to use medvedchuk and medvedchuk's ambitions precisely with the model of a parliamentary presidentialhe idea there was very simple, if vitsya becomes my heir and me. there will be nothing to catch and you will have nothing to catch, and by the way, this is what happened when president yanukovych, our ukraine yuvchenko supported this project, but there were several people among them, if you look at all these surnames, you can see that the majority of them , andriy derkach is now in the city of heroes of moscow, he voted against, being a representative of the whole the elites already, i.e. putin, medvedev and yanukovych , are failures. kuchma's idea of ​​a parliamentary presidential republic and we returned to it only as a result of the first maidan, so kuchma in this regard was always in such a situation of fighting putin for his own self-preservation, and he tried to use his connections with the yeltsin family, he believed that they had some influence and would help him, do you remember? that when the yeltsin center was opened in yekaterinburg, putin, medvedev and kuchma were there. k

imagine that this is not storovoitov, but viktor medvedchuk.or medvedchuk immediately brings yeltsin the figures that 80% of ukrainians are against the act of independence. and on december 2 , yeltsin thinks. what is that? do you need to do something? can the troops enter? something is wrong with them did you vote maybe it's a fake? galina storovoyta, who was not medvedchuk, was just a conscientious, professional person killed there. by the way, we still don't know who killed her and why? well, we understand that it is about the kgb, because she was not in the kgb, because she did not work for the kgb and not according to the methods of the kgb, so she says: "my sociology, boris mykolayovych, will be more than 90% for independence." . and here yeltsin says, so we have to do something, galina vasylivna, let's think, if ukraine leaves the soviet union, what should we do, to somehow maintain his ties with ukraine. well, it's a different approach, if you surround yourself with jerks who just want to make money, then you become putin. well, accordin

, well, he tried to nullify medvedchuk's influence on himself, i think that he tried to use medvedchuknd medvedchuk's ambitions precisely with the model of a parliamentary-presidential republic, the idea was very simple: if vitsya becomes mine, heir, and i won't have anything to catch, and you won't have anything to catch, well, by the way , this is what happened when president yanukovych became president in the 10th year, which was the departure of medvedchuk, nothing, that's why we need a parliamentary-presidential one. the republic, we will share the influence there, even if he becomes the president, we will isolate him, let's say, i , someone of mine will be the prime minister, you will be, uh, the speaker of the parliament, he will be the queen of donetsk there, that's what i was in idea, and medvedchuk tried to explain this idea to vladimir putin and dmitry medvedev in 2000 fourth year, and they sent him, he performed. on their own behalf, on behalf of kuchma, they agreed with kuchma on this, it was a joint approach, but putin was told that they did not need any parliamentary pre

i think he was trying to use medvedchuk and medvedchuk's ambitions precisely the model of the parliamentary-presidentialdea was very simple: if vitsya becomes my heir, and i will have nothing to catch, and you will have nothing to catch, and by the way, this is what happened when president yanukovych became president in the 10th year, which was due to medvedchuk's influence, nothing, that is why we need a parliamentary presidential republic, we will share the influences there, and even if he becomes president, we will isolate him. let's say, i sneeze, some of my people will be the prime minister, you will be, uh, the speaker of the parliament, he there will be a queen of donetsk, that was the idea, and medvedchuk tried to explain this idea to vladimir putin and dmitry medvedev in the fourth year of 2000, and they sent him, he spoke on his own behalf, on behalf of kuchma, they agreed with kuchma on this, this there was a joint approach, but... they said that they did not need any parliamentary, presidential republic, that yanukovych should simply become kuchma's heir, because they knew that yanukovych wa

, medvedchuk is not a ukrainian, but a russian apparatchik.tween a ukrainian apparatchik and a russian one? the ukrainian apparatchik discusses these or other things in the first person so that no lose power, but in principle tries to provide the first person with more or less adequate information about what is happening. the task of the ukrainian apparatchik is to influence the first person and interpret the information he provides. ugh. and this is how all the heads of administrations behave. er, the president of ukraine, who had some influence from the conditional dmytro tabachnyk, by the way, who was such an authoritative head of the administration for the first time, to andriy yarmak, the interpretation of real information, it doesn’t work that way in moscow, in moscow you have to work with information that what the customer wants to hear, uh, that's the first one, that is , they go to the first one, knowing what they want to hear, yes, if you work differently, you'll just... lose everything, that is, it's your job to give the customer th

