and that's the main brand off natal all over the world. so what we have knowing you bring this is not a surprise if we take a look above how the united states worked so hard along with you with the union to solve a democratically elected president. and to try to influence the political situation in the brain and we are seeing now underneath those lives. this is understood as being a challenge on the life of their we, we as need to or we as well, we have to defeat the independence, russia as well as multiple or is this, you saw things understood? and yeah, this is how nato is work is by spreading more and more locally pick news, but also to share and to provide a lot of weaponry to you. great, because the dream is not to see the brain is not to have an independent your brain . they bowl the main goal is only to target russia and other russia equal also can china, the 2 major powers into world war independently work independently from what's the needs and quote, you know, area and wait, wait, we heard from lloyd us, of the secretary of defen

and that's the main brand off natal all over the world. so what we have knowing you brain, this is not a surprise if we take a look above how the united states worked so hard along with you'd be you and you just saul a democratically elected president. and it's right to be influenced the political situation in your brain and we are witnessing now underneath those lives. this is understood as being a challenge on the life of their we, we as nate or we, as west, we have to defeat the independence, russia as well. as multiple or is this, you saw things understood and yeah, this is how nato is work is by spreading more and more locally pick news, but also to share and to provide a lot of weaponry to your brain. because the dream is not to save, your brain is not to have an independent your brain. they bowl their main goal is only to song of the russian and other russia. israel also can china, the 2 major powers into world war independently work independently from western needs and quote, you know, area and wait, wait, we heard from lloyd aweso

because presently there is no best solution for natal. there's no good solution natal simply is continue and trying to use your brain as a weapon against the russian and until the moment that they will not be able to continue to do so on that moment. natal ones have any kind of excuse to plug your parts in for this topic. like you said, there worked at least 5 attempts made by rushes to achieve reach a peace deal. the 1st one. it was not because your brain is even want to. it was because your brand names were forced to languish. we have to cite to say this many, many other funds in that to believe it or not. so this was the dance. there were several others. i don't believe that you gradients are pretty comfortable on, continue fighting against russia and every day listening to the news and watching it with the and reading at the same time that another village another. another place passed full and at the same time, dozens or hundreds of you bringing the dairy personnel test. i, i don't believe that they actually accept up to continued 5 t

we have never heard and zoom out and not only natal officials but also being an individual's speaking about these about jews never have about that. we only hear the say kind of model which is destroying and defeats russia. we have to think rush it re, douglas, what did they fix? they will produce all you bring and i have to west. what do you guys have to bring? will we have in the next one to 2 years? we'll back even be you great. what is this the project alternate to is? this is next. well, you know, alexander, i don't think the nato under the leadership of the united states gives a hoot about what happens to ukraine personally. okay. i mean, i suppose of the, is the lensky resume as illegitimate as it is right now, they will always strive for nato membership as long as they get paid. okay. i don't know. do these people send their kids to the front? i tend to doubt it. you know, aaron, there's a, i mentioned my, my 3rd broken promise lie here. and i don't want to sound really nerdy, but you know, the indivisibility of security. this was what made your opinion security work. you can n

and that's the main brand off of natal over the world. so what we have knowing you bring this is not a surprise if we take a look above how the united states worked so hard along with you'd be union, consult, democratically elected president. and to try to influence the political situation in your brain and to go, we are missing now, underneath those lives. this is understood as being a challenge on the life of their we, we as nate or we, as west, we have to the feeds the independence. russia as well as multiple or is this, you saw things understood? and yeah, this is how nato is work is by spreading more and more locally pick news, but also to share and to provide a lot of weaponry to you brain. because the dream is not to say the brain. he's not the revenue dependent to bring the bowl. the main goal is only to intone, gives russia and other russia equal. also can china, the 2 major powers into world war independently, to work independently from western needs and quote, you know, area and wait, wait, we heard from lloyd austin, the secre

and that's the main brand off of natal. all over the world. so what we have knowing you bring this is not a surprise if we take a look above how the united states worked so hard along with you'd be union, consult, democratically elected president. and to try to influence the political situation in your brain and to go, we are seeing now underneath those lives. this is understood as being a challenge on the life of their we, we as need to, or we is where we have to defeat the independence. russia, as well as multiple or is the so things are understood and mean. yeah, this is how nato is work is by spreading more and more locally pick news, but also to share and to provide a lot of weaponry to you. great, because the dream is not to see the brain is not the revenue dependent to bring the bowl, the main goal is only to target russia and of the russia equal also can china, the 2 major powers into world war independently work independently from western needs and quote, you know, area, and we wait. we heard from lloyd, also the secretary of defense

and that's the main brand of natal all over the world . so what we have knowing you bring this is not a surprise if we take a look above how the united states worked so hard along with you'd be union to solve a democratically elected president. and to try to influence the political situation in your brain. and what we are seeing now underneath those lives, this is understood as being a challenge on the level that we, we as need to, or we is where we have to defeat the independence. russia as well as multiple or is this you saw things understood and mean? yeah, this is how nato is work is by spreading more and more locally pick news, but also to share and to provide a lot of weaponry to you. great, because the dream is not to save, your brain is not to have an independent to bring their goal. their main goal is only to target the russian and other russia. it will also come china, the 2 major powers into world war and independently. i work independently from west the need some point, you know, area, and we wait. we heard from lloyd awesome.

