speaking about nih grants, can you sell it to us?like how how difficult the process is, what the application windows are? and hi again. good to see you, madam secretary secretary. as a newbie to the group, it would be really helpful to account for us as new people and older people of. the adc to understand that any age process because it is a little scary. i agree. well i can i'll go through the basics of the process and then i want point out again jason who's here she said wave your hand if you have questions. even if you ask them to me and you call later, we're going to send you to jason anyway to answer other questions. so it is you know, there are a couple of steps. number one, you want to know who put what grants are, what we fund. we have six divisions that fund different projects, different humanities projects. we also have office of fed state partnership. so if you're interested in a really smaller grant or a smaller project that you're working on, look to the state humanities council first and see what they're offering, they

you don't want the nih developing drugs.will never get anything done. >> evan, who's at most risk of potential restrictions of element? are there companies that come to mind? biotech companies? how would you think about this as an investor? >> if this were to actually happen, i think the entire sector could be at risk because who knows at what level the nih are kind of the march in rights would play. so early technology like the basis of mrna with the vaccines? would it be part of a antibody drug conjugate? it could be one of the appealable, maybe in a therapeutic space like cancer drug manufacturers, inflammation drug manufacturers. happy, potentially merck bristol. >> so what should those companies that do? what is anyone going to do other than kind of wait for more details and would we expect the supreme court to get involved at some point or no? >> i don't know if the supreme court gets involved, but i'm sure if this went through there would be several lawsuits. i think the companies need to do with -- keep doing what th

podcasts house had more open dialogue than the nih or dr. fauci.ult you doctor collins cagey and calling for quick takedown of the declaration that the people are frustrated about because they were correct. >> i appreciate that is so refreshing to hear someone say when you think but the overall consequences of how we handle this. you tell people they need to go away, they lock themselves in their homes for months and months the social impact of that was just horrible in terms of children interacted with each other in terms of little kids get into socialized ship anything more to say about that we have about 10 or 20 seconds left. >> well, i think people are looking for an honest apology as i find as a physician the public can be very forgiving of you are very honest with them. right now people are looking for honesty they did a sense of closure per doctor collins it's hard what the lab leak. he still does not think it came from the lab it's amazing to think the entire pandemic was avoidable had the lab not been doing this again a function research

when enacted will provide additional mandatory resources for diabetes research at nih. that would be a good thing to discuss today, how the nine states is using a discretionary funding. that something over which we do actually have jurisdiction. we should look quite nih habitually under funds obesity research despite it being the kind of foundation of why the rate of type two diabetes has gone up so dramatically. as well as by the way the impact upon many other medical conditions. it is important to explore the impact of recent medical advances. american medical innovation is saving countless lives diabetes is no different. the glucose monitor or cgm quality of life and peace of mind for parents and caretakers. we could familiarize ourselves more with that. i was not aware of it and somebody said look on your phone you can save your diabetes is. it really brings it home to the folks and it is quite remarkable my intern friend explaining to me how this has been changing. so positive of a change in terms of the management diabetes for you point out even 10 years ago paren

when enacted will provide additional mandatory resources for diabetes research at nih.t would be a good thing to discuss today, how the nine states is using a discretionary funding. that something over which we do actually have jurisdiction. we should look quite nih habitually under funds obesity research despite it being the kind of foundation of why the rate of type two diabetes has gone up so dramatically. as well as by the way the impact upon many other medical conditions. it is important to explore the impact of recent medical advances. american medical innovation is saving countless lives diabetes is no different. the glucose monitor or cgm quality of life and peace of mind for parents and caretakers. we could familiarize ourselves more with that. i was not aware of it and somebody said look on your phone you can save your diabetes is. it really brings it home to the folks and it is quite remarkable my intern friend explaining to me how this has been changing. so positive of a change in terms of the management diabetes for you point out even 10 years ago parents w

so we've been asking hhs, which oversees nih.ars, give us the dialogue. give us the debate, the discussion of whether or not this was gain-of-function research because there has to be a reason why anthony fauci decided not to send this to the safety committee. this may be the worst medical decision ever made by a scientist or physician in government not to review this for safety before allowing this money to go to china. >> sean: the book is great. i hope people get a hold of it. thank you for that warning. we appreciate you being with us. senator rand paul. all right, when we come back, things got a little heated last night after i asked governor desantis, governor newsom about biden's apparent cognitive decline. biden made a blunder after blunder after blunder this week. you've got it. got the tape. later, big announcement page and want to miss it come about next weekend a big event atching the , mind-boggling, and unbelievable video footage that goes viral across the globe. "then we who are alive and remain "shall be caught up

