0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. bradley. mr. bradley: no. so once again, i was excluded from the footnote of that notion and my review of it in the chain was could you add me back to the footnote because i did have a contract and i did receive 74,000. mr. stockton: and if i may help you out, let's talk just about that part of the motion that deals with the relationship between the district attorney willis and mr. wade. when you reviewed that, you knew that she was that. mr. bradley: no, i did not know that she was relying on me to for any accuracy other than what was put in there, the 74,000. mr. stockton: mr. bradley if , there was something patently false in that motion, you would have told ms. merchant, would not you? mr. bradley: i can't say i would have or wouldn't have, i don't know what i would have told ms. merchant. mr. stockton: if there was something pat patently speculative, you would have told ms. merchant, would not you? mr. bradley: i don't know what i would have told ms. merchant. if she asked me if it was accurate. we were d
mr. bradley. mr. bradley: no. so once again, i was excluded from the footnote of that notion and my review of it in the chain was could you add me back to the footnote because i did have a contract and i did receive 74,000. mr. stockton: and if i may help you out, let's talk just about that part of the motion that deals with the relationship between the district attorney willis and mr. wade. when you reviewed that, you knew that she was that. mr. bradley: no, i did not know that she was relying...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. bradley: not that i recall saying that mr. wade owes me or owed me money, i don't recall ever saying that. >> i didn't ask if you ever said it, i asked if he ever owed you money in the past? mr. bradley: no, he didn't owe me money. >> and so he steered this contract to you come into your office, and you weren't really talking to him, had not talked to him for two years? mr. bradley: the contract was in 2021. i did not leave until 2022. >> you did not talk to him that whole time? mr. bradley: i left in 2022. i have not really spoken him since 2022 is what i said. when i left june of 2022, june, august dates of 2022. >> one last question. other than your attorney, who did you speak with today about giving testimony in this case? today? mr. bradley: i spoke with my attorneys charles graham and bc chopra. >> i have nothing further, your honor. judge mcafee: all right. i am going to double check, did mr. cromwell ever join us by zoom? >> i think he is still having technical issues. he said all relevant questions were asked. judge m
mr. bradley: not that i recall saying that mr. wade owes me or owed me money, i don't recall ever saying that. >> i didn't ask if you ever said it, i asked if he ever owed you money in the past? mr. bradley: no, he didn't owe me money. >> and so he steered this contract to you come into your office, and you weren't really talking to him, had not talked to him for two years? mr. bradley: the contract was in 2021. i did not leave until 2022. >> you did not talk to him that whole...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> no, i'm going to move mr. bradley's testimony. >> counsel, for mr. bradley, sorry, can i get your name one more time. >> mr. ward. >> mr. ward, ok, if we can get regular updates, where he is and how he is progressing towards the courtroom. and then when everyone has had a chance to read the questions in the interim, let me know, and we can take this up. mr. mcduringle. >> i have a text question from one of mr. floyd's lawyers that he's -- >> someone joining us by -- thank you, someone joining us by zoom who wants to appear for the record? >> yes. chris for mr. floyd. >> thank you. i think we had a legal assistant here announcing on mr. floyd's behalf. it would be better to have counsel of record of mr. floyd's presence today. >> sorry, your honor, did you ask a question? >> mr. floyd joined us yesterday. i do not see him here today. do you have an announcement about his presence for today's hearing? >> he will not be present, your honor. >> all right. >> thank you. we'll be in recess until i hear from the parties. >> taking a break in the georgia hea
>> no, i'm going to move mr. bradley's testimony. >> counsel, for mr. bradley, sorry, can i get your name one more time. >> mr. ward. >> mr. ward, ok, if we can get regular updates, where he is and how he is progressing towards the courtroom. and then when everyone has had a chance to read the questions in the interim, let me know, and we can take this up. mr. mcduringle. >> i have a text question from one of mr. floyd's lawyers that he's -- >> someone...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley testified mr. wade said the divorce proceedings were beginning and >> we have a starting point but does that necessarily foreclose anything from that point on ward? if they started talking about something else entirely? >> post divorce of course not but during the pennsylvania -- observations and other realizations that mr. bradley came into during his representation. to parse it out would put mr. bradley in an untenable position. >> i think we're talking about two aspects of -- the first attorney/client privilege. first is controlled by state law and statute that deals with communications and purpose. i don't hear that being the objection. the objection is that there are confidential matters under 1.6 which in some form or fashion mean that once you start a relationship attorney/client that everything from that point on is confidential between the two of them. there is no such case law in georgia that deals with confidential information of that kind. attorney/client yes, confidential information n
bradley testified mr. wade said the divorce proceedings were beginning and >> we have a starting point but does that necessarily foreclose anything from that point on ward? if they started talking about something else entirely? >> post divorce of course not but during the pennsylvania -- observations and other realizations that mr. bradley came into during his representation. to parse it out would put mr. bradley in an untenable position. >> i think we're talking about two...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> mr. bradley, you have referred to mr. wade as your client, correct >> correct. >> you understand that the court has ruled that communications that you had with mr. way are not privilegedcorrect >> no, i'm i'm aware that the court ruled that one specific dealing with the timeframe of one specific conversation wasn't privileged >> then i'm going to ask, your honor, if sadow limitation the clarifying he made. sure mr. sadow, you asked whether all communications with mr. wade i think we're covered. that was not the extent of the ruling. the only ones that i deemed were not covered and that i'd asked about in the in camera hearing because those are the ones that were relevant were any communications mr. wade made regarding the existence or nonexistence of a romantic relationship with ms willis? >> fine. thanks, your honor. i understand. so, going back to line of inquiry, when you say you don't have personal knowledge, what i want to ask you to start with very simple did you have communications with mr. wade about the relations
. >> mr. bradley, you have referred to mr. wade as your client, correct >> correct. >> you understand that the court has ruled that communications that you had with mr. way are not privilegedcorrect >> no, i'm i'm aware that the court ruled that one specific dealing with the timeframe of one specific conversation wasn't privileged >> then i'm going to ask, your honor, if sadow limitation the clarifying he made. sure mr. sadow, you asked whether all communications...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley and mr.ade from 2018 through there is no such law that protects only communications and i apologize but i think what we are being told is i don't have to say anything at all about mre attorney-client relationship with him it could be deemed confidential and i can't talk about it. there is no rule to that effect both in the court would say are ourretirement attorney/client privilege confidential information you ordered mr. bradley to testify. we have to decide after you ordered him to testify. [inaudible] >> if not said he cannot testify to anything. the question on the table is what observation do you have between mr. wade and ms. willis. now their teams have made an allegation of some impropriety. that same impropriety would be related to a divorce proceeding on every level. were talking about things that gave him knowledge associated with his representation. i realize and then i realize the rule 1.6 we violate that the whole thing comes tumbling down. i'm not saying you cannot ask about mr.
