such a decision has now been taken by kyiv. district administrative court, and in addition, the courtided to collect from the supreme court lviv's salary for the time of his allegedly forced absenteeism. and after that, of course, the judge told reporters that he was satisfied with the decision. georgy shabaev joins our broadcast. an investigative journalist for the scheme program who has covered this topic from the beginning. george, did today's court decision come as a surprise to you? to be honest, in view of those, on that court. the process that took place in the kyiv district administrative court, when the facts of the issuance of the order to remove lviv from the staff of the supreme court, and not the finding out whether or not he had acquired russian citizenship, were investigated, it was not a surprise to me. the security service of ukraine, the supreme court showed, in my opinion, a very weak position in this matter, since no circumstances, facts of acquisition of citizenship were investigated. bohdan lviv, namely, apart from the fact that the security service of ukraine ch

administrative court of kyiv.dious judges in the country. ablo in... is a defendant in the plivok vovka trial case seizure of state power and interference in the work of judicial bodies. bohdan lviv, judge of the cassation commercial court within the supreme court, who has russian citizenship, was reinstated. in addition , the kyiv district administrative court ordered lviv to pay the average salary for the period of forced absenteeism. for the period from october 5, 2022, when it was deducted. we will remind you that bohdan lviv turned out to be a citizen. he received the russian passport of the russian federation back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine, and at the age of 45 in 2012, he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. however, he himself continues to assure that he does not have a passport of the country of the aggressor. that year, the supreme council of justice dismissed 325 j

the son of a scandalous judge. now liquidated of the district administrative court of kyiv, yevhen ablovested on suspicion of premeditated murder. on january 4, 27-year-old ivan ablov was declared wanted. on the 15th, he voluntarily surrendered to the police. according to the case materials, during the new year's celebration at the summer cottage, ablov jr., in a state of alcohol intoxication , picked up a kitchen knife and stabbed the man in the ribcage during a quarrel with one of the people present. he died on the spot. so far the court has taken. ivan ablov is in custody until march 3 without bail. it will be recalled that the father of the arrested person yevhen ablov, the former deputy head of the scandalous, now liquidated district administrative court of kyiv, is one of the most odious judges in the country. ablov is a defendant in the case of plivok vovka about the attempted seizure of state power and interference in the work of judicial bodies. judge of the commercial court of cassation as part of the supreme court , bohdan lviv, who speaks russian. was reinstated in office. in

district administrative court of kyiv, yevhen ablov, was arrested on suspicion of premeditated murder-year-old ivan ablov was declared wanted. on the 15th he voluntarily surrendered to the police. according to the case materials, during the new year's celebration in the country cottage, ablov jr. was in a state of alcohol intoxication. quarrel with one of those present, took a kitchen knife and stabbed the man in the chest, he died on the spot. so far, the court has taken ivan ablov into custody until march 3 without the right to post bail. we will remind you that the father of the arrested yevhen ablov, the former deputy head of the scandalous, now liquidated district administrative court of kyiv, is one of the most odious judges in the country. ablov is a defendant in the case of plivok vovka about the attempted seizure of state power and interference in... the work of judicial bodies. bohdan lviv, a judge of the cassation commercial court within the supreme court, who has russian citizenship, was reinstated. in addition, the kyiv district administrative court ordered lviv to pay th

administrative court of kyiv.one of the most odious judges. of ukraine. ablov is a defendant in the plivok case vovka about the attempt to seize state power and interference in the work of judicial bodies. bohdan lviv, judge of the cassation commercial court within the supreme court, who has russian citizenship, was reinstated. in addition, the kyiv district administrative court ordered to pay lviv the average salary for the period of forced absenteeism, for the period from october 5, 2022, when it was deducted. we will remind you, bohdan lviv. turned out to be a citizen of russia, he received a russian passport back in 1999, when he was already working as a judge in ukraine, and at the age of 45 in 2012 year he renewed this document. the judge's family also owns real estate in moscow. the security service of ukraine confirmed lviv's russian citizenship. however, he himself continues to assure that he does not have a passport of the aggressor country. on tuesday, the supreme council of justice dismissed 325. 293 j