that academic research also happens at nih. it's very duplicative. how do we justify that? >> so i do think that they are separate types of portfolios, nih is doing evidence generation, the kind of work that cdc's doing is detection. are we detecting threats and then responding to them understand anding what best practices work -- and understanding what best practices work. so that is the work that we are focused on in cdc and in public health. again, nih, incredibly important research portfolio -- >> and i appreciate your intent to create a moreers toal cdc. -- a more operational cdc. it's not there right now. we have really no biodetection system. i know you want more of it. i know we talked about waste water in our previous conversations, and that's all good. i like that a lot, but with i do have more questions. i know mr. griffith asked about this, but there was a hidden bio lab out in california. local officials discovered a chinese national was running ap illegal lab with 1,000 mice modifieded to be similar to humans, infected with nasty stuff like dengue, covid, tube

ded whet now, the ego health alliance is where the nih gave money to.. they were in charge of that. they knew some of it wen knew st to wuhan lab and they knew what this wuhan lab was about. then we got more emailsat that came out. the intercept had some.ctua then we got the actual emails, i believe in october of either 2020 or 2021 that you put in your bookpu right. >> we also discovered in the book that there was a committeee it's a somewhat secret committee about pathogens, potential pandemic pathogens, and that the research in china a should have gone to this committee to be overseeno be to study whether or not this was too dangerous of a research her a in a know totalitarian country. but we know the research was never reviewedth. how did that happen? only with anthony fauci's permission. h anthuci'and so when i've askes anthony fauci, how do you know this wasn't gain of function, whe says, all of my experts tod me. so we've been asking hhs, whichk oversees nih, we've been asking themin for over two years, give us the dialog, give us the debate of the discussion g of whether or

major red flags and that was documented by the official six years ago in an internal e-mail at the nihe e-mail, we're going to have hearings in january on capitol hill about the wuhan lab most certainly this will come out then. jon: dr. fauci was pooh-poohing that the wuhan lab was anyway involved in developing the covid virus. >> whether or not someone believes that covid came from the wuhan lab as i do, what was very clear and undeniable there were two entirely different messages externally dr. fauci in many of his colleagues were putting out the message downplaying any lab leak and internally scrambling to cover up any signs they were involved in funding the lab or for that concern to be out there. many experts told dr. fauci it came from the lab in much of the paper trail was destroyed or downplayed. jon: it will be fascinating to watch those hearings in january. doctor marty makary, thank you. back with more on the "fox report" right after this. ♪ you've worn many hats, from past jobs in fact. now, you can trade in those hats to help earn your grad cap! your past experience can he

by the policies that were advocated by fauci, by cdc nih, fda and thing is they were -- they were whiffedon this they were wrong, and a guy like me when i was saying kids need to be school i started saying this in april of 2020. and i was just getting fileted for it but businesses need to be open we can't follow the 15-day or slow the spread indefinitely it doesn't work so i took a lot of heat. i had no -- there was not one doctor willing to stand with me and say enough that. they would say it privately but they were worried to get if hay did it so joe -- ... like, no not that i would not r the value you need and i did not do it. value you need and i did not do it. my wife and all that you what i pulled for the visit, you're going to be the only surgeon in america of all the way that i i'veasked you but that he is not like you. officer ucla is learned is that five colleagues. basically like only became a religion part of anything happening on the ground. it was a way for them to signal their virtue and these are doctors there people who trust covid ideology. staff have happened. harvard g

by the policies that were advocated by fauci, by cdc nih, fda and thing is they were -- they were whiffedy on this they were wrong, and a guy like me when i was saying kids need to be school i started saying this in april of 2020. and i was just getting fileted for it but businesses need to be open we can't follow the 15-day or slow the spread indefinitely it doesn't work so i took a lot of heat. i had no -- there was not one doctor willing to stand with me and say enough that. they would say it privately but they were worried to get if hay did it so joe -- ... like, no not that i would not r the value you need and i did not do it. value you need and i did not do it. my wife and all that you what i pulled for the visit, you're going to be the only surgeon in america of all the way that i i'veasked you but that he is not like you. officer ucla is learned is that five colleagues. basically like only became a religion part of anything happening on the ground. it was a way for them to signal their virtue and these are doctors there people who trust covid ideology. staff have happened. harvard

