it leaves the state law. it is a list of your argument today has been dedicatedohe proposition of idaho law and that may very well be the case. but what you are asking us to do isoonstrue this statute that was enactedecting the reagan administti. send signed by president reagan to maine to have performed an abortion even if during that is a violation of state law. >> of congress had wanted to spce protective or permanent weight who are in danger of sing their own lives or their health that could redefine the state so the fetus self as an iividual with emergency medical condition. at is not how congress struct this they put the women that run johor in ant situation her own life health i is clear the hospital has to offer her staling treatment but she ds not have to accept that these are tragic circumstances manyom want to do whatever they can to save that pregnancy. the statute protects her and gives her that choice. t only way you try to get out of the statutory interpretation is by focusing on the term indiv

a just and lasting — international law. a just and lasting peace _ international law.sting peace, based on fundamental principles within the _ lasting peace, based on fundamental principles within the interests - lasting peace, based on fundamental principles within the interests of - principles within the interests of ukrainians— principles within the interests of ukrainians at— principles within the interests of ukrainians at its _ principles within the interests of ukrainians at its core. _ principles within the interests of ukrainians at its core. we - principles within the interests of ukrainians at its core. we can'tl ukrainians at its core. we can't forget — ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that— ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever— ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever there - ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever there is l ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever there is a | ukrainians at its core. we can't - forget that wherever there is a war, there _ forget that wherever there is a war,

there exceptions to this there were laws, for example, poison laws that regulated drugs could kill pregnanteople early and pregnancy, particularly starting in the 1840s after a series of high profile deaths from poisonous concoctions used to end there were some states that treated abortion as a y in pregnancy. there was very little regulation of contraception at all. until the late 19th century and thatdm of two independent social movements. the first was int on movement, though by no means, a fetal rights movement that began in the mid-19th century and was led by in the american medical association, including horatio daughter, whose pictured here, the american association was new at the time and medical education in general did not in gful way resemble what we would see today. the licensure in a modern sense. completely and often not very credential ized at all. the difference between a so-called regular physician and a midwife or a homeopath medicines in the pages the nation's newspapersd to distinguish, and the doctors in the american medicallooking fort themselves apart professionally.

federal immigration law.ou know those are now in the courts. that is an important issue. i think another issue that is not purely legal is the political stalemate on immigration. as we have seen, there is only so much that can be done through executive action and legal action without legislation. unfortunately, significant immigration reform legislation is not come at the moment, moving. it becomes a challenge for us to see what we can do to try to address issues of migration and immigration without that assistance. >> in terms of cybersecurity? mr. meyer: the biggest issue, the facet of cybersecurity that makes it a challenge is the ever-changing nature of this. it is a fast-moving field because it is driven by innovation and technology. the law has to try to keep up with it, which can always be a challenge. it is a challenge that we try to be up to, but it is also what makes it fascinating. it is almost inherently an ever-changing field. it is also still a relatively new field, cybersecurity and cybersecuri

i came out of law school and i went to a big law firm.making good money, and then at wilmer in d.c.. i saw some of my colleagues who started out wanting to go into public service never really go. reason is, they got used to the money and it became to financially difficult to make that move. my first piece of advice is to start out in private practice, and don't let yourself get used to the money. budget yourself like you are going to be at that firm forever or you will bet ke it. government does not pay as much. you can get by fine on government. i've been in government most of my career. that is the first thing. thing is have goals but be flexible. i was telling her and i tell people all the time, when i came out of law school, i was not planning to beomperhaps in pt bd security did not exist as a field but i wasn't planning to be a national security lawyer. government and i ended up at dhs in the field i'm in almost by accident because an opportunity came alon%cand i took it area if i had been too inflexible and what i wanted to d that

and the parliament must demand the law from the government, the government must follow the law in implementation. judiciary within the framework of the law should ask questions and hold accountable, this is the principle, but why do we sometimes get disturbed when things don't go well, the problem is very clear, we are developing three very important indicators, one of them is the so-called individual capacity, social capacity, organizational capacity social power, administrative power. we come to evaluate the administrative potential in the administrative capacity or administrative structure. for example, let's assume that an ordinary employee becomes the general manager of a place, this person is very it's okay because he didn't go through the hierarchy, as a result of his approach, his decision-making, his movement , he didn't understand the legal framework, god says to hazrat ibrahim in the qur'an that there is no relationship between personnel and society, between the general goals and policies that the supreme leader determining and this organization that is obliged to implement is not don