and that's the main brand of natal all over the world. so what we have knowing your brain, this is not a surprise if we take a look above how the united states worked so hard along with you with the union to solve a democratically elected president. and to try to influence the political situation in your brain and what we are seeing now underneath those lives. this is understood as being a challenge on the life of their we, we as need to, or we is where we have to defeat the independence. russia as well as multiple or is this you saw things understood and mean? yeah, this is how they to his work is by spreading more and more luckily pick news, but also to share and to provide a lot of weaponry to you brain because the dream is not to save. your brain is not to have an independent to bring their goal. their main goal is only to target the russian and of the russia. israel also can china, the 2 major power into world war independently, towards independently from west and east. well, you know, area and wait, wait, we heard from lloyd us of t

there's no good solution natal. simply these continue and trying to use your brain as a weapon against the russian and until the moment that they will not be able to continue to do so on that moment. natal, one to any kind of excuse to go to your parking for this possibly like to share their work at least 5 attempts made by russia to achieve reach a peace deal. the 1st one, it was not because you bring this even want to be, it was because the brand names were forced to buy in west. we have decided to say this many, many other funds and not to believe that this was the dance. there were several others, i don't believe that you gradients are pretty comfortable on, continue fighting against the rest yet and every day. listening to the news and watching it with the and reading at the same time that another village another. another players pass full and at the same time, dozens or hundreds of you bring in the gary personnel has died. i don't believe that they actually accept that to continue fighting is a solution. well, i'm it, but there, and if you, if you know, if you're in the zalinski

i'm peter lavelle, outgoing natal general secretary stilton burg claims. a russian victory in the ukraine. conflict is the biggest risk to the us led military blocks. this is all the more reason russia will achieve its goals and this proxy war, the cross fucking nato and joined by my guest ray mcgovern in raleigh. he is a former c. i a analyst in washington. we have wumer, liam. he is a political scientist, author and radio talk show host, and in salt lake city, we crossed to david pine. he is deputy director of national operations for the task force on national and homeland security. all right, gentlemen. crosstalk rules and the fact that means it can jump any time you want, and i always appreciate re let me quote the outgoing general general. so try and make yourself america. you said a russian victory and ukraine would change the global system. well, i actually agree with him and i think it wouldn't be a bad idea. go ahead. right. well, yeah, i'm reminded that just 3 weeks ago who changed himself. talked about starting back and said that, you know, he d

the natal rector for the past 20 years has nothing to do with dfcs. nato was in volume. and y'all status on in libya and now is involved in supporting a proxy wording. you crate against russia and nato's performance. it has not been for the security of countries in europe. it's everything to do with preserved u. s. empire across the globe. and this is white, and nato is getting, is trying to dip its foot into pacific. you know what the north atlantic treaty organization has to do with anything in the pacific? what the security interest of what, nate, what countries in north, at atlantic, does china threaten? this is ridiculous. you know, again, this is just plain pliable, lack heed to america, to washington's interest, which is to contain china in asia. victor hope out and look for you, just tweet a couple of days ago from bailey jean. you said china is a key power in creating the condition for peace in the brain conflict. that's why he has the same 3 china of his piece mission. mean, china has offered time to get it to be on this piece broker in the ukraine conflict, bu

they don't necessarily have to have bodies on the ground from natal member countries because you have 0, you have skype. you can do so much remotely. now, when these, these aircraft are so technologically advanced, that it's almost, you know, you plug them in on the software. of course, if there's damage, because of it a dog fight or something, you know, then you've got to get parts and you've got to reassemble those parts. so we're going to see uh, you know, an absolute new stage, but there are some issues here in the 16th nato doesn't want f sixteens to be destroyed because it's great marketing for the russian federation to say, hey, our aircraft down to your aircraft. our aircraft are better and of course, natal member countries, the russian federation, other countries, everyone's trying to sell military equipment, so no one wants their stuff destroyed. so ukraine may be keeping the f, the sixteen's not as close to where they would like to have them operate, because they're under pressure from nato and from other countries don't risk these aircraft. and so from the cranium standpoi

most of the criticism counseling natal for other nato countries and washington, and this really lace bears that the fact that nato is not interesting. pete's ok that out where a 3rd of these have released the details of what they quote, a pair of flaws originating from us. so how about us as it has detained some $3000.00 suspects, accuse of preparing to commit to attacks with weapons smuggled in cuba from nearby florida and that correspondent from all spanish language channels as the story it does go most of the items. yeah. but presented evidence and details of an organized terrorist plan against the island. information about this event was 1st provided in december 2023. when the forces of the ministry of internal affairs announced that they had neutralize the plan to recruit people on the island to commit acts of violence, as well as sabotaged a note published on sunday in the cuban press, named a cuban citizen living in the united states who came to the cuban coast for this purpose to lead these operations on the island? number a identity, let's say on monday, my names are dennis

