i am going to double check, did mr. cromwell ever join us by zoom? >> i think he is still having technical issues. he said all relevant questions were asked. judge mcafee: ok. so just for the record, mr. cromwell has been apparently watching the preceding and was in his client's presence and did not have any other questions. mr. bradley, you can step down. thank you, sir. [inaudible] judge mcafee: by way of proffer, what about the texts? >> just to admit when other people asked about the text, some of them were in the record today. so i organized them. the ones that have been talked about today, i just organize them. i just wanted to reference to them. judge mcafee: ok. do we need mr. bradley for that? >> i don't think so. judge mcafee: have you marked them? have you show them to the state? >> i gave a copy to the state. judge mcafee: but so these are just for one second to make sure i give you all you can speak and looking at that. mr. bradley handed me defense exhibit 23, 24, 25. mr. bradley: i didn't realize that they were, oh, is this from the he

that we received notification from mr. cromwell on behalf of ms. latham and he said he was waving her presence. i do not know if he later decided to join us by zoom, but i do not think he was electing to login. so after mr. couture, just in terms of timing, do you have any expectation of how long, if any questioning would last? >> i do not imagine my question would be very long. judge mcafee: ok. let's get back to it at 4:00. you can just step out of the room. mr. qatar, are you still with us? >> i am, your honor. judge mcafee: all right, let us go back on the record with mr. bradley here and everyone else's here as well. you may proceed. >> mr. bradley did you use any , documents to prepare for your testimony today? mr. bradley: no, i did not. >> the last time you spoke with gabe banks? mr. bradley: the day, i do not have the date, but it was the date of whenever the phone call happened. >> and you knew his wife kyra banks works for das office, right? mr. bradley: yes, that is correct. >> when was the last time you spoke to mr. wade? mr. bradley:

before we had mr. cromwell, and i had not heard anything from him. >> i believe mr. cromwell is in a deposition in south georgia. that's all i know. >> that's helpful to know. mr. cromwell, can you hear us? we will keep an eye on that to see if he does join us and we will take it up as it comes. so, just a few preliminaries. i have been under the weather so i will try to speak up. if anyone can't hear me, i will try to talk close to the microphone. but we're here today for the sole purpose of which is that the conclusion of the hearing on february 16. that meeting with mr. bradley to assess the validity of his assertion of attorney-client privilege. i have now been able to do that, i also allow mr. wade the opportunity to weigh in and respond. after considering the testimony, not only in but what came out at the hearing. i found mr. -- neither mr. wade or mr. bradley had met their burden on establishing the attorney client privilege -- privilege applied specifically as it relates to mr. bradley's knowledge with any relationship that existed between miss willis and mr

all right, i know before we had mr. cromwell and i had not heard anything from him. i don't know if any other parties have as well. >> i believe he's in a deposition in south georgia. >> all right. >> looks like he joined. >> okay. that's helpful to know. mr. cromwell, can you hear us? all right. well let's keep an eye on that to see if he does join us. and we'll take it up as it comes. so, just a few preliminaries. first of all, i'm a bit under the weather so i'll try to speak up. if you can't hear me, let me know. i'll try to talk close to the microphone. we are here today the sole purpose is at the conclusion on february 16th, i announced i'd be meeting with mr. bradley to assess the validity of his assertion of attorney client privilege. i've now been able to do that and i also allowed mr. wade the opportunity to weigh in and respond as well. after considering the testimony, not only on camera but also what came out of the hearing, i found that neither mr. wade nor mr. bradley had met their burden of establishing that the attorney client privilege applied. specif

that's it, your honor. >> mr. cromwell. >> no questions, your honor. >> mr. avadi? >> mr. floyd, now it wasn't common for your daughter to confide in you about herro phapbtic life at all. >> no. i haven't confided in her about mine before and i had one. >> and you wouldn't have known about her boyfriend -- >> objection. >> might have just been -- keep going. >> you wouldn't have known about her boyfriend, the disc jockey, had you not been living with her, correct? >> that's correct. >> i'll allow t overruled. >> nothing further. >> did he answer the question? >> he did. >> by show of hands any redirect on those points only? ms. merchant. >> i want to know when you were prepped by the lawyers. when this prep session was. >> i just got off the plane on tuesday night. i think i was probably drooling at the mouth i was so tired. i got in wednesday -- must have been wednesday. >> did you talk about any of the testimony from yesterday or watch any news reports or anything like that? >> you can't cut the tv on without seeing this. the first thing. i listened to conservative radio