that academic research also happens at nih. it's very duplicative. how do we justify that?ink that they are separate types of portfolios, nih is doing evidence generation, the kind of work that cdc's doing is detection. are we detecting threats and then responding to them understand anding what best practices work -- and understanding what best practices work. so that is the work that we are focused on in cdc and in public health. again, nih, incredibly important research portfolio -- >> and i appreciate your intent to create a moreers toal cdc. -- a more operational cdc. it's not there right now. we have really no biodetection system. i know you want more of it. i know we talked about waste water in our previous conversations, and that's all good. i like that a lot, but with i do have more questions. i know mr. griffith asked about this, but there was a hidden bio lab out in california. local officials discovered a chinese national was running ap illegal lab with 1,000 mice modifieded to be similar to humans, infected with nasty stuff like dengue, covid, tuberculosis. won'

after 5a years at the nih and almost a0 years as the director of an institute, you know,

after 5a years at the nih and almost a0 years as the director of an institute, you know, all the things that i've done — research and developing vaccines — what do i want to do for the last five or more years? and i think that the pretty clear answer was to maybe serve as an inspiration for young people who are either interested in a career in public service or already are in a career of public service. your undergraduate, you didn't study medicine, though. you studied classics. i studied classics. greek, latin and the romance language and philosophy in undergraduate, and then i went to medical school... do you remember any of your classics? i could give you the first five lines of the iliad and the odyssey. go on. i would be very... he recites in ancient greek you still remember it. good for you. and being back at georgetown, where your children were born, you were married... and my wife went to undergraduate here and she got a phd here. right. so i got some pretty thick... so this is home? yeah, it is. it really is. when you come back here, do the students want to hang out with you a

after 5a years at the nih and almost a0 years as the director of an institute, you know, all the things that i've done — research and developing vaccines — what do i want to do for the last five or more years? and i think that the pretty clear answer was to maybe serve as an inspiration for young people who are either interested in a career in public service or already are in a career of public service. your undergraduate, you didn't study medicine, though. you studied classics. i studied classics. greek, latin and the romance language and philosophy in undergraduate, and then i went to medical school... i tookjust enough sciences to get me into medical school. do you remember any of your classics? i could give you the first five lines of the iliad and the odyssey. go on. i would be very... he recites in ancient greek. you still remember it. good for you. and being back at georgetown, where your children were born, you were married... and my wife went to undergraduate here and she got a phd here. right. so i got some pretty thick... so this is home? yeah, it is, it really is. when you c

by the policies that were advocated by fauci, by cdc nih, fda and thing is they were -- they were whiffed this they were wrong, and a guy like me when i was saying kids need to be school i started saying this in april of 2020. and i was just getting fileted for it but businesses need to be open we can't follow the 15-day or slow the spread indefinitely it doesn't work so i took a lot of heat. i had no -- there was not one doctor willing to stand with me and say enough that. they would say it privately but they were worried to get if hay did it so joe -- ... like, no not that i would not r the value you need and i did not do it. value you need and i did not do it. my wife and all that you what i pulled for the visit, you're going to be the only surgeon in america of all the way that i i'veasked you but that he is not like you. officer ucla is learned is that five colleagues. basically like only became a religion part of anything happening on the ground. it was a way for them to signal their virtue and these are doctors there people who trust covid ideology. staff have happened. harvard gra

after 5a years at the nih and almost a0 years as the director of an institute, you know, all the thingshat i've done — research and developing vaccines — what do i want to do for the last five or more years? and i think that the pretty clear answer was to maybe serve as an inspiration for young people who are either interested in a career in public service or already are in a career of public service. your undergraduate, you didn't study medicine, though. you studied classics. i studied classics. greek, latin and the romance language and philosophy in undergraduate, and then i went to medical school... i tookjust enough sciences to get me into medical school. do you remember any of your classics? i could give you the first five lines of the iliad and the odyssey. go on. i would be very... he recites in ancient greek. you still remember it. good for you. and being back at georgetown, where your children were born, you were married... and my wife went to undergraduate here and she got a phd here. right. so i got some pretty thick... so this is home? yeah, it is. it really is. when you com