bradley and mr.ade from 2018 through there is no such law that protects only communications and i apologize but i think what we are being told is i don't have to say anything at all about mre attorney-client relationship with him it could be deemed confidential and i can't talk about it. there is no rule to that effect both in the court would say are ourretirement attorney/client privilege confidential information you ordered mr. bradley to testify. we have to decide after you ordered him to...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> mr. mcdougle. >> good afternoon, mr. bradley. you have certain information about the relationship between mr. wade and miss willis that is not privileged, correct? >> well, that was my determination. so i think he disagrees with it. so his opinion is a little irrelevant on that point. >> do you understand that the court has ruled that certain information that you have about the relationship between miss willis and mr. wade is not privileged? >> i -- the court's ruling as i understood it and as my lawyers and i understood it, of the privilege not existing was based off of a conversation that was had in the back of my office, which was confidential, with mr. wade and i. that's what was asked of me on yesterday and that's what the ruling, to my knowledge, unless i'm being corrected here now in saying that it's more, it was that particular piece that the judge said did not have privilege. >> and have you testified already today to the sum total of your knowledge of the relationship that is outside the scope of the privilege according
. >> mr. mcdougle. >> good afternoon, mr. bradley. you have certain information about the relationship between mr. wade and miss willis that is not privileged, correct? >> well, that was my determination. so i think he disagrees with it. so his opinion is a little irrelevant on that point. >> do you understand that the court has ruled that certain information that you have about the relationship between miss willis and mr. wade is not privileged? >> i -- the...
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
do you recall any instance where mr. bradley, where you witnessed mr. bradley sexually assault someone? i think it is highly relevant. i think that it goes to the witnesses credibility and to this afternoon where they committed the assault and the witness who have firsthand knowledge and witness the event. i think it's highly relevant to bradley's credibility. collect subject, your honor. they cannot have a's sub trial. >> seven see how this is a well beyond the core of issue. to go down the whole many trial on whether he did or did not do this in circumstances that were leaving the firm. >> i think he already has. >> i'd like to make it clear that we call on your concerns on the same thing the -- >> understood. anything else that's relevant to this witness? >> given the courts's ruling, no. >> questions from defense counsel. >> good afternoon, sir. >> good afternoon. >> when did you start working out the law firm? >> i believe i stated working march 2021. >> at that time i understand that there was a three-way partnership or sharing arrangement at the
do you recall any instance where mr. bradley, where you witnessed mr. bradley sexually assault someone? i think it is highly relevant. i think that it goes to the witnesses credibility and to this afternoon where they committed the assault and the witness who have firsthand knowledge and witness the event. i think it's highly relevant to bradley's credibility. collect subject, your honor. they cannot have a's sub trial. >> seven see how this is a well beyond the core of issue. to go down...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> mr. bradley mr. campbell. >> so you were you ares with mr. not related to attorney-client privilege, correct? >> related to the contracts come yes. >> but you have conversations, even though as understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from the cannibals would be beginning agenda or in january 2021, right? >> is at the day of his contract? >> pretty close. >> i don't know what the date of this contract was but if they were after the date of the filing of the divorce, then yeah. >> i'm not talking about, i'm not talking about after the date of the filing of divorce. it's been represented to the court that you had an attorney-client relationship with mr. bradley from 2015 forward, correct? >> that is correct. >> mr. bradley received his contract with fulton county that was in 2021, correct? >> i don't know. >> we can prove that to others. but at the time mr. bradley was doing work in fulton county if i understand, you still had an attorney-cli
>> mr. bradley mr. campbell. >> so you were you ares with mr. not related to attorney-client privilege, correct? >> related to the contracts come yes. >> but you have conversations, even though as understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from the cannibals would be beginning agenda or in january 2021, right? >> is at the day of his contract? >>...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. bradley, you have referred to mr. wade as your client, correct? >> correct. >> you understand that the court has ruled that communications that you had with mr. wade are not privileged, correct? >> no, i'm aware that the court ruled that one specific dealing with the time frame of one specific conversation wasn't privileged. >> then i'm going to ask your honor, if it's at the limitation -- >> clarify -- mr. sadow, you asked whether all communications with mr. wade i think were covered? that was not the extent of the ruling. the only ones that i deemed were not covered and that i had asked about in the in camera hearing because those are the ones that were relevant were any communications mr. wade made regarding the existence or nonexistence of a romantic relationship with mrs. willis. >> fine. thank you, your honor. i understand. >> so going pack to this line of inquiry. when you say you don't have personal knowledge, what i want to ask you to start with, have simple, did you have communications with mr. wade about the relationship between mr. wad
mr. bradley, you have referred to mr. wade as your client, correct? >> correct. >> you understand that the court has ruled that communications that you had with mr. wade are not privileged, correct? >> no, i'm aware that the court ruled that one specific dealing with the time frame of one specific conversation wasn't privileged. >> then i'm going to ask your honor, if it's at the limitation -- >> clarify -- mr. sadow, you asked whether all communications with mr....
