0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and mark pomerantz, his issue with bragg was that he wasn't being aggressive or not. after that book came out, charge the case. so, you know i think the pressure points, yeah, where their interpersonal issues, probably, it seems like in just reading his book he's got a lot of digs at alvin bragg along the way but none of that is relevant evidence for the trial and i don't think any of that will be coming up but i agree with you, that is what they are looking for. >> needling. you talked about the jury, jury questionnaires went out today. there are no questions about you know, whether who people voted for in the 2020 election but there is questions about news media consumption and whether or not they consider themselves members of qanon or antifa. how unusual are these questions and do you feel like it's sufficient evidence to find out what channels someone watches and whether or not that gives an accurate window into things? >> those questions about where you consume your news media are pretty standard. any trial i had, we asked those kind of questions. these are inte
and mark pomerantz, his issue with bragg was that he wasn't being aggressive or not. after that book came out, charge the case. so, you know i think the pressure points, yeah, where their interpersonal issues, probably, it seems like in just reading his book he's got a lot of digs at alvin bragg along the way but none of that is relevant evidence for the trial and i don't think any of that will be coming up but i agree with you, that is what they are looking for. >> needling. you talked...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FBC
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the judiciary chairman jim jordan says that x new york prosecutor mark pomerantz put pressure on alvin at the trial saying we still don't understand what the crime is in the threatening years and years in prison for donald trump, what is the crime. >> we talked about this when the indictment came down. it's got no clear, 34 counts but all goes to a felony to get under the statute of limitations. based on the second crime the alvin bragg has still not hallucinated. that's a real problem. in the sense donald trump still doesn't know specifically what is charged with. the reason for that, the secondary charge is the one that is really problematic. it's a federal election charge. alvin bragg has no jurisdiction. the case law in new york says you cannot use a federal statute to bump the state charge that's the way the state law goes. real estate you have to rely on a tax charge or something but the problem with that why didn't he charge it he has jurisdiction over that, the examination of this and why it was brought forward really has merit because the case is almost certainly not going to
the judiciary chairman jim jordan says that x new york prosecutor mark pomerantz put pressure on alvin at the trial saying we still don't understand what the crime is in the threatening years and years in prison for donald trump, what is the crime. >> we talked about this when the indictment came down. it's got no clear, 34 counts but all goes to a felony to get under the statute of limitations. based on the second crime the alvin bragg has still not hallucinated. that's a real problem....
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
pomerantz is a person of interest here. can you talk to me how and why he might be useful to the trump side of things? >> a few days ago trump's team served a subpoena without notifying alvin bragg's team or asking for authorization from the court, which is what a defendant had to do in a criminal case to serve a subpoena on a third party and served it a few days ago and is asking for a number of things, and ultimately mark pomerantz when he was running this before alvin bragg came, he was the special district attorney running this investigation, presumably he has a lot of information, a lot of e-mails, a lot of memos that he wrote in this view of the prosecution, and all of that was turned over to the d.a. when he resigned, you know, quite some time ago. and as the d.a. points out in their papers, look, we've talked to him, we've said do you have anything on your personal devices, do you have anything we don't already have, and in their oppositional subpoena they lay out, look here are the things to get to him, here are hi
pomerantz is a person of interest here. can you talk to me how and why he might be useful to the trump side of things? >> a few days ago trump's team served a subpoena without notifying alvin bragg's team or asking for authorization from the court, which is what a defendant had to do in a criminal case to serve a subpoena on a third party and served it a few days ago and is asking for a number of things, and ultimately mark pomerantz when he was running this before alvin bragg came, he...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
