some conclud know, i didn't give you like a loctite argument. sorry. as a moral phiso deeply that i didn't give you a knock down argument. but here's what wetes. there is no one thing that you must do in response to catastrophe i think we should do something. we have overwhelming reason to do lots ofhing. and so when someone you must do x, i think they're probably wrong. but you could always more and it would be great if you did this is this is the tradeoff you don't have duties so you kind of get of obligation. but that means you can't just satisfy the obligation and be done for the day. you could rightward on that matrix. so that means the workve can be really overwhelming. people crushing. but here's my positive uplifting remember it's a rebuttal to al you to matter. isn't that awesome? that's like, way better than not mattering, right? we get to think about what we is meaningful. so moral life in the 21st century, i say, is a constant and a creative, because we constantly have to be deciding for ourselves ho to make our responses fit our lifestyle