but khodorkovsky of his time they released, and khodorkovsky plus or minus sat quietly.it's not that it's quiet, because khodorkovsky was released from another time, the regime was there. others now we are dealing with an almost completed totalitarian system, i emphasize totalitarian. let me remind you, at the end of 2013, when khodorkovsky was formally amnestied, i don't remember exactly, it seems that this was the question. why was this done? because it was done at a time when moscow had to depict something with the olympics. at that time there was an olympics. back then putin's authoritarian personalist regime fought for some relations with europe, allies, partners, now after the war, after half a million dead there in ukraine, what is the point of portraying something? i can well imagine the conversation of patrushev, who is the main protagonist of all these cruel measures, and putin in the dispute with vaino. the head of the administration of the president of the russian federation and kiriyenko, the first deputy in charge. for internal politics, and what should we

but they released khodorkovsky at one time, and khodorkovsky plus or minus sat quietly.it's not that it's quiet, because khodorkovsky was released after all from another time, the regime was different. now we are dealing with an almost finished... let me remind you, at the end of 2013, when khodorkovsky was formally amnestied, i don't remember exactly, it seems that this was the question. why was this done? because it was done at a time when moscow had to depict something with the olympics. at that time there was an olympics. back then , the authoritarian personalist regime of putin was fighting for some relations with... europe, allies, partners, now after the war, after half a million people died there in ukraine, what is the point of portraying something. i imagine well the conversation of patrushev, who is the main protagonist of all these brutal measures, and putin in a dispute with vaino, the head of the administration of the president of the russian federation, and krienko, the first deputy in charge of domestic policy. what should we be afraid of? yes, they are w

but they released khodorkovsky at one time, and khodorkovsky plus or minus sat quietly. that it's quiet, because after all, khodorychkovsky was released from a different time, the regime was different. now we are dealing with an almost completed totalitarian system, i emphasize totalitarian. let me remind you, at the end of 2013, when khodorkovsky was formally amnestied, i don't remember exactly, it seems that this was the question. why it was done, because it was done at a time when moscow had to show something with the olympics. at that time there was an olympics, even then an authoritarian. putin's personalist regime fought for some relations with europe, allies, partners now after the war, after half a million dead there in ukraine, what is the point of portraying something? i can well imagine the conversation between patrushev, who is the main protagonist of all these cruel measures, and putin in a dispute with vaino, the head of the administration of the president of the russian federation, and krienko, the first deputy in charge of domestic policy. and what should

but they released khodorkovsky at one time, and khodorkovsky plus or minus sat quietly. it's not that it's quiet, because after all, khodorkovsky was released from a different time, the regime was different. now we are dealing with an almost complete totalitarian system. i emphasize, totalitarian. let me remind you, at the end of 2013, when khodorkovsky was formally amnestied, i don't remember exactly, it seems that this was the question. why was this done? because it was done at a time when moscow had to depict something with the olympics. at that time, the olympics were held, even then the authoritarian, personalist regime of putin was fighting for some relations with europe, allies. partners, now after the war, after half a million dead there in ukraine, what is the point of depicting something? i can well imagine the conversation between patrushev, who is the main protagonist of all these cruel measures, and putin in the zvayno dispute, the head of the administration of the president of the russian federation, and krienko, the first deputy in charge of domestic polic

but they released khodorkovsky at one time, and khodorkovsky plus or minus sat quietly. in the fact that is quiet, because khodorkovsky was released after all , at a different time, the regime was different. now we are dealing with an almost completed totalitarian system, i emphasize totalitarian. i remind you at the end of 2013, when khodorkovsky was formally amnestied, i don't remember exactly , i think that was the question. why it was done, because it was done at a time when something was needed in moscow. at that time , putin's personalist regime fought for some relations with europe, allies, the moment was the olympics, even then authoritarian, partners. now after the war, after half a million dead there in ukraine, what is the point of portraying something? i can well imagine the conversation of patrushev, who is the main protagonist of all these cruel measures. and what should we be afraid of? and so are war criminals, but by killing a man, we solved the problem, prevented riots during the elections, we removed part of the headache, we now act like this, we are now satraps, thiev