the kyiv district administrative court partially satisfied the lawsuit of the ex-head of the commercial court of cassation, bohdan. lviv, he will be reinstated as a judge and his salary will be paid for the period of forced absenteeism. let me remind you, they found him in 2022 russian citizenship, i received this information over 20 years ago, and updated it in 2012. he himself still denies russian citizenship. what you published, you published, based on the sources that were available to you, and i am still convinced, and i personally, there is no need to convince myself. i know that i am exclusively. i am a citizen of ukraine, and the only passport i have is the passport of a citizen of ukraine, i have no other passport. he justified russian aggression. the ex-novice of the kyiv pechersk lavra received from the service security of ukraine suspicion. a cleric of a moscow church publicly spread fakes about ukrainian defenders on the eastern front and called the full-scale aggression an escalation of the conflict between russia and ukraine. during the searches , law enforcement officers

kyiv district administrative court partially satisfied the lawsuit of the ex-head of the commercial courthdan lviv. he will be reinstated as a judge and will be paid his salary for the period of forced absence. let me remind you that in 2022 , they found russian citizenship in him. this information was confirmed by the sbu. rfudy lviv received his passport more than 20 years ago, and in 2012 he renewed it. he himself has russian citizenship. denies, what you published, you published, based on the sources that were are available to you, and i still... convince myself, and i personally, there is no need to convince myself, i know that i am exclusively a citizen of ukraine, and i have the only passport - the passport of a citizen of ukraine , i have no other passport. well, what kind of strange metamorphoses are going on in the ukrainian judiciary? i want to talk to my guest, this is iryna fedoriv, ​​journalist, public activist. ms. iryna, i congratulate you, glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. good evening, good evening, mrs. iryna, well, look, even before today's court decision, the chairma

so today the kyiv district administrative court has already issued a final decision regarding the reinstatement of ex-judge bohdan lviv. let me remind you that on october 3, 2022 , the security service of ukraine informed the supreme court about its presence of russian citizenship, and on the basis of this the head of the supreme court, actually the head of the supreme court decided to cancel it after all. the presence of bohdan lviv in this judge, while at the same time the security service of ukraine reported that the checks were ongoing, however , later at the court, a representative of the sbu reported that, as of now, checks on the fact that he acquired russian citizenship are no longer being conducted. on october 22, the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyy, instructed to check the existence of grounds for terminating ukrainian citizenship of mr. bohdan. however, since that time, it is not known whether this task was considered either in the office of the president or in the state migration service. these petitions referred to the investigation of our colleagues, who report that more

the kyiv district administrative court partially satisfied the lawsuit of the ex-head of the commercialation, bohdan lviv. he will be reinstated as a judge and will be paid his salary for the period of forced absence. let me remind you that in 2022 he was granted russian citizenship. this information was confirmed by the security service of ukraine in the passport of rrefij judge lviv received more than 20 years ago, and in 2012 he updated it. he himself still denies russian citizenship. what you published, you published, based on those sources that were available to you, and i am still convinced and... i personally do not need to convince myself, i know that i am exclusively a citizen of ukraine, and i have the only passport - the passport of a citizen of ukraine, i have no other passport. well, what kind of strange metamorphoses are going on in the ukrainian judiciary, i want to talk to my guest, this is iryna fedoriv, ​​a journalist, public activist, ms. iryna, i congratulate you, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, good evening. good evening, ms. iryna, well, look, even before to

the kyiv district administrative court partially satisfied the lawsuit of the ex-head of the commercial court of cassation, bohdan lviv. he will be reinstated as a judge and will be paid his salary for the period of forced absence. let me remind you, in 2022, he was found to have dewclaws. citizenship, this information was confirmed by the sbu. judge levo received a russian passport more than 20 years ago, and in 2012 he renewed it. he himself still denies russian citizenship. what you posted was what you posted based on the sources that were available to you. and i am still convincing, and i personally do not need to convince myself. i am from... that i am exclusively a citizen of ukraine, and i have the only passport is the passport of a citizen of ukraine, i have no other passport. the verkhovna rada appointed olga pishchanska as the head of the chamber of accounts. before that, she headed the antimonopoly committee. 252 people's representatives voted for this appointment. not a single vote was given to the voice and european solidarity faction, people's deputy yaroslav zhelezniak sa

returning to his duties, the kyiv district administrative court partially satisfied the lawsuit of the ex-head of the commercial court of cassation, bohdan lviv. he will be reinstated as a judge and will be paid his salary for the period of forced absence. let me remind you that in... in 2022, they found his russian citizenship, this information the sbu confirmed the passport of the russian federation and judge lviv, received more than 20 years ago, and in 2012 renewed it. he himself still denies russian citizenship. what you published, you published, based on the sources that were available to you, and i am still convinced, and i am personally ... there is no need to convince myself, i know that i am exclusively a citizen of ukraine, and i have the only passport - a passport of a citizen of ukraine, i don't have another passport, well, what kind of strange metamorphoses are going on in the ukrainian judiciary, i want to talk to my my guest is iryna fedoriv, ​​journalist, public activist, mrs. iryna, i congratulate you, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, good evening, good evening,

