mr. rostislav, we also congratulate you. good evening. yulia klymenko, people's deputy of ukraine, first deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada committee on transport and infrastructure, joins us. mrs. julia, good evening, you too. good evening. well, we have our survey, we would like to ask you as well. are you satisfied with the results of the global peace summit, well, let's go, sir, very briefly, let's start with you, mr. rostyslav, well... since the immediate results are there, that family photo, i think that within three months it will be clear whether this gathering has achieved the objectives that were set on the issues of food security, nuclear security and the release of hostages and what will be the next step, that should be answered within three months, then let's see if it was a step to nowhere or some step towards the result, ms. yulia, your opinion, are you satisfied... with the results and consequences of the global peace summit. well, to be honest, i do not fully understand the results of my colleague, mr. pavlenko, but th

mr. rostislav, we also congratulate you. good evening.iya klymenko joins us, people's deputy of ukraine, first deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada committee on transport and infrastructure. mrs. julia, good evening, you too. good evening. well, and we have our survey. i would also like to ask you if you are satisfied with the results of the global peace summit, well, sir, very briefly, let 's start with you, mr. rostyslav, well, since the immediate results, there is only a family photo, i think that within three months it will be clear, did this meeting achieve the tasks that were set on the issues of food security, nuclear security and... hostages and what will be the next step, there should be an answer to this within three months, then we will see whether it was a step to nowhere or some step to the result. ms. yulia, your opinion, are you satisfied with the results and consequences of the global peace summit? well, to be honest, i don't fully understand the results, like my colleague, mr. pavlenko, but the fact that many countries c

well, to be honest, the results, like my colleague, mr pavlenko, i do not fully understand, but the fact that many countries... gathered, supported ukraine, is always good, the main thing is that it be converted into practical actions, such as the supply of weapons, such as, indeed, giving us the possibility of free navigation and exports, as well as providing us with financial assistance to get us through this difficult winter and the next few years if the war continues, mr. alexander, your view on our... are you satisfied with the results of the global peace summit? i satisfied with the results, it is clear that we would like more in terms of successfully implementing all 10 points of president zelenskyi's peace formula, but this is a good start, three elements, three points of this formula, they received wide support, including the one that concerns nuclear security, and in general, if i compare... for example, with the history of the creation of, for example, the united nations, there were 46 states at the san francisco conference, here we have about 100 states, and we see that some

thank you, mr. rostyslav, mr. oleksandr, you communicate quite actively with our western partners, how do they feel about what is happening in the media, in the press, in particular with the scandals regarding ukrinform and the disconnection of tv channels, do our western partners often talk about , which is nevertheless the basis of democracy. words, they should be cornerstones in a democratic country, which is ukraine. well, i did not discuss such specific issues with western partners or western colleagues, because we are mainly talking about other issues related to the provision of military-technical assistance, support to ukraine and so on, but we all understand that, for example, if we take nato, it should be understood that nato, as written in solid... monographs, is also an organization that is united around certain values, including such values ​​as human rights, as democracy, as supremacy law, this applies to the european union as well, i.e. the issue of freedom of speech, the issue of crit

thank you, mr. rostislav, mr. oleksandr, you communicate quite actively with our western partners, how do they feel about what is happening in the media, in the press, in particular with the scandals regarding ukrinform and the disconnection of tv channels, or often our western partners say that... despite all the foundations of democracy and freedom of speech, they should be cornerstones in a democratic country, which is ukraine? well, these are the specific questions. did not discuss with western partners or with western colleagues, because we are mainly talking about other issues related to the provision of military-technical assistance, support to ukraine and so on, but we all understand that, for example, if we take nato, it is necessary to understand that nato, as written in solid scientific monographs, is also an organization that is united around certain values, including such values ​​as human rights and democracy. as the rule of law, this applies to the european union as well, i.e. the iss

mr. roman, i have two questions for you. the first question is, what does this draft security agreement between ukraine and... the union envisage, which is also about to be signed, as expected, again, according to radio liberty, it could be as early as june 27, yes, and the second the question, here is what mr. josep borel says about the mechanisms, in what way to prevent blocking by hungary or even by any other state, will such a mechanism be effective and... how soon can we expect this help, at least at the expense of the frozen funds of the occupying state? well, first, and here the most important thing is to understand that the decisions of the european parliament, the european commission, and the council of the european union, they are implemented by national parliaments, national governments, based on those directions. of them, which will be accepted in the european union, it institutions, and i don't see a problem here, in principle, not to say to orban, goodbye, whatever you want,

interparliamentary cooperation, mr.r, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today, thank you for the invitation, rostyslav pavlenko, people's deputy of ukraine from european solidarity, member of the parliamentary committee on education, science and innovation, former director of the national institute for strategic studies, mr. rostyslav, i congratulate you and thank you for being with us today, congratulations, thank you for invitation, i apologize, with the lights off , it looks a little so steep, well... this, but this is the reality in which we all live now, so thank you for being with us today, and we are waiting for the inclusion of yaroslav yurchyshyn, people's deputy of ukraine , the head of the parliamentary committee on freedom of speech, and the editor tells me that there is already mr. yaroslav, mr. yaroslav, we welcome you, thank you for being with us today, good evening, so gentlemen, as we ask our tv viewers about the admissibility of criticizing the government during the war, i will... ask in

rostislav pavlenko, people's deputy of ukraine from european solidarity, member of the parliamentaryttee on education, science and innovation, former director of the national institute for strategic studies, mr. rostislav, i congratulate you and thank you for being with us today, congratulations, thank you for the invitation, i apologize, with the power out , it looks a little so steep, well, that, but this is the reality in which we all live now, so thank you for being with us today, and we are waiting for the inclusion, yaroslav yurchyshyn, people's deputy of ukraine, chairman of the parliamentary the committee on freedom of speech, and the editor tells me that there is already mr. yaroslav, mr. yaroslav, we welcome you, thank you for being with us today, good evening, so gentlemen, as we ask our tv viewers about the admissibility of criticizing the government during the war , i 'm going to ask you in a blitz poll what you think about it, and then we 'll talk about the results... what kmis measured and what sociology says about it, but since we've formulated this question for our a

research, mr.tyslav, i congratulate you and thank you for being with us today, congratulations, thank you for the invitation, i apologize, bye the light is a little bit so steep, well, it is, but this is the reality in which we all live now, so thank you for being with us today, and we are waiting for the inclusion of yaroslav yurchyshyn, people's deputy of ukraine, chairman of the parliamentary committee on freedom of speech, and prompts i am the editor, mr. yaroslav, mr. yaroslav, we welcome you, thank you for being... with us today, good evening, so, gentlemen, since we are asking our tv viewers about the admissibility of criticizing the government during the war, i will ask format blitz survey and you, what do you think about it, then we will talk about the results of kmis, what kmis measured and what sociology has to say about it, but since we formulated this question for our viewers, i also ... the question is addressed and we will start with you, mr. rostislav: shall we assume criticize the