data law, which was approved in 1401, i think there are 21 databases, if i am not mistaken, or about the same number of national databases, whose reference is to identify who is in charge of them. rosers. make it easy for the data to be completely valid. when i ask what is the educational qualification of dharahpur, he immediately answered if it is 3 years. i also asked if the absolute prayer has not changed , give me the same information , that's why i want to say that this discussion of inquiries, which is the introduction of smart devices, is actually a very difficult task, but it has progressed by about 50%. last year, we were supposed to reach 20% of smart services. we reached around 112, which is a very large action in its own way. god willing, we will not leave this path, especially from the head of the executive branch. as the representative of the government in this department, we are the information technology department of the government. we follow up. at the same time, we are helping the devices to solve their problems, we are also following up, god willing, in 1403, we w

these are the reference databases, according to our interpretation, in the national information data that was approved in 1401. i think there are 21 databases, if i am not mistaken, or about the same number of national databases there is one whose reference is clear, who is in charge of it, it should be updated, the data is completely valid ok, when i asked what is dharapur's academic degree, he answered instantly. if i asked him in 3 years , if his prayer degree has not changed , he would give me the same information. that's why i want to tell you that this discussion of questions, which is an introduction to smart building , is actually a very difficult task, but there has been about 50 days of progress. last year, we were supposed to reach 20% of smart services, which we reached about 112, which is a very large action in its own way. government in this department, we are the information technology department of the government, firstly to the title of a department that we are trans-sectoral, we will definitely follow up while helping to. the devices whose problems are solved, we ar

is that according to the national data and information management law , faraja is a database of vehicles and vehicles. to maintain uniformity , it will be provided to the platforms, now 5 platforms have these records in full and it is possible to order from them. all and during the past months, 150,000 inquiries have been registered . currently, this information is available to the public for free, and in fact, it is available on private sector platforms. the main position is actually a reduction in fraud, there is clarification, but a major part of this issue is the development of the knowledge-based economy around the axis of the digital economy, so a market of 5 million car transactions, and cars are also considered capital goods in our country , when transparency is provided. if it is established , it will cause new businesses to form around it. well , the wise leader of the revolution has been emphasizing the issue of knowledge-based economy for several years, and perhaps one of the most important solutions for the economic progress of the country is that we establish a data flow, o

in the national data and information law that was approved in 1401, i think there are 21 bases if if i'm not mistaken, there are about the same number of national bases whose reference is clear as to who is in charge. this should be updated. the data should be completely valid . when i asked what the dharapur educational qualification was, he answered immediately. if i asked after 3 years, if his prayer has not changed , he would give me the same information. that's why i want to say that this is a question of questions that the introduction of intelligent services is actually a very difficult task, but it has progressed by about 50%. last year, we were supposed to reach 20% of smart services, which reached about 112, which is again of its own kind. a very great action indeed. god willing we will not take this path from the head of the executive branch. as the representative of the government in this department, we are the information technology department of the government. first of all , as a department that is trans-departmental, we must follow up with the ministry of home affairs

, in november twenty in the first year, the country launched a law on the protection of personal dataal center for the protection of personal data. the president ordered the creation of this structure. there are guys working there who know everything about the security of personal information. they help people understand controversial situations and defend. don’t show information about yourself if it’s unnecessary, their website is cpd or kpd.by, there are contacts, life hacks and a lot of other useful information, but in order to feel calmer and more confident, every belarusian should read now law on the protection of personal data make notes in the margins, the document is not long, not complex, but with maximum efficiency. and then, accept the fact that. valuable belarusians are also part of the digital world, we cannot separate from it, partial adaptation is inevitable, appreciate a person who adapts the rules of this world to us by laws, and does not subordinate us to it, when asked to voice our home address, do not hesitate to ask why you should not voice it , if the answer does

china is america's enemy, and this law is a limited, concerted, and direct threat to american national security and data protection, and as a result, their first amendment rights . let's not pretend for a second that tiktok isn't violating our first amendment rights. i would say that this bill is, as the representative from texas said, about behavior. no spying, cover or protection. thanks to the information provided by the respected members of the business energy committee mr. president, from h. 75 21 of the people's protection law. i support america against the tools of foreign enemies. this plan ensures that the information of the american people is protected from the chinese communist party's access through byte dance, the parent company of tik tok , and why it is so important that congress do this is because the chinese communist party controls byte. it is dens and this company has threatened our country's national security. to provide information to any american tik tok user who needs to cooperate. they can use this information instrumentally to manipulate and mislead the america