and nih and f.d.a. about the government's covid-19 response, which, as you heard today, we keep talking about over and over again, but which we really need to move forward to try to be prepared to respond better the next time instead of just whining about it. at that hearing, your predecessor, dr. walensky urged this committee to provide the c.d.c. with new statutory authority for public mission and some of those priorities were priorities you discussed in your testimony today. you need to turn off your mic, thanks. so, some of these priorities are ones that you provided in your testimony today and we are talking about it nine months ago so i'm kind of disappointed that we haven't made more progress as a congress in giving c.d.c. more data authorities because that's what we really need to be able to identify the issue and then to alert the public. so you can't respond to a crisis if you can't measure that crisis or if you're seeing it in the rearview mirror and c.d.c. doesn't have the authority to do th

that academic research also happens at nih. how do we justify that?> i do think there are separate types of portfolios. understanding what the best practices were to make sure we are keeping folks healthy so that is the work that we are focused on in the cdc and in public health. again incredibly important research. >> and i appreciate your intend. it's not there right now. we have no bio detection system. i know you want more of it and we talked about waste water in thell previous conversations and that's all good. i like that a lot but there's more questions. modify it to be similar. the main problem here is why did it take so long to respond to that and for the cdc? the health and human services of california is asking for the cdc to do it. >> i was able to share some information earlier in the there were a number of inaccuracies from the cdc role to come in and do an investigation related to. we did respond and they were there for two and a half days and did an extensive review. they didn't have any equipment that would allow so not only -- >> i'm

we need tonvest money into cessation therapies both through nih both on the actual pharmaceutical parts well as research on the behavioral part because we need to spend more money doing the research. >> the question is actually an interesting one. a lot of other countries have a different category called behind the counter like in australia, i think france. so if we had a behind the product category where products have the license to prescribe but the pharmacist is a learned intermediary and then they go and talk to the pharmacist about the health concerns and the product without a prescription that is a potential channel for the specific products on the channel to expand and democratize access to smoking cessation therapies without changing licenre having to address insurance and all this other complex things and using pharmacists which i think 95 or 96% of americans have pharmacists within a mile of their houseor several miles of their house. so that would be an answer to expanding essentially the otc access. >> in terms of tobacco cessation as a medical indication, i think that the

we need to invest money into cessation therapies both through nih both on the actual pharmaceutical parts well as research on the behavioral part because we need to spend more money doing the research. >> the question is actually an interesting one. a lot of other countries have a different category called behind the counter like in australia, i think france. so if we had a behind the product category where products have the license to prescribe but the pharmacist is a learned intermediary and then they go and talk to the pharmacist about the health concerns and the product without a prescription that is a potential channel for the specific products on the channel to expand and democratize access to smoking cessation therapies without changing licensure having to address insurance and all this other complex things and using pharmacists which i think 95 or 96% of americans have pharmacists within a mile of their house for several miles of their house. so that would be an answer to expanding essentially the otc access. >> in terms of tobacco cessation as a medical indication, i think that

dolls, the already destroying more than $169 million for the military equipment by leaving outside and nihing for research to study sleep habits of monkeys on meth and that wasn't the only study they did, they did one other one, let's pull up this list, they study transgender monkeys, they studied russian cats and $236 million in improper payments, took a look at that, joe, transgender monkeys, really? who does that benefit? >> not sure how to answer that question. 400,000 to a lab to study results of giving female hormones to mail monkeys. what they want to determine my had to read this because i've never processed these words together from a they want to determine if transgender monkeys became more susceptible to hiv after the forced hormone treatment, exactly, who is benefiting from this besides the trans- monkey community? i have no idea. >> it does seemed like an odd thing to study and i took a look at the report, there are other peculiar things, $6 million to promote tourism nature, not sure why, 200 million to study struggling -- not to study, to give to struggling artists post malo

the senate convenes in january 8 at the house on january 9 at nih both chambers faced two upcoming federalget funding deadlines. we are awaiting the other team, the other side, , the other chamber to come forward with a number that we can agree on. we will to get the best way to get this done quickly. neither mcconnell and i want a chÂteau. >> follow the progress when congress returns on the c-span networks, c-span now a free mobile app or anytime online at c-span.org. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. >> a healthy democracy doesn't just look like this. it looks like this, where americans can see democracy at work, where citizens are truly informed, a republic thrives. get informed straight from the source on c-span, unfiltered, unbiased, word for word. from the nation's capital to wherever you are. because the opinion that matters the most is your own. this is what democracy looks like. c-span, powered by cable. >> one of the things wayne motts are present and ceo is, i wish i knew what he has forgotten. he's originally one of the original people that came out to

