0
0.0
Jun 6, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i don't recall them addressing it but there is the language of cas like marbury and statements made by benjamin franklin at the constitial convention, statements of george washington talkingbo the massive risk of strife and how that could desoyhe government. that's what we rely on principally. i cite the olc opionbecause if there's any statute at might impact on the president's prerogatives, they interpreted to avoid that. >> if a president sells nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary, is that immune? >> that soundsimar to the bribery example and likely not immune. if it is structured as an official act, you would have to be impeached and convicted first. >> what does it mean if it structured as anffial act? >> i don't know whether that would be an offici a. you'd have to apply a different analysis. >> how about if a president orders theilary to stage a coup? >>s the chief justice pointed out earlier, there is a whe series of guidelines against that. ucmj prohibits the ay om following a plane fully unlawful act. if one adopts the fitzgerald test, that might be impeached d nvicted befor
i don't recall them addressing it but there is the language of cas like marbury and statements made by benjamin franklin at the constitial convention, statements of george washington talkingbo the massive risk of strife and how that could desoyhe government. that's what we rely on principally. i cite the olc opionbecause if there's any statute at might impact on the president's prerogatives, they interpreted to avoid that. >> if a president sells nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary, is...
0
0.0
Jun 6, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ecuve powers laid out there and but encompsethe powers originally understood to be inud therein and marbury against madison itself provides evence this meant community this kind of immunity tt protects the president's official acts from scrutiny sitting in judgment of the articles. thatates the original understanding of the executive order. >>ow exactly would we determine what an official act is? >> i point the court to two cases for that. fitzgerald against nixon is the best gdae the court gives, the outer perimeter test and the court engaged in analysis that look at the level of specificity at which the acts are described and thatas which was a civil case. >> let's say the official act is appointing ambassadors in the -- and the president appoints a particular individual to the country but it's in exchange for a bribe and somebody says wi give you $1 million if i am made ambassador. how do you analyze that? >>hat would follow this discussions in brewster that bribery is not an official act which matchea mmon-law background. the wathcourt distinguished is these are not official ac. it woul
ecuve powers laid out there and but encompsethe powers originally understood to be inud therein and marbury against madison itself provides evence this meant community this kind of immunity tt protects the president's official acts from scrutiny sitting in judgment of the articles. thatates the original understanding of the executive order. >>ow exactly would we determine what an official act is? >> i point the court to two cases for that. fitzgerald against nixon is the best gdae...
0
0.0
Jun 5, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> absolutely, and again, the only caveat i was making is if that statute was doing what marbury says you can't do, which is going after the subordinates to restrict for executive function, the franklin statement will likely trigger you might not be able ss to go after that president. so, i don't think congress can say, we can't go after the president directly, but we are going to criminalize the way the president speaks to congress, and therefore, we are going to put in a criminal statute that says if you provide false information to congress and carrying out the president's recommendations, you can be prosecuted. but the fundamental point of drawing that distinction between the president himself and his co-agitators in the words of the constitutional convention, is an excellent distinction. >> justice kavanaugh? >> follow up on the llc opinions question, as you read them, i think i read them, they articulate a clear statement rule as to this court's cases for covering official acts, and your point, i think, but i just want to underscore this, is that none of the statutes alleged her
>> absolutely, and again, the only caveat i was making is if that statute was doing what marbury says you can't do, which is going after the subordinates to restrict for executive function, the franklin statement will likely trigger you might not be able ss to go after that president. so, i don't think congress can say, we can't go after the president directly, but we are going to criminalize the way the president speaks to congress, and therefore, we are going to put in a criminal...
0
0.0
Jun 5, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
even going back to marbury, perhaps a point i agree with my friend, marbury says discretionary acts of the president are not the kind of thing that the court reviews. >> could i go back to your brief? going back to what some of my colleagues have asked you, there appears to be some narrowing principles to the concept that the president is subject to all criminal laws in all situations. >> correct. >> do you agree that this affects core powers, then you would not be subject to any laws that attempted to limit those powers? >> correct. >> you are defining core powers as so specified by article ii? >> that is correct. >> the only words in the constitution is that you have to deal with the president and law is that he shall take place that the lobby fully executed, right? >> that is correct. >> hard to imagine that a to president breaks the law if faithfully executing the law. >> he has to execute all of the laws. >> presidents have to make a lot of tough decisions about enforcing the law and they have to make decisions about questions that are unsettled and they have to make decisions bas
even going back to marbury, perhaps a point i agree with my friend, marbury says discretionary acts of the president are not the kind of thing that the court reviews. >> could i go back to your brief? going back to what some of my colleagues have asked you, there appears to be some narrowing principles to the concept that the president is subject to all criminal laws in all situations. >> correct. >> do you agree that this affects core powers, then you would not be subject to...