national police said. law enforcement officers know every russian commander who gave criminal orders to destroy buchi and its inhabitants. police officers not only document the actions of the enemy, but also study his tactics and way of thinking. let me remind you that after the deoccupation in... buchi found 422 two killed persons, a total of 1,190 bodies were found in the district. they were not something unpredictable or special, for example, the excess of individual performers, but were the result of specific orders and instructions that were given by russian commanders to their personnel . we see a clear connection. between the commands given by the immediate commanders to the personnel and the number of those killed on the territory of the city of bucha. it's spring here, hell is in captivity. in the capital, near the pecherska metro station, a traditional sunday rally was held in support of prisoners of war and missing persons it was organized by the families of mariupol defenders. to remind ukraini

security law that requires chinese companies to share data and other information with the government. >> it begins to allow them to know how to influence americans. >> reporter: the annual intelligence committee says china used tiktok in the 2022 midterms, warning it could do so again in this false presidential election. tiktok has repeatedly denied any connection to the u.s. government, with the ceo responding to the vote wednesday. >> we will continue to exercise our legal rights to protect this amazing platform. >> reporter: to 65 house members oppose the bill. >> it's an overly broad bill and i don't think it would stand first amendment scrutiny. the other issue is, there's a lot of people that make their livelihoods on this. >> reporter: it's 100% of our income. even some who support the investment see a double-edged sword in an election year, with more than 20% of american voters using tiktok at least once a day. >> nbc's garrett haig reporting on that. joining us now is one of the democrats who co-authored the tiktok bill. he is the ranking member of the house select committee

from american users, partly because of a national security law that requires chinese companies to sharea and other information with the government. >> the reason that is valuable to the chinese communist party, it begins to allow them to know how to influence americans. >> reporter: in its annual threat assessment, the u.s. intelligence community says that china used tiktok in the 2022 midterms, warning that it could do so again in this fall's presidential election. tiktok has repeatedly denied any connections to the chinese government, with the company's ceo responding to the house vote late wednesday. >> we will continue to do all we can, including exercising our legal rights, to protect this amazing platform. >> reporter: just 65 house members, mostly democrats, opposed the bill. >> it's an overly broad bill that i don't think would stand first amendment scrutiny. the other issue is that there are a lot of people who make their livelihoods on this. >> including creators like j.t. >> it is 100% of our income. it's how i feed my wife and three children. >> reporter: even some who suppo

subject to ccp, demand they turn over user data due to national security laws. they know how to mobilize their users, 117 million of them. call congressman and this will them this information is ban, no, it is diverse and tiktok ownership by chinese company which is based inside of china and your data is not safe on cell phones. american people need to understand china is totalitarian regime and they want data. >> todd: and it is not a ban, it is divest tour, not a ban, that point needs to be driven home. thanks for your great insight, important on morning like this. congress taking major step forward passing the laken riley act as president biden mention of the murdered nursing student is one of the most talked about moments from his state of the union address. >> president biden: lincoln riley, innocent young woman killed by an illegal. that's right. how many thousands of people being killed by illegals? to her inner parents, my heart goes out to you, having lost children myself, i understand. >> carley: next guest, angel mother, daughter was murdered by a gan

partly because of a national security law that requires chinese companies to share data and other information is valuable to the chinese communist party is it begins to allow them to know how to influence americans. >> reporter: in its annual threat assessment, the u.s. intelligence community says china used tiktok in the 2022 midterms, warning it could do it again in the fall's presidential election. tiktok repeatedly denied any connections to the chinese government, with the company's ceo responding to the house vote late wednesday. >> we will continue to do all we can, including exercising our legal rights, to protect this amazing platform. >> reporter: just 65 house members, mostly democrats, opposed the bill. >> it is an overly broad bill that i don't think would stand first amendment scrutiny. the other issue is that there are a lot of people who make their livelihoods on this. >> reporter: increasing jt. >> it's how i feed my wife and three children. >> reporter: even those who suggest a divestment see a double-edged sword in an election year. 20% of american voters use tiktok at least

