot in florida. right? so there is intellectual -- i disagree with the outcome in this case, but there is intellectual consistency from the liberals. what is gorsuch is excuse? what is kavanaugh's excuse? what is it clarence thomas excuse for, first of all, just being the following this case with his presence in the first place? and certainly what is his...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
hu hu even elena kagan and ketanji brown jackson while a bit more sympathetic to the idea that trumpendment may have contributed to an insurrection, skeptically challenged the all-democratic appointees on the colorado supreme court about saying you can't vote for this guy. >> no, and colorados has an interesting path of not voting for -- past of not voting for trump anyway, so they can carry on the same way -- howard: but there's also and other states. >> i actually agree with chief justice roberts here because if this was something that they were to uphold in the colorado ruling, there is nothing to say that another democrat, another republican on down the line, so on and so forth, states could also kick them off. i do think there's something to be said about letting the voters decide. donald trump seems to be the republican nominee. there's no signs of stopping that, and colorado again has proven time and time again at the ballot box they reject donald trump. there's no reason to stop now. howard: most of the justices when you get beyond the legal weeds about self-executing laws an
hu hu even elena kagan and ketanji brown jackson while a bit more sympathetic to the idea that trumpendment may have contributed to an insurrection, skeptically challenged the all-democratic appointees on the colorado supreme court about saying you can't vote for this guy. >> no, and colorados has an interesting path of not voting for -- past of not voting for trump anyway, so they can carry on the same way -- howard: but there's also and other states. >> i actually agree with chief...
0
0.0
Feb 29, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
my question about that is is that could be an issue that ketanji brown jackson wants to handle. that's one of the areas where it seems to me there is a wide range of members of the court who might say, you know, if he's raising this immunity in two different jurisdictions, we just have to take it. >> yeah, i agree with that. i guess the thing i would say to the other side though is why set it for on april 22nd argument? why take so long? >> and neal, is that completely up to the chief justice, the scheduling? >> it's generally as a matter of practice is, but i don't think you do something without the support of his colleagues. i think maybe the best thing we can hope for is that the chief and other justices feel like, look, there is still a lot of room in the joints, that we can decide this case quickly, and that there's two other actors here who other actors here who could truncate their calendars. judge chutkan has said, look, i'm going to give trump 88 days from the time the immunity cases decided to the actual start of trial. but she said that well before the supreme court a
my question about that is is that could be an issue that ketanji brown jackson wants to handle. that's one of the areas where it seems to me there is a wide range of members of the court who might say, you know, if he's raising this immunity in two different jurisdictions, we just have to take it. >> yeah, i agree with that. i guess the thing i would say to the other side though is why set it for on april 22nd argument? why take so long? >> and neal, is that completely up to the...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> jesse: i heard ketanji brown jackson also sounding very doubtful, harold, listening to the argumentsrado attorneys. >> harold: one of the great things about our country, and we sometimes forget, i try not to come is that our legal system works. these are judges -- i disagree, judge pirro, in this way. these are supreme court jus justices. who took an oath of office. we shouldn't be surprised that these justices, because they were appointed by democrats, nor should democrats be surprised when a republican-appointed justice might agree with them. this is what our judicial system, this is what our framers had in mind. when justice sotomayor said due process had not been given to mr. trump, it didn't matter to her who mr. trump was. he was an american. and you can't deny someone an opportunity to be on the ballot if they haven't been convicted of something -- as a matter fact, he hadn't been charged with leading and insurrection, nor has he been convicted of anything. are there more, the record in colorado, you can't take the record of a partisan hearing, which is what it was, it was a d
. >> jesse: i heard ketanji brown jackson also sounding very doubtful, harold, listening to the argumentsrado attorneys. >> harold: one of the great things about our country, and we sometimes forget, i try not to come is that our legal system works. these are judges -- i disagree, judge pirro, in this way. these are supreme court jus justices. who took an oath of office. we shouldn't be surprised that these justices, because they were appointed by democrats, nor should democrats be...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but doesn't that at least that's justice ketanji brown jackson.obviously we don't have cameras in the courtroom but we do have audio, the toughest questioning came from justices on the left side of the spectrum. cerges can he tanky brown jackson. picture for somebody in wisconsin and michigan and disenfranchises voters essentially saying a lot by those questions. >> saying a lot and not in the state of colorado's favor it. did not go well for colorado. and i will think for good reason, bret this is what happens when an untested theory needs judicial reality. and i think the key votes are justice jackson and justice cag for different reasons talking about well is the president even covered by this clause in the 14th amendment and justice kagan pointed out that if we left up the qualification question to the states, the result would be chaos. it's a national question that deserves a national answer. i think we're looking at an 8-1 decision in donald trump's favor. >> bret: and some experts saying maybe 9-0 to try to, you know, john roberts would rea