0
0.0
Jun 2, 2024
06/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's what took place in marbury versus madison. go to the court and say there is a federal officer, a supreme court justice, who is refusing to follow the law. ordering the federal officer to follow the law. this was the and order from the seven justices to alito and thomas to recuse themselves for obvious reasons for the court has said in the williams case, the caperton case, it is an objective test, not subjective. a test whether alito or thomas feels they can be impartial. the question, what a reasonable person would consider looks partial or impartial. if you have a justice who has been likened by chief justice roberts to an umpire, essentially flying the flag to a team competing in the world series, he is supposed to officiate the game, everybody would tell you that if you are flying the flag of one of the teams, you cannot officiate the game. that is an expression of bias. at the very least, the appearance of bias and you should not go in. thomas's case is worse because his spouse got directly involved and essentially tried t
it's what took place in marbury versus madison. go to the court and say there is a federal officer, a supreme court justice, who is refusing to follow the law. ordering the federal officer to follow the law. this was the and order from the seven justices to alito and thomas to recuse themselves for obvious reasons for the court has said in the williams case, the caperton case, it is an objective test, not subjective. a test whether alito or thomas feels they can be impartial. the question, what...
0
0.0
Jun 3, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you know, i previously wrote a book and the marbury versus madison supreme court decision and decisionis so grounded in the political setting of the early 1800s. and it's really a kind of tale of washington d.c. and that is true. all time. at the same time, i also think it would be overly simplistic to say that's the only thing justices care about. i mean, i think justices bring their, you know, sort of judicial philosophy to bear. and so how that all gets woven, you know, can kind of vary at different times. but absolutely the justices are part of the times that they're that living in. and, you know, the justices very, very much a part of the war. as i mentioned before the war dominated every aspect of their personal lives you know five of the justices had sons who were serving in the military. a sixth had a son in law who was serving in the military. and and it especially really affected hugo black. they were obviously all concerned about their sons in the military. black had two sons in the military and it took a terrible toll. and his wife, she suffered terribly had psychological b
you know, i previously wrote a book and the marbury versus madison supreme court decision and decisionis so grounded in the political setting of the early 1800s. and it's really a kind of tale of washington d.c. and that is true. all time. at the same time, i also think it would be overly simplistic to say that's the only thing justices care about. i mean, i think justices bring their, you know, sort of judicial philosophy to bear. and so how that all gets woven, you know, can kind of vary at...
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2024
06/24
by
KTVU
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
most people would say it's a judge and in our nation's earliest constitutional law case, marbury versus, the supreme court said it has the power of the courts to say with the law is and i anticipate the united states supreme court in this will reset that balance and say in that situation it is the power of the courts, not the federal bureaucrats to say with the law really means. >> shannon: we will know as early as wednesday but there are other federal cases playing out with the president. the one dealing with documents in storage and the dealings of these documents in mar-a-lago. the judge there was appointed by president trump in "the new york times" had an interesting piece this week that said when she was assigned the case, there were other judges who went to her to pressure her you don't have the experience for this and you shouldn't take this case. "the new york times" have said that her credits suggested she's in over her head in the take for mr. trump or both. >> it's an outrageous hit piece against this judge appeared this is the same newspaper that went into vapors when anybod
most people would say it's a judge and in our nation's earliest constitutional law case, marbury versus, the supreme court said it has the power of the courts to say with the law is and i anticipate the united states supreme court in this will reset that balance and say in that situation it is the power of the courts, not the federal bureaucrats to say with the law really means. >> shannon: we will know as early as wednesday but there are other federal cases playing out with the...