but at one time they released khodorkovsky and khodorkovsky plus minus sat quietly.he point is not that it is quiet, because khodorchkovsky was released after all. at other times the regime was different. now we are dealing with an almost completed totalitarian system, i emphasize totalitarian. let me remind you, at the end of 2013, when khodorkovsky was formally amnestied, i don't remember exactly, i think so the question was why was this done? because it was done at a time when moscow had to depict something with the olympics. at that moment. was the olympics, even then the authoritarian, personalist regime of putin was fighting for some relations with europe, allies, partners. now after the war, after half a million dead there in ukraine, what is the point of portraying something? i can well imagine the conversation between patrushev, who is the main protagonist of all these cruel measures, and putin in the zvayno dispute, the head of the administration of the president of the russian federation, and krienko, the first of deputy in charge of internal policy. and w

mikhail khodorkovsky publicly questioned the authorship of navalny, alfred koch, who else, all thesei consider kats a rogue, a swindler, a person with an absolutely disgusting biography. now even listen to singing interviews, he says: we will continue to do investigation. so i support alexei navalny , i hope that all of us who support him, everyone in the world, who support him, well, one way or another with any mention of ours, will not allow the authorities to commit a crime that they were already ready to commit 4 years ago, exactly in 2 days. chichvarkin’s entry, that is, on february 16 , 2024, the russian ministry of foreign affairs for the yamalo-neninets autonomous okrug reports the sudden death of alexei navalny in a correctional colony. this message appears on the uvsin website at 14:19 here on february 16th itself. reported. foreign affairs of norway, bart eide writes: that is, at 14:35 of the same february 16, the minister is deeply saddened by the news of navalny’s death, the russian government bears a heavy burden of responsibility for this, you listen to the numbers, an

mikhail khodorkovsky publicly questioned navalny’s authorship, alfred koch, whoever else, all these peopler him a rogue, a swindler. and on february 8, 2024, an absolutely legendary interview with our president will be released american journalist carlson, who managed to get this interview. they started the war in 2000. its resonance was deafening, if you look at the circle in general, it’s practically all together, about half a billion people heard our president, they heard the truth, they heard something that they would never hear from their media, and of course , this caused hysteria in the civilized world, all over the world people are watching this... on wednesday, february 14, navalny is visited by his lawyer leonid solovyov, later he also reports that he saw his client in absolutely normal, healthy, cheerful state. on february 15, navalny connects via video link to a hearing of the kovrovsky court in the vladimir region, from his colony in the yamalo-ninets district, here we see that he is cheerful, he jokes, he... are you hinting at the news about navalny? so i support alexei naval

mikhail khodorkovsky, one of the country's richest men, had been an early putin backer. kremlin corruption, he became an enemy. in 2005, he was arrested and found guilty of financial crimes. he spent a decade in prison and was then exiled. i spoke to him just weeks after russia's all—out invasion of ukraine, and i asked him whether he regretted that early support for putin. do you think he changed or did you get him wrong at the beginning? the soviet empire collapsed 30 years ago. in countries like ukraine, they have begun to build a civil society, democratic institutions, the rule of law. it's very far from perfect, but the process has begun. why, three decades on, has that process not even really begun in russia? and people like you have poured money into 0pen russia foundation and other civil society initiatives have failed. why? do you feel ashamed of your own country today? cos you live outside it, you live in a very different world. and ijust wonder whether you really feel russian any more or whether you just feel shame about your country. vladimir putin insists th

mikhail khodorkovsky, one of the country's richest men, had been an early putin backer. to rail against kremlin corruption, he became an enemy. in 2005, he was arrested and found guilty of financial crimes. he spent a decade in prison and was then exiled. i spoke to him just weeks after russia's all out invasion of ukraine, and i asked him whether he regretted that early support for putin. do you think he changed or did you get him wrong at the beginning? the soviet empire collapsed 30 years ago. in countries like ukraine, they have begun to build a civil society, democratic institutions, the rule of law. it's very far from perfect, but the process has begun. why three decades on, has that process not even really begun in russia? and people like you have poured money into 0pen russia foundation and other civil society initiatives have failed. why? do you feel ashamed of your own country today? because you live outside it, you live in a very different world. and ijust wonder whether you really feel russian anymore or whether you just feel shame about your country. vladimi

