neral prelogar: -- with the discretion. juicgorsuch: or not if it -- if it issues an interpretive rule without notice and comment or issues an audation. it may or may not be that burdensome, right? so brand x also says that an agency can overturn a prior judicial interpretation. and i saw that as a circuit jue th respect to an alien who was allowed into the country unr the tenth circuit's understanding of the law. and the vement come back and says, no, you have to overturn your precede, nth circuit, and he's not allowed in the country. d we had to overrule our judicial precedent. doouhink that's an appropriate understanding of the w too, that judicial precedents, maybe even precedents of this court, can be overturned by agencies? general prelogar: it depends on what the judicial precedent held. if it held at stepnehat that statute was clear, then of course not. but brand x don't require that result. if the pri pcedent held that congress didn't resolve the issue and had delegated to the agency the responsibility and role in