but doesn't that at least that's justice ketanji brown jackson.obviously we don't have cameras in the courtroom but we do have audio, the toughest questioning came from justices on the left side of the spectrum. cerges can he tanky brown jackson. picture for somebody in wisconsin and michigan and disenfranchises voters essentially saying a lot by those questions. >> saying a lot and not in the state of colorado's favor it. did not go well for colorado. and i will think for good reason,...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but unpacking today, my quick takeaway was really rested on justice ketanji brown jackson, because at of the day, she went to a space that i found interesting, where she was making the case that trump's lawyer could not make or was making inartfully. i think it really speaks to the reality that the justices do not want to be in a position where they're telling the states that they can't -- they have to kick someone off a ballot, either a, while voting is taking place, or b, with voting yet to come. i think at the end of the day, my takeaway is 9-0 decision against colorado in this matter. >> i'm going to give you very, very short time, david k. johnston, but quickly, your take. >> i think not only are we going to see donald on all the different ballots but we need to start a discussion about updating the constitution in a number of areas, including the electoral college and pay close attention to judge jackson, the smartest, savviest thinker on the supreme court. >> i concur with that. let's bring in -- thank you all very much. let's bring in white house correspondent mike memoli. wha
but unpacking today, my quick takeaway was really rested on justice ketanji brown jackson, because at of the day, she went to a space that i found interesting, where she was making the case that trump's lawyer could not make or was making inartfully. i think it really speaks to the reality that the justices do not want to be in a position where they're telling the states that they can't -- they have to kick someone off a ballot, either a, while voting is taking place, or b, with voting yet to...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
KNTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i want us to play an exchange between team trump, trump's lawyer and scotus justice ketanji brown jacksonio. >> for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. this riot -- >> the point is that a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we did not concede it was an effort to overthrow the government. none of these criteria met. it was not an insurrection. the events were shameful, criminal, violent, but it did not qualify as an insurrection as used in section 3. >> to be clear, the former president has not been convicted of insurrection. what do you make of the lawyers arguments here? >> one thing that's really interesting is the clip you played, it's basically the only time that sort of factual issue came up in the argument. basically everyone was steering clear of that. there's a very clear record, and even donald trump's lawyer -- i'm not sure how his client, donald trump, would feel about the fact that his lawyer in court was saying it's wrong, it's shameful because don
i want us to play an exchange between team trump, trump's lawyer and scotus justice ketanji brown jacksonio. >> for an insurrection there needs to be an organized, concerted effort to overthrow the government of the united states through violence. this riot -- >> the point is that a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection? >> we did not concede it was an effort to overthrow the government. none of these criteria met. it was not an insurrection. the...
0
0.0
Feb 9, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ketanji brown jackson said the same thing. when you have both the conservative and liberal judges agreeing on the issue of can you just give me the law here? can you give me precedence for this. >> ainsley: i learned a lot about the law listening to. this they were talking about how the con distribution, the 1st amendment should keep the president off the ballot in colorado. the supreme court justice said if you read the constitution. it says it is to keep officers off the ballot. the president is not an officer. >> steve: he is not listed that's the important part. >> ainsley: this dates back to the 1800s when they were trying to get officers, former confederates off the ballot. legally, that was written in not a way to say that a president couldn't be on the ballot. >> brian: between that and the first case being the alvin bragg case probably in the spring, the president has a chance to get on a legal roll despite the ominous decision likely coming down. >> lawrence: a legal roll, i have not heard it before. >> brian: can yo
ketanji brown jackson said the same thing. when you have both the conservative and liberal judges agreeing on the issue of can you just give me the law here? can you give me precedence for this. >> ainsley: i learned a lot about the law listening to. this they were talking about how the con distribution, the 1st amendment should keep the president off the ballot in colorado. the supreme court justice said if you read the constitution. it says it is to keep officers off the ballot. the...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
were you, the thing that surprised me the most, is that you had justice kagan and justice ketanji brown jackson asking questions that were along the same lines as the questions that were coming from justices thomas and neil gorsuch. they all seemed to be in line? >> yeah, so that's one of the best things, jonathan, about the supreme court, is that you got justices, regardless of maybe what people perceive as their political persuasions or whatever, they are always asking the tough questions. and sometimes that's true even when they are going to vote for you. here i think, and this is very much true of both justice kagan and jackson, they are constantly asking me the hard questions on my side, even if they do side with what i am, what i am arguing about. so, that itself was -- i think the problem was, they were looking for certain reassurance of the position -- wasn't going to be as extreme as colorado, unfortunately made it out to be. they were looking for some reason to take this grave step of confirming the colorado supreme court's decision. that's a momentous thing, you've got to rea
were you, the thing that surprised me the most, is that you had justice kagan and justice ketanji brown jackson asking questions that were along the same lines as the questions that were coming from justices thomas and neil gorsuch. they all seemed to be in line? >> yeah, so that's one of the best things, jonathan, about the supreme court, is that you got justices, regardless of maybe what people perceive as their political persuasions or whatever, they are always asking the tough...
