michelle flori said this report. forseveral michelle flori said this report. for several hours, justices from the highest court questioned aspects of legislation passed in florida and texas that limits what social media platforms can do to moderate content. —— fleury. they were proposed after the siege of the capital, which led to donald trump being removed from several social media networks. supporters of the law that it was necessary to prevent censorship of conservative users. a long—running concern among republicans. they argued they were civilly trying to regulate business behaviour, not the speech of these firms. but opponents, including the industry group challenging both laws, net choice, said they infringed on the platforms�* first amendment rights, by limiting the content they can publish and warning that a ruling for the states would deal a blow to the online platforms�* biggest models, which rely on duration to attract users and advertisers. the supreme court is expected to issue its ruling injune in the crucial months ahead of the us presidential

michelle flori said this report. forseveral michelle flori said this report.