tiktok's algorithm, tiktok's data, which includes personally identifiable information about americans, is subject under chinese law to the control decision ping. and that's not ambiguous. that is chinese law that says if z jinping wants it, he gets it and they can control that algorithm to amplify certain types of conduct ten and suppress other types of content. i mean, try posting about the ethnic cleansing and xinjiang province and see how many likes you get on tiktok. it's just not going to happen. so there's >> no doubt that they mentioned the word uyghurs surfaced. know there's no doubt that there is political interference there, but actually, to me, that's secondary i'm just as interested in regulating meta and twitter and instagram and youtube as i am in tiktok, the differences, those are american companies already subject to us law. tiktok is not, we need to hold all of big tech accountable for the effective had on platforming disinformation for the effect of that, they've had on kids mental health for the effect that they've had in our civil discourse, they need to be reined

the chinese communist party could easily access that data under the national security law in china, bytedance would have no choice. choice but to cooperate with the chinese communist party. and then second tiktok could be a tool for information warfare. know, china could easily use tiktok to conduct foreign influence operations against the united states. so both data, privacy, data security, and information warfare or causes for concern we just heard from cnn's marc stewart from beijing. he says the chinese government is accusing the united states of acting like a bully. what's your reaction >> i mean, there's no greater bully than the chinese communist party. i mean, it consistently coerces and intimidates and bullies american companies based in china. and the chinese communist party would never allow the united states to control the leading media platform in china tiktok used the app to encourage users to contact their lawmakers and tell them to vote against the legislation. did you get a lot of calls and messages? >> like every congressional office was flooded with calls. but tiktok is tel

the fact of the matter is is that under chinese national intelligence laws, all information accumulated by companies in the people's republic of china are required to be shared with the chinese intelligence services. bytedance, the initial release of tiktok was 2016. the efforts you made with oracle was in 2021, allegedly walled off in 2023. what happened to the data that tiktok collected before that? >> tiktok is owned by bytedance. we have three americans on the board. you're right in pointing out that over the last three years we've spent billions of dollars with project texas. it is a plan that is unprecedented in our industry to wall off data from the rest of our staff. >> i'm asking about all of the data that you collected prior to that. >> we have finished the first phase of [indiscernible] and we are beginning phase two where we will require a third-party to verify and then go into employees working laptops to delete that as well. >> was the data collected by tiktok prior to project texas shared with the chinese government pursuant to the national intelligence was? >> we have no

there is a national security law that means that if the chinese government demands information from ampany you have to hand it over. now bytedance will tell you over and over data is stored in the united states. they do not have access to the u.s. user data. lways shadows of doubt cast on bytedance because of chinese ownership. so there are fears that see on tiktok is ultimately controlled by china and that they tried to put out things that might be divisive or hot button issues for americans. we have not seen definitive smoking gun proof of that but some researchers put out some studies and other analyses that say that. there is a worry that engineers in china just have access to basic user data, name, location and address. and the idea that a company that is not based in america is wielding influence over american youth and politics and there is this idea that what if an american owned company as a major source of news. that is something on -- that lawmakers have grown uncomfortable with even as they do all they can to quell the fields and -- the fears and said that americans have n

twhiel best response to the privacy risk posed by data brokers is the comprehensive national data privacyw i firmly believe we must do what we can now to selling american's personal data to our foreign adversaries. and the breadth and scope of data sold makes the sale of that data a unique threat to national security and individual privacy. the office of the directoras concluded that commercially available data provides foreign adversaries with a valuable stream of iva and sophisticated surveillance techniques. researchers from duke university successfully purchased sensitive information about duty members of the military, their families and veterans from data brokers. researchers concluded that foreign and maliciouscould use data from data brokers to undermine america's national security. this legislation complements the work done by this body last week to posed by apps owned or controlled by foreign adversaries by closing a loophole that would allow those entities t simply buy sensitive information on americans from data brokers. unless we pass h.r. 7520, data brokers will still be perm