it was not a state law. it was a civil law.ot criminalize abortion explicitly, but it made it functionally impossible to provide because if you provide it, you risk this suit. that would be untenable torough. you have to defend yourself in court and probably would lose at least $10,000. and this was this was so it was so smart because it a ban on abortion. ;but it was like if you could argue listen doctors can go out there and provide abortions as long as they're willing to pay 0,000 every time. but it means that you could be sued out of existence. d after that ban took effect, what we did see was even while states were preparing for the decision, figuring out what kind of bans they would want, there were a couple idaho and oklahoma, who also passed copycats of this texas law just in case. so that no matter what, they would be able to ban abortion when the time came. and of course, it couldn't. i mean, at that point, the supreme court didn't need to technically circumvented the way roe work because it didn't implicate any of th

this is frightening to the rule of law. can you talk about the work they are doing to address this issue? >> the threats to the judiciary and threats to prosecutors and threats to law enforcement agents have all spiked significantly. some cases have accelerated from threats to actual violence. we have a threats task force engaged in investigating these matters. we intend to aggressively investigate and prosecute threats against our public officials including members of congress in which the numbers of actually exploded in the past couple of years. our democracy cannot continue if the people who make the democracy run or are afraid. if they make their decisions. based on being threatened or assaulted. no democracy can survive under the circumstances, and we will do everything we can to investigate and deter and prosecute anyone who makes threats against public servants. >> y jack smith? why did you pick i appointed m smith i explained he was independent. a long time career prosecutor. >> but there are probably others you wou

the main thing is her. appointment, law and order and military discipline in the ministry of defense, the armed forces of ukraine and the state special transport service. military policemen will look for and detain deserters, follow them order on highways, prevent offenses among military personnel. moreover , the total number of military policemen will be 1.5% of the total number of the armed forces. currently, the state bureau of investigation, which is overburdened, deals with crimes among the military, and the military prosecutor's office and the courts in general. no, precisely the absence of these institutions is blamed by the opposition in the verkhovna rada as the main problem of this draft law. for example, iryna gerashchenko from european solidarity calls the military police, i quote, a repressive body against themselves military personnel and policemen. by the way, write in the comments how you evaluate this bill, how you feel about it and what you know. meanwhile, solomiya bodbrovska is a representative of the voice and members of the committee on issues of national securit

we must act consistent with our law and our values. i take these steps today not to walk away from who we are, to make sure we preserve who we are for future generations. i've spoken about what we need to do. in the weeks ahead i will speak to how we can make immigration fair and just. let's stop fighting about it. i'm doing my part, congressional republicans should do their part. thank you very much. [indistinct chatter] netanyahu playing politics with the war? >> i do not think so. serious problem he has.

this law.lewis explained, was called the law of nature because people thought that everyone knew it by nature and did not need to be taught it. and he added, i believe they were right. if they were not, then all the things we said about the war were nonsense. what was the sense in saying the enemy were in the wrong? unless right? is it real thing which the nazis at bottom knew as well as we did and ought to have practiced if they had had no notion of what we mean by right then, though, we might still have had to fight them. we could no more have blamed them for that than for the color of their hair. lewis used the confrontation with the evils of nazi ism, and he gets a pass from godwin's law because he actually fought germans in the first world war. use the evil nazi ism to highlight the reality of the moral law in a dramatic way. if your moral ideas can be true, he argued. and those of the nazis less true, then there must be something, some real morality for them to be true about the reality o

but it's a patchwork of laws.very complicated to figure out whether you can vote in a number of states. host: how many americans areimp? talk a little bit about thex thn gr impacted. guest: estimates are it's up to five milli americans are affected. so there are hundreds of thousands of individuals, for example, potentially in arizona alone who we identified. in georgia, iny8 number of states across the country where this the demographics are -- th are disproportionately, though not predominantly, people of color. particularly black individuals. usually male because most people convicted of crimes, felonies, . that's kind of the rough break . host: for people watching at home who maybe don't record, explain why this is an important issue. why should people be conrn pridn being a democracy on being a where people have a voice in what en government. and faith in democratic now. when you have a system in which peopleote -- one thing i want to emphasize is millionsf to vote. that they can't actually figure that out fo

we must act consistent with our law and our values.these steps today not to walk away from who we are, to make sure we preserve who we are for future generations. i've spoken about what we need to do. in the weeks ahead i will speak to how we can make immigration fair and just. let's stop fighting about it. i'm doing my part, congressional republicans should do their part. thank you very much. [indistinct chatter] netanyahu playing politics with the war? >> i do not think so. he is trying to work on a serious problem he has.