nullify, to nullify medvedchuk's influences on himself, i think that he tried to use medvedchuk andons as a model parliamentary-presidential republic, the idea there was very simple: if vitsya becomes my heir, and i will have nothing to catch, and you will have nothing to catch, well, by the way , this is what happened when president yanukovych was president in the 10th year that was due to medvedchuk's influence, nothing, that's why we need a parliament... a presidential republic, we will share the influences there, even if he becomes the president, we will isolate him, let's say, i whose some of my person will be the prime minister, you will be, uh, speaker of the parliament, he will be there the donetsk queen, that was the idea, and medvedchuk tried to explain this idea to vladimir putin and dmitry medvedev in 2004, and they sent him. he spoke on his own behalf, on behalf of kuchma, they agreed with kuchma on this, it was a joint approach, but putin and the medvedevs said that they did not need any parliamentary, presidential republic, that yanukovych should simply become kuchma'

imagine that this is not storovoitov, but viktor medvedchuk. medvedchuk immediately brings yeltsin the figures that 80% of ukrainians are against the act of independence, and on december 2 yeltsin thinks. and what is it, something needs to be done, maybe troops are sent there, something they didn't vote the right way, maybe it's falsification, galina storovoyto, who was not medvedchuk, was just there a conscientious, professional person, killed, by the way, by killerrum, it is still unknown who killed her and why, well, we understand that it is about the kgb, because she was not in the kgb, because she did not work for the kgb and not for kgb methods, she says, but i have sociology, boris mykolayovych, more than 90% will be in favor of independence. and here yeltsin says, it means we have to do something, galina vasylivna, let's think, if ukraine leaves the soviet union, what should we do to somehow maintain our ties with ukraine. well, that's a different approach if you surround yourself with idiots who just want to make money, then you become

he did, well, he tried to nullify medvedchuk's influence on himself, i think that he tried to use medvedchukbitions in the very model of a parliamentary-presidential republic, the idea was very simple: if vitsya becomes my heir and i there will be nothing to catch and you will have nothing to catch, and by the way , this is what happened when president yanukovych. became president in the 10th year, which was due to the influence of medvedchuk, nothing, that is why we need a parliamentary-presidential republic, we there we will share the influence, even if he becomes president, we will isolate him, let's say, i sneeze, some of my people... she will be the prime minister, you will be, uh, the speaker of the parliament, he will be the queen of donetsk there, here in why there was an idea, and medvedchuk tried to explain this idea to vladimir putin and dmitry medvedev in the fourth year of 2000, and they sent him, he spoke on his own behalf, on behalf of kuchma, they agreed with kuchma on this, it was a joint approach, but putin and the medvedevs were told that they don't... need any parliamenta

company, which is for a moment, who is medvedchuk, we all know, great, he is putin's best man, he isitor and the enemy of ukraine, and everything is closed to this... eyes are closed and even i think that it was not raised, but when we speak now behind the eyes of the pro-russian narratives about what i allowed myself to publish in 2014. in 2016, and this is for a minute there was the first and second year of the war at that time with the russian federation, this hailo, they did not pay attention to it. what happened then? the fact is that now it is all worn out, but the manuscripts and the conclusions of the public integrity council, of which i am a member, are not burning, we checked, the public integrity council in 2018 checked on criteria of integrity. hale's wife, and that's how it's established, and she's a judge, by the way, she's a judge, at that time she was a judge in the appellate judge of the donetsk region, and that's how we were established in the state administrative court in the public integrity council, well, it 's logical that not only the judge is checked, family m

oksana knows what zik was until the moment when medvedchuk sent natasha 50,000 vlaschenko, you know,t's like that. an unspoken symbol of public people for 50 thousand connections, she fulfilled this task, let go of journalistic investigations, let go of ukrainian narratives, vakhtan kipini remove the historical truth, the kapranov brothers, remove the russian peace forward, what happened next to the murayevs, the medvedchuks and everything else, why are they people still have a platform, she still doesn't have a wolf ticket, the lustration will be based on such rusamir... informational projectiles, well , look, that's the same question, at least now during the hot phase of the war, it's also the same to a certain extent debatable, here to a greater extent now it is necessary to call on all journalists and all copper workers to help ukraine responsibly at the present time, but i definitely agree with you that we should not anyway, well if we call on the state to be responsible. conduct an investigation and the conditions under which licenses were obtained, why the entire apparatus pro