0
0.0
Feb 8, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think in the main here, you saw the, quote, liberal justice ketanji brown jackson move into the conservative camp on this, around the idea of one state deciding for all states, who should be on the ballot for the presidency. that doesn't sit well, and actually, that for her and those like her is constitutionally consistent. politically outside the courtroom, people are going to bounce back and forth on this, ana, and the reality of it is, it is great soup for donald trump to do what he does, continue to stir it, continue to poison it as much as he can, as jen just noted with the kind of rhetoric and the kind of nonsense that's not related to the case at hand, and that's going to create further political confusion. but i think the court at the end, my bet is going to be 9-0 against colorado. >> public confidence in our institutions is at an all-time low. according to the latest nbc news poll, only 28% of americans view the supreme court very or somewhat positively. 40% view the court very or somewhat negatively. can the supreme court do itself any favors with this decision one way or another?
i think in the main here, you saw the, quote, liberal justice ketanji brown jackson move into the conservative camp on this, around the idea of one state deciding for all states, who should be on the ballot for the presidency. that doesn't sit well, and actually, that for her and those like her is constitutionally consistent. politically outside the courtroom, people are going to bounce back and forth on this, ana, and the reality of it is, it is great soup for donald trump to do what he does,...
0
0.0
Feb 10, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i'm not just only talking about the supreme court justice ketanji brown jackson, but also people thatal judges. president biden, vice president kamala harris have when kept their word, your promise, and we have to make sure voters are prepared to have their back in pennsylvania come november. >> period. pennsylvania speaker joanna mcclinton, thank you for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> tonight's last word is next. nemours next. ne mour ryone and is not for those with severe allergic reactions to its ingredients or to a previous dose. an increased risk of guillain-barré syndrome was observed after getting shingrix. fainting can also happen. the most common side effects are pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, muscle pain, tiredness, headache, shivering, fever, and upset stomach. ask your doctor or pharmacist about shingrix today. ♪ ♪ and upset stomach. is this yours? you ready? surprise! i don't think you can clear this. i got this. it's yours now. type 2 diabetes? discover the ozempic® tri-zone. ♪ ♪ i got the power of 3. i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some wei
i'm not just only talking about the supreme court justice ketanji brown jackson, but also people thatal judges. president biden, vice president kamala harris have when kept their word, your promise, and we have to make sure voters are prepared to have their back in pennsylvania come november. >> period. pennsylvania speaker joanna mcclinton, thank you for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> tonight's last word is next. nemours next. ne mour ryone and is not for those with...
0
0.0
Feb 11, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
brown jackson asking questions that were along the same lines as the questions that were coming fromomas and neil gorsuch, they all seem to be in line? >> that's one of the best things, jonathan, about the supreme court, you have justices, regardless of maybe what people perceive is their political persuasions, or whatever. they are always asking the tough questions. and sometimes it's not even sure they're gonna vote for you. here, and i think, and this is very much true both justice kagan and jackson, they are constantly asking me the hard questions on my side. even if they do side with one of what i am arguing about so that itself wasn't unusual. i think the problem is, they were looking for certain reassurance of the position wasn't going to be as extreme as colorado, unfortunately made it out to be. they were looking for some reason to take this grave step of confirming the colorado supreme court's decision. that's a momentous thing, you've got to reassure them, unfortunately there wasn't that reassurance. >> so catherine, let's talk about the appeals court ruling, the unanimous
brown jackson asking questions that were along the same lines as the questions that were coming fromomas and neil gorsuch, they all seem to be in line? >> that's one of the best things, jonathan, about the supreme court, you have justices, regardless of maybe what people perceive is their political persuasions, or whatever. they are always asking the tough questions. and sometimes it's not even sure they're gonna vote for you. here, and i think, and this is very much true both justice...