dolls, the already destroying more than $169 million for the military equipment by leaving outside and nihg for research to study sleep habits of monkeys on meth and that wasn't the only study they did, they did one other one, let's pull up this list, they study transgender monkeys, they studied russian cats and $236 million in improper payments, took a look at that, joe, transgender monkeys, really? who does that benefit? >> not sure how to answer that question. 400,000 to a lab to study results of giving female hormones to mail monkeys. what they want to determine my had to read this because i've never processed these words together from a they want to determine if transgender monkeys became more susceptible to hiv after the forced hormone treatment, exactly, who is benefiting from this besides the trans- monkey community? i have no idea. >> it does seemed like an odd thing to study and i took a look at the report, there are other peculiar things, $6 million to promote tourism nature, not sure why, 200 million to study struggling -- not to study, to give to struggling artists post malone

the nih approved a grant to study russian cats walking on the treadmill. that is a full stop.al which left $7 billion worth of equal and in afghanistan which is now in the hands of the taliban and and the 200 million taxpayer dollars that went to gaza and the west bank and hamas. a lot of grievances here and switching from politics, if you think russian cats have different metabolism than american cats, why specific to russian cats. >> it is an important question. >>'s. engine millions of dollars studying them. >> is the russian or dominant on a treadmill? >> what are we learning about monkeys on meth? we have got a pretty big human population on meth. have we not learned the effects of meth with enough of a sample size with the drug problems in america, we need to get monkeys on meth, to see what? >> we have in of human controls, we've moved on. >> to the monkeys clean up their cage and make sure they get a lot of stuff done, do a 36 hour stretch. >> i've senator rand paul in years past about this. he points out there is really no way to stop the government from getting these

military equipment by leaving it outside and the millions of equipment left behind in afghan tan and nihfunding for researchers to study the sleep habits of monkeys on meth. we can go on and on. one of my favorite things and you call yourself a happy warrior and i love hearing you say that every time. then you also say we as americans are paying for our own destruction. what do you mean when you say that? >> we're funding this government with the hard-earned tax dollars and have to work a little harder and on the treadmill and people laugh about that and it's no longer funny because these numbers are so destructive to the future of this country and for our children, grandchildren, and subsequent generations. we are paying to fund the government. this government particularly under joe biden with the wide open boarder and chaos in the cities and this kind of wasteful spending, foreign boarders with -- foreign wars we have no business being involved in in eastern europe and elsewhere. we're paying to fund our own destruction and very few things outrage me more than that. and of course, you

. >> people who surface sized research at nih, we don't want public health officials.ight have been around at the last pandemic, we don't want them around the next one. >> david's gonna stick around a bit because he's gonna give us his thoughts on the passing of the deeply controversial figure, henry kissinger, after this break. >>>y kissinger, after thi break. break. >>opportunities in the market. e*trade from morgan stanley. with powerful, easy-to-use tools, power e*trade makes complex trading easier. react to fast-moving markets with dynamic charting and a futures ladder that lets you place, flatten, or reverse orders so you won't miss an opportunity. e*trade from morgan stanley rsv is out there. for those 60 years and older protect against rsv with arexvy. arexvy is a vaccine used to prevent lower respiratory disease from rsv in people 60 years and older. arexvy does not protect everyone and is not for those with severe allergic reactions to its ingredients. those with weakened immune systems may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects ar

it republicans and watching did were coming after them, cdc, nih, and it was relentless, day after day was not just coming up through remit one new cycle and don did the next thing. they never let up with some of the worst things you can possibly imagine about somebody, but he held true to what he knew in his heart was right. he stood up for the children to begin school, he nature of the people were able to work to put food on the table for the families. a key major families could be with their loved ones in the final moments of their life. businesses, big businesses were able to stay open, but these little guys were getting pummeled across the country, but not in florida. he held the line, so i say this what you want in a leader in washington is someone who is going to stand up and fight for you no matter how hard they are getting attacked. you want somebody as rush limbaugh said on his final radio show before he passed away he said ron desantis has an ironclad spine of steel, and that is the god's honest truth. this guy will never waver, back down, give up, nt will stand for the valu