mikhail khodorkovsky, one of the country's richest men, had been an early putin backer.st kremlin corruption, he became an enemy. in 2005, he was arrested and found guilty of financial crimes. he spent a decade in prison and was then exiled. i spoke to him just weeks after russia's all out i spoke to him just weeks after russia's all—out invasion of ukraine, and i asked him whether he regretted that early support for putin. do you think he changed or did you get him wrong at the beginning? the soviet empire collapsed 30 years ago. in countries like ukraine, they have begun to build a civil society, democratic institutions, the rule of law. it's very far from perfect, but the process has begun. why three decades on, has that process not even why, three decades on, has that process not even really begun in russia? and people like you have poured money into 0pen russia foundation and other civil society initiatives have failed. why? do you feel ashamed of your own country today? because you live outside it, you live in a very different world. and ijust wonder whether you re

mikhail khodorkovsky, one of the country's richest men, had been an early putin backer.inst kremlin corruption, he became an enemy. in 2005, he was arrested and found guilty of financial crimes. he spent a decade in prison and was then exiled. i spoke to him just weeks after russia's all—out invasion of ukraine, and i asked him whether he regretted that early support for putin. do you think he changed or did you get him wrong at the beginning? the soviet empire collapsed 30 years ago. in countries like ukraine, they have begun to build a civil society, democratic institutions, the rule of law. it's very far from perfect, but the process has begun. why, three decades on, has that process not even really begun in russia? and people like you have poured money into 0pen russia foundation and other civil society initiatives have failed. why? do you feel ashamed of your own country today? cos you live outside it, you live in a very different world. and i just wonder whether you really feel russian any more or whether you just feel shame about your country. vladimir putin insis

these operations, in my opinion, this is such a strengthening of the so-called russian position, from khodorkovsky fighter, including and... including kasparov, everyone else, i see how they react to this operation, evgenia came to kyiv chirikova, mark has arrived feigen, yesterday there was a forum to support russian volunteers, there is such a rise, an increase in the status of those russian, russian, so-called oppositionists, at the same time almost nothing is being done to really... support those, these national movements, who are fighting against the russian federation, those liberation movements that had to be supported and helped, everything was concentrated on the russian position of the so-called, which in essence is no different from the climate except to submit to others, i think that the danger of russia, the needle of such russia, it is in nationally isolated movements. because exclusively national movements, national republics are the achilles heel of the russian federation, just like the former union republics, you have to work with them, focus on the russian opposition, hope that t

at his feet all autumn, begging the western intelligence services to help him stay in the west, like khodorkovskyhe other trash, who have three options for the path, i said about this 20 years ago. prison, immigration or grave. why is this so? the fact is that in parallel with the return navalny to russia, an advertising propaganda film about the supposedly under construction of putin’s palace is being shot at a german studio. journalists from the newspaper shvartsvete managed to establish that navalny’s film was made in the town of kirdsharten at the blakefort film studio. only his wife and daughter came in , the doors were locked, the curtains were even drawn on the windows , so that the foothills of the alps could no longer be seen, but they were clearly visible from navalny’s house, which he rented in the most prestigious area of ​​freiburg even before joining the german company an order has arrived from the united states, here it is he moved into this villa with the symbolic number 13 at the end of november. whose money is it for officially unemployed bloggers?