propaganda, the network is not medvedchuk's hope in ukraine works, it works, why the main propagandistmain manager of all this antony. pakanych goes on, although there are some kind of conditional sanctions, why does he continue to act on his own and so on and so on, why are there a lot of cases of examples, for example, regarding the fact that they are accused of religious intolerance there, there all confessions can be in something like this to accuse like this, since he also has intolerance to the moscow patriarchy, we all have intolerance to something, and therefore, this is not the accusation that it should be, is anti-state activity, i still know how moscow priests acted during the time of kuchma and yushchenko. patriarchy, the army and its consequences in the 14th year, i heard from the military, why no one deals with those who were engaged in the army, in our people's parliament, oh, in the people's parliament, in the verkhovna rada we have a people's deputy artem dmytruk, i already i remembered him today, who recently, a month ago, became a subdeacon of the ukrainian orthodox

is interesting about the pope, if diana panchenko, if you remember, is the propagandist, host of the medvedchuk channels, who wrote that the ban of the ukrainian orthodox church, and she also connected this with the arrest of pavlo durv, that it is a link in a chain and says that it the whole event is bad, trying to take. under the totalitarian, under the totalitarian.

medvedchuk, the first says, i'm opening a school, and the second constantly quietly opens roshen storesthe first petro poroshenko says: i transferred the business to a blind trust, and the second increases his wealth 82 times in a year. tell me, please, so maybe let's transfer the budget of ukraine to the blind tras. maybe it works normally? mr. volodymyr is hiding from journalists, mr. volodymyr is hiding from his opponent, and most importantly, he is hiding from the ukrainian people, because it is the right of the ukrainian people to know what exactly the candidate for president of a warring country is going to do, and we never found out. because for the ukrainian people first it is extremely important to know the future, and not to throw mud at each other, to know how you... demand the enemy, and not to spread russian fakes. your team said that you have already started the course of a young fighter, this is a good thing, but it should have been started four years ago, in the 14th, when the country needed the efforts of all volunteers and volunteers, and volodymyr was hiding from the

principle when there are factions that are a group, a faction and a group that were under control. one to medvedchukand the other, let’s say, to various groups of oligarchs who voted no or abstained voting for this draft law, and here it appears absolutely, the infographic does not have those who did not vote, there are actually a little more of them, yes, yes, yes, well, yes, they did not vote yet, there are many more servants of the people who simply took out their cards, being in the hall, did not vote, accordingly they are not in this infographic, yes, yes, thank you for the clarification. mr. volodymyr, ms. solomi, considering this, this and such a position on the fundamental issue of these people's deputies of ukraine, whether they can now be called people's deputies of ukraine, isn't it time to raise questions about the existence or presence in the verkhovna rada of people who were elected on the lists of the same party, the opposition platform for life, which is already officially banned in ukraine, but the deputies still... adopt laws or vote against laws, form the legislative field of the

away, because yesterday i watched a former compatriot of ours, there was such a radio continent, his medvedchuk closed with a bunch, and even the former director was hunted, but he is now a us citizen and writes, all left-wing channels, such as espresso and others, all the time demonstrate anti-trump some line, and then they talk about bicameral support, in one word, attacked us with criticism, and you say in a better way. well, i say for the better, because in my opinion and in the opinion, i think, of many, maybe not no as much on the left as there are generally liberal views of people, and harris is still a better option for the democratic party than joe biden, and for america in general, and for america in general, i think, to have a president who... can a president who can withstand this, well, in general, this volume of work, yes, this volume, this stress, the position of this president, who at least has such an age that allows it to be done, then even in theory, it is much more receptive, than than to have the 80-year-old president, who just... for the next four years will get older and

was the case with the parties that were banned opzh and the sharia party, among other things, since medvedchuk's tv channels were taken off the air, i.e. why here, well, there is no sequence, that we can also go down this road, proving that it is not a religious organization, that it is an organization of moscow's influence on the information space and ukrainian society. as for me, yours the question is absolutely correct in the first part, now the situation is reversed in the fact that... in our country its activity is prohibited, and i, for example, do not fully understand that a significant part of this activity could be done at the expense of the special services and actually due to the detection of specific agents, not isolated cases, systematically and en masse, in fact, we understand that not everyone has been reached, and actually the organization is not as terrible as the terrible members of the organization, if the organization does not have members infiltrated by russian agents, then in in such a case, there is a sign there, you are not there. it is not so scary, but it is obvious tha