because when natal is trying to explain what the threats clear to say is that the russian and chinese expansion, aggression use a direct threat to alternate to account concrete is not only minutes early, but also to the investor in values. so if you write see or document the western values in name of nate told them story ratio type out of the clear to say is that what's happened to your vest in liberal values? new side goes off for that reason, the rigid type of blogs use pulling down at tension to the nato countries. most of the united states, brandsound england, lots is going to mean garza is narrower, became an explanation from the nape of perspective, especially for the investor values because it, in the eyes of all the worlds there is a mess. it could, which is going on you side because that there is almost more explanation with, especially from some natal number such as i said, united states, england, france and germany. and they say is the gathering of those 32 leaders from the member countries of knighthood gathering in washington, dc. mocking the 75th anniversary since the fo

so it, i'm sure natal social security is more often than not built on others in security. and what it does, puts the world in regents at high security risk, but firmly reject me. it is vilification and blame shifting against china were urged you know, to form the right perception of china, get rid of its cold board mentality in 0 sum approach. stop scare mongering on security and making imaginary 75 years later, nato was the most successful defense belief in history. the world is about preventing worse. it's about the turn. it's about making our people more say, what our t come tribute or carl john is of the view. nato is not acting in defense of its members states, but it is rather being used to preserve the dominance of one particular country. the nato claims its mission is for the defense, you know, fusion says listen to one's worst, but watch for one's action. the natal rector for the past 20 years has nothing to do with defects. nato was involved, you know, stand a son in libya and now is involved in supporting a proxy wording, ukraine against russia and nato's perfor

and so he doesn't president trump, doesn't quite understand how natal words please made very clear. he's not a fan. all right, petty, thank you very much for the moment. we'll leave it there for now. of course, we'll come back to uh when we hear from president biden, who again, is you to speak any moment now at the opening ceremony of the nato summit in washington, dc. body, thank you. now does a u. k. way upon them? it has begun the 3 day task of swearing, an old 650 members of the lower house neighbors. landslide victory, last week's election, has paved the way for the biggest transformation in decades. sonya go, reports loads commission is designed to meet his attendance in the house to hear the commission write a day of pub ceremony with traditions that go back for 100 years. first order of the day, selecting a speaker, speak of the house of commons for the 1st chosen piece as a house of rules directed and abused to decide no make cuz gavin in a packed house of commons, had already agreed on the choice. lindsey hoyle, re elected as a speaker of the house of commons welcoming 335

the natal rector for the past 20 years has nothing to do with dfcs. nato was involved. you, you all stand a son in libya and now is involved in supporting a proxy wording, ukraine against russia and nato's performance. it has not been for the security of countries in europe. it's everything to do with preserved us entire across the globe. and this is why nato is getting is trying to dip its foot into pacific. you know, what the north atlantic treaty organization has to do with anything in the pacific . what the security interest of what, nate, what countries, even north at atlantic, does china threaten this? is ridiculous, you know, again, this is just plain pliable, lack key to america, to washington's interest, which is to contain china in asia. victor. oh, about and look, see you just tweeted a couple of days ago from beijing. he said, china is a key power in creating the condition for peace in the spring conflict. that's why he has the same to china of his piece mission. mean, china has offered time to get it to be on this piece broker in the ukraine conflict by may

i just talked about how natal has expanded because of his leadership. how natal is stronger because of his leadership. i think that's important to note as well. and so look you're going to see the president being a leader in front of the, in front of these world leaders. you're going to see the president continue to bring these world leaders together and as it relates to what's happening currently, you heard directly from this president he understands the criticism, he gets, the criticism he has owned up to it. but he also wants to move forward and continuing to deliver on really critical, important issues that the american people care about when you think about natal, you think about foreign policy is important to continue. our world leadership on that liters and strengthening our national security as well. and that is how the president thinks about this day. in, day in and day out. >> what kind of questions about the outreach from the white house does the president intend to make any other cops you've made today to the congressional leadership. >> and

it's still controversial among some natal members. many expect us to focus more on the region in the future, and then you will p. and so we'll have to do more for their own defense. in any case, the warning ukraine has demonstrated to the natal nations needs partners to uphold the rules based international order. a set of sets of jones from the roll. united services institute told us one day to wants to engage more actively in that region . well, i think you have to look at the engagements of nights over time and see this is a kind of the 3rd phase, 1st phase of partnerships was the period one day. so it was in launching a new pot and those were prospective members. in the 2nd phase of to 911, you had partnerships which were very much good. so the global war on terror acts. so what we have now is something new. actually a paradigm shift, i would say it's not just another phase of nato's evolution in its own priorities. it's also a reflection of how the world has changed europe and you're atlantic is no longer a central in the world as