s office when mark pomerantz presented it.ut the question is, do wey believe that for a candidate to either want to pay extortion money or hide some fact that may be unpleasant from the public that that is really election interference? but the probleaim m is we don't' what they claim the charges. we don't necessarily get to the misdemeanor because that requires intent to defraud with the wa y things are booked. you can be sure president trump didn't direct elvis was to behat booked. e if you got to that, they haveo prove they did that with intent to commit another crime. without the grand jury charging what the other crime is t committed is impossible to defend. let's say through this witness helpit is to cover up some sala fact to help himself in then electionfi. but another witness, it is really campaign finance violation and another ona e say, no, a tax violation. a defendant doesn't have to hit a moving target all the time. today's testimony perfectly highlights what many of the problems are but this case. by the way, woul
s office when mark pomerantz presented it.ut the question is, do wey believe that for a candidate to either want to pay extortion money or hide some fact that may be unpleasant from the public that that is really election interference? but the probleaim m is we don't' what they claim the charges. we don't necessarily get to the misdemeanor because that requires intent to defraud with the wa y things are booked. you can be sure president trump didn't direct elvis was to behat booked. e if you...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
pomerantz does the same thing it was all about getting trump, in fact, these are the guys who said we put michael cohen as our star witness one thing that probably bothers me the most about this case right now is the fact that they put a gag order on president trump former president current republican nominee for president of the nine states likely going to be the next president i certainly hope he is he is not allowed to talk about michael cohen is a convicted perjurer guy who came in front of congress in life six times in one congressional hearing he is allowed to say whatever he wants? but president trump has a gag order from this judge this obviously partisan judge whose daughter works for every democrat you can thank of this is what is so unfair it's all driven by politics the whole plan here is to keep biden in the basement because he can't talk anybody then keep biden in the basement and trump on trial that's what the democrats are trying to do that their whole plan because they know president trump will win if he's out there able to campaign and that's why they're trying to ke
pomerantz does the same thing it was all about getting trump, in fact, these are the guys who said we put michael cohen as our star witness one thing that probably bothers me the most about this case right now is the fact that they put a gag order on president trump former president current republican nominee for president of the nine states likely going to be the next president i certainly hope he is he is not allowed to talk about michael cohen is a convicted perjurer guy who came in front of...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
pomerantz would be prosecuted.y guests. adam, i've got to start with you. 18 years, you were with the d.a.'s office in manhattan and you happen to know juan merchan. >> we started in the office 30 years ago. rookie prosecutors together, and, you know, always judge merchan was a very serious prosecutor, serious guy in the office. and went on to take the bench a number of years ago, and has a great reputation as a judge. >> so to see judge merchan today saying to a lawyer, and you're a practicing law year right now too, to say you are losing all credibility with this court, what did you immediately think? >> well, you said it, right? words that as a lawyer in the courtroom, you never want to hear directed at you. you're pretty happy if they're directed at your adversary. so i think, look, you've been in trials. you know, people get frustrated, they get impatient. defense lawyers have to make arguments for their clients, and i think that judge merchan got frustrated and addressed that to the defense table. but you kno
pomerantz would be prosecuted.y guests. adam, i've got to start with you. 18 years, you were with the d.a.'s office in manhattan and you happen to know juan merchan. >> we started in the office 30 years ago. rookie prosecutors together, and, you know, always judge merchan was a very serious prosecutor, serious guy in the office. and went on to take the bench a number of years ago, and has a great reputation as a judge. >> so to see judge merchan today saying to a lawyer, and you're...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
one, president trump announces he's running for president, and then, two, mark pomerantz, who had volunteereds so committed to going after president trump, he didn't even take a value -- salary, he's working for alvin bragg. he resigned, goes public and writes a book. that's what prompted alvin bragg to bring this case when there is no case and no crime. and our report lays all that out. in fact, pomerantz, he wasn't even -- we subpoenaed him, and he fought it. we went to court, and the judge, the court says, no, you have got to come testify. so he comes testifies and takes the fifth umpteen times. it's all a political. and, again, as a eric trump said earlier, i think the country sees. maria: well, that's what i wanted to ask you, is that resonating on people. whether or not what you're saying is right, that there's no crime, we can't figure out what the crime is, or president trump is in court every day all a day long, and he's sitting there. and hen you've got joe biden on the other side of the screen campaigning in all of these swing states. after a while does this resonate in the psyche