ideas and bring russian peace here, and we saw these decisions of the national security council when medvedchuk'sv channels were closed, and we saw how the national security council... made decisions regarding vkontakte networks and classmates, well, the russian orthodox church, the branch of the russian orthodox church in ukraine is also such a network, that is, in principle, a propaganda network that was created yet. during stalin's time, this church was created in the form in which it exists, and what's more, now the head of this church the uoc mp is a member of the holy synod of the russian orthodox church, is this not a reason to say that this church is hostile to ukraine, and perhaps, again, not to go this long way of nine months and a month for... to entry into force of this law, that is, 10 months, whether or not it would be easier to pass through the council of national security and defense a decision on banning the activities of organizations connected with the russian orthodox church. this is a very sensitive issue, we cannot here, and so they, we, us they did everything as loyally as

among other things, it happened with the parties that were banned by the opzh and the sharia party, as medvedchuk's tv channels were taken off the air, i.e. why is there no consistency here, that we can also go down this road, proving that it is not religious organization, that it is an organization of moscow's influence on the ukrainian information space and society. as far as i am concerned, your question is absolutely correct in the first part, now the reverse situation is reversed in that its activity is prohibited in our country, and i, for example, do not fully understand that a significant part of this activity could be done at the expense of the special services and in fact , due to the detection of specific agents, not isolated cases, systematically and massively, in fact, we understand that we have not reached all of them, and actually not such a terrible organization. as scary members of the organization, if there are no members of the organization infiltrated by russian agents, then in this case there is a sign there, there is no sign there, it is not so scary, but it is obvious that th

about 30 minutes later , this person called me back and said he had just spoken with viktor medvedchuk ukrainian villain who was the head of kuchma's administration at the time, who assured me that there would be no attack. after victor came to power yushchenko in kyiv-washington relations, warming again. president bush wanted anything to bring ukraine closer to nato, says william taylor, who headed the embassy. the usa has been in kyiv since 2006. it was bush who, during the 2008 summit in bucharest, advocated for ukraine and georgia to join the nato membership action plan. in this, he encountered resistance from paris and berlin. if things had gone the other way, he would have forced the germans, the french and all other members of the alliance to agree to the traffic rules for ukraine, of course, kyiv never... never joined the alliance, but it would have been built the bridge we are talking about now. in my opinion, the war that started in 2014 and then erupted in 2022 would not have happened. after yanukovych came to power, he announced his rejection of the path to nato, and the ne

one news site, and that's all his , all his knowledge is in political science, well, but he was in medvedchukere, he worked with them there, then he somehow took part in all those st. george’s ribbon distributions and probably had russian money for it, that is, even there far away i remember the year there correctly, if i am correct i remember the year, in 2007, when rogo decided that he could now engage in politics, he started. go around officials' offices and tell them that he just flew in from moscow, was there at a big event, he was awarded, congratulated, these are the times that putin gave him, there really were some chinese times that he himself burned out there, that this is from vladimir putin, and he is now responsible for conducting the action "georgivska tape" in the zapolizhsky region, when this action was first announced in russia, well, it was held there for the second year. something like and that is why he is asking them to allocate funds for this action, it is very important, it is very symbolic, and since a large number of officials were really quilters, they allocated mone

the property worth almost uah 400 million of ex-people's deputies traitors serhiy medvedchuk and bohdanozak was transferred to the state this week. the court seized land plots, enterprises, factories, cars and immovable. the sbu reported. let me remind you that in june, law enforcement officers exposed both brothers of former people's deputies for financial fraud. according to the investigation, the accused used controlled enterprises to embezzle funds due to non-payment of taxes to the state budget. in this way , more than 75 million hryvnias were caused to the treasury. both suspects are currently hiding abroad. kyivstar vodafone and lifecell report what to provide. percent autonomy of mobile communication and the internet for 10 hours during outages power supply is difficult. this is stated in the joint statement of the companies. they continue to work now on. increasing the energy stability of their networks, but this requires significant resources and time - top managers say. recently, the national center for operational and technical management of telecommunications networks oblig