in the declaration of that, ukraine's cost towards an natal membership is reversible and that they will become a member when allies, as we and the condition will be met. meaning that ukraine still 5 says the print still has to implement important reforms. this document is however, still under negotiation, and there are some natural countries who are saying, yes, it's important for ukraine to become a member, because if they don't, then that will have consequences and 14 will feel and bold and, but there are still be mitchell countries such as the us 1st and foremost, but also germany has taken a more cautious sense start pointing to the fact that's us allies regard and the tax on one of them as an attack on all of them. so there are saying, what will it mean in case of ukraine, if the war continues, if you create, decides to take back, for instance, crimea, will that detract nato into the conflicts? so those are the kind of conversations that are taking place behind the scenes. postpone it, i'll have some fun and um, and the reporting from the nato summit in washington dc. thank you. wh

um, does it options argue that natal states are supplying as ukraine with the weapons? trying to keep right in, sol, just and supporting chief with money. so that means so that from that option, the point of view mental states, it will with russia. and at the same time, president put in a claim, a few weeks ago, was that the russia was not crazy enough to wants to actually go to war wasn't a to directly. it's in finland and sweden joined the lines of the even bigger and right on rushes border. now what do you expect for me to do in response to something he so eagerly wanted to prevent an expansion of nato? see, all right, the roster has already indicated that it's a view. for example, move its troops directly to the finish bordeaux since finland, the joints made a last is edit. that means it to the i'm moving troops, doesn't you need to bother with russia, which is extremely long, almost 1300 kilometers and it's on protect this board up on both sides. now feel and wants to change that and build a wall. the baltic countries, by the way of life, it looks anyway, i'm right

not only that is to undermine 5 or you can still bring t and we have to, to natal, you know, hands to actually respond to that. but days of december of 10 says you where we were discussing earlier, especially coming from bending and washington to take the risk of natal membership, which in fact is to take the risk of peace or ukrainian charts. and this is where we're stuck now. yep. they tow has grown quite a bit. it's a, it's a huge alliance present. biden says, is the greatest defense alliance in history. but the u. s. is nato's biggest contributor by part? can we expect that same level of commitment february's probably us after november's presidential election, especially if the winter is donald trump or well, this is obviously speculation, both on the who would be the winner of the presidential election, but also what we the we know do if it's a don't that truck, however, i think the realities and this goes over over many, many years. and many us presidents. the europe ends have to show both value for us monday and come each month. and the numbers are better. uh i think weight too

and that is of course, because of the fact that the united states through, by way of natal abuse has been calling for unity among the alliance. and consensus is an important aspect of the nato alliance. it seems that the turkish president and bunker is not interested in following the directives provided by the united states and that of the united kingdom for instance. but more importantly, of course. so it is going to be important to see how the bite administration terry's through with their plans, of course. and in this interview, the church present has been quite vocal against that us. it ministration. not just because of ukraine, but also because of gaza accusing washington not being complicit in the crimes taking place in gaza. and this is his statement. well, of course, a lot of countries around the world have the same line, those for now. what about topics that the tech is president touch upon on his interview? like i said, there have been many interviews coming out of the summit. the interview from use week magazine. but what one thing that's quite important, of course to note

most of the criticism counseling natal for other nato countries and washington. and this really lace bears that the fact that nato is not interesting piece. on the box numbers may say is preventing was this week, nasal gathering kicks off with the approval of a fresh on package. the kids. the donation would include patriot and batteries provided by the us, jeremy, and were mania as well as some defense systems from it to the the only european made equipment that came into set ballistic missiles, organs, and also i pledged a wide list of tactical defense tag on the other lengthening delivery list, his aunty correspondents, steve sweeney, of us president joe biden. and his nice her account balance of gathering and washington as russia continues to advance on the possible field and ukraine. the agenda for this is something that is predictable from supporting a cry. so tackling what lazy as evil, bogeyman, russia, china, um, on the democratic people's republic of korea, back in 2022 nights are labeled china a security challenge for the 1st time. it was a warning that

inside your europe central powers and the natal. so it does steps to follow only be here, the rest american government's interest in the whole months, and that is not good for germany as a states. no, this is it for, for the safety, all of your nation. it's only a political geostrategic go step to get to the strong this call on central you and military lies as about badges. nothing good. if you look strategically, um it has to make the utah and then we have to learn from history in the story, always at the escalation and do commodity conferences. this has been in the famed all the populations in the central european states and the table of the people in russia in the table, people was white. and i think the general government has to look back, i think, continue on, get back to the politics of already some of the video on the so the escalation politics which has friendship and multiple interest in the center. all the possibilities are to stay with our to international up next on roads apart. asana talk so it's hard to say it's footba