one, president trump announces he's running for president, and then, two, mark pomerantz, who had volunteereds so committed to going after president trump, he didn't even take a value -- salary, he's working for alvin bragg. he resigned, goes public and writes a book. that's what prompted alvin bragg to bring this case when there is no case and no crime. and our report lays all that out. in fact, pomerantz, he wasn't even -- we subpoenaed him, and he fought it. we went to court, and the judge,...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
pomerantz's book about this case.et you meet another dismissed juror here, who i just met a few moments ago this is mark. you're one of those individuals, correct me if i'm wrong, you rose your hand and you said you would not able to be fair and impartial. how did that play out? >> we were summoned and the judge read all the particulars of the case, how one was supposed to evaluate the law, and the evidence, and then he said, you know, if there is a reason that you don't think you could be impartial, or that you could be perceived as biased, that you should raise your hand. so, i raised my hand because i was certain that even if an intellectually i would be capable of being unbiased, because i satirized mr. trump often in my art work, that this would come to light and that were i to be seated on the trial, a, it would be dishonest for me to withhold that information, but there is -- there would be no way that blanch, not going is rely on the kind of -- kindness of strangers would allow me to be on the jury. >> would y
pomerantz's book about this case.et you meet another dismissed juror here, who i just met a few moments ago this is mark. you're one of those individuals, correct me if i'm wrong, you rose your hand and you said you would not able to be fair and impartial. how did that play out? >> we were summoned and the judge read all the particulars of the case, how one was supposed to evaluate the law, and the evidence, and then he said, you know, if there is a reason that you don't think you could...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
another asks if they have read either of mark pomerantz's or michael cohen's books about the case. are these your typical jury questions? >> some of them are. let's say two corporations are going to trial against one another in a civil trial that had a jury. it would be typical to have questions, have you or any member of your family or close friends worked for corporation a or corporation b. it is typical to ask, do you know any of the lawyers here, do you know the law firm that they come from? those kinds of questions are typical. what is less typical here are the things about the jurors' political beliefs, not beliefs, but how strongly they feel those beliefs. they're not asking people, are you a republican or a democrat, who did you vote for, judge merchan said he's not going to ask that. but they're testing the intensity of feeling by asking things like, have you volunteered, what kind of media do you consume, how regularly do you consume it, right? they're trying to sus out are these people who can be fair, not do they have an opinion, but can they set the opinions aside and
another asks if they have read either of mark pomerantz's or michael cohen's books about the case. are these your typical jury questions? >> some of them are. let's say two corporations are going to trial against one another in a civil trial that had a jury. it would be typical to have questions, have you or any member of your family or close friends worked for corporation a or corporation b. it is typical to ask, do you know any of the lawyers here, do you know the law firm that they...
158
158
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 158
favorite 0
quote 1
mark pomerantz, who is pushing this case, saying was, we got to go after trump. alvin bragg simply to go after. e on and he's the one who persuades alvin right to do it, no tsistan he's assistant d.a., but only after he resigns, throwstemper a temper tantrum, does a media blitz and most importantly, writesa a book where he lays it all out, how he was out to get the president from the get go.wt that's what promptedd alvin bragg that franklyg he and donald trump announcing that he was going to run for president. that's what prompted run fog to bring this ridiculous case. and pomeranz called it the zombie case because it was dead, gone and buried. and then the statuteause is of limitations passed anyway. you talkmitation about as well. how is it what do you consider the third highest ranking official by biden' s to beto a pretty prestigious job? woul d you it that would that be okay? sure. why did this guy move from that job? to giv from the opening argumens and work on this case in a d.a.'s office in the state of new york? why would you give up that biga? job? >> s
mark pomerantz, who is pushing this case, saying was, we got to go after trump. alvin bragg simply to go after. e on and he's the one who persuades alvin right to do it, no tsistan he's assistant d.a., but only after he resigns, throwstemper a temper tantrum, does a media blitz and most importantly, writesa a book where he lays it all out, how he was out to get the president from the get go.wt that's what promptedd alvin bragg that franklyg he and donald trump announcing that he was going to...