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley you were counsel for mr. wade in the divorce case when the interogger toes were initially served on opposing counsel on or about december 27, 2021, correct? >> that's correct. >> and you were also counsel on -- for him when he amended -- when the amended interrologier toes were served in may, 2023. >> that's incorrect. >> so you ceased representing before may 30, 2023. >> that's correct. >> at any point in the divorce proceedings was a pleading filed with the court or a paper served on opposing counsel that purported to have your signature that you were not the one that signed or authorized your signature on? >> say that again? >> did anyone sign your signature without your authorization on any pleading or any other paperwork served on opposing counsel in the divorce proceedings? >> i don't think so. if you have the documents, i can authenticate my signature. >> and you testified that you also practice criminal law and divorce law and perhaps other types of law as well? >> that's correct. >> and are you aware
bradley you were counsel for mr. wade in the divorce case when the interogger toes were initially served on opposing counsel on or about december 27, 2021, correct? >> that's correct. >> and you were also counsel on -- for him when he amended -- when the amended interrologier toes were served in may, 2023. >> that's incorrect. >> so you ceased representing before may 30, 2023. >> that's correct. >> at any point in the divorce proceedings was a pleading filed...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if we could call for mr. bradley. that's fine. all right. mr. bradley, deputy scott will swear you in again. >> i do. >> terrence bradley. >> sorry. >> thank you, judge. good afternoon, mr. bradley. good to see you, sorry under these circumstances. i'm going to just go straight to where we left off before. fani willis and nathan wade were in a romantic relationship, correct? >> correct. >> and it began at the time they were both municipal court judges, correct? >> objection, your honor. based on privilege. >> no further -- okay, overruled. >> i do not have knowledge of it starting or when it started. >> you told me it started when they were both municipal court judges though, correct? >> that is incorrect. >> you never confirmed in writing that it was instead of magistrate court, municipal court when they started dating? >> if you're speaking of the text message, you can go to that text message and read that text message and i will explain the text message to you. but you and i did not have a conversation about when it start. you asked a compoun
if we could call for mr. bradley. that's fine. all right. mr. bradley, deputy scott will swear you in again. >> i do. >> terrence bradley. >> sorry. >> thank you, judge. good afternoon, mr. bradley. good to see you, sorry under these circumstances. i'm going to just go straight to where we left off before. fani willis and nathan wade were in a romantic relationship, correct? >> correct. >> and it began at the time they were both municipal court judges,...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> mr. bradley and mr. campbell. >> you were discussing matters with mr. bradley which were not related to attorney/client privilege, correct? >> related to the contracts, yes. >> but you were having conversations that would not -- even though, if i understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from fulton county, which would have been the beginning of january, or in january of 2021, right? >> that the date of his contract? >> pretty close. >> i don't know what the date of his contract was, but if -- if it was after the date of the filing of the divorce, then yeah. >> i'm not talking about -- i'm not talking about after the date of the filing of the divorce. it's been represented to the court that you had an attorney/client relationship with mr. bradley from 2015 forward, correct? >> that is correct. >> when mr. bradley received his contract with fulton county, that was in 2021, correct? >> i don't know. >> we can prove that through other evidence. but at the
>> mr. bradley and mr. campbell. >> you were discussing matters with mr. bradley which were not related to attorney/client privilege, correct? >> related to the contracts, yes. >> but you were having conversations that would not -- even though, if i understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from fulton county, which would have been the beginning of january,...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so you said that you were aware of the contracts that mr. bradley and mr. campbell had with the fulton county district attorney's office, correct? yes, sir. and how did you become aware of those? >> just through conversation, they >> conversation with who mr. bradley and mr. campbell, you were discussing matters with mr. bradley which were not related to attorney-client privilege, correct? >> related to the contract, yes. okay. but you were having conversations that would not even know if i understood correctly. mr. bradley, was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from fulton county, which would've been beginning of january or in january of 2021, right? >> is that the date of his contract? >> pretty close >> i don't know what the date of his contract was, but if late for my after the date of the filing of divorce, then i'm not talking about i'm not talking about after the date of filing divorce it's been represented to the court that you had an attorney-client relationship with mr. bradl
so you said that you were aware of the contracts that mr. bradley and mr. campbell had with the fulton county district attorney's office, correct? yes, sir. and how did you become aware of those? >> just through conversation, they >> conversation with who mr. bradley and mr. campbell, you were discussing matters with mr. bradley which were not related to attorney-client privilege, correct? >> related to the contract, yes. okay. but you were having conversations that would not...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley. but mr. bradley refused to admit it. you can hear the lawyers coming at it five or six different ways. he kept saying no, no, no. ultimately i don't think they proved that he was in debt, but who knows. it's possible the defense team will come up with some evidence later that shows in fact that the opposite, that he was in debt, which will call mr. bradley's testimony even further in to question. >> charles: let's take a listen to a compelling part of this and then i want your thoughts. >> did you lie to mrs. merchant when you told her facts about mr. wade and mrs. willis' relationship? >> i mentioned earlier that i speculated on some things. i've testified to what i did know. so i can't recall whether or not i -- no. >> mr. bradley, speculation is a weasely lawyer word. let's speak truth here. you're under oath. when you were details different details of the relationship to mrs. merchant, did you lay to her about those details? >> objection. asked and answered twice. >> i don't think he's answered it yet. >> i don't rec
bradley. but mr. bradley refused to admit it. you can hear the lawyers coming at it five or six different ways. he kept saying no, no, no. ultimately i don't think they proved that he was in debt, but who knows. it's possible the defense team will come up with some evidence later that shows in fact that the opposite, that he was in debt, which will call mr. bradley's testimony even further in to question. >> charles: let's take a listen to a compelling part of this and then i want your...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley is looking at mr.ade and his lawyer to wait for them to object and they are clearly interacting in the court. it wouldn't otherwise. >> it's there now. >> a question was put to you mr. bradley. >> one of my lawyers is sitting right in the back, a, behind -- >> you can look wherever you want. >> i never looked at mr. wade or his attorneys. >> all right. mr. bradley, question put to you. >> repeat the question please. >> i showed you or asked you, what did nathan wade tell you about the relationship? >> same objection, your honor. >> and it's already been ruled upon. >> i recall him stating that at some point they were dating. i can't tell you what date that was. it was made in confidence. we were in the back of our office. our offices were the only two in the back. there was no one else present. that is all i can tell you at this time. >> one time? >> one time. >> you only had a conversation one time about the recessionship? >> objection, asked and answered. >> clarify for cross. miss merchant. >> i do