but so the time being natal is a made of woman good intentions. they are going to expand toward the middle east and africa. and of course, the name is and know it's down to 3 d organization that has nothing to do with the way with them in the east and africa. but they are the exact same go month. those who are destroyed of guns down iraq, syria, libya and now they have the intention to use everything possible to provo, russia, including mentioning and then updating. denise good, awesome. then this is only a language off wall. there is no language of peace. there is no way to bring both policies around the negotiation table because the decision is not in the hands of ukraine. it is in the hands of even not to the states and united states is conducting the cheapest will as a by allowing ukraine to depend on the support of the united states and for the ukraine to fight to that asked ukraine in. so that is, are very possible for the united states to go as far as possible, a provoking worship because they are just saying we are behind the scenes. it is

most of the criticism, counseling natal for other nato countries and washington and this really lace bears that the fact that nato is not interesting piece called john. well, while the blocks members may say it's preventing wars, the nature of gathering kicked off in the us with the approval of a fresh arms package to key if the donation will include patriot batteries provided by the us, germany and romania, as well as some of the defense systems from italy, the only european made equipment that can intercept ballistic missiles. washington also pledged a wide list of particles defense tech on the ever mentioning delivery list. here's our t correspondent, steve suite. us president joe biden on these nights had counter balance of gathering and washington, as russia continues to advance on the battlefield and ukraine. the agenda for this is something that is predictable from supporting you trying to tackling what lazy. i think able bogeyman, russia, china, um, on the democratic people's republic of korea back in 2022 nights are labeled china, a security challenge for the 1st time. it wa

so it, i'm sure natal social security is more often than not built on others in security. and what it does puts the world and regents at high security risk, but firmly reject me. it is vilification and blame shifting against china. we urge that you know to form the right perception of china, get rid of its cold board mentality in 0 sum approach. stop scare mongering on security and making imaginary nato has been the most successful defense of the lives in history, the world. it's about preventing worse. it's about the turn. it's about making our people more safe and secure as they contribute to accomplish all a's of the view, nato is not acting in defense of its members stays, but it's rhonda being used to preserve the dominance of one particular country. the nato claims its mission is for the defense. you know, fusion says less than 2 once worse, but watch one's action. the natal rector for the past 20 years has nothing to do with deeper as nato was in volume enough to amazon in libya and now is involved in supporting a proxy word in ukraine against russia and nato's perf

do you attribute negotiations on the washington natal meeting and well, i think is a campaign. well, for example, the speed of the online magazine re, politics that the job itself is as i said. so i have to provide was lose the ball also lessons starting nation fence against thought back out the issue of ryan, the town by a farm cotton on may. and in the following weeks, less than intelligent service i've said to have placed with all the handful of suspicious persons i miscellaneous, including that traveling movement spots. however, that was not enough information to make arrests. so we had some things like not, nothing is proof, no evidence is something like this story telling to legend teammates the policies which i've done for my mind. i know. yeah, exactly. you bought i, i mean that's why i was so surprised. you know? no, it was given any sort of is anonymous even when germany with a different company, you know, right? metal at the us. they've also declined to make a comment as, as well, even the us of the site and they say why they think that is it, is it because there is

most of the criticism counseling natal for other nato countries in washington. and this really lace bears that the fact that nato is not interesting piece. to cuba now, well thought as it relates details of what they call a terror floats originating from us soil. as honestly, as it has to obtain some 3 dozen suspects. the case of preparing to commit attacks with weapons smuggled into cuba from nearby florida. a correspondence most spanish language china is across the story of the most of the m. c l. u, but presented evidence and details of an organized terrorist plan against the island to information about this event was 1st provided in december 2023. when the forces of the ministry of internal affairs announced that they had neutralize the plan to recruit people on the island to commit acts of violence, as well as sabotage. a note published on sunday in the cuban press, named a cuban citizen living in the united states who came to the cuban coast for this purpose to lead these operations on the island. number a identity, let's say i, my name is are dennis garci

then the west and natal in particular, will increase the delivery of weapons and then they would find one, the 100 excuse is to say that we did not instructed or allow ukraine to bomb inside russian territory. and that would provoke a world war 3. that's to buck yet is concerned about this is only the language of war. there is no language of peace. there is no way to bring both policies around the negotiation table because the decision is not in the hands of ukraine. it is in the hands of even not to the states and united states is conducting the cheapest will ever by allowing ukraine to depend on the support of the united states and for the ukraine to fight to that asked ukrainian but i've been rising concerns about whether dual biden is going so naturally he does feel to the fire at the latest summit by mistake he lea introducing, you cleans the landscape as, quote, president puts in. now i want to hand it over to the president ukraine who has as much courage as he has determination page i'm, i'm president of the big president food present woods. i'm so focused on being booed and we

as a natal member to say, you weren't going to say no. and my guess is that, you know, he's going to 1st we're saying no, as long as there's a war. and then we're saying no until we see what some sort of pieces like. so, you know, this is going to be a long time, but he's not the only head of state or head of government with respect to the 32 members of nato, who have that same opinion that i'm not just talking about prime minister or, but there are others to feel for different reasons that are that ukraine's your reversible pathway to membership the ukraine should be conditional and i think it that's really what it is. a southern countries, even in the you, we know the hungry for example, the claim that it was to stay out of the need to mission a new plane. and instead perhaps fire and size of on his own interests. we have countries in, you know, south east asia that are close to china, but nobody wants to see it and nato expansion in that region as well. when you look at all the sort of examples of how predictable was this decision for

