appropriate monitoring at the public level, then how deeply should the authorized state bodies work, namely nakc so on. but well, we understand that there is such a thing history, as i do not know, there are decisions of the governing bodies of the party, yes, to conclude one or the other. agreements or to agree on one or the other, i don't know what kind of diversions or transfers of those funds there are, or did you conduct some kind of similar analysis on this matter? well, we do not have access to the internal decisions of the party or to its internal documents, contracts and payments, such access can be obtained by the party, if they send a request to the party, if you look at the conclusions of the party based on the results of checking these reports, then they ask. these contracts and asked these decisions, if we are talking about how to counteract similar schemes there, or to ensure the integrity of the use of public funding in such a format, then with this story it is more difficult to do, because formally no legal norms were violated, eh, but it is about language in the conclusion of t