did mr. cromwell ever join us by zoom? >> i think he's still having technical issues. he e-mailed me and said he had no questions. all relevant questions were asked. >> for the record, mr. cromwell has been watching the proceeding. he waived his client's presense and didn't have any other questions. so turning it over to mr. abadi. >> i have no questions. >> mr. bradley, you can step down. >> you want these exhibits? may by excused? >> i would like to follow up based on some questions. >> by way of proffer, what about the texts? >> just to admit. so when other people asked about the texts, they weren't record based. i organized them. they're the ones that were talked about today. i want to have a point of reference. >> do we feed mr. bradley for that? >> i don't believe so. >> have you marked them? >> yes. >> have you showed them to the state? >> i gave a copy to the state. >> hang on one second just to be sure. while he's looking at that, mr. bradley handed me defense exhibit 23, 24, 25. >> judge, i didn't realize that they were in my folder. >> is that from the hear

that's it, your honor. >> mr. cromwell. >> no questions, your honor. >> mr. avadi? >> mr. floyd, now it wasn't common for your daughter to confide in you about herro phapbtic life at all. >> no. i haven't confided in her about mine before and i had one. >> and you wouldn't have known about her boyfriend -- >> objection. >> might have just been -- keep going. >> you wouldn't have known about her boyfriend, the disc jockey, had you not been living with her, correct? >> that's correct. >> i'll allow t overruled. >> nothing further. >> did he answer the question? >> he did. >> by show of hands any redirect on those points only? ms. merchant. >> i want to know when you were prepped by the lawyers. when this prep session was. >> i just got off the plane on tuesday night. i think i was probably drooling at the mouth i was so tired. i got in wednesday -- must have been wednesday. >> did you talk about any of the testimony from yesterday or watch any news reports or anything like that? >> you can't cut the tv on without seeing this. the first thing. i listened to conservative radio

mr. cromwell? >> the defense presentation of evidence is done. all of the witnesses have been subpoenaed. >> i think that's fair. miss merchan, any reason to hold on any of those witnesses? >> i have two short witnesses. >> ok. >> mixed witness of the state. >> for the testimony? >> yes, my name is austin. >> could afternoon. i want to direct your attention -- first of all, how are you employed? >> i am employed, i have my own firm. >> i want to direct your attention to 2021, 2020 two. what was your employment and background? >> i was employed with the wade bradley kimball firm. >> nathan wade and chris kimball? what did you do at that firm? >> i was an associate attorney. >> generally speaking, who in the firm did you work for, what kind of matters did you handle? >> i believe i work for all of them equally, they would all give me tasks to do, which court dates to go to, which cases to work on. >> i want to direct your attention to a particular instance. did you have a reason at any time to go to a club with mr. bradley? >> could you repeat the

so just for the record, mr. cromwell has been a barely watching the proceeding. he had waived his client's presence and didn't have any other questions as well. so turning it over to mr. body and i have no questions. >> all right. >> mr. bradley, you can step down. thank you, sir. >> judge, you want these exhibits >> matter excuse her just about what just by way of proffer, what about the texts to admit >> when other people asked about the texts, some of them were any records today, so i organized them and talk about today. so i just organize them just wanted reported reference to me. >> okay. okay >> and do we need mr. bradley for that? >> i don't. >> have you mark them >> have you showed them to the state? >> i gave them a copy it does state that so these roads are saying i'm just for one second just to make sure i'll give you all many you want >> and while he's looking at >> that, mr. bradley handed me defense exhibit 23, 24, 25 years. >> i didn't realize they were folder >> oh, is that from the hearing on friday all right. well, thanks for returning those rea

i'll note for the record that we received a notification from mr. cromwell on behalf of mr. latham. he was waiving her presince. i don't know if he decided to join by zoom. i don't think he was electing to log in. so after mr. catrove, mr. abadi, you have any expectation of how long if any questioning would last? >> i don't imagine any questioning would be long. >> let's get back at 4:00. >> martha: okay. well, we have been watching rather lengthy and not that informative testimony from terrence bradley who was former divorce attorney for nathan wade. nathan wade is alleged to have had a romantic relationship. the big question is when it began with fulton county d.a. fani willis. wade and willis testified earlier this month that they started a romantic relationship after she decided to hire him as part of the georgia election interference team for the case against former president trump in georgia. let's bring in andy mccarthy, former u.s. assistants attorney. he's been watching us this afternoon. boy, terrence bradley is finding it hard to answer a lot of these questions. the attor