test2treat.org, funded by the nih. t-e-s-t-2-t-r-e-a-t, funded fully by government., the consultation is and free treatment delivered right to your doorstep. it's a fantastic service, not enough people know about it. i'll say, chris, just on the point of better at-home services for acute infectious diseases, pfizer launched an at home covid flu test. here's the problem, and even though that's well intended, these innovations are incredible, here's the problem, these medical innovations are not accessible to people because th'rtoo unaffordable. it's $40 a pop, and there's no guarantee that insurance will cover it. it's great that we have these tests now that can test for more things like covid and flu at the same time. but the problem is it's $40 out-of-pocket, and you have no guarantee your insurance will cover that. that is the problem. >> so much more we could talk about, but dr. vin gupta, happy holidays to you and yours. it's great to see you, and thank you for all that great information. >>> and still to come, a touching military reunion between an air force sta

president biden kept to his plans, popping over to the nih for an event about drug prices. >> this haseen a fight that i just started the other day when i was 37-year-old senator. >> peter: four more years? a tough sell for a majority of americans. 56% polled by a.p. they would be very or somewhat dissatisfied with biden as the nominee. swing state numbers also soft. in michigan 451% of democrats would be satisfied with biden on the ballot. only 27% enthusiastic. >> i think that there is real work that has to be done in michigan to tell the story of what the president has done. >> next up, a trip to battleground wisconsin. >> he is going to go milwaukee. he is going to talk about bidenomics. >> that's a head scratcher for strategists. >> it's a basic fundamental principle of marketing, if you don't have a good product, don't put your name on it. they don't have a good product with bidenomics and they put their name on it. >> there is also new palace intrigue as vice president harris wants the white house to get tougher on netanyahu and, quote: president joe biden is among the officials

, the media was coming after him, the republicans in washington were coming after him, the cdc, the niht was relentless day after day after day after day. they never let up with some of the worst things you could possibly imagine about somebody. but he held true to what he knew in his heart was right. he stood up for the children to be in school, he made sure people could put food on the table, he major families can be with their loved ones in the final moments of their life. businesses. big businesses were able to stay open. the little guys were getting pummeled across the country, but not in florida, he held the line. i say this, what you want in a leader in washington is someone who is going to stand up and fight for you no matter how hard they're getting attacked. you want somebody, as rush limbaugh said on his final radio show before he passed away, he said ron desantis has an ironclad spine of steel and that is the god's honest truth. he will never waver, never back down, never give up, and he will stand for the values and principles that made this country great and that is why i'

so he lobbied congress to establish a national center for sleep disorders research at the nih, and one in the center, founded in 1993. the first government agency on the planet devoted to slumber within a decade, funding sleep research had tripled the number, scale and ambition of sleep studies expanded accordingly, and their growth continues to this day. so those the first three protagonists of my book, kleinman, esther minsky and danette, you'll notice something different. the fourth one. mary carr's garden. she's not a man. at the time she sleep science, that alone made her stand out. but her work earned her a place as one of the field's great pioneers. curse garden had no thought of becoming a scientist when she signed on his defense lab assistant in 1970. a recent college from small town pennsylvania. she had no clear vision of her future as a child. she'd been fascinated by the workings of the brain. but her parents and teachers had discouraged such curiosity. girls, they said, were better off limiting their ambitions to school teaching or just becoming wife and mother. neither o

the cdc, nih, fda, people like fauci. they harmed this country. nobody has been held accountable.e will clean house. for example, here is the thing. fda, they will approve a covid mrna vaccine for six-month-old babies. there's no data to support such a thing for emergency use. the question is, why are they doing that? pharmaceutical companies will make money. where do the people from the fda go to work when they are done in the fda? they work for big pharma. we will stop the revolving door. >> i want to bring in rob, a former, livestock producer, representative of the iowa soybean association, who is undecided. >> governor, thank you for taking the time. undecided, i'm learning about you. i appreciate that. want to talk a little trade. china remains a vital market for the u.s. soybeans. how do you plan to approach trade relations with china to ensure access to the significant market for our soybean exports while also addressing trade related challenges and ensuring fair competition for american farmers? >> rob, thanks for the question. thanks for what you do. you are the backbone

so he lobbied congress to establish a national center for sleep disorders research at the nih, and one in the center, founded in 1993. the first government agency on the planet devoted to slumber within a decade, funding sleep research had tripled the number, scale and ambition of sleep studies expanded accordingly, and their growth continues to this day. so those the first three protagonists of my book, kleinman, esther minsky and danette, you'll notice something different. the fourth one. mary carr's garden. she's not a man. at the time she sleep science, that alone made her stand out. but her work earned her a place as one of the field's great pioneers. curse garden had no thought of becoming a scientist when she signed on his defense lab assistant in 1970. a recent college from small town pennsylvania. she had no clear vision of her future as a child. she'd been fascinated by the workings of the brain. but her parents and teachers had discouraged such curiosity. girls, they said, were better off limiting their ambitions to school teaching or just becoming wife and mother. neither o