bradley is looking at mr.ade and his lawyer to wait for them to object and they are clearly interacting in the court. it wouldn't otherwise. >> it's there now. >> a question was put to you mr. bradley. >> one of my lawyers is sitting right in the back, a, behind -- >> you can look wherever you want. >> i never looked at mr. wade or his attorneys. >> all right. mr. bradley, question put to you. >> repeat the question please. >> i showed you or...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley and mr.ey represented that he had firsthand knowledge from speaking to several witnesses that he would be able to impeach with the statements she represented. that is the relationship prior to mr. wade being appointed special prosecutor and that there was issues of cohabitation that he would be able to directly impeach those witnesses. that is false. speaking with mr. cheap yeah those are misrepresentations not true. they are for the purpose of harassment and undue burden to the district attorney and renew our motion to quash. the only hearing we should be having is a hearing as it relates to sanctions for the defense counsel's lack of candor that is required by not only statutory law and professional rules of responsibility and case law and we ask we move into a hearing that is related to the sanctions due to misrepresentation and flagrant falsehoods that have been spread throughout the world in an effort to affect this case and keep it from moving forward. with that, your honor, that's our
bradley and mr.ey represented that he had firsthand knowledge from speaking to several witnesses that he would be able to impeach with the statements she represented. that is the relationship prior to mr. wade being appointed special prosecutor and that there was issues of cohabitation that he would be able to directly impeach those witnesses. that is false. speaking with mr. cheap yeah those are misrepresentations not true. they are for the purpose of harassment and undue burden to the...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley you were counsel for mr. wade in the divorce case when the interogger toes were initially served on opposing counsel on or about december 27, 2021, correct? >> that's correct. >> and you were also counsel on -- for him when he amended -- when the amended interrologier toes were served in may, 2023. >> that's incorrect. >> so you ceased representing before may 30, 2023. >> that's correct. >> at any point in the divorce proceedings was a pleading filed with the court or a paper served on opposing counsel that purported to have your signature that you were not the one that signed or authorized your signature on? >> say that again? >> did anyone sign your signature without your authorization on any pleading or any other paperwork served on opposing counsel in the divorce proceedings? >> i don't think so. if you have the documents, i can authenticate my signature. >> and you testified that you also practice criminal law and divorce law and perhaps other types of law as well? >> that's correct. >> and are you aware
bradley you were counsel for mr. wade in the divorce case when the interogger toes were initially served on opposing counsel on or about december 27, 2021, correct? >> that's correct. >> and you were also counsel on -- for him when he amended -- when the amended interrologier toes were served in may, 2023. >> that's incorrect. >> so you ceased representing before may 30, 2023. >> that's correct. >> at any point in the divorce proceedings was a pleading filed...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> good morning, mr. bradley, how are you? >> good morning. >> not happy to be hear, i'm assuming? >> i am not. >> okay. i understand, thank you for being here. >> wasn't my choice. >> right. >> you were subpoenaed to come and testify in this case? >> i was. >> but you and i have spoken previously about relevant fcts surrounding mr. wade. >> no, we have not. >> we have not texted about those facts? >> through a third party, you were given some information. you and i shared texts. our texts were more so about my health, more so about if i was okay with what was going on, that i would not be -- whether or not i was going to be subpoenaed or not, and that emphatically i would not have been sitting in this position as being called as a witness, so that's what my text chains show. so no. >> that we've never talked about willis and wade having a relationship? >> not directly you and i, no. we talked about my health. >> okay. >> we talked about as i stated before, other things, but not this, no. >> okay. did you text me about wade an
. >> good morning, mr. bradley, how are you? >> good morning. >> not happy to be hear, i'm assuming? >> i am not. >> okay. i understand, thank you for being here. >> wasn't my choice. >> right. >> you were subpoenaed to come and testify in this case? >> i was. >> but you and i have spoken previously about relevant fcts surrounding mr. wade. >> no, we have not. >> we have not texted about those facts? >> through a...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
she said that came from mr. bradley. well, we know that's not true from the testimony of fani's father there's this further statement about them taking the daughter out to california to live. she's the daughter is never lived in california. so why was he making up things out of whole cloth? i don't know. sometimes people lies. maybe he was upset about the way he was fired from the firm but none of that has anything to do with the charge made by ms merchant and mr. sadow and these other attorneys into me. that is the most reckless conduct here. >> elie, you intimated that if it can be proven that the relationship between district attorney fani willis and her prosecutor, mr. wade, if that relationship started before she hired him that that would be a real blow for her. >> why >> would she lie about such a thing? does that relate more to are you supposed to hire somebody that you're having a relationship with or might that have to do with his divorce. >> so this goes to the heart of the whole dispute here. then narrative of
she said that came from mr. bradley. well, we know that's not true from the testimony of fani's father there's this further statement about them taking the daughter out to california to live. she's the daughter is never lived in california. so why was he making up things out of whole cloth? i don't know. sometimes people lies. maybe he was upset about the way he was fired from the firm but none of that has anything to do with the charge made by ms merchant and mr. sadow and these other...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley is looking at mr. wade and his lawyer to wait for them to object and they're clearly interacting somehow in the court. so i just want the record to reflect that because it wouldn't otherwise it's there now, you have a question was put to mr. grubman. >> judge, one of my lawyers is standing is sitting right in the back a bit on that rabbit hole. you can look wherever you want. >> yeah. and i never looked at mr. wade or his attorneys. that sounds golf shirt all right. mr. brown, the question was put to you >> repeat the question, please. >> yes. so i showed you or i asked you, i'm sorry, the question. the last question i asked you was, what did nathan wade tell you about the relationship? >> objection. >> and that's already been ruled upon i. >> recall >> him stating >> that at some point they were dating i can't tell you what date that was. it was made in confidence. we were in the back of our office. our officers were the only two in the back. there was no one else present that is all i can tell you at
bradley is looking at mr. wade and his lawyer to wait for them to object and they're clearly interacting somehow in the court. so i just want the record to reflect that because it wouldn't otherwise it's there now, you have a question was put to mr. grubman. >> judge, one of my lawyers is standing is sitting right in the back a bit on that rabbit hole. you can look wherever you want. >> yeah. and i never looked at mr. wade or his attorneys. that sounds golf shirt all right. mr....