. >> okay, mr. floyd. mr. cromwell. >> one question. in the time period between february 2021 and january 2022, did your father ever come and visit you during that time period? >> he did not. >> that's all i have. >> i would imagine you have a number of topics to cover with ms. willis. it will take more than 10 to 15 minutes. okay. then i think we have reached a stopping point for the day, and so, ms. willis, i ask if you can step down, and i also remind you you are not to discuss your testimony. and we will begin again at 9:00 a.m. we will do 9:00 a.m. this time tomorrow. before we reassess for today, i want to check in on logistics. and i will ask ms. merchant, once the testimony of ms. willis has concluded, how many other witnesses? [indistinct] >> we can handle that now. ms. wilson, you can step down. >> do you want me to leave the courtroom? >> you can sit at the council table. two witnesses, and other defense counsel. i know there was a potential witness that was objected to by the state. there is another one there. we can talk ab

on behalf of mr. floyd. okay. mr. cromwell? >> nothing, your honor. >> all right. ms. cross. >> mr.ave used to get exhibit number 14 in front of you? >> i believe i do. >> all right. so you are asking mr. wade about a couple of the invoice items, and your testimony i think was that percentage of income post special counsel appointment in november 2021. the percentage of income roughly after that time was about 50-50, fulton versus of income from your law practice, correct? >> roughly, yes, ma'am. >> sometimes more sometimes less? >> yes, men. >> how about your time? i'm interested in the percentage every time from november 2021 to let's say the close of the special-purpose grand jury when this would've been january 2023. you estimate for us the percentage of the time spent on phone county work versus of the work. >> oh, gosh. 99-199% of the time here in this building working on this case. >> all right. it was as i understood your testimony it was an intense time in terms of hours without special grand jury was needy, correct? >> yes, ma'am. >> and who was head our manager of the col

cromwell >> all right. ms cross >> mr. wade have you still got exhibit number 14 in front of year all of that believe i have them all right >> so you were asked mr. wade about a couple of the invoice items and your testimony, i think was that percentage of income post special counsel appointment in november 2021, the percentage of your income roughly after that time was about 50. 50 fulton versus other income from your law practice, correct? >> roughly, yes, ma'am. okay. >> sometimes more. sometimes less? yes, ma'am. all right >> how about your time? i'm interested in the percentage of your time from sap term november 2021. so let's say the close of the special purpose grand jury when it was dissolved in january 2023, you estimate for us the percentage of your time that was spent on fulton county? versus other words. >> oh gosh 9091 99% of the time. here in this building working on this case >> it was as i understood your testimony, it was an intense period in terms of hours while that special purpose grand jury was meetin

>> no. >> no further questions. >> mr. gillen. mr. mcculloch and mr. cromwell. >> no questions. >> cross. >> we haven't met before, is that correct? >> correct. >> you are able to see and hear me okay? >> yes. >> i want to start with a couple of things. i think you have made it clear that you never lived at the south full con condie, you never lived at that address with district attorney willis, correct? >> correct. >> never at any time. >> never. >> you never observed or have any information about district attorney wade and distinct attorney willis and nathan wade living together correct. do you have any information about that? >> no. >> when they said that information was sourced to you that's not correct? >> that's incorrect. >> did advertise tricked attorney willis pay rent at the condo while she lived there and you were living elsewhere. >> yes. >> who paid the rent? >> she did. >> nathan wade ever pay the rent? >> no. >> you never told anyone otherwise? i didn't hear your answer. did you ever tell anyone otherwise? >> no. >> all right. let's talk

cromwell. >> nothing, your honor. >> miss cross. >> thank you, your honor. >> mr. wade, have you still got exhibit number 14 in front of you? the one with all of the invoices, i believe. >> i believe i have them all. >> all right. so you were asked, mr. wade, about a couple of the invoice items and your testimony, i think, was that the percentage of income post summer counsel appointment in november 2021, the percentage of your income roughly after that time was about 50/50 fulton versus other income from your law practice, correct? >> roughly, yes, ma'am. >> sometimes more, sometimes less. >> yes, ma'am. >> how about your time? i'm interested in the percentage of your time from november 2021 to, let's say, the close of the special purpose grand jury when it was dissolved in january 2023. can you estimate for us the percentage of your time spent on fulton county work versus other work? >> oh, gosh. 99/1. 99% of the time here in this building working on this case. >> all right. it was as i understood your testimony, it was an intense period in terms of hours while t

i'll also note for the record that we received a notification from mr. cromwell on behalf of ms latham and he said he was waving her presence and i don't know if he later decided to join us by zoom, but i don't think he was electing to login, so after mr. kutcher off, just in terms of timing mr. body, do you have any expectation of how long year, if any, questioning would last? >> i don't imagine my question would be very long. >> okay. >> well, let's get back >> in at 04:00 mr. ralph, you can just set up a jury room they are taking a short break in fulton county, georgia >> after just scathing intensely emotional, and personal testimony by terrence bradley, this is all part of an effort by the defense in the georgia the election subversion case against donald trump and his co-defendants to boot the main prosecutor the district attorney, in fulton county, fani willis, off of this case, there are accusations that she had an inappropriate relationship with a prosecutor that she hired on that case, nathan wade brianna, some very intense personal relationshi