court of the city of kyiv, about interference in the court's activities regarding the administration of justice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind you that earlier on january 12 , the supreme court appealed to the director of the dbr for a manifestation of the inadmissibility of court pressure. all because of the actions of the investigative bureau, which conducted searches in the premises of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. presumably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific case court case the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law required. has a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of a law enforcement agency have legal grounds, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general, and prosecutor general andriy kostin must immediately enter the

court of the city of kyiv about interference in the court's activities regarding the administrationustice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind you, earlier on january 12. the supreme court appealed to the director of the sbi with a statement about the inadmissibility of court pressure. all because of the actions of the investigative bureau, which conducted searches in the premises of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. in particular, documents were seized and judge yulia ivanina's computer. presumably , the searches were related to the consideration of a specific court case. the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law requires a court order to confirm that their actions, that is, the actions of law enforcement agencies , have a legal basis, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, and if the vrp considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general and prosecutor general andriy kostin must immediately enter the data into the edpr and

court of the city of kyiv, about interference in the court's activities regarding the administration of justice. representatives of the dbr are also invited to the meeting of the vrp. let me remind you that earlier on january 12, the supreme court appealed to the director of the dbr from on the evidence of the inadmissibility of pressure, the court. all because of the actions of the investigative bureau, which conducted searches in the premises of the dnipro district court of the city of kyiv. in particular, the documents and computer of judge yulia ivanina were seized. presumably, the searches were related to the consideration of a specific court case. the biggest violation is that they came without a court order. the law would... require a court order to confirm that their actions, i.e., the actions of the law enforcement agency have legal grounds, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime, if the prosecutor general's office considers that there are indeed signs of a crime, they turn to the prosecutor general, and the prosecutor general andriy kostin

yulia ivanina of the district court of kyiv and the meeting's appeal of the court on interference inctivities related to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice of the council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined. for the safety of my family members, including young children. the decision on the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to apply to the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the dbi regarding the verification of the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigations to the need to observe guarantees of ind

court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the meeting of this court about'. interference in theof justice, however, the case was heard in closed session, which was requested by the judge herself for security reasons. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice, council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. thirteen members supported the decision to hold a closed hearing grp according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the state criminal investigation department to check the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigation to the need to observe guarantees of independence of judges and maintain the

court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the assembly of this court about interference in theies of the administration of justice. however, consideration of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. judge. requests this notification about interference in the activity of a judge regarding the administration of justice, i ask that it be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice, council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. the decision on closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the general the prosecutor and director of the dbr. regarding the verification of the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. the members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigations to the need to observe the guarantees

court of kyiv, which was sought by the state bureau of investigation, is interference in the administrationjustice.

searches in the dnipro district court of kyiv, which were sought by the state bureau of investigation. this is interference with the administration of justice. this is a crime. but how did the law enforcement officers break the law? we turned to the state bureau of investigation regarding their explanations, watch the judicial control program with tetyana shostrova on thursday, january 18 at 5:45 p.m. on the espresso tv channel. verdict with serhii rudenko. from now on in a new two-hour format. even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests: foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and feedback. you can express your opinion on the evil of the day with the help of a phone survey, turn on and turn on the verdict with serhiy rudenko, every weekday from 8 to 10 pm on espresso. congratulations, friends, live on the tv channel. program verdict, my name is serhiy rudenko, i congratulate everyone and wish everyone good health. we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are

watch this week's judicial control program with tetyana shustrova, searches in the dnipro district court of investigation was looking for, this is interference with the administration of justice, this is a crime. but how did the law enforcement officers break the law. we have reached out to the state bureau of investigation for their explanation. on thursday, january 18, at 5:45 p.m. , the judicial control program with tetyana shustrova on the espresso tv channel. 93 separate mechanized brigade cold yar is in dire need of fivi drones. to effectively hit the enemy and increasing the loss of living and non-living forces of the occupier. to get closer to the victory that all of ukraine is waiting for. glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, glory!