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> mr. bradley and mr. campbell. >> you were discussing matters with mr. bradley which were not related to attorney-client privilege, correct? >> related to the context, yes. >> but you were having conversations -- even though if i understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from fulton county, began in january 2021, right? >> is that the date of his contract? >> pretty close. >> i don't know what the date of his contract was but if it was after the date of the filing of divorce, then yeah. >> i'm not talking about the date after filing of the divorce, it's been represent today the court that you had an attorney-client relationship with mr. bradley from 2015 forward? >> yes, sir, that is correct. >> that was in 2021, correct? >> i don't know. >> we can prove that through other -- but at the time that mr. bradley was doing work for fulton county if i understand you still had an attorney-client privilege at least you're claiming one with mr. bradley, correct?
>> mr. bradley and mr. campbell. >> you were discussing matters with mr. bradley which were not related to attorney-client privilege, correct? >> related to the context, yes. >> but you were having conversations -- even though if i understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from fulton county, began in january 2021, right? >> is that the date of his...
0
0.0
Feb 17, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
do we have an update for mr. bradley? >> he should be here at 12:20. >> then what i think we should do is have these preliminary conversation about privilege, see if we can make any headway and then take our afternoon break. i don't know if you want to argue in place there or go to the table. maybe it was relayed to you since you weren't in consider earlier this morning, we had some initial conversations about the distinction between privilege and rule 1.6 and it sounded like you wanted to be heard on that. >> it was brought to my attention, i apologize. the case is necessary it's just taking a second. >> whatever you need to do. >> i believe the case move tbarsd in anticipation. we have corning fiber glass. >> it's difficult hearing counsel. >> there's a microphone at the jury box. you can try lift that microphone up and stick it in the jury becomes or make your way to the podium or table. that was provided in our morning recess. i think that was indicated to go more toward potential crime fraud argument. i don't think w
do we have an update for mr. bradley? >> he should be here at 12:20. >> then what i think we should do is have these preliminary conversation about privilege, see if we can make any headway and then take our afternoon break. i don't know if you want to argue in place there or go to the table. maybe it was relayed to you since you weren't in consider earlier this morning, we had some initial conversations about the distinction between privilege and rule 1.6 and it sounded like you...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
do we have an update for mr. bradley? >> he should be here at 12:20. >> then what i think we should do is have these preliminary conversation about privilege, see if we can make any headway and then take our afternoon break. i don't know if you want to argue in place there or go to the table. maybe it was relayed to you since you weren't in consider earlier this morning, we had some initial conversations about the distinction between privilege and rule 1.6 and it sounded like you wanted to be heard on that. >> it was brought to my attention, i apologize. the case is necessary it's just taking a second. >> whatever you need to do. >> i believe the case move tbarsd in anticipation. we have corning fiber glass. >> it's difficult hearing counsel. >> there's a microphone at the jury box. you can try lift that microphone up and stick it in the jury becomes or make your way to the podium or table. that was provided in our morning recess. i think that was indicated to go more toward potential crime fraud argument. i don't think w
do we have an update for mr. bradley? >> he should be here at 12:20. >> then what i think we should do is have these preliminary conversation about privilege, see if we can make any headway and then take our afternoon break. i don't know if you want to argue in place there or go to the table. maybe it was relayed to you since you weren't in consider earlier this morning, we had some initial conversations about the distinction between privilege and rule 1.6 and it sounded like you...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley mr. copra is that anything that he any knowledge of anything he would have would be protected under the attorney-client privilege. he would assert that privilege has not the way by mr. wade. more importantly, representation was made to the court that ms merchant spoke to mr. bradley and that mr. bradley represented that he had firsthand knowledge from speaking to a several witnesses, that he would be able to impeach with the statements she represented, that there was a relationship prior to mr. wade being appointed special process jeter and that there was issues with cohabitation that you would be able to directly impeach those witnesses. that is patently false because speaking with mr. chauffeur those are misrepresentations that are not true. they are for the purpose of harassment and undue burden to the district attorney. and lead asked to renew our motion to quash. and the only hearing we street having to the hearing as it relates to sanctions or the defense counsels lack candor. that'
bradley mr. copra is that anything that he any knowledge of anything he would have would be protected under the attorney-client privilege. he would assert that privilege has not the way by mr. wade. more importantly, representation was made to the court that ms merchant spoke to mr. bradley and that mr. bradley represented that he had firsthand knowledge from speaking to a several witnesses, that he would be able to impeach with the statements she represented, that there was a relationship...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> mr. bradley and mr. campbell. >> so you were discussing with mr. bradley that were not related to attorney/client privilege, correct? >> related to the contract, yes. >> if i understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from fulton county, which would have been the beginning of january or in january of 2021, right? >> is that the date of his contract? >> pretty close. i don't know what the date of his contract was. if it was after the date of the filing of divorce, then yeah. >> i'm not talking about after the date of the filing of divorce. it's been represented to the court that you had an attorney/client relationship with mr. bradley from 2015 forward, correct? >> yes, sir, that is correct. >> when mr. bradley received his contract with fulton county, that was in 2021, correct? >> i don't know. we can prove that through other evidence. at the time that mr. bradley was doing work for fulton county, if i understand, you had an attorney/client privile
