despite the fact that nazk has electronic document management, because it is impossible to do this.oth cases were opened at the request of lawyer rostyslav kravets. is the center of the kremlin network of telegram channels, as well as a henchman of pavel vovk, the head of oask, who after the capture of kyiv was supposed to legalize yanukovych, a rather sharp statement by vitaliy shabunin, and rather serious accusations both towards tatarov, who currently works in the office of the president of ukraine, and in side of the state bureau of investigation, because if tatarov is really in charge of the state bureau. the bureau of investigation and provides information about vitaly shabunin or asks the state bureau of investigation to open criminal proceedings against him, this means that we are again, friends, returning to the times of viktor yanukovych, and in this situation, the comments of the state bureau of investigation and nazk are not enough, because, as writes shabunin, he could not forge the document. on zk, since there is an electronic document flow, but this case is also illus

, despite the fact that the nazk has electronic document processing, because it is impossible to do thisses were opened at the request of lawyer rostyslav kravets. it is the center of the kremlin network of telegram channels, as well as a patron pavlo vovka, the chairman of oask, who after the capture of kyiv was supposed to legalize yanukovych. pretty eh... vitaliy shabunin’s sharp statement and quite serious accusations against bik tatarov, who now works in the office of the president of ukraine and for the state bureau of investigation, because if indeed tatarov runs the state bureau of investigation and provides information about vitaliy shabunin or asks the state investigation bureau to open criminal proceedings against him. this means that we are again, friends, returning to the times of viktor yanukovych, and in this situation there is not enough the comments of the state bureau of investigation and the national security agency, since, as shabunin writes, he could not forge documents of the national security agency, since there is an electronic document flow, but this case is also

, despite the fact that the nazk has electronic document processing, because it is impossible to do thisases were opened at the request of lawyer rostyslav kravets. he is the center of the kremlin network of telegram channels, as well as a henchman of pavel vovk, the head of oask, who after the capture kyiv had to legalize yanukovych. quite eh... a sharp statement by vitaly shabunin, and rather serious accusations against bik tatarov, who now works in the office of the president of ukraine and for the state bureau of investigation, because if indeed tatarov runs the state bureau of investigation and provides information about vitaly shabunin, or asks the state bureau of investigation to open criminal proceedings against him. this means that we are again, friends, returning to the times of viktor yanukovych, and in this situation there are not enough comments from the state bureau of investigation and the nakc, because, as shabunin writes, he could not forge the documents of the national security agency, since there is an electronic document flow, but this case is also indicative, because

your investigations, they always make some kind of statements, either immediately or later, to nabu or nazkp, so what? can it be here? well, look, there are actually three planes in which to move. the first question is really, as the expert said, this is an unreliable declaration, since we noticed that there was no apartment where the family had lived since 2020 in kyiv, it was not in the declaration of kyrylenk himself, and there was also no car used by the wife, and it was not only that we found out that the car is used by the wife under during the conversation with krylenka's mother-in-law, she directly told us that her daughter drives this car. on a bmw x3, which belongs to mother-in-law, that is, in principle, we can be sure of this here, because kyrylenka's relatives themselves say about it, that is, this is the first moment, the second moment that can be - this is a criminal article, illegal enrichment, which should be investigated by the national anti-corruption bureau of ukraine, in the event that it confirms that all this property, which was purchased by kyrylenk's relatives, was

fact that the sbi accuses him of possibly creating documents on the basis of which he was seconded to nazkm defending the homeland at the front. well, in particular, they are accused of probably forging the signatures of chairman nazik novikov and deputy chairman sytnyk, and himself he organized it all, and instead of being at the front, he ended up in the nakc. what is this story? well, shabunin doesn't mince words when he criticizes the government, let's not forget that, that is, he criticizes quite directly, sharply enough, calls everything by its name and names specific prizes. who are behind these or other schemes, that is, i, as far as i know shabunin, i cannot imagine myself as a person who sits there, forging signatures, but for me this story is enough... seriously far-fetched, but it is very unpleasant and very dangerous . well, our western partners are great understand that it is not just a group of hooligans who came to yuri nikolov's apartment and described the door to him. behind these hooligans are the customers, there are whole groups of people who want to generally kill the