. >> and mr. cromwell? >> no questions, your honor. >> any redirect? can the witness be excused? the question is you want the exact date of the meeting occurred? >> yes. >> and i'm wondering if we can -- if it is really material, the exact date rather than just its proximity to the november 1st hiring, is that fair? if he knows whether it was earlier in the year versus maybe closer, would that obviate the need for the exact date? >> if he can't get the exact date, we'll take the best we can. >> let's start there. you may take care of it for us if we hold in place. >> i'm not sure -- >> let me try this first, governor barnes, before you do a deep dive in the email there. do you recall what time of year it was when this meeting occurred? >> i'm afraid not. you know how this is, the cases and the days move together. i had a fellow a few years ago who said i represented him in 1978, i told him i would take his word for it. >> i got to ask, if you wouldn't do that -- >> no, i would not. i'll tell you, i believe lawyers should be well paid. >> so -- >> i'll have to look. it didn't come

that's not accurate >> thank you >> okay. >> mr. mccullough? hello, mr. floyd. >> all right. mr. cromwell and atmos later >> great thing about coming last question i had one question is, can you jeremy >> yes, sir. >> is the time period between february 2021 in january of 2022 while you were saying at the urine does your father ever come and visit you during that time period at the urticaria? >> he did not. >> that's all i have. thank you, your honor >> all right. >> ms cross, i would imagine you have a number of topics to cover with ms willis, that'll take more than ten to 15 minutes. >> i did. >> okay. >> then i think we've reached a stopping point for today. and so ms willis, i'd ask you, you can sent down now and i'd also remind you that you're not to discuss your testimony or that of any other way? back here and will begin again at 09:00 a.m. i. will do 09:00 a.m. this time tomorrow. >> before we recess for today, i want to check in on logistics and i'll ask ms merchant once the testimony of ms willis has concluded. how many other witnesses you anticipate calling >> and then

. >> mr. cromwell. >> i have one question. can you hear me? >> yes sir.y of 2022 danger father ever come and visit you? >> you did not. >> i would imagine you have a number of topics to cover with ms. willis so we'll take with more than 10 to 15 minutes? >> i do. >> i think we have reached a stopping point for the day and so ms. willis you can step down now and i remind you that you're not it is i. we will begin again at 9:00 a.m.. we will do 9:00 a.m. this time tomorrow. the four-week recess for today i want to check in on logistics and i'll ask ms. merchant wants the testimony of ms. willis is completed how many other witnesses do you have? [inaudible] you may step down. >> do you want me to leave the courtroom? >> you can speak with council. all right so and querying other defense council mr. gillen there was a potential witness by the state and there's another one there and we can talk about that. were there any other witnesses anticipated from a defense council? the no show of hands miss cross any wit misses on your behalf? howany witnesses? >> witho

. >> mr. cromwell. >> i have one question. can you hear me? >> yes sir.of 2022 danger father ever come and visit you? >> you did not. >> i would imagine you have a number of topics to cover with ms. willis so we'll take with more than 10 to 15 minutes? >> i do. >> i think we have reached a stopping point for the day and so ms. willis you can step down now and i remind you that you're not it is i. we will begin again at 9:00 a.m.. we will do 9:00 a.m. this time tomorrow. the four-week recess for today i want to check in on logistics and i'll ask ms. merchant wants the testimony of ms. willis is completed how many other witnesses do you have? [inaudible] you may step down. >> do you want me to leave the courtroom? >> you can speak with council. all right so and querying other defense council mr. gillen there was a potential witness by the state and there's another one there and we can talk about that. were there any other witnesses anticipated from a defense council? the no show of hands miss cross any wit misses on your behalf? how many witnesses? >> witho

. >> and mr. cromwell. ms. cross. >> thank you. >> we have not met before. is that correct?> correct. are you able to see and hear me okay? i think you made it clear you have not lived at that address that you are releasing. you never lived there were district willis, correct? >> never. you never observed or had any information for district attorney willis and nathan wade living together. correct. >> you don't have any information about that? >> no, i don't. that information source to you was correct. >> correct. >> did mr. willis pay rent at that establishment? at that condo while she was living there. >> who paid the rent? >> she did. >> you never told anyone otherwise? >> i did not hear your answer. >> no. >> let's talk for a second about the district attorney's office. the district attorney's office during your employment there. correct? >> no. you are not written up as poor performance. >> one max. >> one time you were written up for poor performance? several times about your performance in the district attorney's office that was subpar. >> no. >> did the district attor