oppositionists, these foreign agents, envoys, traitors, traitors, envoys, including a terrorist killer khodorkovskypolitical preparation for possible future events, and i’ll add a sixth fact, this article was published, of course, today in the magazine, the american communist forren affairs, but it was written long before that, by four specialists on russia, one of whom worked in one russian educational... this is not a prelude, i think this is not the only material that they prepared, again taking into account the personality of the authors, they are all very non-random guys, and that’s the main thing. author, especially, buddy, hello, how are you promised, today we are preparing the flow, hey, hey, it ’s not the first day, oh, we need to transfer money home, by the way, it’s better to transfer with vtb online, it’s faster and more convenient, thank you for teaching, this is someone who taught whom, vtb, all together it turns out, alpha investments, this leads to money. we give promotions every day! open an investment account and get another one as a gift for purchasing any stock! not just profita

we ask you to resign your powers, it’s good for you, we have no shame, here is the appeal of mikhail khodorkovskyressing german gref, alexei kudrin, anatoly chubais, roman abramovich, mikhail. to all those who know me, whom i know. guys, now is the time when you shouldn't try to sneak between construction sites. either state your position, or we are enemies, don’t be offended. i’m interested in this question, these are those who are mr. huge financial leverage, huge , well, now look at this, i don’t know what to say to you, other than to forgive, that’s what they ’re crying about, about these people, ah, this is very scary, this is very scary, to live it’s no longer possible, it’s simply impossible, help, whoever can, help us as much as possible. where is this power that sits there, the devils? and i have to shout glory to ukraine, for what? for the fact that i worked all my life, paid taxes, and now i’m sitting in the basement, and little children are dying, their arms and legs are being torn off, and i will shout words to ukraine, or about these? ukraine, we are ruined. but certainly not about

there at my feet all autumn, begging intelligence services of the west, help him stay in the west, like khodorkovskyd everything else. the opening of the studio itself in germany surprisingly coincided with the beginning of the investigation about the palace, it turns out that back in december, in early december, they called from america to this black forest studio, reserved a place, well, time to shoot, it turns out that navalny, well, he wasn’t so bad, well, after such a poisoning, he... was actively involved in filming a studio film. the work was carried out as secretly as possible, only the wife came in from strangers and daughter, the doors were locked, the curtains were even drawn on the windows, so that the foothills of the alps could no longer be seen. but they are clearly visible from navalny’s house, which he rented in the most prestigious area of ​​freiburg, even before the order came to the german company from the united states. he moved into this villa with the symbolic number 13 at the end of november. with whose money did the officially unemployed blogger rent these two floors? who pa

at his feet all autumn, begging the western intelligence services to help him stay in the west, like khodorkovskyash, who have three options for the path, i said this 20 years ago, prison, immigration or the grave, why is that? the fact is that in parallel with navalny’s return to russia... an advertising, propaganda film about the supposedly under construction putin's palace. journalists from the newspaper schwarzwelder bothe managed to establish that navalny’s film was made in the town of kirdsharten at the black forest film studio, which is run by nina gwynwiland and sebastian weiland. the opening of the studio itself in germany surprisingly coincided with the beginning of the investigation about the palace. it turns out, back in december at the beginning. in the lower district of freiburg even before the order came to the german company from the united states. he moved into this villa with the symbolic number 13 at the end of november. whose money? officially unemployed blogger took it off. these two floors who paid him to create a mockumentary film? well, in the end , on december 25, 2023, m

mikhail khodorkovsky publicly questioned navalny’s authorship, alfred koch, who else, all these peopleperson with an absolutely disgusting biography. now even listen to the singing interviews, he says: we will continue to carry out an investigation, but who needs an investigation? yours, well, throw them out, who needs your investigation? and on february 8, 2024 , an absolutely legendary interview of our president with the american journalist carlson, who managed to get this interview, comes out. they started the war in 2014, our goal. of course, this caused hysteria in the civilized world. people all over the world are watching this ridiculous interview with vladimir putin conducted by tucker carlol, and we must not fall into this web of lies, especially that putin is somehow destined to succeed in ukraine. on the contrary, he doomed to fail. how do events develop further? 3 days before navalny's death. on february 12, his mother lyudmila comes to the colony and reports that she saw him, he is alive, healthy and cheerful. on wednesday, february 14 , navalny is visited by his lawyer le