>> mr. bradley and mr. campbell. >> so you were discussing with mr. bradley that were not related to attorney/client privilege, correct? >> related to the contract, yes. >> if i understood correctly, mr. bradley was your attorney at the time, correct? >> at what time? >> at the time that mr. bradley received his contract from fulton county, which would have been the beginning of january or in january of 2021, right? >> is that the date of his contract?...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if there's a way to submit my entire text history with mr. bradley, that's fine. if they want us to read every single text, that's fine. i just don't want to be in a position where people are saying that i'm not -- >> i also want to avoid the situation where you as counsel of record are having to lay the foundation and do that sort of thing yourself, i don't know how much further we can do with this before we get into that. >> i'm not sure what their objection is. so i asked him about one question ask he read off several others. >> why don't we go with your next question and see where we go from there. >> all right. let's -- >> but so -- >> wait for her to ask a question. >> and i understand that, judge. >> apparently you don't, sir. wait for her to ask a question and you'll have a chance. >> so i think the last thing i asked you was about september 14th. so those texts that you're talking about those refer to the issue we're here today about, though? >> some texts did, yes. >> and then you called me again on september 15th, 2023, and we spoke on the phone? >> i d
if there's a way to submit my entire text history with mr. bradley, that's fine. if they want us to read every single text, that's fine. i just don't want to be in a position where people are saying that i'm not -- >> i also want to avoid the situation where you as counsel of record are having to lay the foundation and do that sort of thing yourself, i don't know how much further we can do with this before we get into that. >> i'm not sure what their objection is. so i asked him...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so there was mr. bradley, there was mr. wade and there was christopher campbell. 1/3, 1/3, 1/3. so when you ask me if i was paid $300,000, the answer is no. i got 1/3 of that that went to my personal firm. now, once the money was distributed to my personal firm, obviously the expenses come out of that and i get at the end of the day whatever the profit is. so i did not get $300,000. no, ma'am. >> let me just clarify. my question was not did you put in your pocket $300,000. my question was, was the law firm of nathan wade paid over $300,000 in the year 2022? >> again, 1/3 of that came to the law firm of nathan wade. >> so you're saying that the law firm of nathan wade did not receive checks from fulton county government over $300,000 in the year 2022? >> that's a different question. 1/3 of the $300,000 came to nathan wade. >> ok. again, not asking what went in your pocket. i'm asking, was the law firm of nathan wade paid over $300,000 in 2022. >> object, asked answered a. >> i think you're dancing around the point there. >> that's fine. i can move on, judge. thank you. so you sai
so there was mr. bradley, there was mr. wade and there was christopher campbell. 1/3, 1/3, 1/3. so when you ask me if i was paid $300,000, the answer is no. i got 1/3 of that that went to my personal firm. now, once the money was distributed to my personal firm, obviously the expenses come out of that and i get at the end of the day whatever the profit is. so i did not get $300,000. no, ma'am. >> let me just clarify. my question was not did you put in your pocket $300,000. my question...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i have never used mr. bradley's credit card. >> never used his credit card? >> never. >> for transactions to anything with miss willis, out to dinner or anything like that? >> i have never used mr. bradley's credit card. i have never used anyone else's credit card, not even my father's, and we have the same name. >> you would pay back if you ever used it you would pay back in cash, correct? >> ma'am, i have never used son one else's credit card. -- someone else's credit card. >> can you take a look at the bank records that i gave you? it's the largest tab you have. >> which exhibit is this? >> it is exhibit 9. >> it should be the larger section. exhibit -- i maintain my relevant objections. >> let's see the next question and the objection may be highly relevant. >> is that an accurate copy of your capital one statements you provided in discovery to -- is that an accurate reflection of your capitol one records? >> discovery to whom. >> your divorce lawyers. that you provided in the divorce proceeding. >> does he recognize it by s
>> i have never used mr. bradley's credit card. >> never used his credit card? >> never. >> for transactions to anything with miss willis, out to dinner or anything like that? >> i have never used mr. bradley's credit card. i have never used anyone else's credit card, not even my father's, and we have the same name. >> you would pay back if you ever used it you would pay back in cash, correct? >> ma'am, i have never used son one else's credit card. --...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
where you also friends with mr. bradley? >> i've never been friends with mr. bradley. >> you've never been friends with mr. bradley? >> i don't consider us to be friends. i don't dislike mr. bradley, but i do not consider us to be friends. >> is he someone you would have in your phone and you would message them. >> i may have text messaged him. >> would you text message him and mr. wade on the same conversation. >> i don't recall doing that but if it happened it would not surprise me. >> that would not surprise you. okay. how frequently do you think the three off you would've text. >> i would not think very often. i don't even know what time. you are asking me to recall. i willl not speak to that becauw i really do not know the answer to that. i don't want to speculate how much that would happen. it is not out of my practice to text to people on one text message. if you showed me that happened it would not surprise me. although i have no recollection of it. >> they would have the record of those texts. talking about sometimes paying cash, when you went on vaca
where you also friends with mr. bradley? >> i've never been friends with mr. bradley. >> you've never been friends with mr. bradley? >> i don't consider us to be friends. i don't dislike mr. bradley, but i do not consider us to be friends. >> is he someone you would have in your phone and you would message them. >> i may have text messaged him. >> would you text message him and mr. wade on the same conversation. >> i don't recall doing that but if it...