the law governing the armed services were lawful conduct of war or any other provision of law imposing a public duty. that sounds a lot like dividing a line between official and private conduct. i recognize it's a defense and not an immunity. when you look at the definition of it are you acting within the scope of authority conferred by law, discharging a duty conferred by law? narrow the nixon versus fitzgerald. that's what it sounds like to me. do you agree or disagree? >> justice, i certainly understand the intuition that when you act outside of your lawful authority of kind of gone to a frolicking d tour and are no longer carrying it out. i no longer think that quite works for presidential activity. the only way that he could have implemented the orders is by exercising his commander and chief authority over the armed forces or supervise the executive branch. seem like or executive acts to me. there is such a possibility as an unlawful executive act. >> i'm not sure that i understand your answer. i was thinking, it seems to me that in your briefs and today, when you refer to the pu

i come from a state that we respect law enforcement and abide by the law. y tha i get on a plane and fly to dc, my husband wonders if something is going to happen to me while i'm here working serving the people of the congressional district. it is absolutely infuriating to me what is happening to the nation's capital right now. people call my office excited to come this summer to tour the monuments and bring their children and one of the questions they are asking my office is can you tell me about safety? why in the world do we have to have a conversation with visitors to the u.s. capital, the heart of this country worried about safety. it's appalling and i think it should be noted the majority of the members have been in and out but we haven't seen the majority of the democratic side attended the hearing nor did they offered a witness to ask questions too. as my colleague mentioned, this isn't a partisan issue. this is a safety issue and it was brought up at the beginning of this hearing by the ranking member there was a discussion about gun violence. this

so chances has complicated laws. we are looking in texas and iny.nia is an interesting case because their laws are quite clear. are tensñ6 of thou, hundreds of thousands of individuals whorobation or parole there who actually can vote but they may not know that they can. if you googled it, can i put in? it's not like to get his clean clear answer. u through thick a lot of people don't know what their status is even in athe laws are relatively clear. >> host: a c coming in on twitter from■i he says, on onean they have supposedly paid their debt to society. on the other hand, they still crimes, voting more than once, harvesting ballots, intimidating voters, legitimate vote know aut former felons who are looking to have the rights restored? of any evidence that people with pavictions are more likely to be able, more likely to commit the sorts of crimes that this individual is suggesting after individuals, ts is an important part of being a. you serve your time.ost want to vote when want to do so because he want to be part society can. they want that ch

urging that these regulators enforce the law. and on the reform side, where we see areas of campaign finance law that could be stronger or have potential gaps, we try to identify those and work with members of congress to essentially fill those gaps. >> we were talking campaign- finance. suddenly there's lots of different kinds of money. some different definitions what is dark money? >> it's not a term of hours, per se, but it refers to any kind of money spent on elections that is dark in terms of the voters ability to note the source, right? so essentially any money where you cannot trace it back to who is trying to influence the election. one of the main vehicles for dark money is the 501(c) for, which is any type of entity that's nonprofit status and therefore does not have to disclose it donors. despite claiming to be a nonprofit, they are essentially engaging in social welfare to spend money directly on elections. >> what are the types of entities that viewers would not know what >> americans for prosperity is a long running

law. ten years later. black wilderness artists and members of the black community of philadelphia and harrisburg, pennsylvania played a critical role in the release of a man with the interest. a black man with the interest, the name of daniel webster. at the time, webster was living with family in harrisburg, where was arrested on a warrant issued by a local commissioner. webster was accused of escaping from his owner in virginia five years earlier. words of his arrest was telegraphed to friends in philadelphia and a number of opponents of slavery in the state house of pennsylvania began in search of witnesses, testify in webster's behalf. five african-american witnesses traveled from harrisburg, including in the 60 year old dr. william jones and his doctor, his honorific who had long played an active role in the community's resistance to the all claim to have known webster a year before his owner claimed he had escaped. scores of philadelphia supporters arrived early for the hearing. all

