do you know who machiavelli is? well, we don't know each other.was a famous teacher in the 18th century. oh, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. i remember. but we don't know him. yes. what's your name? what do you want, but you are still lying in the same place, i didn’t think about it, but what should i have choose another place, how about work? “i talked here with one boss, you don’t have a zero cycle yet, he says, you need to dig a pit, they’ll start digging it in me, this is, as they say, an image, i still feel uncomfortable, well, go to our brigade, where is this yours, and this is the forty-first precinct, vladykin’s brigade, okay, who should i write to?” "petition, foreman of the forty-first section, kuznetsov ap, yeah, maybe i’ll come, but if you don’t come, where should you look? how do i know, your name is sergey, yeah, and i’m zina, yeah, you’re strange some kind, it’s at first glance, take it, and you come, uh-huh, hey, guy, what, well, get out of here, what do you want to live for? i'm tired, great, great, ivan, hey, guy, let's get out of here,

i think machiavelli was completely right on the few comments i make about my own career. we'll illustrate that to. a tee i think i. i began when i was more or less your age as a as a in college with the thought that i wanted to be a professor. i wanted to teach political philosophy. i wanted to read philosophy. i wanted to write about i wanted to teach about it. and so when i graduated, i went to graduate school and did an mba and a ph.d. at princeton. and continue on what i thought was my normal course as it happened. the job opened up unexpectedly at the university, pennsylvania and i ended up getting that job. it was maybe the best job in the country at that point in my and i was really pretty well convinced that i was the master of my own ship, that things were moving along just as had planned them. i found after having been at penn for a few years, that really wasn't entirely the case and that penn, at least in my department, was running through assistant professors for three year contracts, and then flushing us out and starting again on the bottom and. so it was cle

chairperson and the person who played the deed of the broker is working with prime minister modi so it is machiavellind there is no reason he would come out and say anything. paul: are you worried you could be sued for defamation? >> let them try. they threatened to sue hindenburg. the first rule is it has to be false. that is the first rule of defamation. stocks fell billions of dollars in january when hindenburg came out with their report. what action has adani taycan, nothing. most of it is true. paul: i want to be very clear that in the securities regulator says it addresses issues of conflict of interest in the chairperson has made relevant disclosures. at the end of this saga regardless of how it ends, what reforms would you like to see? >> we would like to see that they have a transparent mechanism. the gentleman on the governance committee is a brother-in-law, and in-laws. son is married to the daughter. [typing sounds] >> how do you have your in law on the same committee? judge, jury and executioner for adani. how do you have a regulator connected to adani? entire thing stinks. we would like

wants tampons and boys bathrooms and really i don't think he's that smart i don't think he is a clever machiavelli bouts liberal talking points like gavin newsom i think he is a true believer which makes him a real idiot which makes complete sense why kamala harris would be the perfect match for him. >> makes her look good i wonder hiring or choosing walz was much like his stance on the tampons there were strings attached. >> i will give them that one. >> took a while just came to me right now. >> just pulling it out of this guy boom. >> the strings attached to the furthest left of the progressive wing of the democratic party. paris at a chance here to pick somebody that would be more moderate moving her towards the centre she had to do that considering where she was concerned where they were as a primary candidate in the twain 20 election when she called biden a racist so she is at the moderate it's a big swing for their sure exactly what they believe instead of thing people minnesota they'll give you money back because you know how better does spend it he said we would triple down on the governm

was modern natural right the philosophy inaugurated by thomas fox, jon a lot, it would even include machiavelli in that number and spinoza in that number. this is the philosophy of social contract theory that inspired our founding fathers. the philosophy we would recognize his classical liberalism. the second wave was a response to the first wave. in strauss is it telling it arose as a challenge for the first wave. but also from the first wave. it was a modification on social contract which is of course the preeminent example. it is a way of retelling the story to achieve a sort of different and part input particular the idea of progress this is what makes mill kind of interesting. he kind of straddles these two waves. he kind of appeal so that he of classical liberalism but in the name and defense of progress. he is someone who is a transitional figure. and then the third wave i heard the tail end of q&a the third wave is a critique of the first two waves. they have three successive breaking waves of philosophy which in strauss' view ended up having corresponding regimes and nations. in the 20

machiavelli, better to be feared than loved, always.hundreds and hundreds of years and centuries shown. we're not there right now. we're not there right now. >> that's right. president trump wants to unleash american energy, keeping in mind when president trump was president iran was broke. hezbollah would never have made a move on israel like we're seeing right now. the world was a safer place because we had a thriving economy. we had the highest growth of our gdp and our economy in modern history. if people realized that the night was a force to be reckoned with especially came to our strong economy. how we were able to protect our world through strength. so president trump which i think he is going to do by unleashing american energy, getting a lot of tax revenue back, building up the military, paving down our debt, these are all basic principles about the economy, democrats have no idea what they're talking about. furthermore i want to talk about kamala harris. could you imagine kamala harris negotiating with vladmir putin or xi xin

so so the the the gracchi and machiavelli even and i think this is the strand that jefferson to follownd when he talks the avoiding an agrarian law he's talking about avoiding some of the more heavy handed measures that you know americans at this time would have known from the reading of history. so the purchase of louisiana for him i think critical to maintaining republicanism in the united states at large it was basically to off some of the commercial that he feared some of the financial developments and his thinking. i think was that if land if all those new land is acquired there will be you know new yeoman farmers families that can settle and they will be able to achieve some degree of economic independence putting off for an additional decades a few decades, maybe even centuries, the fate of europe, which he really was terrified of. yeah. jay, you seem to suggest, i think, more continuity between the the kind of cicero republican ism and jeffersonian is a missouri. well, without disagreeing with what clem has said here, i agree with the basic idea here that you can sort of distin