0
0.0
Jun 23, 2024
06/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
most people would say it is a judgment in fact our nation's earliest famous constitutional law case marburyeme court said it's a power of the court to stay with the law is and i anticipate the united states supreme court and this case is going to reset that balance and in that situation it's the power of the court not the federal bureaucrats is have the law really means. >> you shall know as early as wednesday other federal cases playing out with the president. one jon with documents the storage and handling of these classified documents at more a lot of the judge there was appointed by president trump "new york times" had an interesting piece this week said when she was assigned the case there were other judges who went to her to sort of pressure her like you don't have the experience for this maybe should not take the case for the "new york times" said this they suggested she could be in over her head for mr. trucker both for. >> it's an outrageous hit piece against this judge. this newspaper would into vapors when anyone questioned the judge and his selection which was not random. he was
most people would say it is a judgment in fact our nation's earliest famous constitutional law case marburyeme court said it's a power of the court to stay with the law is and i anticipate the united states supreme court and this case is going to reset that balance and in that situation it's the power of the court not the federal bureaucrats is have the law really means. >> you shall know as early as wednesday other federal cases playing out with the president. one jon with documents the...
0
0.0
Jun 26, 2024
06/24
by
ALJAZ
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
he's a professor of economics at phillips university of marbury keys, joining us from germany. thank you so much for being with us. the economy, a huge concern, as we heard the for iranians. what is, 1st of all, driving this high inflation in the of on is it just down to the sanctions? the typical drive is up inflation in boy. these economies spending a day, a positive changing the oil prices deductible, thought the been the one prices are declining often to bunch of defeats even the way that the government gives you to finance the defeat. but barring going to central and by increasing degrees and t. but in the case of, you know, and we have also 2 other fact drawers, they will be charged, contributing to these inflation rate in the coffee want up any decides. and y'all, days across him indicates all sanctions the basically my estimation, the comp craziness studies shows that it wouldn't call he long rubel, but no singular concrete before cap is sanctioned. we do see that this actually contributed to an excess inflation rate available. 8 percent a point per year. okay, so, you
he's a professor of economics at phillips university of marbury keys, joining us from germany. thank you so much for being with us. the economy, a huge concern, as we heard the for iranians. what is, 1st of all, driving this high inflation in the of on is it just down to the sanctions? the typical drive is up inflation in boy. these economies spending a day, a positive changing the oil prices deductible, thought the been the one prices are declining often to bunch of defeats even the way that...
0
0.0
Jun 12, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that was marbury v. madison by chief justice marshall in 1804, i believe.o the constitution is the supreme law of the land. it's not the political branches. i think we have seen every institution in washington, d.c. corrupted in one way or the other by the politicalization of previously re veer -- previously revered institutions and i'm talking specifically about the fbi and the opposition on a presidential candidate, president trump, and then the fbi director said his mission in life was to see a special counsel appointed, which he was, robert muriel who -- robert mueller who found no bases to bring charges. apparently there are those who feel there is a two-tiered justice system in this country and that justice system, which is the crowned jewel has been corrupted by politics. and now our colleagues want to use that same corruption by politics of the independent judiciary and the supreme court of the united states. that may not be their intention. maybe it is. they want the supreme court to become subservient to the congress which is anathema to the const
that was marbury v. madison by chief justice marshall in 1804, i believe.o the constitution is the supreme law of the land. it's not the political branches. i think we have seen every institution in washington, d.c. corrupted in one way or the other by the politicalization of previously re veer -- previously revered institutions and i'm talking specifically about the fbi and the opposition on a presidential candidate, president trump, and then the fbi director said his mission in life was to...
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
electionings, but -- elections, but ultimately the supreme court gets to decide what the law cas in marburythree separate but equal branches. the system of checks and balancesles is to -- if chairman durbin and our senate colleagues on the judiciary committee respect the sep resist this latest attempt to hijack the court. the supreme court is a separate and coequal branch and its operations squarely fall outside the authority of the legislative branch. mr. president, i often think back to a statement issued by chief justice roberts in 2018 when he said, we do not have obama judges, we don't have trump ■h clinton judges. what we have is a of dedicated are doing their level best to do right for the people before them. it's true then and it's true now. the men and women on the supreme court should not be pawns orers likely to apply perceived political views to cases is dangerous and disingenuous, we have been with the hijacking of our justice system including the fbiée and the department of justice for partisan political purposes, and it's very, verye know what goesd comes around. is set aroun
electionings, but -- elections, but ultimately the supreme court gets to decide what the law cas in marburythree separate but equal branches. the system of checks and balancesles is to -- if chairman durbin and our senate colleagues on the judiciary committee respect the sep resist this latest attempt to hijack the court. the supreme court is a separate and coequal branch and its operations squarely fall outside the authority of the legislative branch. mr. president, i often think back to a...