. >> we have ms. malony to explain what this is. >> speaker: thank you, chair melgar, the ordinance is sponsored by the planning position and the impotence is that the nature of the code is complex living document and such errors are bound to occur in the implementation of it. in this case, we have two very specific projects that followed all proper permitting procedures and received approval from all agencies. the planning department approved these in error and as improved element that do not meet the planning code. the elements cannot be reversed without great expense to the sponsor. they propose to amend the code n.addition to the two project specific fixes, two programs that the temporary use for retail program and the temporary reduction and inclusionary requirements program are able to operate as intended and consistent lea cross all codes and lastly we have a minor non substantiative code section. we would appreciate your support on these today and of course i'm available for any questions, tha