mikhail khodorkovsky, one of the country's richest men, had been an early putin backer.led. i spoke to him just weeks after russia's all out invasion of ukraine, and i asked him whether he regretted that early support for putin. do you think he changed or did you get him wrong at the beginning? the soviet empire collapsed 30 years ago. in countries like ukraine, they have begun to build a civil society, democratic institutions, the rule of law. it's very far from perfect, but the process has begun. why? why three decades on, has that process not even really begun in russia? and people like you have poured money into open russia foundation and other civil society initiatives have failed. why? initiatives have failed. do you feel ashamed of your own country today? because you live outside it, you live in a very different world. and ijust wonder whether you really feel russian anymore or whether you just feel shame about your country. vladimir putin insists that his rule commands overwhelming popular support and his poll ratings are consistently high when elections come aro

is worth the speculation of garbage dumps, probably associated with the oligarch and foreign agent khodorkovskyhat police were on duty near krokhus and they did not come to help. in reality, the van turned out to be a non-spoon carriage, but the cunning schemers did not hesitate to cover up the cross on its back door and the typical ambulance markings on the side doors. in addition, the special vehicles of the ministry of internal affairs have different glazing and body shapes, or so. foreign agents ilya korosilchik and morat gelman write synchronously on social networks. the detained terrorists are not real, and their testimony was extracted from them through some kind of intimidation. by the way, their absurd the character’s posts were not deleted even after a video from the phone of one of the criminals appeared in the public domain, where the identities of all four were clearly confirmed. here are the fantastic speculations of the trash, according to which the terrorist attack... was coordinated by an fsb officer in a blue sweater, and he then detained the criminals. in fact, the man works

these activists abroad, including in the ngo kovcheg, which is financed directly by khodorkovsky, firsttled in turkey and, realizing that they could not find much prospects for shaking the regime there, they moved to serbia. it seems that the american customer really doesn’t like russian-serbian friendship, so they’re trying destroy the sympathy of moscow and belgrade, otherwise suddenly one of the eu countries will see that it is possible with russia... and the most cynical thing is that here in this case the americans are trying to destroy such a last enclave of human relations towards russians with the hands of former russians. trilocanthus, former russians, they act as a kind of trojan horse. the serbs perceived them as their own, but it turned out that there was nothing like these people were not part of their homeland here, but... for anti-serbian and anti-russian politics, it just doesn’t work out very well, belgrade rejects them, it seems that a common cultural code is working, like a pendulum that doesn’t swing. a summit of european union leaders has started in brussels today ;

for much more joint enterprise, for a coalition of forces, perhaps including, for example, mikhail khodorkovskyn israel. are you now looking to actjointly with these other anti—putin forces? we are acting jointly, like every single political force in the russian opposition... well, with the greatest of respect, you're not. here's a direct quote from mr navalny not so long ago when asked about coalitions, he said, "i'm going to be direct — to hell with your coalition." exactly! exactly, we are strictly opposed to any, like, formal coalition to a round table debate itself. and we always were very strong proponents of the idea of ad hoc coalition. we don't need to have a lengthy discussion with a politburo to decide that these political actions that we are doing now — this noon against putin campaign — is a good idea. and every single politicalforce in the russian opposition — not only the liberals, also the left and so on — are supportive of it. we didn't need to build, like, a formal organisation. no, there are very different political organisations, each talking to their audiences through their

for much more joint enterprise, for a coalition of forces, perhaps including, for example, mikhail khodorkovskybased in israel. are you now looking to act jointly with these other anti—putin forces? we are acting jointly, like every single political force in the russian opposition... well, with the greatest of respect, you're not. here's a direct quote from mr navalny not so long ago when asked about coalitions, he said, "i'm going to be direct — to hell with your coalition." exactly! exactly. we are strictly opposed to any, like, formal coalition to a round table debate itself. and we always were very strong proponents of the idea of ad hoc coalition. we don't need to have a lengthy discussion with a politburo to decide that these political actions that we are doing now — this noon against putin campaign — is a good idea. and every single political force in the russian opposition — not only the liberals, also the left and so on — are supportive of it. we didn't need to build, like, a formal organisation. no, there are very different political organisations, each talking to their audiences thro