i've give my life to the law.out the law and i think that the law fair we've seen against president trump will do great damage well beyond our time. i see my time is expiring. i yield. >> thank you. ranking member is recognized to talk. >> do you want to respond to anything from mr. gaetz's tirade? >> i don't know mr. pomerantz, i don't know what's in his book, these are decisions made in another office independent of the justice department. >> thank you mr. attorney general. last week, a journey of his peers convicted former president trump on 34 felony counts. the case was brought in front of the manhattan d.a. . it's a state case, not a federal case. i shouldn't have to ask you maj confused, can you please explain the difference between a state case in a federal case? >> yes. the manhattan district attorney has jurisdiction over cases invo5xlving new york state law, completely independent of the justice department, which has jurisdiction over cases involving federal law. we do not control the manhattan district

we're talking about people changing the law and order to change the law. you have to to practice making those arguments at the appellate and supreme court level. how do you do that without practice, moot court competition? how do become a chemist without a laboratory right. or a biology without some type of practice beforehand? it's impossible. he fundamentally changes howard university school of law as an institution, it becomes nation's premiere institution for turning out civil rights lawyers hands down, second to none more from this school will bring cases before supreme court decades of the fifties and sixties that with respect to civil rights law than anybody else, fundamentally transforms. okay, we'll talk about a few of those. i told you had a short time. short time, because he's making these changes started in 1929. by 1931, the american bar association has accredited how university school of law two years. that's phenomenal. that's phenomenal. turn it out, lawyers. okay. turning out lawyers making changes. questions. a pause for a second because

we make the law, you execute the law, to give you the authority, we are asking the questions. you are in extension of us when we create the law so i'm asking you the question. there is a coming from? isn't coming from the dea? is it coming from the attorney general? is a coming from the white house office of omd? where is it coming from? >> under the administrative procedures act which congress has made into law, there is a formal rulemaking process that goes on that we should issuance of an prm and then the opportunity for public comment and then the process plays out beyond that with an ultimate decision being made at dea as to the scheduling or rescheduling of a substance. as the agency that will be the ultimate decider. i'm not going to engage in conversations about issues that could be part of this conversation. >> marijuana is a very dangerous drug. not as dangerous as some of the others we talked about here but it certainly is much more dangerous than what you see regularly that people partake of like alcohol. you have a significant increase in traffic accidents that we

it rule of law is being abandoned in vacuum.to our history and present history at the time, and lincoln makes that connection, one that, incidentally, no other politician is making that makes the speech particularly impressive but also unique. one of the things that was characteristic this period was that the participer in the mobs and people who defended them were often very respectable members of the community. they were members of the elite wh say, well, we just had to do this because we had to run those bad guys out of town or. the abolitionists are divisive. abolitionists are a threat to our community. and so we have violently push them out of town, make an example them to preserve the piece of our community. and so many of these mob actions were done in the name of the icd peace. it is never okay toincoln is participate in a mob or justifyu doing, you should never resort to allowing our passion to overtakeeason and we have institutions that are designed to deal need use them. ruin. we don't, we are on the at the very begin

the rule of law.le bit about your professional background. you started at the department of justice as a mine prosecutor and i know you served as a special assistant prior. but the bulk of your early career was a line prosecutor. >> yes. >> drug trafficking, organized crime and violent crime cases. >> yeincipal associate deputy attorney general. >> yes. one title. >> important job. in that capacity you oversaw a series of very important criminal prosecution including the prosecutions connect to the oklahoma city bombing? >> yes. >> you are nominated and confirmed on a bipartisan basis here and wipe -- washington dc with the dc circuit court of appeals and you rose to chief judge of the dc circuit court of appeals. >> i think it just meant i survived my colleagues. >> that maybe. but what i can say with confidence is you have a more distinguished record with respect to the fidelity to the rule of law then any member sitting on the dais here on either side of the aisle. i do appreciate your integrity, y

there is a federal law, a 1986 law, the emergency treatment and labor act.arize it, as it is relevant here, it requires hospitals that receive medicare funding to provide necessary medical treatment to the patients who arrive in the emergency medical decision. idaho has a pretty strict abortion ban. it has only a narrow handful of exceptions, including one to save the life of a mother. so in the wake of the supreme court's decision in 2022, in the dobbs case, overturning the constitutional right to an abortion, they went to the federal court in idaho and it that essentially there is a gap between those two laws, because pregnant women will come to an emergency room in idaho, in an emergency state, and it may not be that they need an abortion to save their lives, but they do need one to prevent serious health problems. , for example, so, for example, they don't have an abortion, they are hoping to deteriorate to the point where they may not be able to have children in the future. in this case, the biden administration said in power trump, idaho's abortion ban