0
0.0
Feb 28, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
she says, the trump attorneys says to mr. bradley, do you think their relationship began before she hired him? that's i'm paraphrasing. and he says absolutely why does that matter? why does it matter when the relationship between fani willis and mr. wade began >> right. so we need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture here. when the defendants challenged fani willis, their story was essentially fani willis was in a romantic relationship with nathan wade. and then while that relationship was ongoing, she appointed did him to lead the trump case, even though he had never prosecuted a felony criminal trial in his life thereafter, mr. wade made a lot of money, hundreds of thousands of dollars from the fulton county taxpayers, some of which made its way back to the da fani willis, the da fani willis and nathan wade though, offered a counter narrative where they said, no, no, no, he got hired first first then the relationship started. none of this was sort of intentional. none of this was planned. and then the stakes g
she says, the trump attorneys says to mr. bradley, do you think their relationship began before she hired him? that's i'm paraphrasing. and he says absolutely why does that matter? why does it matter when the relationship between fani willis and mr. wade began >> right. so we need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture here. when the defendants challenged fani willis, their story was essentially fani willis was in a romantic relationship with nathan wade. and then while that...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it sounded as if the court is going to have to order mr. bradley to testify and then mr. bradley will have to take his decision whether he is going to follow the court's order or whether he is not. if he does, then he will be able to ask him some questions that miss merchant prepared on mr. roman's behalf. if he says i'm not going to do that we're in the position the court will have to -- [inaudible] at that point my guess is he would say i would like him -- think on appeal. i'm trying to play through where we'll be. if we're going to do that we might as well put him on the stand. >> a good thing to flag. yesterday during the hearing there was some intermingling of 1.6 and attorney/client privilege and now having had the time to kind of parse through that, and it does seem that there is a distinction between the two. one is not covered with it and according to a case in georgia, supreme court doesn't make that distinction. to that and mr. evans as we work through these issues when mr. bradley takes the stand i would be directing him to respond and be responsive to any que
it sounded as if the court is going to have to order mr. bradley to testify and then mr. bradley will have to take his decision whether he is going to follow the court's order or whether he is not. if he does, then he will be able to ask him some questions that miss merchant prepared on mr. roman's behalf. if he says i'm not going to do that we're in the position the court will have to -- [inaudible] at that point my guess is he would say i would like him -- think on appeal. i'm trying to play...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> we were back at 2021, we also friends with -- mr. bradley? >> i don't consider us to be friends. i don't dislike mr. bradley but i don't consider us to be friends. >> would you message him? >> i might have text him. >> would you text him? >> i don't recall that but it wouldn't surprise me in. how equally would you say? >> i wouldn't think very often but you're asking me to recall, i don't even know what time. you are asking me to recall but i will speak to that because i don't know the answer to that so i don't want to regulate how often that would happen. it's not out of my practice to text people online so if you told me that happened and showed it to me, it wouldn't surprise me but i have no recollection of it. >> the record of it. >> i know you said you paid security cash, when you went on vacation, let's go one by one, what is the first time he went on vacation? >> i think the first time was around april 22. i'm trying to be competitive, article april 22, birthday is march 18 come about happen his 49th birthday. something like tennessee,
. >> we were back at 2021, we also friends with -- mr. bradley? >> i don't consider us to be friends. i don't dislike mr. bradley but i don't consider us to be friends. >> would you message him? >> i might have text him. >> would you text him? >> i don't recall that but it wouldn't surprise me in. how equally would you say? >> i wouldn't think very often but you're asking me to recall, i don't even know what time. you are asking me to recall but i will...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i have never been friends with mr. bradley. >> you have never been friends with mr. bradley? >> no, i don't consider us to be friends. i certainly -- i don't dislike mr. bradley. i don't consider us to be friends. >> is he someone that you would have in your phone and message with? >> i might have text messaged him. >> okay. would you text message him and mr. wade on the same conversations? >> i don't recall doing that. if it happened, it wouldn't surprise me. >> okay that wouldn't surprise you. the three of you. >> huh-uh. >> how frequently do you think the three of you texted? >> i wouldn't think very often. you're asking me to recall i don't know what time period you're asking me to recall. i'm not going to speak to that. i really don't know the answer to that. i don't want to speculate as to how often that would happen. but it's not out of my practice to text two people on one text message. so if you told me that happened and showed it to me, it wouldn't surprise me. although i have no recollection of it >> there would be some record of it in your phone or the phone recor
>> i have never been friends with mr. bradley. >> you have never been friends with mr. bradley? >> no, i don't consider us to be friends. i certainly -- i don't dislike mr. bradley. i don't consider us to be friends. >> is he someone that you would have in your phone and message with? >> i might have text messaged him. >> okay. would you text message him and mr. wade on the same conversations? >> i don't recall doing that. if it happened, it wouldn't...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
do we have an update on mr. bradley? >> he will be here at 12:22. >> i think we should have the prese preliminary -- i don't know if you want to argue in place or whatever makes you trouble. it was relayed to you since you weren't in court earlier this morning we had some initial conversations about the distinction between a privilege and rule 1.6 and you wanted to be heard. >> i apologize that i >> whatever you need to do. >> your honor, i believe -- anticipation of the rule 1.6 is fiberglass versus -- is that correct? >> it is difficult hearing -- >> there is a microphone in the jury box, you can try to lift that microphone up and speak in the jury box or make your way to the podium or table. the >> sorry. >> is that better? >> that was authority provided by mr. sadow, our morning recess and that was indicated to go toward a potential argument, i don't think we have gotten there yet. it is fraud on the court. it is attorney-client privilege, 1.6. >> the case i had cited this morning showing distinction was tenant healt
do we have an update on mr. bradley? >> he will be here at 12:22. >> i think we should have the prese preliminary -- i don't know if you want to argue in place or whatever makes you trouble. it was relayed to you since you weren't in court earlier this morning we had some initial conversations about the distinction between a privilege and rule 1.6 and you wanted to be heard. >> i apologize that i >> whatever you need to do. >> your honor, i believe -- anticipation...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> i don't i've never been formed with mr. bradley. >> you've never been friends with mr. bradley? >> no, i don't. i don't consider us to be friends. i said i don't dislike mr. bradley, but i don't consider us to be friends as he someone that you would have in your phone and you would message was i might've text message tim. >> okay. >> would you text message him and mr. wade on the same conversations? >> i don't recall doing that, but if it happened, it wouldn't surprise me. >> okay. so that wouldn't surprise you. >> three of you. okay? >> how >> frequently would you think that the free of you would have text? that's not very >> i wouldn't think very often, but, you asking me to recall. i don't even know what time period you're asking me to recall, but i'm not going to speak to that because i just really don't know the answer to that. and so i don't want to speculate as to how often that would happen, but it's not out of my practice. to text to people on one text message. so if you told me that happened in showed it to me, it wouldn't surprise me, although i have no recollection o
>> i don't i've never been formed with mr. bradley. >> you've never been friends with mr. bradley? >> no, i don't. i don't consider us to be friends. i said i don't dislike mr. bradley, but i don't consider us to be friends as he someone that you would have in your phone and you would message was i might've text message tim. >> okay. >> would you text message him and mr. wade on the same conversations? >> i don't recall doing that, but if it happened, it...