fabricated data about ukraine, which was supplied to him by his own corrupt spies, such as sivkovich, there, medvedchuko on, who just made up whatever came across, fashioned fake sociological studies. and gave putin the wrong impression about ukraine, and he made the wrong move, well, the same here, you can simply misjudge the people you work with and get some unforeseen result for yourself. thank you very much, yuriy nikolov, journalist and founder of the project our money, we talked about oleg tatarov and his influence on the office of the president and the president. thank you very much. well, i will also remind you once again that we contacted the president's office today for a comment as well. contacted oleg tatarov, messages reach him very slowly, he changes phone numbers very often, but nevertheless, we are open, and if the representatives of the president's office or oleg tatarov have something to say and tell in more detail about the heroic moments during defenses of kyiv, if there were any, we are open and ready to listen to what oleg tatarov is valuable for the office of the president and fo

when there are factions that are both a group, a faction and a group that were under the control of medvedchuk, and the other, let's say, different to the groups of oligarchs who did not vote or abstained from voting for this bill, and here it appears absolutely, this infographic does not have those who did not vote, there are a little more of them, in fact, yes, yes, yes, well, yes, they have not voted yet, there are many more party servants of the people who they simply took out the cards, being in the hall, did not vote, accordingly they are not in this infographic, yes, yes, thank you for the clarification, mr. volodymyr, ms. solomi, but considering this such and such a position on the fundamental issue of these people's deputies of ukraine, can they now to call people's deputies of ukraine, isn't it time to ask questions about the existence or stay in the verkhovna rada of people who were elected on the lists of the same party, the opposition platform for life, which is already officially banned in ukraine, but the deputies still pass the law. or vote against laws, form the legislative fi

the property worth almost uah 400 million of ex-people's deputies traitors serhiy medvedchuk and bohdanozak was transferred to the state this week. the court seized land plots, enterprises, factories, cars and real estate, the sbu reported. let me remind you that in june, law enforcement officers exposed both brothers of former people's deputies for financial fraud. according to the investigation, the accused used controlled enterprises for stealing. funds due to non-payment of taxes to the state budget, thereby causing losses to the treasury of more than uah 75 million. both suspects are currently hiding abroad. kyivstar vodafone and lifecell report that it is difficult to ensure 100% autonomy of mobile communication and the internet for 10 hours during power outages. this is stated in the joint statement of the companies. they continue to work now on. increasing the energy stability of their networks, however, this requires significant resources and time - top managers say. recently, the national center for operational-technical management of telecommunications networks obliged operat

its curator was viktor medvedchuk, so they actively encouraged installing telegram. europe does not want to let russia's trojan horse behind its walls. unfortunately, ukraine has already done this, but it is not too late to correct the situation. i know how to protect national security without limiting human rights and freedom of speech. our state should know who the ultimate owner of such platforms is. here, for example, viber and whatsapp are registered in the eu, and therefore comply with the european act on digitalization, but telegram does not. is not registered either in ukraine or in the countries of the european union. the ukrainian state knows nothing about the owners of the telegram company. network administrators refuse to contact and, for example, delete information that threatens the national security, or distributes pornography. ukraine cannot control servers, traffic, content, or personal data, that is, absolutely nothing. my bill requires transparency. if this is how youtube and facebook work in ukraine, why can't telegram work? only. for one of the r

data about ukraine, the first of which was supplied by his own corrupt spies, such as sivkovich, there medvedchukmade up just what happened, molded by fake sociological studies.

different people, all presidents are very different, yushchenko, poroshenko, zelensky, yanukovych, and medvedchukfor example, was also the head of the kuchma, but every time, in this tandem, this tandem, it emerges, it’s not just like that, it’s some kind of systemic, just a mistake that is rooted in the constitution, yes, we, we have always evaluated the work of the heads of the office as extraordinary. influential people in the state, but the task of each leader was only one: to make the president stronger. remember how the verkhovna rada was dissolved during yushchenko's presidency, there were several publications decrees, decree after decree, which the parliament did not implement, later it turned out that they refused to print the decree of the president of the voice of ukraine in the government courier, and then they remembered that there is another edition. this combination was rotated by viktor baloga, who made the president stronger, just as rybachuk made the president stronger, there was loshkin and many others, but i do not recall a history where a configuration was formed under one of

