nataliya panchenko, judge-speaker of the kyiv district administrative court, is trying to get to the constitutional court for evaluation by experts. nataliya panchenko recently ran for the position of the supreme council of justice, and natalya panchenko at that competition had questions about her property, about the property of her, her family, in fact she did not become a member of the supreme council of justice. for 10 years in a row, in her declarations, she hid the fact that she had the right to use the apartment since 2012 in kyiv, which belongs to her mother, and she remembered it only that year. in general, forgetfulness and sudden recovery of memory, judging by the declaration, accompanies natalia panchenko everywhere. in the electronic declaration for 2015 , the judge indicated the right to use another apartment in kyiv since 2010. however, in paper declarations. until the 15th year , there was no word about it, also in the 15th year, panchenko mentioned that she had been using the audiq7 for two years, which she had forgotten to mention earlier. in addition, in the declara

in addition, nataliya panchenko probably understated and deliberately did not indicate the value of thes of her family members in her declarations. for example, she claimed that she sold her toyota rav 4 in 2008 for uah 100. there are also many questions regarding the ability of panchenko family members to purchase valuable real estate. for example, in 2012, the judge's mother bought an apartment in a new building near the center of kyiv costing about 75,000, and two years before that , another one for 50,000 dollars also in the capital, although she lived and worked in uman. my sister received quite a good salary there from 2005 to 2013, you are hinting that you and your sister supplied my mother with funds, i will now, if you allow, i will explain, and the apartment for the friendship of peoples was purchased with my sister's money, yes i don’t know, that is , she had an agreement with her mother, but it was currently purchased, why did my sister not issue it for herself, she had certain family troubles there , another interesting thing: the apartment was purchased by her mother, alle

panchenko everywhere. in the electronic declaration for 2015 the judge indicated the right to use another apartment in kyiv since 2010, but there is no word about it in the paper declarations until the 15th year. also, in the 15th year, panchenko mentioned that she has been using an audi q7 for two years, which she had previously forgotten to mention. in addition, natalia panchenko probably underestimated and deliberately did not indicate the value of the assets of her family members in her declarations. for example, she claimed that she sold her toyota rav4 in 2008 for uah 100. there are also many questions regarding the capacity of panchenko family members buy valuable real estate. for example, in 2012, the judge's mother bought an apartment in novobudov, near the center of kyiv , for about 75 do, and two years before that another one for 50,000 dollars. so, in the capital , although she lived and worked in uman, my sister received quite a good salary there from 2005 to 2013, you hint that my mother was

in addition, in the declarations nataliya panchenko probably understated and did not deliberately indicated of her family members, for example, claimed that she sold her toyota rav4 in 2008 for uah 100. there are also many questions regarding the ability of panchenko family members to purchase valuable real estate. for example, in 2012, the judge's mother bought an apartment in novobudov near the center of kyiv, worth about 7,500 dollars. and two years before that, another one for $50,000 also in the capital, although she lived and worked in uman. my sister received quite a good salary since 2005. and there until 2013, you hint at the fact that the mother funds were supplied to my sister, i will now, if you allow, i will explain, and the apartment for the friendship of peoples was purchased with my sister’s money, i don’t know, that is , she had an agreement with my mother, and it was currently purchased, and why did not my sister issue on herself, she had family troubles there , another interesting thing is that her mother bought the apartment, supposedly for herself, but nataliya panchenk

nataliya panchenko, recently nominated for a position in the supreme council of justice. we had questions about her property, about her property. family, in fact, she is not, did not become, a member of the supreme council of justice. for 10 years in a row in declarations, she hid the fact that since 2012 she has the right to use an apartment in kyiv that belongs to her mother, and only mentioned it that year. in general, forgetfulness and sudden recovery of memory, judging by the declaration , she worked in uman, my sister received quite a good salary from 2005, and there until 2013, you are implying that you and your sister provided money to my mother, yes, if you allow me, i will explain, and the apartment for the friendship of peoples was purchased with my sister's money, i don't know, that is , she had an agreement with my mother, but it was purchased at the moment, and why did my sister not issue it for herself, she has certain family rights ... there were troubles, another thing is interesting, the apartment was bought by the mother, allegedly for herself, however,

panchenko is also a member and founder of the association for the development of judicial self-government, which opposed judicial reform. the judge applied for the competition to the preliminary composition of the higher qualification commission of judges, but did not pass. and this is another candidate for the position of to the constitutional court, oleksandr korovayko, chairman of the kherson court of appeal. he has held this position since 2012. ya . korovayko, a candidate for judges, also the head of the kherson court of appeal since the 12th year, although this is prohibited by the law from serving more than two terms in a row, that is, here you can, you can understand, the attitude of this person to the law and to changes in the judicial system. korovayko has a bad memory and forgets to pay for the car or the real price of the apartment almost 150 km away. this apartment. purchased and presented to the judge's wife, allegedly his 68-year-old mother for $22,000. obviously , the specified amount is underestimated several times. before that, in 2000, the mother also bought 65 km in si