>> these are the wages of law fair.ing in a system where it is okay to announce you're going to target political figures to disable them. to destroy their campaigns. and to come up with inventive use of a law for that very purpose. it is the antithesis of everything rule of law stands for. think about this. this week we had the incredible spectacle of michael cohen appearing on tv and announcing truth is important. that is the spokesman, the minister of truth for law fair is michael cohen for that should tell you a lot. i view it as historic in terms of damage. as you and i have talked about this is the rubicon. it has been crossed if it is not on done though and forever damaged institution and the respect for the institution of criminal justice. mark: do you think the fact that one state is not even a one state, one prosecutor, one judge and now they are saying they sentence a trump and so forth and so on. nay will the question is to what. should have this kind of power with the nation in the middle of an election with

federal law would ou can't do that. medically it have to be accepted in shakir to require the treatm diabetics with insulin for the medically accepted obligation of doctors and women with certain conditions that may not r in death but more than likely will result in very serious medical cons including blindness for sd for others the loss of organs. for some to blood strokes. idaho is sayings the doctor and say in good faith thats person's death as likely as opposedo s illness they can't perform the aborti so i don't know your argument about state licensing law because this is what this law does. tells states you are licensing laws can't take out objective medical conditions that could save a person fm serious injury or dea >> i i think they are two crucial responses to your point. let me begin preemption point. 1595 are telling hhs the federal government and court sug you can't unless there's a direct conflict if objective medical care requires you to potential serious medicalith the compons and abortion is the only thi

retaliation against whistleblowers is against the law. >> three people have common talked about their security clearance and marcus allen gets his eain place today and the inspector general city's concerns during an investigation as we speak about what is going on. >> the management memo you're retaliation. >> you will notice he is investigating. >> mr. chairman, regular order. >> thank you. we do adthe chairman's question or comments? i answered. it is the policy and practice somebody has a complaint about whistle-blowing to go to the inspector general and that is why they are investigating and the memorandum that the inspector general issued doesn't say concluded that anybody retaliated against anybody. >> thank you and i do ask unanimous consent to submit for the record a wall street journal article that appeared june 3 titled merrick garland three special counsel's and the justice department under fire. i do ask you after this to go back and read this article talking about a long and distinguished career and i do think the article rea

>> no one is above the law.e being investigated that's not something i was you can appreciate i can comment on here. >> is it ongoing? >> let me see if we can get back to you and provide. >>. >> these allegations in this lawsuit. >> i haven't seen it. is the fbi can investigate that. >> i would like to know. >> is the fbi still investigating this or are these prominent people æ >> i'm not sure i can tell you whether or not there is ongoing work being devoted to this i'll be happy to take a look at that specific article i share your discussed of mr. epstein's conduct and ms. maxwell's conduct. >> and others. >> the whole operation. >> thank you senator kennedy, senator peters, senator heinrich has kindly consented to give you time to prepare for your round of questioning and he's going next. because i made a deal with him. >> we've done some musical chairs i apologize. >> i wanted to ask you a little bit about the bipartisan communities act specifically how the engaged in the business language may have broadened

what is the impact of this law?ed into law means that children all over the state of louisiana and every single classroom whether it be the math classroom, art classroom will be subjected essentially to codified christianity, our schools, public schools will be turned into sunday schools and throughout the time we have been studying this law, we know one thing, the first amendment and its free exercise clause, which allows each and every united states citizen to choose their own faith or no faith at all, and the importance of the establishment clause which says that the government should not interfere, coerce, proselytize or choose or give one's particular religion preference over another. those two clauses are incredibly important in the united states constitution and for the first amendment we believe in challenging this law, we will ensure freedom of religion and the first amendment are still rights louisiana citizens hold. >> it would be easy to look at the story and say, it is just happening in louisiana or tha

this law went there, it was passed , it came, it was promulgated, well, now we have to say that a law was an obstacle, this law filled the hands of the negotiators, as hazrat agha said, when a law came, they had a conversation, what they said was , look, if you remember. when trump left the jcpoa, there was a discussion that, well, now us should we go out or not, there was a discussion that sometimes there was an opinion that we should go out, anyway, the government decided and said that we will give them a week to come back. we make a decision. well, it's been a week, two weeks later, we say a month, then we say 2 months . this is how it went. this was the same indecision that hazrat agha said, "well, this law has been passed. what did we decide here? how did we reach something from this?" we want the us government to say, sir, this law is not our authority, this is the congress, so here the parliament fills this negotiator , we wrote in that law, what did we say? the additional protocol that we used to implement as a volunteer , now that we are out of jcpoa, sanctions are coming , w