medvedchuk's tv channels were closed, and we saw how the nsdc made decisions about vkontakte networks and classmates, well, the russian orthodox church, the branch of the russian orthodox church in ukraine is also such a network, that is, in principle, a propaganda network that was created even during stalin's time, this church was created in the form in which it exists, and even more, now the head of this uocp church. is a member of the holy synod of the russian orthodox church, is this not a reason to say that this church is hostile to ukraine, and perhaps, again, not to go down this long road of nine months and a month for this law to come into force, well that is 10 months, wouldn't it be easier to pass through the national security and defense council a decision to ban the activities of organizations connected to the russian orthodox church? this is a very sensitive issue. we can't here, and so they are, we did everything as loyally as possible. by the way, there is no need to wait nine months, if they do not cut off the connection, the state can do it in three months, then they

medvedchuk, and the other, let's say this, to various groups of oligarchs who did not vote or abstainedm voting for this draft law, and here it arises absolutely, this infographic does not have those who did not vote, there are actually a little more of them, yes, yes , yes , well, they haven’t voted yet, there’s a lot more, they just took out the cards while in the hall, they didn’t vote, accordingly they are not in this infographic, yes, yes, thank you for the clarification, mr. volodymyr, ms. solomi, but considering this , this, such a position on the fundamental issue of these people's deputies of ukraine, whether it is possible for them now to call people's deputies of ukraine, isn't it time to raise questions about the existence or stay in the verkhovna rada of people who were elected on the lists of the same party, the opposition platform for life. which is already officially banned in ukraine, but deputies still pass laws or vote against laws, form the legislative field of the state, during the war, representatives of this enemy party were and remain not only in the verkhovna ra

ideas and bring russian peace here, and we saw these decisions of the national security council when medvedchuk'schannels were closed, and we saw how the national security council made decisions regarding vkontakte networks and classmates, well, the russian orthodox church, a branch of the russian orthodox church in ukraine is also such a network, that is, in principle, a propaganda network that was created even during stalin's time, it is... the church was created in the form in which it exists, and what's more, now the primate this uocp church is a member of the holy synod of the russian orthodox church. isn't this a reason to say that this church is hostile to ukraine, and perhaps, again, not to go down this long road of nine months and a month for the entry into force of this law, that is, 10 months, or not wouldn't it be easier to pass through the council of national security and defense a decision to ban the activities of organizations associated with the russian orthodox church. this is a very sensitive issue, we cannot be here, and so they, we, we did everything as loyally as possible, by

with information, some with money, some politically, some different, not all of them are, as they say, medvedchuks, and putin did not manage to exchange all of them and take them to moscow, some of them wore embroidered shirts, they are louder than our soldiers, they say hello, glory to ukraine, and they say... does everyone have the right to be reborn, we reincarnated, don't move us, yes, this is the sbu's problem, the sbu can't work on such a scale, it's bad, the population should get involved in this, in order to expose such criminals, the entire fifth column, everyone, what so what otherwise, he helps russia with his propaganda, by spreading his various pro-russian texts on the networks, all those who really helped, all those who directed rockets and bombardments at our objects, all must go to court, now they are caught, and i am talking about those who changed shoes, changing shoes is just that external, and we need to explore their path, we did not do lustration at the time, and this was our mistake, but it was determined by our development, i remember those early 90s, when dissidents in the

pope, if diana panchenko, if you remember, agrees at the same time, such a propagandist, host of the medvedchuk channels, who wrote that the ban of the ukrainian orthodox church, and she also connected this with the arrest of pavlo durv, that this is a link in the same chain and he says that this whole event is bad, he is trying to take under totalitarian, under totalitarian... control, so to speak, all the information, one of our viewers from the occupied territories wrote to me here, he says: youtube does not work, google is impossible for him to use, whatsapp doesn't work, and the only thing that works is telegram, amazingly close, that's how it is, in a word, how did the pope mean it, to andrii kovalev, candidate of political sciences and religious scholar, we ask, is he already in touch with us dear, mr. andriy, i congratulate you, glory to ukraine, friends, glory to the heroes, here is such fresh news from the pope. do you agree with him that the church should not be touched? lesya, maybe the church cannot be touched, but when it is a quasi-religious organization with a religious center,

problem of tabachnyk, to think that he is like that, but then, in addition to tabachnyk, there was also medvedchuktill kuchmi somehow managed to slip out of full control, but i don't know if he wanted to appoint and you see.