0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it's obviously a reference to the motion filed by ms. merchan. they choose to go after the black man. and she then goes on, again, deflecting away, and deflecting to the -- what i call the third rail in american society. accusing somebody on the other side of being a racist. so and so is a racist. they're racist. she was the one playing the race card in a way to deflect from her own conduct. she goes on to say in her discussions with the lord. god, is it that some will never see a black man as qualified no matter his achievements, again, the deflection. what is she saying? the listener is not necessarily in that audience, in church, the listener is in fulton county. the potential jurors who will come into a courtroom and say whether or not they can fairly judge the evidence or the defense in this case, she chose to inject race into the minds of the listeners and virtually everybody in this community, and literally everybody in this country has reviewed and analyzed her speech that she made in a premeditated way in bringing in not only the race ca
it's obviously a reference to the motion filed by ms. merchan. they choose to go after the black man. and she then goes on, again, deflecting away, and deflecting to the -- what i call the third rail in american society. accusing somebody on the other side of being a racist. so and so is a racist. they're racist. she was the one playing the race card in a way to deflect from her own conduct. she goes on to say in her discussions with the lord. god, is it that some will never see a black man as...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and as i referenced earlier, ms. merchan represented that mr. bradley had personal firsthand knowledge of it all, and he would be able to basically be an impeaching machine. your honor witnessed as a star witness. in relation to ms. merchant's representations to the court. what i would submit to the court is that all of mr. bradley's representations as it relates to or when the relationship between ms. willis and mr. wade began, and whether they cohabitated. that was a promise that was made, he would be able to impeach the investigators. it was mere speculation, gossip and innuendo. and this is, your honor. >> the impression i got, and we can correct this while we're all here together is there bradley directly overheard a statement from each of these individuals that they could be impeached for this. is that accurate? >> directly overheard, which ones are we talking about? >> essentially there kind of seem to be all of a sudden of them. you had said allen, young, and then the investigators, hill, green and rich, could be directly impeached by st
and as i referenced earlier, ms. merchan represented that mr. bradley had personal firsthand knowledge of it all, and he would be able to basically be an impeaching machine. your honor witnessed as a star witness. in relation to ms. merchant's representations to the court. what i would submit to the court is that all of mr. bradley's representations as it relates to or when the relationship between ms. willis and mr. wade began, and whether they cohabitated. that was a promise that was made, he...
0
0.0
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ms merchan, is that accurate >> directly overheard >> which ones are we talking about? >> well, essentially, the kind of seemed to be all of them. you'd said alan ban, young. and then the investigators hill, green and r6 could all be directly impeached by statements overheard by mr. bradley? >> yes >> in reference to your question, the unequivocal answer was yes. and when you're on there, is looking through the text messages, i would submit to the court that the text messages don't even say or indicate what was represented to the court in relation to the good faith basis for this motion to disqualify as it relates to the testimony of an the ability to impeach witnesses through mr. bradley what's been referenced by all counsel is mr. bradley's assertion of absolutely. as it relates to whether the relationship existed prior to mr. wade hiring and the question in itself involves speculation because it asks, do you think it started before she hired him? and he says absolutely, he doesn't say he no. he doesn't provide any context as to how he knows. and in these text message
ms merchan, is that accurate >> directly overheard >> which ones are we talking about? >> well, essentially, the kind of seemed to be all of them. you'd said alan ban, young. and then the investigators hill, green and r6 could all be directly impeached by statements overheard by mr. bradley? >> yes >> in reference to your question, the unequivocal answer was yes. and when you're on there, is looking through the text messages, i would submit to the court that the...
429
429
Mar 1, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 429
favorite 0
quote 1
well, when ms. merchan filed the motion to disqualify, now the game plan has to change. game plan, i call the deflection begins to take place. the deflection is when the district attorney sat down and wrote out, i'm sure the court has. when you look at that video, it's in evidence, for a speech at church, she has written out everything and she's reading from it. she chooses to deflect, the court asked earlier, wasn't she really responding to the motion that had been filed against her, that she had. if she had, she would have looked the members of that church in the face and say, there's been an allegation that i had a romantic allegation with mr. wade, and ladies and gentlemen, this congregation, it's true. she didn't do that. she chose to deflect, and to do two things that are reprehensible for any lawyer but particularly for a prosecutor. she chose to pull out the race card and the god card. that's what she did. and she wrote it out. she went on to deflect away from the allegations in the wade motion, and she's saying why in her talk, public discussion with god, why ar
well, when ms. merchan filed the motion to disqualify, now the game plan has to change. game plan, i call the deflection begins to take place. the deflection is when the district attorney sat down and wrote out, i'm sure the court has. when you look at that video, it's in evidence, for a speech at church, she has written out everything and she's reading from it. she chooses to deflect, the court asked earlier, wasn't she really responding to the motion that had been filed against her, that she...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
then, if there is nothing else, i will turn it over to ms.chant to begin on behalf of the defense. >> i'm sorry, judge. she cannot be here today. >> may you please the court, john merchan on behalf of mr. roman. by way of roadmap to give you an idea of the allocation of time and what i will be covering. i've been charged with talking to your honor about the conflict issue and the appearance of the confli the evidence to show on that issue. mr. gillam will be talking more about the forensic misconduct piece of it. ms. willis' statements made to the media. theve several interviews for care and i will not be discussing any of those issues. if you would like to ask me i can try to that. and towards the end, other folks they have some issue specific type arguments in follow-up to mine. those are the two lanes we will be covering but i will do the conflict piece of it for you. on that, this is a matter of first impression in georgia. i cannot find a single case that has been published by the court of appeals or the supreme court that is based on th
then, if there is nothing else, i will turn it over to ms.chant to begin on behalf of the defense. >> i'm sorry, judge. she cannot be here today. >> may you please the court, john merchan on behalf of mr. roman. by way of roadmap to give you an idea of the allocation of time and what i will be covering. i've been charged with talking to your honor about the conflict issue and the appearance of the confli the evidence to show on that issue. mr. gillam will be talking more about the...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
cross in relation to miss merchan's representations to the mit to the court is that all mr.ons of it relates to when the miss willis and mr. wade began and whether they cohabitated. that was a promise that was also made, that he would be able to impeach the investigators as it relates to cohabitation. it was speculation, gossip, innuendo. >> the impression i got is that mr. bradley directly overheard a duals that they could be impeached with. is that accurate? >> directly overheard -- >> they actually seem to be -- all of them could all be directly impeached by statements overheard by mr. bradley. >> yes. >> in reference to your question, the answer was yes. when you are looking to the text messages, i would submit to the court that the text messages don't even say or indicate what was represented to the relation to the good faith basis for this motion to disqualify, as it relates to the testimony of and ability to impeach witnesses through mr. bradley. what has been referenced by all counsel is mr. bradley's assertion of, absolutely, as it relates to whether the relationshi
cross in relation to miss merchan's representations to the mit to the court is that all mr.ons of it relates to when the miss willis and mr. wade began and whether they cohabitated. that was a promise that was also made, that he would be able to impeach the investigators as it relates to cohabitation. it was speculation, gossip, innuendo. >> the impression i got is that mr. bradley directly overheard a duals that they could be impeached with. is that accurate? >> directly overheard...