court of kyiv, what the state bureau of investigation was looking for, this is interference with theadministration of justice, this is a crime, and how law enforcement officers broke the law we have reached out to the state bureau of investigation for their explanation. on thursday, january 18, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tetyana shustrova on the espresso tv channel. we return to the espresso studio. thanks for watching. good morning, let's see that the tantrums of the international criminal simonyan have at least some meaning. it didn't work out, she simply states that the russian fascist troops themselves started to attack back in the 14th year, when the international system of law and security was destroyed, and now everything just goes well , entropy keeps increasing. we only recently talked about another israeli-hamas war, now we can say that there are already several of them in the region, since the military operation of the forces of four states, which are trying to reconcile with the houthis, is ongoing, the houthis have captured a part of the territ

searches in the dnipro district court of kyiv, which were sought by the state bureau of investigation. this is interference with the administration of justice. this is a crime. but how did the law enforcement officers break the law? we have reached out to the state bureau of investigation for their explanation. on thursday, january 18, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tatyana. howling on the espresso tv channel. verdict with serhiy rudenko is now in a new two-hour format. even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests. foreign experts, inclusion from abroad. about ukraine, the world, the front, society. and feedback. you can express your opinion on the bad day with a phone survey. turn on and turn on. verdict with serhiy rudenko. every weekday. from 20 to 22 for espresso. how am i worse than other people, those who struggle? why do i need a country in which there will be no freedom. kateryna, an officer of the armed forces of ukraine, has been in the army for about four years, at first she worked as a specialist in moral and psychological su

searches in the dnipro district court of kyiv, which were sought by the state bureau of investigation. this is interference with the administration of justice. this is a crime. but how did the law enforcement officers break the law? we have reached out to the state bureau of investigation for their explanation. on thursday , january 18, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tetyana shustrova on the espresso tv channel. congratulations. the end of the past, the beginning of this week. a rather significant event took place in russia, the first major protest this year, and i would say, the first major protest in russia in a very long time, the curiosity of this story is that, well, most of all, it can be said, all escalated processes that usually intensify in russia before any election, with all the artificiality and such, you know, virtuality of these elections, all the same... some speeches begin, some, well, such, you know, attempts to convey something to the authorities begin, well and this time such protests took place in bashkir ba... bashkirstan, i'm sorry, and it

searches in the dnipro district court of kyiv, which were sought by the state bureau of investigation interference with the administration of justice. this is a crime. but how did the law enforcement officers break the law? we turned to the state bureau of investigation regarding their explanations, watch the judicial control program with tetyana shostrova on the espresso tv channel on thursday, january 18 at 5:45 p.m. verdict with serhii rudenko, from now on in a new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and feedback. you can express your opinion on the evil of the day with a phone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhiy rudenko, every weekday from 20 to 22 on espresso. hello, this is svoboda ranok, an informational project of radio svoboda. top guests every day. this is the shipping district of kherson. turn on live. we are somewhere in the vicinity of bakhmut. we tell the main thing. weekdays at 9:00. we are back in the aether. thanks

judge of the court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the meeting of this court about interferenceactivities related to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge requests this notice of intervention. actions regarding the administration of justice, i ask to be considered at a meeting of the supreme council of justice of the council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances i have outlined regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. decision about the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the state criminal investigation department to verify the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court. kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau of investigation to the need to observe guarantees of

of the court of kyiv, yulia ivanina, and the appeal of the meeting of this court about interferenceed to the administration of justice. however, the hearing of the case took place behind closed doors, which was requested by the judge herself for reasons of security. the judge asks for this notification about interference in the judge's activities regarding the administration of justice, please consider it at the meeting. of the supreme council of justice, the council of judges of ukraine in closed session, taking into account the circumstances described by me regarding the threat to the safety of my family members, in particular minor children. decision the closed review was supported by 13 members of the vrp. according to his results, the supreme council of justice decided to contact the office of the prosecutor general and the director of the state criminal investigation department to check the circumstances of the search in the dnipro district court of kyiv two weeks ago. members of the vrp draw the attention of the state bureau. investigations on the need to comply with guarante

court of kyiv sentenced the former manager of kativna izolyatsia. he is accused of torturing and abusing captured ukrainian soldiers and civilians. since 2019, he moved to kyiv and secretly lived in the capital until he came into the sight of law enforcement officers. in general, it is very important for me that there is at least some form of this verdict, and the detention of kolukovskii in question was extremely resonant. i think the whole society knows that he stayed in kyiv for two years, that's why for me, as a lawyer, it is still important that he has been brought to justice and has already been sentenced. the shevchenko district court of kyiv rejected roman chervinsky's complaint. the ex-spy complained about the inactivity of the investigators of the state bureau of investigation, who refused to enter information into the edpr and start an investigation. chervinsky, on the other hand, points to the commission of two offenses: introducing known false data into suspicion and glorifying the narratives of russian propaganda. roman himself was not at the court. both the defenders and h