why is it ffent here than it was in kisor? you know, in kisor, the court declined to overrule auer and the part -- the opinion that was for a majority of the court was largely it was on stare decisis grounds. so why would a different result obtain here? rtinez: i think my first answer is that the chief justice's opinion suggested it might be different and i think the reasons 's -- it's reason -- it's -- it's -- it relys different is because there are important differences betweeron and auer. the most important that i think plays on the riae question is this idea that chevron allows and -- and almost like a feature of chevron, not a bug, is that it encourages anws agencies to flip-flop. and so the reliance consideration with respect to evn is -- is much, you know, weaker for -- for -- for the ment's side because the agency is allowed to flip-flop alatnce, whereas, with our deference, the idea is that the agency's going to be very hard for the agency to flip-flop. so i think it's more important to correct chevron because it's --