then the west and natal in particular, will increase the delivery of weapons and then they would find $100.00 the excuses to say that we did not instructed or allow ukraine to bomb inside russian territory . and that would provoke a world war 3. that's co buck yet is concerned about this is only the language of war. there is no language of peace. there is no way to bring both policies around the negotiation table because the decision is not in the hands of ukraine. it is in the hands of the united states and united states is conducting the cheapest will as a by allowing ukraine to depend on the support of the united states and for the ukraine to fight to that asked ukrainian but i've been rising concerns about whether a dual binding is going so naturally he does feel to the fire at the latest summit by mistake in the introducing, you cleans the landscape as, quote, president puts in. now i want to hand it over to the president ukraine who has as much courage as he has determination bases. i'm, i'm president of the big president food present list. i'm so focused on being booed and we g

she went and cut a deal with nato with mr. stone and bergen, and basically said natal can, you know, provide assistance, etc. but that we move hungry doesn't want to be a part of that part. and nato said, ok, i think that is, is an under reported story because that severely weakens nato. because nato was supposed to be consensus. everyone says yes or it's, you know, or everyone says no. and then the case, now we have 31 that are doing and one is it can, there are others, you know, they are, the one of the turkey is, is one. this is small rock in government that they also have issues. and so if we start seeing nato having to allow more more countries to opt out and to go their separate way in terms of, you know, whatever kind of relationship they want to have with the russian federation, that's going to continue to weaken nato. that took this president recept type edible and also attended the need to somebody to in washington and spoke to news week magazine about pressing global issues that he criticize us and the deposit positions on the green conflict and read to write it took a sta

i wasn’t aware of the operation, are you sure, i’ll check, get up, natal, natal, where, i got lost, ii showed up somewhere else, okay, did i miss something, who is nikolai? the veterinarian finished a sketch of the third bandit, superb. a i thought you were removed from the case, not yet, well , it won’t be long, i really want to, yes, you know why, oleg, don’t start, please, no, no, let him say, you thought you were a bit of a tough guy, stuffed with intuition, but your plan turned out to be complete crap, with us... he didn’t even deign to consult, when valera and i found out that you were taking a gang, we went crazy, well, where is the gang, and where, but it’s not necessary, please, it’s necessary, because he was poking me with his face because of the missing flash drive, now a whole gang has left from under our noses, and now these doors will become even more cunning, more resourceful and they will continue to kill our guys, because you, sergei kovalev, have crap, i’ll go get some paper, seryozha, seryozha! seryozha, seryozha, seryozh, seryozha, i beg you, please, just don’t tak

natal has become larger. it's now another lines of $32.00 with sweet and joining already of this year. it's also becoming stronger and the decisions that heads of state and government took at washington um are moving in the right direction, i think. but the requirements also increasing significantly in some respects, and that requires the continued move forward to meet the demands that the domain specific regional specific defense plans. unlike anything we've seen since the end of the cold war being translated into forces, capabilities, infrastructure and stop pulse and, and that's where the rubber hits the road. you say it's stronger, but the fact is, as we heard from a kristi, is that what the alliance is doing now? are the members of the lines in a to itself is not a party to that conflict? is what, what's being done right now is not enough to ensure that ukraine would when this war would you say that to europe, and they don't have been too intimidated by putting stress. but there are essentially a central

it was conducted by a you asked, let call ation of countries which included some other natal members the conduct of the west and both operations undermined its claims that it wants to protect a rules based global order, the suffering of the civilian populations in the rock enough gone is done, and eventually the humiliating retreat from a guy and it's done weekends, the reputation of the west leading power. the us, one thing we should to do as nato is told him, to throw less us from afghanistan at the search because it was hot breaking to see while a nato troops were leaving, as the tenant and the disorderly, the behavior on the part of a kinase for city is the united states as been so well, it's well this taken us into one adventure of to the other. and the full has full for to the right, full modeling, the new emerging powers like india are eager to step in to feel defined. we are in new delhi, india, capital, the country of 1400000000 people has aspirations to become a top global power. faithful to the corner stone of its foreign policy, multi alignment. india has refused to sacri

in any case, the warning ukraine has demonstrated to the natal nations need partners to uphold the rules based international order. and i'm now please to welcome your colleagues . she's a senior policy analyst for china and east asia at the us institute of peace. and according to the news agency, reuters the draft communicate for the summit, calls china at the sciences enabler of russia's war and ukraine. how big a rhetorical escalation is that a well, it would certainly be a much different statement then you had it last year's bill may have some a declaration. and, you know, i think the secretary general has, in a, in a couple of places recently emphasize that what they believe china is doing is it's not openly providing weapons to russia to support the we're providing the material components as you refer to, mentioned like, uh, micro electronics that eventually go into russian weapons and it's also helping russia to sort of weather the economic sanctions that the west has placed on it. so it's effectively supporting rest has more effort. and, you know, i think if, if it's true that thi