and following the letter of the law in m because so much is policy and regulation in in law there isot of inrptation that could bete made by the various factors transfer decision-making process but also the ch i'm wondering whether congress or executive branch or civil do better to more effectively implement u.s. law and policy as intended wre or favor to certain government so were looking a these as arms transfer policy indicates could these criteria norms be emplaced, who wants >> all go ahead. i have said today many others have said as i mentioned earlier that the united states is not complying with the law when it comes to the u.s. arms generally when there's no compliance of law courts involved in the place where i arms trade because intervene on any substantive issues transfers and the reason comes down to something called sociability the set of principles that rooted in thenstitution for when the system what way and uncertain disputes. you probably heardin the mutinouss a political question in the political doctrine is one of the largest barriers i have seen for judicial enfor

it has been a particularly tough year for law enforcement.ccording to the fbi, 2023 marked a 10-year high for the number of officers assaulted or injured by firearms. 60 officers were feloniously killed in the line of duty. i knew that none of us will give up until that number is zero. just upstairs in this buildg we recently rededicated the memorial to those who have lost their lives to the tragic of the 118 people honored in the memorial today, 39 are heroic law enforcement officers who are killed by gun violence in the line of duty. they include a loving husband and father who served for over two decades as a police officer. and whose heroism even after he was shot saved the lives of countless more officers. they include a wife and mother who was a trailblazer in her police department and who died in the line of duty while protecting others. they include two fbi agents who put their lives on the line combatting insidious crimes against children and made the ultimate sacrifice. the justice department is committed to honoring the memories of

mykhailo, touched on the understanding that a by-law cannot narrow the effect of the law, right? we understand that we are talking about a whole series of certain things, yes, which should be regulated, and whether some, i don't know, open or closed meeting is planned with the participation of representatives of the cabinet of ministers, with the participation, perhaps, of the office of the president and representatives of the factions of the verkhovna rada, well because there can be no different reading. yes, in what concerns the spirit and letter of the law, laws, they are adopted for that, yes, well, by the way, in every laws, or almost every one of them has a task for the cabinet of ministers to prepare by -laws, but i clearly support your position, they should not either expand or narrow the parameters that are laid down in the law, we will remember how the law on improving mobilization was not simply passed, until things submitted by the cabinet of ministers, allegedly for... in general, then they withdrew, then they changed something, they approved, why not simply, because

what do you do when there are laws that you think are wrong or laws that you disagree with?ress you get themep answer is not toe laws. it's to get them repealed. lincoln believed that since the founders have died off, we don't have t m for democracy the way we used to. this comes down to feelings how do we get those feelings to the proper level? educate nation. democracy has to be ritualized. it has tof0 be cared for and cultivated on an ongoing basis and i think this is what lincoln is getting at. you know, it's not. well, the founders established it and we're good know each generation is charged with caretaking american democracy. one way that i think ordinary ■american citizens can help shoe up our democracy and uphold our representative government is to x# americans, citizens are■fat a holding the t upholding the republic meansrech other. so i think it's really potent right now, not to pour fuel into the constantly rile up people, which seems to be are present political mode, unfortunately. but i think that es republic ine long run, because if you're ■< going to to that

oleksiy, i hope that your draft law, ms.e voted on, because, well, this is the question , we need to put an end to this story. because it is difficult to imagine the future of ukraine in a different way, well, accept it and it would be easier for everyone to live , yes, yes, yes. one more question, rather short, regarding our prospects in nato. the secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, jen stoltenberg , said that ukraine will immediately become a member of nato, after the war with russia is completely finished, and not frozen. let's listen to what stoltenberg said. ukraine will become a member of the alliance. when we will have a consensus, when all the allies will agree, because as you know, decisions on enlargement are being made by consensus, it is not enough that a majority of nato allies are in favor of an invitation, we need all allies to agree, and let me add one more thing about membership: no one knows when or how the hostilities in ukraine will end, but when they will , we must be sure... that this is p