0
0.0
Feb 16, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> yes >> also with mr. bradley. he's actually not >> we need you to notify yourself for the record, sir. i maybe i'm worth at this moment he has currently. the patient it's going to wait here. we'll look you, have a, copy of compression >> you a time estimate of one supposed to be here? the question, where's the dr. in relation to hear? yes >> very at the very earliest deeply about all right, he's he's currently driving here as we speak. >> is an actual dr. okay >> and i think council all. right >> i wasn't tender ten-party >> sure. it was merchant other than mr. bradley, did you have any other witnesses >> i can tell you do you. think we can take up sure >> i think we can use this time to do that. so when you all to take a moment to look at the questions and then let me know when you're ready to proceed. >> my part of your it has question, i understood yesterday. i don't want a surprising development at the outset this friday morning, this hearing and fulton county, georgia fani willis, the district attorney who wa
>> yes >> also with mr. bradley. he's actually not >> we need you to notify yourself for the record, sir. i maybe i'm worth at this moment he has currently. the patient it's going to wait here. we'll look you, have a, copy of compression >> you a time estimate of one supposed to be here? the question, where's the dr. in relation to hear? yes >> very at the very earliest deeply about all right, he's he's currently driving here as we speak. >> is an actual dr....
0
0.0
Feb 24, 2024
02/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
bradley former law partner and friend of mr. wade, who apparently has some information it has communicated by text and email with the defense attorneys about that. so if these records back up, something mr. bradley tells a judge in chambers and cameron private, or if mr. bradley tells him something that backs up the records in private, i think they become particularly critical. i mean, this this is about like watching somebody on the titanic say, well, the iceberg is really not that big. this is a big deal in the sense that it could very well undermine the credibility of the district attorney and mr. wade. that's a problem going forward because the judge has got to make a decision on whether or not there has been some appearance of conflict or has there been some false filing or statement made to the court if that's the case, then i think she's got a problem. i don't know yet, but i do know that prosecutors and law enforcement use this type of cell phone tracking data, all the tab so additions here now the district attorney's of
bradley former law partner and friend of mr. wade, who apparently has some information it has communicated by text and email with the defense attorneys about that. so if these records back up, something mr. bradley tells a judge in chambers and cameron private, or if mr. bradley tells him something that backs up the records in private, i think they become particularly critical. i mean, this this is about like watching somebody on the titanic say, well, the iceberg is really not that big. this...
0
0.0
Feb 27, 2024
02/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
merchant, you said to print out a complete chain, mr. bradley, which you began corresponding. will give you a chance to do that, and you can follow up by email without exhibit. it will be the complete chain without any deletions or removals, exhibit 39. ms. merchant: at 1:57, when he texted himself a screenshot, i literally rode him, do you want any other screenshots? i have nothing to hide. >> all right, we are done. ok, i will wait to hear back from you all on exhibit 39, and is there anything else to take up before we discuss friday? just kind of really open to the floor. seeing men, i believe i asked him put it out there among the defense counsel to be considering how they would like to organize their arguments on friday. have there been any decisions reached on that? ms. merchant: we are going to be making a decision on that. >> in terms of subject matter or something like that? >> and time limits. >> yeah. that is the idea. >> ok, great. >> what is it that you are asking for? we will start there. i'm just kind of curious. >> i don't think we can answer that right now. if
merchant, you said to print out a complete chain, mr. bradley, which you began corresponding. will give you a chance to do that, and you can follow up by email without exhibit. it will be the complete chain without any deletions or removals, exhibit 39. ms. merchant: at 1:57, when he texted himself a screenshot, i literally rode him, do you want any other screenshots? i have nothing to hide. >> all right, we are done. ok, i will wait to hear back from you all on exhibit 39, and is there...
0
0.0
Feb 15, 2024
02/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
they're not just done for mr. bradley land mr. campbell. they're done through my office. life is not stagnant. there's been new police cases. i have a lawyer that is doing that work now. that doesn't work for me. that's same kind of deal. i have another lawyer that does filtering for this case. completely separate. >> so in the same private office, you had a filter contract, then you had somebody else having pedalling first appearances and so forth and then a special prosecutor. is that correct? >> i'm just not -- ultimately the answer to your question is question. but i'm not sure that they did it at the same time. the first appearance contract, even 60 or $90. i don't know how i convinced them to take that. but i think because it was for such a short amount of time. and then i think i pay my filter lawyers, which i still don't know how i get away with about $150 an hour. i want you to understand, the a.g. pays special prosecutors $1,000 an hour. so i'm a tough negotiator. paul was paying people up to 375 an hour. i won'ts pay anyone more than 250 is my max. i have a lot
they're not just done for mr. bradley land mr. campbell. they're done through my office. life is not stagnant. there's been new police cases. i have a lawyer that is doing that work now. that doesn't work for me. that's same kind of deal. i have another lawyer that does filtering for this case. completely separate. >> so in the same private office, you had a filter contract, then you had somebody else having pedalling first appearances and so forth and then a special prosecutor. is that...