meantime, there's a lensky has been securing bilateral defense agreements with a number of individual natal member countries. in may, several european partners pledge to more aid, including of 16 fighter jets. ukraine has also asked for more help with an air defenses, including patriot missiles, systems keeping it with nato membership. not likely in the immediate future. ukraine continues to push for bi lateral assurances, most recently from neighboring poland. one of keeps most vocal allies still is the lensky hopes for more aid from nato. but it does seem it's time into night, the very concrete answers and steps from our partners at the nato summit. we will have meetings dedicated to reinforcing your brains their defenses, to our civilian infrastructure, water supplies, and the energy grid. i expect the concrete steps i'm going to go. okay. our moles nato members last week stopped short of backing secretary general young, stolen birds request just for a multi year funding package for ukraine's on. the recent budget battle in the us also underscored the limits to leaders. official pledges

in any case, the warning ukraine has demonstrated to the natal nations needs partners to uphold the rules based international order. and i'm now please to welcome here and our colleagues. she's a senior policy analyst for china and east asia at the us institute of peace, and according to the news agency, reuters the draft communicate for the summit, calls china at this time. so if enabler of russia's war and ukraine, how big a rhetorical escalation is that as well, it would certainly be a much different statement than you had it last year's vilnius summit declaration. and, you know, i think the secretary general has an, in a couple of places recently emphasize that what they believe china is doing is it's not openly providing weapons to russia to support the we're providing the material components as you refer to, mentioned like, uh, micro electronics that eventually go into russian weapons and it's also helping russia to sort of whether the economic sanctions that the west has placed on it. so it's effectively supporting rest has more effort. and you know, i think if, if it's true that t

but then the natal up to date doesn't think in terms of security at all. because because if you had a security architecture in europe, you wouldn't need nato because it wouldn't be a new architecture would include russia and be with russia that we have, it's against russia without russia. that's nato. it's afraid of that because then it would risk its own existence. david a absolutely right, yeah. so nato was a lot of those bits of the lines up until the end of the soviet union. when the worst soft pack was disbanded, un nato, she knew full well the biggest span shortly thereafter as well. 1994 when all russian troops were withdraw from eastern europe. um, at this point uh, you know, natal began to be in advance of alliance with uh its uh, brutal bombing of uh, of serbia yugoslavia and 1999. and uh, is this been mentioned, it's continued in with the libya, syria and canal in the parade. and there's a, you know, the only the only path to security for nato never states is by having some kind of mutual security frame. or notice of the event i, uh, with the, w

it's still controversial among some natal members. many expect us to focus more on the region in the future, and then you will p. and so we'll have to do more for their own defense. in any case, the warning ukraine has demonstrated to the natal nations need to partners to uphold the rules based international order. and i'm now pleased to welcome here in a galaxy is a senior policy analyst for china and east asia at the us institute of peace. and according to the news agency, reuters the draft communicate for the summit, calls china at this time. so if enabler of russia's war and ukraine, how big a rhetorical escalation is that it would certainly be a much different statement than you had at last year's build me a summit declaration. and, you know, i think the secretary general has an, in a couple of places recently emphasize that what they believe china is doing is it's not openly providing weapons to russia to support the we're providing the material components as you refer to, mentioned like a micro electronics that eventually go in

they don't have whenever natal went to build the, you know, a do the lock and i've done this on, on. if you, if you talk about countries that are go into the global solid countries that are not western, i think for them, it's about too many movie to which perhaps exist that does change, which is that every time nato was global, it doesn't, you talk and i've gone to find so mutual splendors and you all kind of got us on something by which all we have a perception and i think it's a correct valid perception because of business. while we are under the sun, the do can justify what need to do. the kind of kind of funds need to elyse went into. i've gotten this done up to the 911 terrorist attacks on the u. s. to ensure they said that the country, which never again become at safe haven for terrorists. the invasion of iraq was launched in 2003, under what's turned out to be a phone street text. it was conducted by a you asked, let call ition of countries which included some other natal members the conduct of the west and both of probations undermined its claims that it wants to protect the

what kind of military assistance has actually available, natal militaries and industry are very strange to provide the kinds of weapons that ukraine needs and whether or not they can do it in definitely it's something that is really a real question that, that we need to take seriously mm hm. now close the supporting ukraine and then the offering ukraine membership. my you said yourself, the missing ukraine to nato? would be a mistake for both ukraine the alliance tell us why is that that? yeah, well i mean, i think certainly under current conditions it would be a mistake and at any time in the, in the future would be a mistake. there are 3 basic reasons why it doesn't seem to make sense to me. i mean, the 1st is that, you know, we're gonna be realistic about this branding ukraine into nato imports. the gigantic vulnerability into the alliance. ukraine. it has a, has got $300000.00 men under arms fighting pressure right now. those men are going to need to be re integrated into the ukraine economy once the war is over, if you create an economy, it's going to have any hope of taking off. a