which is worth the speculation of garbage dumps, probably associated with the oligarch foreign agent khodorkovskyhe police and they didn’t come to help, in fact the van turned out to be a carriage, but the cunning schemers did not hesitate to cover up the cross on its back door and the typical ambulance markings on the side doors, in addition , the special transport of the ministry of internal affairs has different glazing and body shapes, or so. foreign agents ilya korosilchik and morat gelman simultaneously write on social networks: the detained terrorists are not real, and their testimony was extracted from them by some kind of intimidation. by the way, your absurd character posts. was not deleted even after the video from the phone appeared in the public domain one of the criminals, where the identities of all four are clearly confirmed, here are the fantastic speculations of the trash, according to which the terrorist attack was coordinated by an fsb officer in a blue sweater and he then detained the criminals. in fact, the man works as an ordinary builder, attended the concert with his daug

opposition of the russians is russian, it acts in a very irrational way, in particular, you know that khodorkovskynd yulia navalny and many others were set to leave at 12:00 on sunday. on march 17, at a polling station in a foreign electoral district inside the country, to demonstrate that their vote is present, from the results we understand that these votes could not be counted, or they were few, but a beautiful, just in quotes, a picture for the audience , that there is a high turnout of voters at the polling station, that they are all ready to stand in line, in lines, but the result shows... that these lines were for the sake of voting for volodymyr putin , and with this, the kremlin regime , unfortunately, strengthened its position, at least visually, because this is where we started, not about procedures, but again about the rights of freedom and about legitimacy, and legitimacy is a political perception, that is, there is a political perception , this person legally, in a legal manner, in compliance with all international standards, with the realization of all freedoms. citizens' rights, bo

of returning you to the nineties, they romanticize those times so much, but you can understand why khodorkovskyt a loan for 300 million, bought himself a company, became a billionaire, did not repay the loan, well... you, something didn’t bother me when he filmed a program with government money on the russia 2 tv channel, well, who are they, they behave very uncomprehensively, on the one hand, they are adherents of western, so -called democracies, exactly the so-called, because what is recited and what happens as a result are the exact opposite things, this is true democracy, it cannot be called what western democracy is, democracy in general, if the power of the people. yes, if we turn to england , sunak’s democracy elected how many people , no one chose him at all, in england there is not even such an institution as democracy, therefore not a single democratic point is written down in any document that defines what the state of great britain is. principle, because it is a monarchy, this is a monarchy. as a union building within the framework of the new geopolitical status that the republic of

consider the speculation of garbage dumps, probably connected with the oligarch and foreign agent khodorkovskyhe spirit that police were on duty near krokhus and they did not come to help. in fact, the van turned out to be a carriage, but the cunning schemers did not hesitate to cover up the cross on its back door and the typical ambulance markings on the side doors. additives for special transport. ministry of internal affairs has different glazing and body shapes or so. foreign agents ilya krasilchik and morat gelman simultaneously write on social networks: the detained terrorists are not real, and their testimony was extracted from them by some kind of intimidation. by the way, the character did not delete his absurd posts even after a video from the phone of one of the criminals appeared in the public domain, where the identities of all four are clearly confirmed. this also includes the fantastic speculations of the trash, according to which the terrorist attack was coordinated a little. little fsb officer in a blue sweater and he later detained the criminals. in fact, the man works as an

general, about his performances at events of ardent russophobes, like the fugitive oligarch-criminal khodorkovskyry district, they seem to be. i’m glad that all this has moved away and let it take root there, they will have some degrees there, they will calmly live out their lives there, stinking from there and earning their piece of bread. in general, many frankly strange things do not seem so to makarevich, for example, he lived in russia his entire adult life, here he became a famous musician, but not once did he think about supporting the russian soldiers who defend the country and , risking their lives, ensure the peace of the russians, but in his new homeland in israel he is an ardent patriot and fully justifies all the actions of the army. after what happened on october 7, israel has every right to respond to it the way it will now respond. and he will answer: don’t doubt it, but to those who today around the world are shouting about the bloodthirsty zionist aggressors, i would, of course. really didn’t want their children to be killed tomorrow, their wives to be killed, their parents were