well, now we will talk about the new law regarding the economic security bureau, whether this law wille able to ensure the transparent activity of bebu, we will find out with anna derevyanko, the executive director of the european business association, who should be with us from minute to minute. and the news arrived from our cabinet of ministers, so the government can change one of the criteria for booking employees from mobilization, how kyiv actually affects the recognition of enterprises as critical and allows them to reserve workers from mobilization, first vice prime minister and minister of economy yuliya sveridenko said. according to the order of reservation of conscripts during martial law, approved by resolution no. 76 of the cabinet of ministers , enterprises that meet at least three of the specified criteria can reserve up to 50% of employees. one of the criteria is the size of the average salary at the enterprise, which should be. not less than the average salary in the region for the fourth quarter of the 21st year. deputies proposed to change this criterion, taking the a

this law.s called the law of nature because people thought that everyone knew it by nature and did not need to be taught it. and he added, i believe they were right. if they were not, then all the things we said about the war were nonsense. what was the sense in saying the enemy were in the wrong? unless right? is it real thing which the nazis at bottom knew as well as we did and ought to have practiced if they had had no notion of what we mean by right then, though, we might still have had to fight them. we could no more have blamed them for that than for the color of their hair. lewis used the confrontation with the evils of nazi ism, and he gets a pass from godwin's law because he actually fought germans in the first world war. use the evil nazi ism to highlight the reality of the moral law in a dramatic way. if your moral ideas can be true, he argued. and those of the nazis less true, then there must be something, some real morality for them to be true about the reality of basic moral princ

law, we checked and saw the law.s this work at all? we sat down with the experts and the people we saw . there is a law for what we want to say . governments do not implement it again in these governments. we came again in this parliament , we wrote the anti-corruption law. if we were to implement the law we wrote , it would not be possible for me to take a bribe so easily. it is not possible for smuggling to enter the country so easily . do you know why it enters the country because we did not implement the laws? we have a postal code law , we have a national code, we have a land code, in addition to article 169 , we have frequent taxes. where are these fields , what birth certificate do i have related to kn melin? agriculture is whatever it is, article 169 of the tax repeatedly says that every iranian has the duty to declare to the ministry of finance what he owns, what his assets are, how much he earns, how he earns, what his job and business are , if we connect these together, i am now a representative. because i

small mom and pop landlords that own up to four units are exempt from this law. it also does not protect tenants from damages that exceed the deposited amount. those so-called junk fees at restaurants are going away on monday, at least for now. come july 1st, it will be illegal for any business to advertise a price for an item and then add a hidden fee at the time of purchase. this does not include taxes or shipping costs. a separate law is moving through the state legislature that would allow restaurants to bring back those surcharges, as long as they are displayed up front on the menu. >> the new law is taking effect july first in california. that brings changes to the credit card industry to prevent gun violence. the law requires companies such as visa and mastercard to adopt a new merchant code to categorize sales at gun shops on the. for today, we heard from the author of the bill, state assembly member phil ting of san francisco. he talked about how the codes could flag suspicious activity. >> what we've seen in the past is mass shooters have used credit ca

there exceptions to this there were laws, for example, poison laws that regulatedarly and pregnancy, particularlyhigh profile deaths from poisonous concoctions used to end pregnancies. there were some s treated abortion as a misdemeanor for early in pregnancy. tle regulation of contraception at all. until the late 19th century and that was to change because of two independent social movements. the first was in what we would view as an anti-abortion movement, though by no means, a fetal rights movement that began in the mid-19th century and was led by in the american medical association, including horatio daughter whose pictured here the american association was new at the time and medical education in general did not in any meaningful way resemble what we so there were no real licensure in a modern sense. medical education was completely and often not very credential ized at all. the difference between a so-called regular physician and a midwife or a homeopath medicines in the pages the nation's newspapers was hard to the doctors in the american medical association looking for a way

it has been a particularly tough year for law enforcement. according to the fbi, 2023 marked a 10-year high for the number of officers assaulted or injured by firearms. 60 officers were feloniously killed in the line of duty. i knew that none of us will give up until that number is zero. just upstairs in this building we recently rededicated the memorial to those who have lost their lives to the tragic epidemic of gun violence. of the 118 people honored in the memorial today, 39 are heroic law enforcement officers who are killed by gun violence in the line of duty. they include a loving husband and father who served for over two decades as a police officer. and whose heroism even after he was shot saved the lives of countless more officers. they include a wife and mother who was a trailblazer in her police department and who died in the line of duty while protecting others. they include two fbi agents who put their lives on the line combatting insidious crimes against children and made the ultimate sacrifice. the justice department is committ