how great is the potential of nato to really ward off the kind of aggression that we did just see natal has become larger. it's not one of the lines of 32 with sweet and joining audio those here. it's also becoming stronger and the decisions that the heads of state and government took at washington are moving in the right direction, i think. but the requirements also increasing significantly in some respects. and that requires the continued move forward to meet the demands that the domain specific regional, specific defense plans. unlike anything we've seen since the end of the cold war being translated into forces, capabilities, infrastructure and stop pulse and, and that's where the rubber hits the road. you say it's stronger, but the fact is, as we heard from christie, is that what the alliance is doing now? are the members of the lines in a to itself is not a party to that conflict. is what, what's being done right now is not enough to ensure that you can and would when this war would you say to europe, and they don't have been too intimidated by putting threats that there are essen

so i think natal leaders will have to think about how to better support ukraine, at least when it comes to the short term, given the fact that the russians still have enough capabilities to conduct the loan race strikes and will certainly use this gap in error. that's kansas in order to destroy different targets, including those located in the cities, including the capitol. speaking of the nice i summit that is coming up in washington. how significant is the timing of this attack coming up a coming just before the nice face on this as well? i think it's pretty significant from what it looks like so. right, right now the international community is condemning russia, as i said, investigation that should be conducted in order to find out what happens. but as it seems, the national leaders will probably want to support key morrison. they have specifically because this made assignment is supposed to discuss what is going to happen with ukraine and prepare for the possibility of the whole from winning the u . s. selections, which would be a huge blow for me to and a possible blow to ukraine a

so once again, natal faces the question of how to contain russia, but the big picture is more complicated. now, among other issues, leaders are seeking ways to push back against russia, china, north korea, and iran in the and no pacific region. we use in his pull reports or nato was created on a promise to us and best on europe would defend each other as they would defend themselves, their common enemies in this subject union. also, the end of the cold war, the west seemed to have one blood rushed us invasion of ukraine. more than 2 years ago changed everything. nato suddenly became relevant again and its future is now in the political spot. when he does for a member of the countries comma in washington, it's not just for a birthday party and the celebration of its recent expansion to so to, to member states and also discuss changes already taken in those still necessary. the response of restaurants invasion to ukraine, that'd be anxious to be looking at america's future engagement. and that'll be also looking beyond your nato's increased presence in the in the pacific region is designed

but again, natal only has for partners in the region. so it's with those partners that's working mostly. yeah. some critics of the car and course argue that the united states should disengage from europe and pivot entirely to the in the pacific. while european countries take on greater responsibility for their own security. how do you see it? i don't know why it has to be in either or you know the us as effectively pivoted in terms of policy to the endo pacific for some time we have a strong in the pacific strategy. that mentions, but the endo pacific is not review the most important and dynamic region in the world in terms of economy, in terms of impact on us, security, etc, etc. and yet, at the same time, we are strongly supporting ukraine and the current war that russia is putting there . and we are continuing to support our european allies and partners on the continent. and we'll continue to do so. i think the idea that we can only do one thing or the other i think is a bit um not correct. uh, i wouldn't say that if it can be only on

to mr. president, your political future has hung over the natal somebody a little bit this week. speaker polosa, you made a point of suggesting that your decision on whether to stay in the race was still open. george clooney and a hand for a handful of law makers have called on you to step aside. reuters is reporting tonight that you a w leadership is concerned about your ability to when deputy in just in doors, people go ahead. thank you. my question for you is, how are you incorporating these developments into your decision to stay and separately? what concerns do you have about vice president harris's ability to be donald trump . if she were at the top of the ticket book, i wouldn't have picked vice president trump to be vice president. i think she was not qualified to be president. so start there. number one. the fact is that the consideration is that i think i'm the most qualified person to run for president. i beat them lunch and i will beat them again. secondly, the idea i sort of extended a long time the idea that senators and congressmen running for office worry about the ticket

they don't have whenever natal went to build the, you know, a do the lock and i've gone this on. and if you, if you talk about countries that are going to the global solid or countries that are not western, i think for them it's about too many movie to which perhaps 6 percent does change. which is that every time they did was google, it doesn't the dock and i've gone to find so mutual splendors and you all kind of got us on something by which all we have a perception and i think it's a correct valid was action because of business while we are under the sun, the do can justify one need to didn't you talking of kind of funds need to elyse went into i've gotten this done up to the 911 terrorist attacks on the u. s. to ensure they said that the country, which never again become at safe haven for terrorists. the invasion of iraq was launched in 2003, under what's turned out to be a phone street text. it was conducted by a you asked, let call ition of countries which included some other natal members the conduct of the west and both of preparations undermined its claims that it wants t