0
0.0
Jun 6, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that seems to be with the olc opinions suggest. i know youava little bit of a disagreement with that. >> justice kavanaugh, i would like to take all othe in turn because i do not thk is court's cases speak that broadly and i don't think the office of legal counsel's opinions stand for this broad proposition that unless the president is specifically named he is not in the state d i don't think that is necessary to afford advocate protection for the president's valid article two functions. >> sorry to interrupt t want to get this out and you can incorporate it. you set unless the ia serious constitutional question. it is a serious constitutional question whether stute can be applied to the president's official acts, so wouldn't you always interpret the statute not to apply to the president even under your formulation unless congress had spoken with clarity? >> i don't think across-the-board that a serious constituon question exists on applying any criminal prosecution to the president. >> t pblem is the vagueness that can be used aga
that seems to be with the olc opinions suggest. i know youava little bit of a disagreement with that. >> justice kavanaugh, i would like to take all othe in turn because i do not thk is court's cases speak that broadly and i don't think the office of legal counsel's opinions stand for this broad proposition that unless the president is specifically named he is not in the state d i don't think that is necessary to afford advocate protection for the president's valid article two functions....
0
0.0
Jun 5, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but that's a very different argument than the immunity claim that you are making here, which olc has definitively not supported. >> i don't recall an opinion directly addressing it, but your honor, it's in fact the cases like marbury and statement made by benjamin franklin at the constitutional convention, statements from george washington talking about the massive risk and how it could destroy the republic. that's what we rely on. principally here, i cite the opinions because, of course, when you see there's a very strong threat, and there's any statute that might infringe on the president's prerogatives, they interpreted it to avoid that. >> if a president sells nucleara secrets to a foreign adversary, is that immune? >> similar to the bribery example, if it structured as an official act, he would have to be competes and convicted first. >> what does that mean? >> i don't know hypothetically whether that would be an unofficial act. an analysis, or even the fitzgerald analysis that we've been talking about. >> how about if a president orders the military to stage a coup ? >> i think
but that's a very different argument than the immunity claim that you are making here, which olc has definitively not supported. >> i don't recall an opinion directly addressing it, but your honor, it's in fact the cases like marbury and statement made by benjamin franklin at the constitutional convention, statements from george washington talking about the massive risk and how it could destroy the republic. that's what we rely on. principally here, i cite the opinions because, of course,...
0
0.0
Jun 5, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that seems to be with the olc opinion suggests. i know you have a little bit of a disagreement with that and with this court case is also suggested. >> justice kavanaugh, i like to take those intern because i don't think the office of legal counsel opinions stand for this broad proposition that unless the president is specifically named, he is not in the statute. and i don't think that is rr necessary in order to afford adequate protection for the president's valid article to function. >> sorry to interrupt, i want to get this out, you can incorporate it in your answer, you said unless there is a serious constitutional question. is a serious constitutional question whether a statute can be applied to the president's official acts, so wouldn't you always interpret the statute not to apply to the president even under your formulation, unless congress had spoken with clarity? >> i don't think across the board serious constitutional question exists on applying any constitutional statute to the president. >> the problem is the vagueness
that seems to be with the olc opinion suggests. i know you have a little bit of a disagreement with that and with this court case is also suggested. >> justice kavanaugh, i like to take those intern because i don't think the office of legal counsel opinions stand for this broad proposition that unless the president is specifically named, he is not in the statute. and i don't think that is rr necessary in order to afford adequate protection for the president's valid article to function....
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i am sure i'm not the only 1 here today count the opening olc ceremonies he will cheer usa.jor sporting events and that would with different countries and cultures in the us can leverage all from the iconic brands and educational exchanges to show what america stands for while building the alliance of a partnership. we have for game changers with us here today. is so excited to be a part of the conversation. representing california 37th district since 2023. spending her career fighting for families national government level uses a platform on the house foreign affairs committee. as well as advocate for the community. and then living in 12 different countries across europe and asia and then to travel around the globe with the concepts and then to enhance their performance or representing the united states we also have with us jim, as a board member that works for coca-cola. and bringing 20 years of public policy and political advocacy. now may be a little less known and with the state department does and i well will come everybody to the stage. [applause] >> so we have a pane
i am sure i'm not the only 1 here today count the opening olc ceremonies he will cheer usa.jor sporting events and that would with different countries and cultures in the us can leverage all from the iconic brands and educational exchanges to show what america stands for while building the alliance of a partnership. we have for game changers with us here today. is so excited to be a part of the conversation. representing california 37th district since 2023. spending her career fighting for...
0
0.0
Jun 13, 2024
06/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the olc a legal advisor for the department the justice department, wrote that no administration official has been prosecuted for failing to comply they subpoena when the president has claimed executive privilege. that is what president biden has done. executive privilege over these audiotapes. a call from pittsburgh, you support the contempt of congress. go ahead. caller: good morning, gretchen. tell you the truth, never going to work, gretchen. i'm sorry this is all -- host: go back to the contempt of congress. caller: well, i don't know gretchen, i'm sorry, i got to let you go. host: that's all right. carlos and pasadena, texas, you support the contempt of congress. caller: yes, i do. i believe garland is totally disingenuous. he is treating this interview with the president very differently than the way he is treating the very similar interviews with people that support republicans. host: in what way? caller: well, look at what is happening to the aides of trump or to trump himself and the way that his appeals for release from prosecutions that seem to be orchestrated from the white h
the olc a legal advisor for the department the justice department, wrote that no administration official has been prosecuted for failing to comply they subpoena when the president has claimed executive privilege. that is what president biden has done. executive privilege over these audiotapes. a call from pittsburgh, you support the contempt of congress. go ahead. caller: good morning, gretchen. tell you the truth, never going to work, gretchen. i'm sorry this is all -- host: go back to the...