dream of returning you to the nineties, they so romanticize those times, but you can understand why khodorkovsky out a loan for 300 million, bought a business for himself, became a billionaire, but did not repay the loan. yuri dudya was not embarrassed by anything when he used state money to film a headbutt program on the russia-2 tv channel, well, they behave very uncomprehensively, on the one hand, they are adherents of western, so -called democracies, precisely the so-called, because what is recited and what happens as a result are exactly the opposite things, this cannot be called genuine democracy, what is western democracy, democracy in general, if? yes, if we turn to england, democracy chose how many people , no one chose it at all, in england there is not even such an institution as democracy, therefore not a single democratic point in principle is spelled out anywhere in any document that defines what the state of great britain is. because it's a monarchy, it's a monarchy. i, as a person who is both an international political scientist and an international lawyer, have studied specifica

people, the heroes now are those who are in the zone of a special military operation, but excuse me, khodorkovskyyukas empire was once like, so i’m sure, despite this, our... the task is that these people are working off their 30 pieces of silver, who are traitors, so if they don’t do this, they will lose funding, so they will do it, although they themselves understand that their case is... obviously losing, and i am sure that what is happening, that high level, well, the work of our security agencies, will ensure the smooth conduct of elections and the further development of our country, this is very important, you like former fsb general, i already know you quite well from your speech at the program, it seems to me that you are not inclined to complacency. we’re making noise, we’re making noise, yes, i think that ’s most likely the case, i don’t see that they have any potential, because in reality they don’t have any positions in russia now, more besides, no, well, there are different people who got scared and ran away, if they... silently, no , excuse me, they don’t say anything bad against th

katz publicly said that he doubts navalny’s authorship, knowing full well that this not so, mikhail khodorkovskyr, and we did not start it in 2022, this is an attempt at it. stop, its resonance was deafening, if you look at the circle in general, it’s practically all together, about half a billion people heard our president, they heard the truth, they heard something that they would never hear from their media, and of course, this caused hysteria in the civilized world. all over the world people are watching this ridiculous interview with vladimir putin, which was carried out by tucker carlol, and we must not fall into this web of lies, especially that putin is somehow destined to succeed in ukraine, on the contrary, he is doomed to fail. how do events develop further? 3 days before navalny’s death on february 12, his mother lyudmila comes to the colony and reports that she saw him. he is alive, healthy and cheerful. on wednesday, february 14 , navalny is visited by his lawyer leonid solovyov. later, he also reports that he saw his client completely normal, healthy, cheerful state. on february 1

and who is khodorkovsky? is it mi-6 or is it the cia, or is it some other organizations? scheme, the one twenty years ago, more than 20 years old, today, it still exists in the same way. there is this group that is going, as they say in the west, to carry out a revolution, a cultural revolution. who goes to carry out a terrorist attack without shouting to allah akbar, this is not suicide, not a suicide from islamic jihad, this is someone from a gangster group who was given an order, and with this order he goes out and carries out his own tasks, so you can talk as much as you like what yes it is islamists, and the perpetrators, maybe they belong to some part of radical islam, it’s quite likely, but it’s absolutely certain for me that the scheme... the territory of russia and who committed terrorist attacks already in moscow, including, but they don’t hide this, so what, what reason could the same sholsa have today , quite openly and purely says: no, this is isis, well, then call otashili, this is the former minister of internal affairs, who just then first learned about ,

garry kasparov, mikhail khodorkovsky, who was seen as a political threat, either jailed or exiled. and then you even have those outside of russia who dared to challenge putin's candidates think of like a viktor yushchenko ukraine who was poisoned all those years ago for challenging the pro russian candidate there, or an alexander litvinenko who died in london from radia, radiation poisoning. again, someone who challenged putin, putin does not tolerate opposition, political opposition protests. and many of those who are brave enough to stand up to him, pay with their lives. it's a fact and the signal is one piece of that strategy of keeping the russian people from being able to see these shows of courage and the show's of opposition in the question going forward will be for what i mean, martyred, for what to achieve, watch him one of the reasons excited to read your book is, what do you think the future is? do you think putin is at risk and russia? >> so the prigozhin brief uprising showed that there were some willing to challenge him, even those close to him and prigozhin wouldn't