a large number of other people arise who claim authorship, but there is actually still a point that neroset and so on can claim its authorship, the model itself has a license, for example , kandinsky and this also depends on, that is, a masterpiece is a model that is not laid out and is not in the public domain, kandinsky is the opposite story, since ours is one of our first missions: i already talked about this, after all, to move the community as a whole and move science forward, then we put the model in the public domain, you can use the model, absolutely not without paying some company, and deploy it on your own, and why create such a model, which is not widely available, is for some limited circle of people to use it, well, to sell generation, imagine how a person creates a picture , any, any image, any painting, he has some kind of white canvas, well, not necessarily white, just white paper, some kind of empty, napkin, napkin, yes, there is a tablet screen, does he have some kind of idea? definitely, he starts sketching out some details, with a pen, a stylus, whatever, he adds details