. >> and mr. cromwell. ms. cross. >> thank you. >> we have not met before. is that correct? >> correct. are you able to see and hear me okay? i think you made it clear you have not lived at that address that you are releasing. you never lived there were district willis, correct? >> never. you never observed or had any information for district attorney willis and nathan wade living together. correct. >> you don't have any information about that? >> no, i don't. that information source to you was correct. >> correct. >> did mr. willis pay rent at that establishment? at that condo while she was living there. >> who paid the rent? >> she did. >> you never told anyone otherwise? >> i did not hear your answer. >> no. >> let's talk for a second about the district attorney's office. the district attorney's office during your employment there. correct? >> no. you are not written up as poor performance. >> one max. >> one time you were written up for poor performance? several times about your performance in the district attorney's office that was subpar. >> no. >> did the district att

mr. mccullough on behalf of mr. floyd? all right. mr. cromwell on behalf of ms. latham. >> great thing about coming last is -- i have one question, can you hear me? >> yes, sir. >> in the time period between february, 2021, and january of 2022, while you were staying at the condo, did your father ever come and visit you during that time period at the condo? >> he did not. >> that's all i have. thank you, your honor. >> all right. ms. cross, i would imagine you have a number of topics to cover with ms. willis that will take more than 10 to 15 minutes. >> i do. >> okay. then i think we've reached a stopping point for today. and so miss willis, you can step down now. and i also remind you that you're not to discuss your testimony or that of any other witness until tomorrow morning. we'll begin again at 9:00 a.m. we'll do 9:00 a.m. this time tomorrow. before we recess for today, i want to check in on logistics and i'll ask ms. merchant once the testimony of miss willis is concluded how many other witnesses you anticipate calling. >> then we subpoenaed records that th

mr. cromwell. >> nothing, your honor. >> all right. ms. cross. >> thank you, your honor. >> mr. wade, have you still got exhibit number 14 in front of you? the invoices. >> i believe i have them all. >> all right. so you were asked, mr. wade, about a couple of the invoice items and your testimony, i think, was that the percentage of income post special counsel appointment in november 2021, the percentage of your income roughly after that time was about 50/50 fulton versus other income from your law practice, correct? >> roughly, yes, ma'am. >> sometimes more, sometimes less. >> yes, ma'am. >> how about your time? i'm interested in the percentage of your time from november of 2021 to let's say the close of the special purpose grand jury when it was dissolved in january 2023. you estimate for us the percentage of your time that was spent on fulton county work versus other work. >> oh, gosh. 99/1. 99% of the time here in this building working on this case. >> it was as i understood your testimony, it was an intense period in terms of hours while that special purpose grand jury was

. >> mr. gillon. >> no questions, your honor. >> mccullough? >> no questions. >> and mr.cromwell. >> no questions. >> ms. yeartie, we haven't met before, is that correct? >> correct. >> you're able to see and hear me okay? >> yes. >> all right. i wanted to start with a couple of things, now i think you've made it clear that you never lived in we'll call it the south fulton address, the south fulton condo that you were leasing. you never lived at that address with district attorney willis, correct? >> correct. >> never at any time? >> never. >> all right. you never observed or have any information about district attorney wade -- district attorney willis and nathan wade living together, correct? >> you don't have any information about that? >> no, i don't. >> anybody said that that information was sourced to you then that's incorrect? >> that's incorrect. >> did district attorney willis pay rent at that establishment, at that condo while she lived there and you were living elsewhere? >> yes. >> who paid the rent? >> she did. >> nathan wade ever pay the rent? >> no. >> and y

and ms mr. cromwell, from his lengthen no question. >> all right. any redirect, mr. this one to speak excuse >> a way that we could ask you for that? >> the question. is, you want the exact date that the meeting occurred >> and >> i'm wondering if we can if it's if it's really material, the exact date rather than just its proximity to the november 1st hiring. is that fair? >> if he >> knows whether it was far earlier in the year versus maybe closer with that obviate the need for the exact date yeah the exact date. take the bathroom. >> okay. let's start there all right. >> let me think. well, it may take care of it for us just more if we hold in place. i'm not sure this well let me try this first ever barnes before you >> do a deep dive in the email there, do you recall what time of year it was when this meeting occurred? >> break. >> okay >> having, you know you have this is today the cases and the days moved together. i had a fellow a few years ago that said i represented him in 1978. i told him i'm taking work you got to ask you wouldn't do that. it was question o