i come from a state that we respect law enforcement and abide by the law. every week that i get on a plane and fly to dc, my husband wonders if something is going to happen to me while i'm here working serving the people of the congressional district. it is absolutely infuriating to me what is happening to the nation's capital right now. people call my office excited to come this summer to tour the monuments and bring their children and one of the questions they are asking my office is can you tell me about safety? why in the world do we have to have a conversation with visitors to the u.s. capital, the heart of this country worried about safety. it's appalling and i think it should be noted the majority of the members have been in and out but we haven't seen the majority of the democratic side attended the hearing nor did they offered a witness to ask questions too. as my colleague mentioned, this isn't a partisan issue. this is a safety issue and it was brought up at the beginning of this hearing by the ranking member there was a discussion about gun viol

the respect for the law gives way to the law of the jungle.us have taken to despotism and ruin. it's the responsibility of the protect the rule of law and its equal application. our responsio guard our nation against the convulsions that commonly afflict banana republics whenever a ruling party tries to jail its opponents. the radically different handling of the documents cases involving mr. trump and mr. biden should ring alarm bells in every corner of the land. the the principal justification of this radical application of law is the interview the judiciary committee seeks through ancient constitutional prerogatives. it is vital we understand the whole context of this decision to verify the accuracy of the transcript and to determine the extent that this conversation informed a decision that strikes at the heart, not only of our rule of law but the right of the american people to guide their own destiny through fair, free, and unfettered elections. congress has a constitutional ay to seek this information and the attorney general has a legal

law. model chiseled on supreme court building here in washington. as we await some of the biggest decisions on the term on presidential immunity and abortion will take a deep dive into the cases and take a look at why there is such partisan heat on the high court. i am shannon bream this is a special edition of "fox news sunday" at live at the supreme court. it ♪ >> the supreme court has never been us out of kilter as it is today. i mean never. >> are setting up to got american democracy toward the end of the season. >> there and they're trying to make much to do about nothing but. >> the bottom line is i do not like a lead out. they do not like thomas a jat conservative justices. shannon: democrats target the supreme court had the announcer the key opinions could have a seismic impact on the race for the white house. we'll get reaction from a top ally of president biden senator chris coons that leader public on the senate judiciary committee lindsey graham. then we are just four days away

law period to have u.n. standard just incorporate it into u.s. law. now, of course the u.n. international law standard problematic. it was created in the 1950s in response to world war two. but we live in a world of formal laws and immigration exclusion. what we seen in the last four years is a massive effort by immigrants voting with their feet to use the exception informal law to come to the united states and, seek asylum. and despite evolving efforts to restrict this exception by presidential ministrations, trump and biden alike, people are still coming and the law still stands. that people have a right to seek asylum no matter how they enter the country. and no matter how many people do unkept, it is astounding. just think about this for a minute. it is astounding giving the plenary power that was just described. the biden administration has tried numerous ways to limit but ultimately had to turn to congress and try and to change law and put a cap or a quota on the number of people who can seek asylum. it didn't work. just this past winter, to all the doomsayers that say

in most states to introduce laws. although they rejected some of the harshest proposals that were introduced. it was relatively unusual for state laws to authorize felony punishments for abortion seekers and virtually all with the sole exception of new hampshire, included for the life of the pregnant person, something that stoddard also was not concerned about in his proposal storer wasn't alone in wanting to regulate reproduction in this era, this handsome gentleman anthony comstock was part of the picture to comstock's proposals were different, though he was not concerned with what he saw as the taking of fetal life. he was concerned instead with what he saw as obscenity. so business model first developed in new york in the late 1860s came about because comstock, his own account, was a compulsive master who worried that exposure to pornography was damaging the nation's fabric for young men and women alike. he proposed to new york law that would define a much broader class of material as obscene everything from medic

i started as a law student. i don't necessarily recommend that to the law students that are here. of course, columbia is in the city, so you are close to -- you are far away from albany, so it will be a heavy commute. i was a maryland law student when i ran for the legislature, and i served during my third year of law school. it's been a long run, and i really appreciate the support i've received from the people of maryland. so i do intend to stay active. i will follow the priorities that i have. one of those is the equal rights amendment. i will be engaged to see if completed. i hope it's completed during my term as senator. if it is not, i will continue to work in that effort. i'm going to work on environment. i'm going to work on human rights issues. i'm going to work on those issues i think that are ones that i think i can give some value to the policy development of our nation, so i have been heavily engaged in human rights issues and the environment. i love baltimore. i will do all i can do to help my beloved city. thank you all very much. >> everyone, enjoy your lunches, we