usaid, nih, hhs, they're withholding documents because they funded the lab in wuhan not just once, notnding. and we have anthony fauci e on record as saying that even if a pandemic occurs, even if a gain of function research infects the scientists and a pandemic occurs, that the knowledge would be worth the risk. and i think most people who had a loved one die, you know, from covid either here or around the world would disagree and think anthony fauci made a disastrous judgment call. but he also took the research, and it didn't go before the normal scrutiny. there's a safety committee that was supposed to review this, and anthony fauci allowed this research to be done at his signature, at his conclusion, at his approval without the approval of the safety committee. and this, for this he really should go down in history perhaps as one of the worst people in public office ever and responsible for probably more deaths than any other individual in the medical world. maria: i mean, there was so much censorship of so much information that was slatal for americans to see -- vital for american

the cdc, nih, fda, people like fauci, all those things that really harmed this country.et nobody has been held accountable. so we're gonna go up there and clean house. so for example, fda, they will approve a covid mrna vax for six-month-old babies. there is no data to support such a thing for emergency use. the question is, why are they doing that? well, pharmaceutical companies are going to make money. where do the people from the fda people go to work when they're done with the fda. they go to work for big pharma. we're gonna stop the revolving door from fda to big pharma [applause] >> i'm going to bring in a representative the iowa soybean association, a republican from davenport, it was undecided. >> governor, thank you for taking the time and undecided, i'm learning quite a bit about you so, i appreciate that. i just want to talk a little bit of trade. china remains a vital market for the u.s. soybeans. how do you plan to approach trade relations with china to ensure access to a significant market for our soybean a market. while also addressing trade related challe

usaid, nih, hhs, they're withholding documents because they funded the lab in wuhan not just once, notre funding. and we have anthony fauci e on record as saying that even if a pandemic occurs, even if a gain of function research infects the scientists and a pandemic occurs, that the knowledge would be worth the risk. and i think most people who had a loved one die, you know, from covid either here or around the world would disagree and think anthony fauci made a disastrous judgment call. but he also took the research, and it didn't go before the normal scrutiny. there's a safety committee that was supposed to review this, and anthony fauci allowed this research to be done at his signature, at his conclusion, at his approval without the approval of the safety committee. and this, for this he really should go down in history perhaps as one of the worst people in public office ever and responsible for probably more deaths than any other individual in the medical world. maria: i mean, there was so much censorship of so much information that was slatal for americans to see -- vital for ame

. >> reporter: and president bideninging speaking at nih on thursday. >> reporter: do you want israele back its assault on gaza but the -- by the end of the year? do you want them to tone it down, move to a lower benzty phase? >> i want them to be focused on how to save civilian lives, not stop going after hamas, but more careful. >> reporter: john kirby says this war would end in hamas released all the hostages. neil? neil: you know, lucas, the leaking of this divide can, they don't call it a divide, but between the vice president and the president on israel and how we react to that, who was behind it? >> reporter: it's not clear who was behind it, neil, but it's certainly apparent that in some quarters of this administration, we saw the letter from the interns, protests outside the white house from, apparently from white house staff, there's a growing movement inside the administration that more pressure needs to be put on israelif also -- israel and also from some quarters they want the president to speak more about the civilians in gaza who are being killed and not just about the

usaid, nih, hhs, they're withholding documents because they funded the lab in wuhan not just once, notdecade they were funding. and we have anthony fauci e on record as saying that even if a pandemic occurs, even if a gain of function research infects the scientists and a pandemic occurs, that the knowledge would be worth the risk. and i think most people who had a loved one die, you know, from covid either here or around the world would disagree and think anthony fauci made a disastrous judgment call. but he also took the research, and it didn't go before the normal scrutiny. there's a safety committee that was supposed to review this, and anthony fauci allowed this research to be done at his signature, at his conclusion, at his approval without the approval of the safety committee. and this, for this he really should go down in history perhaps as one of the worst people in public office ever and responsible for probably more deaths than any other individual in the medical world. maria: i mean, there was so much censorship of so much information that was slatal for americans to see --